Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
In its essence Multi Modal Transportation of goods means transportation of cargo from the
premises of the shipper to those of the consignee, by more than one mode of transportation,
under a single contract which has its evidence in form of a single multimodal transport contract.
Thus a multi modal transport system involves the coordination of rail and road networks to
ensure good connectivity between port and hinterland.
As a general rule criteria such as Speed, Safety, Reliability, Availability and Flexibility in any
transportation system ensures an efficient door to door service & there by determine the quality&
success of any mode of transportation.
Establishment of an efficient door to door transportation service plays a key role in eliminating
an interruption in continuous movement of goods from the place of their origin to that of their
destination. Consequently the enactment of a system of multi modal transportation had its
genesis in reducing costs, delays and improving upon the quality of transportation of goods and
services.
However multimodal transport on account of its ability :to minimize loss of time at
Transshipment points, coupled with its encouraging faster transit of goods, reducing
documentation formalities and its success in saving costs, scored over the existing modes of
cargo transportation, and became the primary choice of majority of cargo consignors from
around the world.
The Success of the multimodal system lies in its initiative to harness upon the positive aspects of
each mode of transportation.
In essence the multi modal system consists of beneficial characteristics of each mode of
transportation viz: it makes use of rail transport for utilizing its feature of ensuring transportation
of a high volume of goods at a comparatively lower per unit variable cost. It also envisages very
low per unit cost by transporting cargo by sea. Apart from encouraging door to door delivery of
merchandise, Inclusion of road transport in the multi-modal system has even solved the pressing
problem of connectivity of hinterland based indigenous industries with sea ports. This has in fact
spiraled abundant export of local indigenous products in international markets.
On account of its advantages over the Segmented and Uni-Modal systems of Transportation, the
Multi-Modal system of transportation has become so popular that it has become a standard
practice of trade between developed countries and has been gaining steady popularity in
developing countries as well.
Concept of multimodal transportation is not new, multimodal transportation was born with the
railways in 1830, in the beginning horse drawn carriages were detached from their wheels and
were loaded on flat wagons or were attached to bogies so as to save travelers from the trouble of
changing from carts to wagons, this system however soon disappeared because of fierce
opposition from a few cities.
As far as cargo transport is concerned, container transport on railways had started even before
the First World War; In France the cargo was being moved in strong re-useable boxes carrying
goods mainly removable from door to door.
The Real multi modal revolution was however introduced by an American Trucker Malcolm
Maclean, who wanted to overcome the legislative hurdles, being posed to his trucking
businesses, wherein several legislative regulations and license formalities were being required to
be abided, by his trucks carrying cargo, across 50 states of The United States. So as to overcome
this ambiguity Malcolm Maclean devised a chassis on which a container could be bolted and in
turn started the first ever multi modal transport chain from New Jersey to Texas, there by
revolutionizing the era of multi-modal transportation.
His containers could be stacked on top of each other and could nest safely in bad weather.
This container revolution coupled with advances in transport technology has introduced several
structural changes in international transportation of goods.
With the advent of containerization, multimodal transportation has become standard practice of
international trade, & general overseas cargo of India too has started moving in containers. In
light of the popularity of the container revolution, Government of India on its part; has taken
several measures to facilitate smooth flow of international trade & promote exports.
Unlike other contracts MTO acts as the principal and not the agent of the shipper, in
containerized transport it is often difficult to determine the point at which the cargo was
damaged , while in case of multi modal transport cargo owner will have no difficulty because he
is bound by just one contract, and can sue under that very contract, while in case of other
transport contracts, cargo owner will have to determine the stage at which the goods were
damaged, this is particularly important for suing the responsible carrier, in instances where he is
not able to determine the stage of journey at which goods were damaged, then he might be
forced to claim against all carriers involved and this shall lead to additional expenses.
In view of various measures for liberalizing control and simplifying procedure for facilitating
smooth flow of international trade and export promotion, there arose an immediate need to
regulate the multi modal transportation of goods by law. Need for the enactment of this
legislation in India was all the more inevitable, considering the fact that interruption in
continuous movement of goods, from their place of origin to that of their destination needed
attention for serving the larger commercial interests ,which are considerations quite often
relevant to all developing countries such as India..
