Está en la página 1de 3

My Right To Travel

"Operation of a motor vehicle upon public streets and


highways is not a mere privilege but is a right or liberty
protected by the guarantees of Federal and State
constitutions." Adams v. ity of !ocatello "#$ !%d"$"The
use of the highways for the purpose of travel and
transportation is not a mere privilege& but a commonand
fundamental right of which the public and the individual
cannot be rightfully deprived." "'o Stategovernment entity
has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways...
Transporting his vehicles and personal property for either
recreation or business. "Travel is not a privilege that can be
permitted at willwith forced insurances& registration& (
licensing& but a common ( fundamental right of liberty
granted bythe onstitution."hicago Motor oach o. ).
ity of hicago& **+ ,ll. %--&#$. './. %%."The use of the
automobile as a necessary ad0unct to the earning of a
livelihood in modern life re1uires usin the interest of
realism to conclude that the right to use an automobile on
the public highways parta2es of the nature of a liberty
within the meaning of the onstitutional guarantees..."
3erberian v. 4ussier #*. A%d5$.& 5+% 6#.758"...to be free
to travel throughout the length and breadth of our land
uninhibited by statutes& rules& or regulations which
unreasonably burden or restrain this movement." 9S
Supreme ourt& Shapiro vThompson& *." 9S $#5& %% 4 /d
%d $--& 5. S t #*%%."The police power of the state must
be e:ercised in subordination to the provisions of the
9.S.onstitution." 3acahanan vs. ;anley& %"7 9S $-<
!anhandle /astern !ipeline o. )s. State
=ighwayommission& %." 9S $#*."The right of a citi>en
to travel upon the public highways...to operate an
automobile...is not a mere privilege...which the city may
permit or prohibit at will." Thompson v. Smith 6hief of
!olice8& #7" S./.7+.& 75-.",f the state does convert your
right into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it& you
can ignore thelicense and a fee and engage the right with
impunity." Shuttlesworth v. 3irmingham& *+* 9S %$%
6#.$%8.?,!4OMAT, ,MM9',T@Title 5A Aliens and
'ationality !ART #-#B!R/S9M!T,O' OF 4A;F94
A?M,SS,O'C #-#.* reation of record of lawful
permanent resident status for person born under diplomatic
status inthe 9nited States.6a8 !erson born to foreign
diplomat B6#8 Status of person. A person born in the
9nited States to a foreigndiplomatic officer accredited to
the 9nited States& as a matter of international law& is not
sub0ect to the 0urisdiction of the 9nited States. That person
is not a 9nited States citi>en under the
FourteenthAmendment to the onstitution. Such a person
may be considered a lawful permanent resident at birth.6%8
?efinition of foreign diplomatic officer. Foreign diplomatic
officer means a person listed in the State?epartment
?iplomatic 4ist& also 2nown as the 3lue 4ist. ,t includes
ambassadors& ministers& chargDsdEaffaires& counselors&
secretaries and attachDs of embassies and legations as well
as members of the?elegation of the ommission of the
/uropean ommunities. The term also includes individuals
withcomparable diplomatic status and immunities who are
accredited to the 9nited 'ations or to theOrgani>ation of
American States& and other individuals who are also
accorded comparable diplomaticstatus.T,T4/ %% C %7"d.
?ismissal on motion of action against individual entitled to
immunityAny action or proceeding brought against an
individual who is entitled to immunity with respect to
suchaction or proceeding under the )ienna onvention on
?iplomatic Relations& under section %7"b or %7"c of

También podría gustarte