Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
9. The personals or chatter column. Of all columns, the personals column has
replaced the gossip column which was given to unkind and even malicious
innuendo. The personals column chatters about well-known persons. All its
materials should be true and all suggestions, complimentary. It may include: lists
of couples at a party, parodies of popular songs, playful verses that characterize
well-known persons in kindly manner, praise directed to certain persons.
This columns new value lies in the names. The writer must try to spread his
coverage and not limit himself to friends.
Grammar review
Subject-verb agreement
The number of the subject determines the number of the verb.
Problem areas
1. Intervening words between subject and verb do not affect the number of the
verb.
Wrong: The captain, along with his men, were attacked by several
assailants.
Right: The captain, along with his men, was attacked by several assailants.
(Phrases like along with, together with, as well as do not change a singular
subject.)
2. A verb agrees with its subject, not the noun in the predicate.
Wrong: The problem are crimes.
Right: The problem is crimes.
Wrong: Among these problems are they energy crisis.
Right: Among these problems is the energy crisis.
(The subject of this sentence is crisis)
3. One of phrases
On of is always followed by a plural noun, and the verb in the relative clause
after it must be plural as well.
Wrong: One of the member who has signed up for the project is Roberto
Pangilinan.
Right: One of the members who have signed up or the project is Roberto
Pangilinan.
Wrong: One of the delegate is late.
Right: One of the delegates is late.
4. Each, either, everyone, everybody, neither, nobody, someone
These pronouns take singular verbs.
Wrong: Each of the candidates are expected to present their platform.
Untouchable clergymen
Laymen who publicly slam court actions can get jailed for contempt. Not
clergymen, it seems, like Baguio City Catholic Bishop Carlito Cenzon.
The prelate has been haranguing in the pulpit and on church-run radio
against a trial judge. Reason: the judge happened to dismiss three lawsuits that
Cenzon and fellows had brought against SM Mall-Baguio.
The cases concern SMs relocating 182 trees in its compound to give way to
a traffic-unclogging car park and urban-greening giant rainwater cistern. We are
shocked at how the court disregarded the opinion of our witnesses, rants Cenzon,
one of the witnesses. The judge should have ignored instead the incompetent
testimony of government ecologists, he says.
Of about a thousand trees in the SM complex, 87 pine and 95 alnus
(flowering) trees will be replanted, by consent of the environment bureau and
Baguio city hall. Most will be moved to SMs reforestation projects in Baguio and
Cordilleras, where it has sown more than 23,000 of 50,000 intended trees. Fortytwo have been moved within the compound. A temporary court injunction halted
the earth balling of the rest by UP-Los Baos arborists. The tree doctors have
recommended the sanitation cutting and replacement of six contagiously
diseased pine trees.
As bishop of Baguio, Cenzon oversees the diocese-owned Porta Vaga Mall,
down the road from SM. We hear reechoing Gods instructions ... Fill the earth
and subdue it, he refutes the judges ruling with the Bible. (Only recently he
scoffed at laymen who quoted the same passage in arguing for Reproductive
Health.)
Deeply religious, the matriarch of the Sy family that runs SM has built in all
their malls chapels that teem with devotees on Sundays. Cenzon had barred priests
in his diocese from celebrating Mass at SM-Baguio for a year, to make SM atone
for the 182 trees to be transferred.
Baguio old-timers are wondering if Cenzon would punish his own church
for a worse offense. In the 60s, when he was newly ordained priest, the Catholicrun St. Louis University felled some 3,000 pines in wooded Mount Mary, at the
heart of the city. This was to construct the for-profit Hospital of the Sacred Heart.
The church never revealed where it brought the logs.
Climate Change was not a hot issue back then, a septuagenarian lawyer
recounts, but that doesnt mean the wholesale tree cutting was correct.
Now if 128 relocated trees equals one year of no Masses, good Lord, what
penance would Cenzon impose for 3,000 axed trees?
Rebalancing
A year after US troops weighed anchor in Subic Bay, John Negroponte arrived in
Manila as Americas ambassador.
Today Negroponte is back, this time as a civilian on a visit to boost business
links between the two countries, a year after the Philippine government allowed
US troops to use Subic regularly again.
The years from 2000 he considers the era of emerging markets, and he
believes Washington has the same view.