Thus following considerations were relevant, while enacting a law for governing multi-modal
transportation of goods.
• A Multi-Modal Law was needed for reducing costs and delays& for improving upon the
quality of transportation services.
• For determining liabilities & responsibilities of multi-modal transport operator for loss or
damage to goods.
• To reduce and eliminate interruption in continuous movement of goods from their place
of origin to that of ultimate destination.
Reasons for Enactment of Multi-Modal Law In India :( Multi-Modal Transport Act, 1993)
• Multi- Modal transport has become a standard practice in trade between developed
countries and is now gradually spreading to developing countries.
• India’s overseas general cargo trade has also started moving in containers, now
containerized cargo is moving from hinterland (inland container depots set up in countries,
connect hinterland to the ports, to the ports ,& there by facilitate containerized trade, now
containerized handling facilities are being developed at all major ports & railway flat wagon
inland container depots are also being adequately developed.
In International trade goods mainly pass through the hands of more than one carrier and through
more than one mode of transportation. Under conventional system of segmented transportation,
consignee enters into separate contracts with each other, and the liability of each carrier is
limited to the carriage performed by him.
An interesting feature of multi-modal system is that here only the consignor or his agents have to
attend to all arrangements required for trans-shipment of goods from one mode to another, so
much so that this even includes warehousing of such goods.
Multi-modal transportation has become a standard practice in International trade, and general
cargo of India too has started moving in containers. However concept of Multi-Modal law is
quite new to India .Liberalization of the Indian economy has led a host of consumer goods
industries being set up through the length and breath of the country and for these industries to be
serviced effectively, multi-modal transportation has to be accorded high priority as a vital
infrastructural input, consequently leading companies in multi–modal transport sector have
begun investing time and resources in establishing quality systems complying with ISO -9000,
series of standardization of services in India.
The Government of India took various measures to: liberalize controls, simplify procedures,
facilitate smooth flow of international trade and promote exports, so as to realize these objectives
it became pertinent to immediately regulate multimodal transportation of goods by law.
In India there was no uniformity in multi-modal transport of goods and government felt that
absence of uniformity leads to ambiguity and imbalance of interests between operators and cargo
owners, thus multi-modal transportation of goods provides for, regulation of multi-modal
transportation of goods, from any place in India to any place outside India, involving two or
more modes of transport on the basis of a single multi-modal transport contract.
Multi-Modal Transportation of Goods Act came in force in India in 1993 and provides for the
registration of a person as a multi-modal transport operator. In India a multi-modal transportation
can only be carried out by a person registered as a multi-modal transport operator, under the
multi-modal transportation of goods act.
The multi-modal transportation of goods was in fact introduced to facilitate exports by giving
exporters a sense of security in transporting their goods.
Multi-modal transportation reduces logistics costs of exporter and makes products more
competitive in the international market.
It was in fact in view of, the aforesaid needs that, Government of India codified and enacted the
multi-modal law which is based on UNCTAD and ICC rules.
Certain Draw- Backs & Constraints Pertinent In Indian Multi-Modal Transportation Laws:
• Air freight operators are excluded from the applicability of this act.
• Indian Multi-Modal Law provides higher liabilities for multi-modal transport operators
• In addition the basic multi-modal motto, don’t stop the box appears to be a mirage in the
Indian context.
Each and every person willing to start the business of Multi-Modal Transport operation, has to
get himself registered as a multi-modal transport operator, such a requirement is mandatory, thus
in absence of compliance with the requirements of registration, a non-registered multi-modal
transport operator would not be permitted to carry on the business of multi-modal
transportation .
Section-3, 4, 5&6 of Multi-Modal transportation of goods act deal with the law regulating
various aspects such as registration, cancellation and appeal against such registration or
cancellation of registration of multi-modal transport operator.
Section-3, Provides, that no person shall carry on the business of multi-modal transportation,
unless he is registered as a certified multi-modal transport operator under the provisions of this
act.
