Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Course Syllabus
Course Information
Course Number/Section AUD 6318
Course Title Pediatric Audiology
DC Swanepoel 214-905-3019
Office – Callier A-229C
Course Description
This course has been designed to ensure that students demonstrate required knowledge and skill as outlined in
the Standards and Implementation Guidelines for the Certificate of Clinical Competence in Audiology. The
specific standards addressed in this class are:
Pediatric Audiology: Diagnosis, Technology, and Management. (2008). Jane R. Madell and Carol
Flexer. Thieme Publishers, Inc: New York.
Infants and Hearing. (1996). Deborah Hayes and Jerry L. Northern. Singular Publishing Group: San
Diego.
Required Materials
Various assigned readings
Recommended Texts
Hearing in Children: Fifth Edition. (2000). Jerry L. Northern and Marion P. Downs. Williams &
Wilkins: Baltimore.
Foundations of Pediatric Audiology (2007). Bess & Gravel. Plural: New York
Behavioral Evaluation of Hearing in Infants and Young Children. (1998). Jane R. Madell. Thieme:
New York.
Diagnostic Audiology. (2000). Ross Roeser, Michael Valente, and Holly Hosford-Dunn. Thieme: New
York.
Auditory Disorders in School Children. (2003). Ross Roeser and Marion Downs. Thieme: New York.
Resource Texts
Syndrome Identification for Audiology. (2001). Robert Shprintzen. Singular: New York.
Congenital Anomalies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat. (1997). Ted Tewfik & Vazken der Kaloustian.
Oxford: London.
Medical Genetics
26 May (Tuesday) Introduction - Outcomes of Hearing Loss Issues in Screenings - The Quest for Early
Identification; Special education law (Chapter 2 Roeser & Downs; Chapter 1, Hayes; Genetics (Chapter 3 &
4, Hayes; Chapter 2, Madell/Flexer)
2 June (Tuesday) Genetics & Embryology, Central Nervous System Development (Chapter 3 & 4, Hayes;
Chapter 2, Madell/Flexer)
8 June (Monday) Pediatric Speech Assessment (Chapter 10, Madell/Flexer) – Dr. Kwan
9 June (Tuesday) Otitis Media; Auditory Deprivation; Factors affecting Neonatal Viability; High Risk
Register; Developmental milestones (Chapter 6, Madell/Flexer); Tetrachoric Table (Chapter 5 pg 96 – 105,
Roeser & Downs); Patient history (Chapter 5, Madell/Flexer);
15 June (Monday) Present Syndromes; Syndromes and etiology resulting in Hearing Loss (Chapter 6, Hayes)
16 June (Tuesday) Infant Hearing Screening Programs and Screening for Hearing Disorders (Chapter 4 & 11
Madell/Flexer; Chapter 5, Roeser & Downs; Chapter 2 & 7 Hayes) – Dr. Clark & Swanepoel
22 June (Monday) Audiological Assessments: equipment (Chapter 8 pg 104 – 124, Roeser: Behavioral
Measures: Auditory Behaviors; Behavioral Observation Audiometry, Visual and Tangible Reinforcement; Play
Audiometry (Chapter 6 - 9: Madell/Flexer; pp. 145 - 170 Northern - optional)
29 June (Monday) Measures of Physiology: Auditory Brainstem Responses (pp. 251 - 264 Hayes; Chapter 3,
Roeser & Downs; Chapter 15, Madell/Flexer)
30 June (Tuesday) Otoacoustic Emissions and Immittance Measures (pp. 63 – 69, Roeser & Downs; Chapter
13- 14, Madell/Flexer
6 July (Monday) St. Paul Tour (Chapter 5 Hayes); Begin Long term project presentations
13 July (Monday) Counseling parents of the pediatric patient; Reporting Child abuse. (Chapter 19 & 20,
Roeser & Downs)
Class Projects
1. Clinical case interpretations and presentations (25%):
a. Interpreting results of completed auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions
b. Genetic pedigrees will be mapped by each student and returned for credit no later than June 3
(10% of total course grade).
c. Each student will choose 2 syndromes to provide a 5 minute power point presentation with
hand-outs showing references, etc during class (to share with classmates and instructor) due
June 15 (15% of total course grade)
Waardenburgs Pendred Golden Haar
Mohr Syndrome Hunters Stickler
CHARGE Treacher Collins Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Usher Charcot-Marie-Tooth Fetal Alcohol
Fabry Cornelia de Lange Crouzon
Branchial-oto-renal (BOR) Beckwith-Wiedemann Apert
Cockayne Miller Fetal Rubella/Rubella Embryopathy
2. Each student will describe pediatric audiology protocols recommended for a facility of their choosing
in both oral and written format. It will be necessary for the student to seek protocols that will assure
quality patient/client/student care for the pediatric population. Protocols must have justification and
motivation interweaving current literature citations, evidence-based practice, ethics, and best care
practices (30% of total course grade). Must share resource information with fellow students. Power
Point Presentations with write-up due on July 13 & 14
!#!#! POOF!#!#! You are the Director of Audiology in one specific setting listed below (you choose).