Its a particularly good time to deepen our ties with ASEAN, he said at the
Tower Club. Now is a good time for the US to put a bit of a spotlight on its
own on the relationship between the Philippines and the United States.
The relationship is currently strained again after a US Navy minesweeper
ran aground in Tubbataha Reef, damaging the World Heritage Site. But if handled
well by both sides, this is going to be a blip in ties that have generally improved
since terrorists struck at the heart of America on Sept. 11, 2001.
* * *
Negroponte sees 9/11 as the start of Washingtons loss of focus on the AsiaPacific. In the decade after 9/11, as the US became preoccupied with the war on
terror and then exit strategies, he said Asia became a demographic, economic and
political center of gravity in the world.
Obama assumed leadership at the height of a financial crisis in America, as
the world was shifting from bipolar to (briefly) unipolar and then to a different
post-cold war environment.
Now Obama must face the challenge posed by a China that has the will and
growing resources to end 200 years of military weakness.
Negroponte sees Obamas attitude toward China falling into the same
pattern as other US presidents since Richard Nixon in 1972: eventually they all
came out in favor of engagement and forming a positive relationship with the
Chinese.
As deputy secretary of state, Negroponte had met with Chinese officials and
stressed the importance of China being a responsible stakeholder in building a
peaceful world.
He said US relationship with China must be managed carefully
assiduously.
The overall relationship with China will be a challenge for decades to
come, indeed for the next generations, he said, not just for the US but also for
Chinas neighbors. We have to find positive issues with which to work with
China.
Like other US officials, retired or not, Negroponte has been asked what
America is prepared to do in case territorial disputes between the Philippines and
China deteriorate into armed conflict.
And like other US officials, Negroponte emphasizes that Washington isnt
taking sides in the dispute and prefers only a peaceful settlement through
negotiation.
Under the Visiting Forces Agreement, the US is committed to come to our
aid in case of attack on Philippine soil by an external threat. But there are
`Unsettled issue
Does the nullity of a reconstituted lost certificate of title settle the issue of
ownership of the property covered by said title? This is the question answered in
this case between Nora and the spouses Montes.
Nora was the registered owner of 11 adjacent lots covered by TCT Nos.
72654 to 72664. However, the owners duplicates of said titles were not in her
possession. So she reported to the Register of Deeds that she lost the owners
duplicate copies of said TCTs and at the same time filed a petition for the issuance
of new owners copies before the Regional Trial Court (RTC).
After due notice and hearing the RTC granted Noras petition. Hence, new
copies of the 11 TCTs were issued to Nora pursuant to Section 129 of the Land
Registration Act.
It turns out however that the TCTs were not actually lost but were in the
actual possession of the spouses Montes. So when they learned that new TCTs
were issued in the name of Nora, they filed with the RTC a petition for relief from
judgment asking that the new owners duplicate copies of the 11 TCTs be declared
null and void.
The spouses claimed that they had actual possession of the owners copies of
the TCTs which had been declared lost and cancelled. They alleged that Nora had
sold the lands covered by the TCTs to a certain Mr. Lazo before it was subdivided
into 11 lots. They further alleged that when Mr. Lazo subdivided the land into 11
lots, the titles remained in the name of Nora because Lazo lacked funds to transfer
them in his name. On March 21, 2006, Lazo sold the 11 lots to them and gave them
the 11 copies of the TCTs. They said they discovered the RTC decision ordering
the issuance of new owners copies to Nora when they tried to register the
properties in their names, thus prompting them to file this petition for relief from
judgment.
The RTC granted the petition of the spouses and restrained and prohibiting
the Register of Deeds from accepting/registering any document executed by Nora
and any person authorized by her that will in any way encumber or cause the
transfer of the property covered by the 11 TCTs. The RTC also set aside its
decision granting Noras petition for reconstitution of titles and instead dismissed
said petition. It also declared as null and void, the new owners TCTs in the name
of Nora. The RTC said that when the original owners copy of the title is not lost
but is in the possession of a new owner, being the alleged buyer, it did not acquire
jurisdiction over Noras petition for the issuance of new owners copies of the
eleven TCTs. Was the RTC correct?