The multi-modal transportation of goods act prohibits any person from carrying on or even
commencing the business of a multi-modal transport operator, without being registered as a
multi-modal transport operator under this act.
How ever the act does provide a breather, to those carrying on the business of a multi-modal
transportation prior to the commencement of this act, and such persons are permitted to carry on
the business of multi-modal transportation, for an additional period of three months, from the
date of enactment of this law, even without their being registered as multi-modal transport
operators.
But they too need to get themselves registered within the stipulated period, & in case of any non-
compliance on their behalf they stand the risk of being prohibited from carrying on the business
of multi-modal transportation of goods.
Section-4 : Lays down the legal provisions with regards to the formalities required for the
registration of multi-modal transportation, the law on the subject provides that:
Any person may apply for registration to the competent authority to carry on or commence
business as a multi-modal transport operator.
Once an application for multi-modal transportation has been received, the competent authority
has to ensure that the applicant fulfills certain criteria.
The criteria to be fulfilled for being registered as a multi-modal transport operator are as follows:
• The applicant should be engaged either in the business of shipping or freight forwarding
in India or abroad.
• In addition such an applicant must have a minimum annual turn over of Rs 50 Lakh,
during the immediately preceding financial year or must have an annual average turn over of Rs
50 Lakh, during the preceding three financial years. How ever the same needs to be certified by a
chartered accountant.
• Where the applicant is a company, firm or proprietary concern other than one engaged in
the business of shipping or fright forwarding in India or abroad, and that the subscribed share
capital or aggregate balance in its capital account or that in the capital account of its partners or
proprietor is not less than Rs 50 Lakhs and that the applicant has offices, agents or
representatives in not less than two other countries.
• The competent authority on being satisfied about the existence of the above mentioned
credentials shall, register the applicant as a multi-modal transport operator and will grant him a
certificate to carry on or commence the business of multi-modal transportation.
Refusal of Registration
Competent authority may for reasons to be recorded in writing, refuse to grant registration,
where it is satisfied that the applicant does not fulfill the aforesaid conditions.
An applicant who is not a resident of India and one, who is not engaged in the business of
shipping, shall not be granted registration, unless he has established a place of business in India.
In addition in respect of such an applicant as has been mentioned above, the turnover for
determining eligibility for registration ,shall be certified by any authority competent to certify the
accounts of a company in that country.
A certificate of registration shall be valid for a period of three years; such a certificate is subject
to renewal from time to time for a further period of 3 years at a time.
An application for the renewal shall be accompanied with such amount of fees as shall be
notified by the central government
.
Ordinarily the fee for the registration of a multi-modal transport operator, shall in no case be for
a fee of less than Rs 10,000 and not be one that exceeds Rs 20,000.
Thus a company ,firm or proprietary concern ,engaged either in the business of freight
forwarding in India or abroad ,with a minimum annual turn over Rs 50 lakh,during the
immediately preceding financial year or an average annual turn over of Rs 50 Lakh during the
preceding three financial years, and having offices, agents or representatives in at least two
countries ,can apply for registration to carry on or commence the business of multi-modal
transportation in prescribed form when accompanied with a fee of Rs 10,000.
Section –5 of the Multi-Modal Transportation of Goods Act lays down the guidelines for
cancelling the registration of erring Multi-Modal Transport Operators.
The competent authority wherever satisfied that:
Section-6, of Multi-modal transportation of goods act, 1993 provides for provision of appeal
against a refusal by the competent authority to (a) Grant or renew registration (U/s 4) or (b) on
cancellation of registration under section –(5).
An appeal against refusal by the competent authority to grant, renew or cancel registration lies
with the Central Government. Generally an appeal preferred after the expiry of the prescribed
period shall not be admitted, but where the appellant satisfies the central government that he has
sufficient cause, for not preferring the appeal within the prescribed period, and then in such a
situation his appeal may be preferred even after the expiry of such prescribed period.
All Appeals to be made in the prescribed form and on the payment of the prescribed fee.
All Appeals shall be accompanied by a copy of order, against which such an appeal has been
preferred.
Where the central government receives an application for appeal, it shall:
“After giving parties a reasonable opportunity of being heard, & after making such inquiry as the
central government deems proper”, make such order as it deems fit.
Section -7 of the Multi-Modal Transportation of Goods Act deals with the issuance of a Multi-
Modal Transport Document:
In instances where both consignor of goods as well as the multi-modal transport operator have
entered in to a contract for multi-modal transportation, and where such multi-modal transport
operator has taken charge of goods, then in such a case the Multi-modal transport operator shall,
(at the option of the consignor ) issue either a negotiable or a
Non –negotiable multi-modal transport document.
However the issuance of such multi-modal transport document shall be permitted only after
obtaining and during the subsistence of a valid insurance cover.
Due care must be taken to ensure that, such a multi-modal transport document is signed: (i) By a
Multi-Modal Transport Operator or (ii) by a person duly authorized by him.
Section -9 , specifies the details of the necessary particulars, required to be specified in every
multi-modal transport document. The Performa of a multi-modal transport document shall
comprise of:
The details of general nature of goods shall comprise of details such as:
(c)Details of the Name and Principal place of business of the Multi-Modal Transport operator.
(e) Name of Consignee (shall be mentioned in instances where it has been specified
by the consignor).
(f) Place and date of taking charge of goods by the multi-modal transporter.
(h) Details of the date or period of delivery of goods by MTO , as have been
expressly agreed upon between the consignor and the multi-modal transport
operator.
Note:
Freight payable by the consignor and the consignee (shall be mentioned) only if expressly agreed
by the consignor and the consignee)
Note:
Instances where the intended route of journey, modes of transport and places of
Transshipment if known at the time of issue, must be mentioned in the multi-modal
Transport document.
(k)Terms of shipment accompanied with a statement that the multi modal transport document
has been issued subject to or in accordance with the Multi-modal transportation of Goods act.
Note:
Parties to a multi-modal transport agreement are free to insert any other
particular, however any particular so inserted shall not be inconsistent with any
Law for the time being in force.
It must be noted that the absence of any of the particulars listed above shall not in any
Way affect the legal character of such a multi-modal transport document.
Section-10 of the Multi-Modal Transportation of Goods Act, deals with the concept of
reservation in multi-modal transport document
The concept of reservation has relevance in instances where a multi-modal transports operator or
a person acting on behalf of such an operator:
(i) Has reasonable grounds to suspect, that the particulars furnished by consignor in multi-
modal transport document do not accurately represent the goods actually taken in charge
.
(ii) Or in case where he has no reasonable means of checking/matching the particulars of the
goods consigned.
In the above mentioned cases the Multi-Modal Transport Operator or person acting on his behalf
shall insert in the multi-modal transport document a reservation specifying the details of the
inaccuracies, grounds of suspicion or the fact about the absence of reasonable means of
checking the particulars of such consignment (of goods in question)
Note:
However where a multi-modal transport operator or a person acting on his behalf fails to insert a
reservation in such multi-modal transport document, specifying the apparent condition of
goods ,then he shall be deemed to have accepted the goods in an (apparent good condition).
Thus in instances where a multi-modal transport operator or those acting on his behalf know or
have reasonable grounds to suspect, that the particulars furnished by the consignor (in the multi-
modal transport document) do not represent the exact accurate description of the goods being
transported or being taken under his charge for such transportation and where he has no
reasonable means of checking such particulars. Then in this situation an insertion highlighting
such inaccuracies in the multi-modal transport document shall be duly specified.
Section -11 of the multi-modal transportation of goods act 1993, deals with the evidentiary effect
of a multi-modal transport document.
In all cases except those in which a reservation has been made in multi-modal transport
document:
• The Multi-Modal Transport Document shall be prima-facie evidence of the fact that the
multi-modal transport operator has taken charge of goods as described in the document.
• No proof furnished by the multi-modal transport operator to the contrary (with regards to
goods actually taken in charge) shall be admissible if multimodal transport document is issued in
a negotiable form and has been transmitted or transferred by a consignee to a third party who has
acted in good faith relying upon the description of the goods in the document.