Yes. It is judicially settled that a trial court does not acquire jurisdiction over
a petition for the issuance of a new owners duplicate certificate of title if the
original is in fact not lost but in the possession of the alleged buyer. Such
reconstituted certificate is itself void once the existence of the original is
unquestionably demonstrated. Nonetheless the nullity of the reconstituted
certificate does not by itself settle the issue of ownership over the property; much
less does it vest such title upon the holder of the original certificate. The issue of
ownership must be litigated in appropriate proceedings. It cannot be determined in
an action for the issuance of a new owners duplicate certificate of title or in
proceedings to annul such newly issued certificate.
In this case, the RTC did not decide the issue of ownership when it
permanently enjoined the Register of Deeds from accepting or registering any kind
of conveyance that may be executed by Nora to any person except as to the
spouses Montes. It did not declare that the spouses Montes are the new owners of
the properties. The spouses Montes possession of the 11 TCTs is not necessarily
equivalent to ownership of the lands covered by the TCTs which must be litigated
in another appropriate proceeding. This case is similar to the ruling in the case of
Espino vs. Spouses Bulut, G.R. 183811, May 30, 2011.
One year after
Just last year the Senate was the toast of the town. This was immediately after the
impeachment trial that ended in the conviction of erstwhile Supreme Court (SC)
chief justice Renato Corona. The Senator-judges were being feted for faithfully
doing their job in removing from office a sitting Chief Justice in accordance with
constitutional process of impeachment.
Specifically lionized was Senate president Juan Ponce-Enrile as the
presiding officer of the impeachment tribunal. The 88-year-old Enrile presided
over the grueling trial that had marathon sessions over a five-month period that
started on January 16 last year.
While the 15th Congress was still on holiday recess, reports leaked out that
Enrile purportedly dispensed very generous Christmas cash gifts to his senatorallies.
Enrile was forced to admit indeed having issued checks to fellow senators
ranging from P250,000 to as much as P1.6 million. But these were not Christmas
cash gifts as wrongly reported, Enrile explained, but checks representing MOOE
released to respective offices of each senator on various dates from November to
December.
And the usual loose talk on coup plots against the Senate president ensued
days before their resumption of session. So when they resumed their sessions last
Monday, Enrile immediately took the Senate floor to deliver his privilege speech to
particularly take issue on the allegations of Miriam and his other senator-critics.
Enrile invoked his prerogative and discretion as Senate president to explain
the disparity of amounts of MOOE given to each senator. It goes without saying
the apple of discord had something to do with these amounts.
It was no empty boast when Enrile stood up and told his colleagues at the
Senate that he is not one to cling to his post. Declaring the Senate president seat
vacant, Enrile got 11 senators to reject his resignation bid. Under Senate rules,
Enrile needs only a majority to keep his post. But electing a new Senate president
needs a vote of 13.
As far as Enrile was concerned, he submitted himself to a vote of confidence
of his colleagues and he got the majority. With only his arch critic Trillanes,
neophyte Sen. Koko Pimentel and of course, Enrile as the author of the motion
to declare his seat vacant voting in favor. Joker and Bongbong (NP), both
known critics of Enrile, were again on the same side in abstaining.
The camp of Enrile senses his latest woes might have been triggered by
another book. Enrile finally came out with his own autobiography entitled
Memoirs released in September last year. The tell-all book of Enrile edited by
comebacking STAR columnist Nelson Navarro apparently stepped on a lot of
toes and hurt monumental egos of certain influential people in power circles.
In the book launch of Memoirs, Enrile was still the most celebrated
national figure for the Corona impeachment trial. Enrile dismissed his sudden rise
to popularity then as one of those times he was on top in the ups and downs in the
roller coaster of his life and career.
One year after, Enrile may have to brace for more of the downs as his sworn
enemies have vowed to bring it on.
Make it governments business
Before I get into my heavy-duty topic for today, allow me to issue this warning to
the public. With the start of the election campaign, we would like to warn owners
of SUVs, 4-wheel luxury vehicles, pick-up and the likes to please be extra careful
about where you drive your car and especially where you park. According to
neighborhood sources, two SUVs were recently carnapped from a grocery parking
lot within our Barangay in Barrio Kapitolyo, Pasig.