Issuance of an International Multi-Modal Transport Document Under, the UN Convention on
Multi-Modal Transportation of Goods:
When goods are taken in charge by a MTO , under an International Multi-Modal Transport
assignment, then he shall in such a situation issue a multi-modal transport document, which at
the option of the consignor shall either be negotiable or non –negotiable.
Such a document shall be signed by the MTO or by a person authorized by him, such a signature
shall be in the handwriting, may be stamped or be in any electronic means, provided it is not
inconsistent with the law of the country where such multi-modal transport document has been
issued.
The Convention also provides for the issue of a non-negotiable multi-modal transport document,
in case of issue of such a document the multi-modal transport operator shall after taking the
goods in charge deliver the consignor a document containing all particulars recorded so recorded
and the same shall be deemed to be a multi-modal transport document for the purpose of the
aforesaid act.
In case of a Negotiable Multi-modal transport document goods can be demanded from the MTO
only against the surrender of duly endorsed multi-modal transport document, while a Non-
Negotiable Multi-Modal transport document shall have to indicate the name of consignee.
An MTO shall only be discharged from his liability to deliver goods where he makes delivery to
the consignee named in a non-negotiable multi-modal transport document or to any other person
as is duly instructed in writing.
Though the multi-modal transport document does not preclude issue of any other documents
relevant for facilitating transportation or any other services in accordance with law applicable to
international conventions, yet the same shall only be permitted only if it does not affect the legal
character of the multi-modal transport document.
The consignor shall be deemed to have guaranteed the multi-modal transport operator of both
adequacy as well as accuracy of the goods, which he intends to transport through such a multi-
modal transport operator.
At a time when the multi-modal transport operator takes charge of goods the particulars such as:
• General nature of goods, the leading marks necessary for identification of goods,
character of goods (including dangerous nature of goods), number of packages or units and the
gross weight and quantity of goods as declared by the consignor.
• The apparent condition of goods, as furnished by the consignor for insertion in multi-
modal transport document, Need to be mentioned by the consignor.
Note
In event of any loss resulting from any adequacy or inaccuracy of any of the above stated
particulars ,such as general nature, gross weight or quality of goods the consignor shall be liable
to indemnify the multi-modal transport operator .
How ever such a right of being indemnified for any inadequacy or inaccuracy with regard to
particulars of goods shall in no way limit his liability, under multi-modal transport contract to
any person other than the consignor.
Section 13, of the multi-modal transportation of goods act deals with the basis of liability of a
multi-modal transport operator.
A multi-modal transport operator shall be liable for any loss resulting from any:
However a multi-modal transporter shall be liable only in instances where such loss, damage or
delay in delivery of consignment took place at a time when the consignment was in the charge of
such multi-modal transport operator.
Where a multi-modal transport operator is successful in proving that no fault or neglect on his or
his servant or agents behalf had caused or contributed to such loss, then in such a situation a
multi-modal transport operator cannot be made liable for the loss or damage to such a
consignment.
Moreover a multi-modal transport operator shall not be liable for any loss or damage which
arises or is consequential to such delay of delivery, unless such consignor had made a declaration
highlighting his interest in timely delivery, which has been accepted by the multi-modal transport
operator.
Note:
A delay in delivery shall be deemed to occur when the consignor fails to deliver the consignment
within the time agreed upon, and where there is no such agreement then within reasonable time
(as would have been required by a diligent multi-modal transport operator (to deliver such a
consignment having regard to circumstances of the case as to effect delivery of consignment.
Under circumstances where the consignment has not been delivered ( within 90 consecutive
days) following the date of delivery or within a reasonable time as is agreed upon or within a
reasonable time (required by a diligent multi-modal transport operator , having regard to the
circumstances of the case),then in such a situation the claimant ought to treat the consignment as
lost .and the multi-modal transport operator shall be liable for any consequential loss or damage
which follows such delay.
Thus in instances where a multi-modal transport operator becomes liable for any loss or damage
to any consignment, nature and value of which have not been declared by consignor, while
entrusting it upon such multi-modal transport operator, or where the stage of transport at which
such loss or damage occurred is not known then in such a situation :
“The liability of the multi-modal transport operator to pay compensation will in no case exceed a
maximum of 2 SDR/ Kg (Special Drawing Rights per Kilogram) of the gross weight of the
consignment lost or damaged. Or 666.67, Special Drawing Rights Per Package or unit lost or
damaged which ever is higher.”
Note:
However where a container, pallet, or similar article is stuffed with more than one package or
units, then units enumerated in the multi-modal transport document shall also be deemed to be
packages and units.
In Instances where the multi-modal transport contract does not include carriage of goods by Sea
or Inland water ways, then in such a scenario, liability of a multi-modal transport operator shall
be limited to an amount not exceeding a maximum of 8.33 SDR (Special Drawing Rights per
Kilogram of gross weight of goods lost or damaged.
Liability When Nature and Value of Consignment Have Not Been Declared or Where Stage of
Transport Where Such Loss or Damage Occurred Is Not Known
In cases where nature and value of the consignment have not been declared or where the stage of
transport where such loss or damage occurred is unknown ,then the liability of the multi-modal
transport operator to pay compensation, shall in no case exceed 2 SDR/Kg(Special Drawing
Rights per Kilogram of gross weight of consignment) lost or damaged. Or 666.67 SDR (Special
Drawing Rights per Package of unit lost or damaged, which ever is higher.
Limits Of Liability When Nature And Value Of Consignment Have Not Been Declared Or
Where Stage Of Transport Where Such Loss Or Damage Occurred Is Known:
Section 15, deals with instances where a multi-modal transport operator becomes liable for any
loss or damage to any consignment, nature and value whereof have not been declared by the
consignor before such consignment has been taken in charge by multi-modal transport operator
and where stage of transport at which such loss or damage occurred is known ,then in such a
situation Section -15 of the act comes in to picture, and then the limit of liability of such a multi-
modal transport operator for such loss or damage shall be determined in accordance with
provisions of relevant law applicable in relation to mode of transport, during course of which
such loss or damage occurred.
Any stipulation in the multi-modal transport contract to the contrary shall be both void and
unenforceable.
(Where there is any loss, damage or delay in delivery, due to a cause for which the carrier is
exempted from liability in accordance with any applicable law ,then in such a situation the multi-
modal transport operator /carrier shall be exempted from liability in accordance with that law)
Limitation of Liability under International Multi-Modal Transport Agreement:
If the International Multi-modal transport does not according to contract include, carriage of
goods by Sea, or Inland Waterways, then in that case liability of MTO shall be limited to an
amount not exceeding 8.33 units of account /SDR(Special Drawing Rights),per KG of gross
weight of goods lost or damaged.
When loss or damage to the goods occurred during one particular stage of multi-modal
transportation, in respect of which an applicable international convention or mandatory national
law provides a higher limit of liability than the average limit, then in that case the limit of multi-
modal transport operator’s liability for loss or damage shall be determined by reference to the
provisions of such convention or mandatory national law.
Liability of Multi-Modal Transport Operator for Delay of Delivery of Goods under Certain
Circumstances
Section 16, of the multi modal transportation of goods act deals with the liability of multi-modal
transport operator in case of, delay in delivery of goods under certain circumstances.
• Consignment not having been delivered with in the time expressly agreed upon or in
absence of such agreement ,within such reasonable time as is required by a diligent multi-modal
transport operator having regard to the circumstances of the case, to effect the delivery of the
consignment or any consequential loss or damage that arises from such delay, then in such a
situation liability of such a multi-modal transport operator shall be limited to the freight payable
for the consignment so delayed.
Note:
Where there is delay in delivery the liability of the multi-modal transport operator shall be
limited to freight payable for the consignment so delayed.
An assessment of compensation for loss or damage to consignment shall be made ,with reference
to the prevailing value of such consignment ,at the place and time at which ,such consignment is
delivered or should have been delivered to the consignee.