This seasonal occurrence has been observed to take place during campaign
periods in the same way that more bank and moneychanger robberies also take
place during elections. People tend to put their guard down when theyre within
their neighborhood and this presents a perfect opportunity for seasoned criminals.
* * *
Another warning to motorists; be careful when driving out of the NAIA
specifically Terminal 1. A band of street hoodlums have been openly harassing
motorists and intimidating them for money and when you piss them off they
scratch your car, break your wipers, or your side mirrors.
The irony is that the Airport Police, that can be oh so powerful and scary
when they want to, as well the Philippine National Police detachment have ignored
or been useless in arresting these criminal elements. It would seem that the NAIA
PNP contingent and the Airport Police are more interested in what goes on inside
the terminal and completely forget that their area of concern is several hectares
wide.
The hoodlums reportedly hide or reside along a creek some 500 meters from
the NAIA 1 driveway and main parking lot. All the cab drivers Ive spoken to
know about the problem and now, the problem is posted on the Internet. So what
are the NAIA security officials going to do about it? Wait until a foreigner posts
that highway robbers strike at the bottom of the NAIA driveway? Sorry but I
already mentioned this before but NAIA officials seem to have more important
concerns than criminals in their driveway.
While watching Jessica Sohos SONA news program, I watched their
segment concerning the fight over graphic warnings to be placed on cigarette
packs. The idea is to force cigarette manufacturers to print photos of smokers who
have developed different types of cancers and tumors essentially to shock or scare
smokers. A group called Health Justice has principally been at the forefront of the
campaign alongside the Department of Health and they have been pushing and
pushing Congress to pass the law.
Unfortunately, in a nation where the legal process is more complicated than
the Genesis Chronicles in the Bible, the proponents of the Graphic Warning
campaign have found their work stonewalled by Judges, injunctions, and
politicians. Knowing the people involved in the conflict, I surmise that they all
agree on one thing; its all a matter of time when the graphic warnings will happen
just like the Sin Tax was passed. The tobacco company executives are merely
postponing the inevitable for as long as they can, while the anti-tobacco coalition
know that every push they make brings them a day closer to victory.
In the mean time, it might interest the anti-tobacco coalition to consider an
added option in their war against smoking. Why not make it governments business
to educate and advertise the physical effects of smoking?
Recently I have observed a number of government/public sector advertising
that are really eye catching, novel and attention grabbing. The first one I noticed
was that of the Department of Foreign Affairs which has come out with a series of
print ads with the Philippine STAR featuring human interest stories about their
officers and staff working as Foreign Service professionals. The style and
presentation successfully communicates a fresh look and washes away impressions
of DFA people as gray haired, stuck-up snobs who just want to live abroad. The
new ads make the DFA people look good but all in a natural way.
Then I recently saw the TV ad that worked around an encounter between
kids and military personnel. The story was so tight that I was not sure at the
beginning whose ad it was. It felt like some NGO, or maybe from the Peace Panel
or Office of Muslim Affairs. Eventually it became clear that the military were in
the village to build relationships and do this through sports. Ultimately the ad
reveals that it was a PAGCOR advertisement promoting their involvement in
nation building.
Of course most of us have seen the Its More Fun In The Philippines
campaign that has become the most successful promotion of Philippine Tourism
perhaps because it was a combined effort of government, citizens and Social
Media.
Using this as a background, plus the fact that the government recently passed
the Sin Tax that will net them gazillions from taxes, why cant government also
spend money on developing video messages for TV and Social Media concerning
the horrible impact of smoking?
Instead of just forcing the hand of the cigarette companies to slap
themselves, government should make it their business to continuously educate
Filipinos about the real effects of smoking and not just try to scare them with
warnings or talk about the problem in forums. For instance, let the DOH come
out with testimonials from people who discovered the bad side to smoking, people
who cant talk, who have impairments or complications.
I for one would share how two decades of smoking started by the bell boy
shouting Call for Philip Morris all the way to the Marlboro Man, has now given
me what I consider a debilitating or serious condition call COPD or Chronic
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. I quit smoking in July of 1991 but that was not
soon enough, because now, every time I develop a bad cold or a cough, it almost
always ends up with me needing to undergo a 5- to 7- day treatment of a 750mg
antibiotic designed especially for upper respiratory ailments. Its expensive but
what sucks even more is gasping for air or choking when your air passages get
obstructed by phlegm or mucous. Last time I had it was Nov. 15, now it feels like I
have it again. Its that bad people, its that bad!