The current commodity exchange price shall be the index for determining the value of
consignment for the purpose of assessment of such compensation .in instances where the current
market price is not ascertainable, and then such assessment shall be with reference to the normal
value of consignment of a similar kind and quantity.
Multi-Modal transport operator shall not be entitled to the benefit of limitation of his liability
under any of the provisions of the multi-modal transportation of goods act ,if it is proved that
such loss, damage or delay in delivery of such consignment had in fact resulted from:(i) an act
or omission on part of multi-modal transport operator ,with an underlying intention to cause
such loss, damage or delay or (ii) or with recklessness in utter disregard of his knowledge about
the fact that such loss, damage or delay shall in all probably ensue .
The Multi-Modal Transport Operator shall in no case be liable for an amount greater than the
liability for total loss of goods, for which a person shall be entitled to make claims under any of
the provisions of the Multi-Modal Transport Act.
A multi-modal transport operator, who has not been paid the amount of consideration stipulated
in his multi-modal transport contract, would then be entitled to have a lien over the documents as
well as the consignment in his possession.
Responsibility of a multi-modal transport operator shall continue to exist for a period of time,
commencing from the moment he has taken the goods in his charge, and shall cease only after
delivery of such goods has been duly completed.
Thus in other words the responsibility of the multi-modal transport operator (under multi-modal
transport of goods act starts & begins from the time when the goods are put under his charge and
cease only after they have been duly delivered to the designated consignee.
It is in fact section -20 of the multi-modal transportation of goods act which enumerates the
provision of issuance of notice in case of loss or damage to goods.
Generally the delivery of consignment to the consignee by multi-modal transport operator shall
be treated as a prima –facie evidence of delivery of goods of a description as have been
described in a multi-modal transport document.
On any loss or damage being noticed in the consignment delivered by a multi-modal transport
operator , it shall be necessary for such a consignee(receiver of goods) to give a written notice of
the general nature of loss or damage to the goods.
However such notice must be given in written & that too at the very instance of handing over of
such goods to the consignee
Period Of Limitation For Attracting The Provisions Of Multi-Modal Transportation Of Goods
Act:
No provision of the multi-modal transportation act shall make a multi-modal transport operator
liable under the provisions of this act, unless the aggrieved consignee initiates an action with in,
9 months of:
Any legal action relating to international multi-modal transport, under this convention shall be
time barred, if judicial and arbitral proceedings have not been instituted within a period of 2
years.
However in instances where the nature and main particulars of claim have not been given, then
such aforesaid proceedings shall lie with in 6 months after the day when the goods were to be
delivered or should have been delivered and any action after this period shall be time-barred.
Provision for Determination of Jurisdiction for Initiation of Action against the Multi-Modal
Transport Operator:
Any of the parties to the Multi-modal transport contract are entitled to institute an action in a
competent court, having requisite jurisdiction to try such cases.
Thus jurisdiction for initiation of action against a multi-modal transport operator shall consist of:
• Principal place of business or in absence of such a place the place of habitual residence of
such defendant.
• Place of entering into multi-modal transport contract, provided it is also the place having
the business, branch or agency of the defendant.
• The place of taking charge of goods for delivering them for multi-modal transportation.
• Any other place as may be specified in multi-modal transport contract and such as is
evidenced by multi-modal transport document.
Provisions with regards to jurisdiction are mandatory and need to be duly followed by courts.
• Place of entering into multi-modal transport contract, provided it is also the place having
that business, branch or agency of the defendant. Through which contract was made or
• At the place of taking the charge of goods for international multi-modal transport or in
the place of delivery of such goods.
Apart from the places enumerated above, no judicial proceedings can be instituted at any other
place.
Note:
An agreement made by parties which designates the place where plaintiff may institute action
(where made after the claim has been arisen) shall be effective.
Parties entering in to a multi-modal transport contract are free to agree to refer all multi-modal
transportation related disputes to arbitration; these proceedings may be instituted at such place &
in accordance with such procedure as may have been specified by such multi-modal transport
document.
International Arbitration shall, at the option of the claimant be held at any of the following
places.
• Place where multi-modal transport contract was made, provided the defendant has at such
a place a business or agency through which such contract was made.