So, I say to government, can we please spend some of the Sin Tax
collections to advertise against smoking and drunk driving as well? I dont think
its in good taste for the government to collect all that money with out spending
part of it to save our children and our selves from ignorance.
entrepreneurs, Jose, Raul and Rene (who has passed away), as wife of
distinguished architect and Rotarian Paing, as mother to Renna, Rafael, Jr., Raissa
and Riana.)
Melys little known community service and charities are recognized by
international VIPs and royalty. In sum, common sense and finer sensibilities
characterize Mely.
Tubbataha Reef. And at present it is still heavily grounded and being hit by strong
winds, which could serve to damage the coral atoll even further.
Understandably, my daughter, an avid diver and lover of the ocean, was
distraught by the thought of her paradise being the target of such destruction. And
she is not alone. The Philippines as well as members of environmental
organizations from various parts of the world have pledged to make sure the
United States pays (at least monetarily) for the reefs that were damaged in the
wake of this accident. Public officials have assured us that compensation for the
damaged reefs will be sought from the US. In a previous interview, Protected
Areas and Wildlife Bureau director, Theresa Mundita Lim said the assessment of
the damage will depend on the condition and extent of the coral cover in the
affected area. The baseline peg for damages currently stands at P12,000 per square
meter of coral damaged.
This is actually not the first time an unfortunate incident like this has
happened. In 2005, the Rainbow Warrior ship of the group Greenpeace also hit the
reef in Tubbataha damaging 32 meters of coral. They paid a fine of $6,857 for the
damage according to their website, roughly P384,000. According to them, the chart
they were using had shown them to be miles away from the reef when they ran
aground.
Presently it is impossible to tell how much damage as occurred until the USS
Guardian is successfully removed. It is still very heavily entrenched in the area and
plans are underway to determine the best possible way to remove it safely from the
reef. The United States Navy alongside Tubbataha Park officials and
environmental officers need to all work together to find the safest way to remove
the vessel while minimizing further damage. The plan is to be conducted as soon as
possible to get the ship out of the park. Once the ship is successfully removed, then
true assessment of the damage to the reef can truly begin. Alongside determining
the physical damage to the coral, damage to habitats and breeding areas, which can
affect marine life, will also be taken into account.
The main problem now though is the timely and safe salvage of the ship. Not
only is further reef damage a concern, but also possible leaks and oil spills as well.
Currently the vessel is said to be flooded within so steps will also have to be taken
to ensure it can still float once removed. Should this not be possible, there are also
talks of lifting it out the reef and pulling it away aboard a heavy lifting vessel. The
most important part of the plan is that it causes no further damage to the
surrounding areas.
This is the first and most important step to be undertaken now. However,
there are other things to consider as well including how this accident happened in
the first place. Government officials will take the explanation of the faulty map at
face value; however there also remains the question of did they ignore the park
officials who patrol the area warning them about their location. There are a handful
of park rangers who live daily in Tubbataha, made up of Coast Guard and Navy
personnel, tasked with the job of patrolling the area to make sure no fishing boats
or unauthorized vessels penetrate the 968.24 sq. km. protected area. Reports
indicate that one of these rangers tried to warn the USS Guardian before she ran
aground.
Additionally, Philippine senators have voiced their opinion as well that the
United States issue a simple formal apology for the unfortunate incident. While the
US Navy as already issued an apology, some feel that this is not enough and that
the US Ambassador should also issue an apology for the accident. Just to ensure
the Philippines that they are taking this as seriously as we are. It was an accident,
for sure, but there still needs to be accountability. A formal apology for the
destruction of a portion of our national treasure is another step in the right
direction. That along with proper compensation for the destroyed area of the reef is
the right thing to do for the United States and would be no less than what they
themselves would demand should our roles be reversed.
There is definitely still much to be done to successfully put this unfortunate
incident behind us. Damage assessment cant even fully begin until we are able to
successfully conduct the delicate extraction of the navy ship from the reef. Whats
more is that, even with just monetary compensation, it will take years and years for
the reef to naturally rehabilitate itself. This is a process that cannot be rushed or
paid for by any amount of money.