Note
In case of any dispute under the United Nations Convention on Multi-Modal Transportation,
arbitrator or the arbitral tribunal shall apply the provisions of this convention.
It is mandatory for all multi-modal transport documents to mention a statement with regards to
the fact that such multi-modal transport agreement is subject to provisions of this convention.
The United Nations Convention on Multi-modal transport of goods , has been quite instrumental
in encouraging the development of the Indian multi-modal transportation laws, it has in fact been
a great source of inspiration and to say the least is the very foundation on which the multi modal
law of several countries including ours are based.
The importance of the aforesaid convention can be gauged from the fact that there has been a
growing consensus on International Multi-modal Law being considered as the very means of
facilitating the orderly expansion of world trade.
Main Objectives of the UN Convention on International Multi-Modal Transportation of Goods.
• Laying down of emphasis upon the need to have regard to the special needs, interests and
problems of developing countries, such as those relating to introduction of new technology, cost
efficiency & maximum use of local labor and insurance in their multi-modal systems.
• Assurance of an adequate emphasis upon the need for creating a balance of interests
between suppliers and users of such multi-modal transportation services.
• Emphasis upon the need to streamline custom procedures, while giving due regard to
problems of transit countries.
• There should be consultation with regards to terms and conditions of service both before
and after the introduction of any new technology in multi-modal transportation of goods between
multi-modal transport operator, shipper, shipper’s organization and appropriate national
authorities.
• The Liability of the multi-modal transport operator under this convention shall be based
upon the principal of presumed fault or neglect.
Provisions of the convention shall apply to all contracts of multi-modal transport between
persons in two states if:
(a)The place of taking charge of goods, by the multi-modal transport operator (as provided in the
multi-modal transport contract) is located in the contracting state or
(b) Place of delivery of goods as mentioned in multi-modal transport contract is located in any of
the contracting states.
Where a multi-modal transport contract has been concluded in accordance with the convention,
provisions of such convention shall be mandatorily applicable to such contract.
• The Multi-modal transport operator shall be bound to comply with the: (a) laws
applicable in the country in which he operates (b) along with provisions of this convention.
Conclusion:
In essence the previously popular mode of uni-modal transportation has been largely replaced by
the Multimodal Transport system which has had its genesis in the combining and utilizing of the
outstanding features involving several key uni-modal transportation modules.
What had largely started as an aftermath of the Malcolm Maclean induced container revolution
has now come to assume such vast proportions that a large chunk of domestic as well as
international trading operations have readily adopted it as a safe ,quicker & reliable substitute for
easy growth and expansion of their international export operations.
The popularity and growing significance of the multimodal system of transportation in domestic
as well as international arena is amply evident from the fact that even UN, on account of its
growing international acceptance had to duly enact a convention for regulating and harmonizing
trade relations between trans-border consignors and multi-modal transport operators.
Its ability to combine the four S’s representing: Speed, Safety and Superior quality of service
combined with Substantially low costs of transportation have in fact given a boost to multimodal
transport which has grown to become the first transport media preference of developed nations
and has quite steadily garnered due acceptance in the Third World, and is now in vogue in
developing nations.
The multi-modal act of 1993,by catering for: adequate provisions of registration ,criteria for
being recognized as an multi-modal transport operator, and by enumerating consequences of
non-registration and specifying the rights and duties of Multi-modal transport operator, coupled
with its relentless efforts to clear anomalies regarding jurisdiction for settlement of disputes
along with its unending efforts for encouraging peaceful and amicable settlement of disputes
by facilitating ,arbitration and other adjudicatory rules and regulations, has on its part been quite
successful in putting to rest all confusions .and anomalies, if any ,as may in due course arise
from the interpretation of the aforesaid act .The success of the law can be gauged by analyzing
the growing harmonization of international trade relations which can be sufficiently gauged by
analyzing the changing dynamics of international shipping and containerized transport which in
their wider sense have assumed the status of being the very foundation of the entire multi-model
transport regime.
Cre ated by Aniket Datta on 11/12/2009