Decide and describe which pediatric audiology protocols you will initialize to assure quality
patient/client/student care.
Justify the motivation of your chosen protocols by interweaving literature citations. Within your bank
of cited literature, at least 5 CURRENT (from the last 8 years) must be used. Don’t forget to be
comprehensive: getting/giving referrals, testing protocol, follow-up, etc.
FACTS & MECHANICS OF WRITING:
a) APA style must be strictly adhered to
b) please don’t mistake quantity for quality - be concise (this reader always appreciates it!!)
c) after 15 to 20 pages you will have lost my interest and patience
Facilities to choose from for protocol:
• Program in Independent School System (special education division: hearing impaired K – 12
grades)
• Program in Public School System “Q” (general school population K – 12 grades)
• Head Start Program in South Dallas (2 – 5 year old population educationally at risk)
• State-wide Public/parent education program for awareness of childhood hearing loss
Course Syllabus – Pediatric Audiology (AuD 6318) Page 3
• Private hearing, vision, and speech screening practice in a Metropolitan area (serving 4 – 18
year olds)
• St. Paul Hospital Audiological Services (birthing hospital + general pediatric hospital
population)
• University Based Speech & Hearing Clinic (serving birth to grave: your focus will be pediatric
• Testing for Central Auditory Processing in a Private Practice serving Learning Disabled
Children
• Mobile Van in Cooperation with the Early Childhood Intervention Program
3. One comprehensive final (45% of grade).
Grading Policy
Acquired knowledge will be assessed via one comprehensive exam, which will cover information presented in
lectures, readings, student presentations, and videotapes. Knowledge will be applied and skills demonstrated
via class discussion, semester long project, power point presentations, and interpretation of clinical case
studies.
Off-campus, out-of-state, and foreign instruction and activities are subject to state law and University
policies and procedures regarding travel and risk-related activities. Information regarding these rules and
regulations may be found at the website address
http://www.utdallas.edu/BusinessAffairs/Travel_Risk_Activities.htm. Additional information is available
from the office of the school dean. Below is a description of any travel and/or risk-related activity associated
with this course.
Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, statements, acts or omissions related to applications for
enrollment or the award of a degree, and/or the submission as one’s own work or material that is not one’s
own. As a general rule, scholastic dishonesty involves one of the following acts: cheating, plagiarism,
collusion and/or falsifying academic records. Students suspected of academic dishonesty are subject to
disciplinary proceedings.
Plagiarism, especially from the web, from portions of papers for other classes, and from any other source is
unacceptable and will be dealt with under the university’s policy on plagiarism (see general catalog for
details). This course will use the resources of turnitin.com, which searches the web for possible plagiarism
and is over 90% effective.
The University of Texas at Dallas recognizes the value and efficiency of communication between
faculty/staff and students through electronic mail. At the same time, email raises some issues concerning
security and the identity of each individual in an email exchange. The university encourages all official
Email Use
student email correspondence be sent only to a student’s U.T. Dallas email address and that faculty and staff
consider email from students official only if it originates from a UTD student account. This allows the
university to maintain a high degree of confidence in the identity of all individual corresponding and the
security of the transmitted information. UTD furnishes each student with a free email account that is to be
used in all communication with university personnel. The Department of Information Resources at U.T.
Dallas provides a method for students to have their U.T. Dallas mail forwarded to other accounts.
The administration of this institution has set deadlines for withdrawal of any college-level courses. These
Withdrawal
from Class
dates and times are published in that semester's course catalog. Administration procedures must be followed.
It is the student's responsibility to handle withdrawal requirements from any class. In other words, I cannot
drop or withdraw any student. You must do the proper paperwork to ensure that you will not receive a final
grade of "F" in a course if you choose not to attend the class once you are enrolled.
Procedures for student grievances are found in Title V, Rules on Student Services and Activities, of the
university’s Handbook of Operating Procedures.
Student Grievance Procedures
In attempting to resolve any student grievance regarding grades, evaluations, or other fulfillments of
academic responsibility, it is the obligation of the student first to make a serious effort to resolve the matter
with the instructor, supervisor, administrator, or committee with whom the grievance originates (hereafter
called “the respondent”). Individual faculty members retain primary responsibility for assigning grades and
evaluations. If the matter cannot be resolved at that level, the grievance must be submitted in writing to the
respondent with a copy of the respondent’s School Dean. If the matter is not resolved by the written
response provided by the respondent, the student may submit a written appeal to the School Dean. If the
grievance is not resolved by the School Dean’s decision, the student may make a written appeal to the Dean
of Graduate or Undergraduate Education, and the deal will appoint and convene an Academic Appeals Panel.
The decision of the Academic Appeals Panel is final. The results of the academic appeals process will be
distributed to all involved parties.
Copies of these rules and regulations are available to students in the Office of the Dean of Students, where
staff members are available to assist students in interpreting the rules and regulations.
te Grade
semester’s end and only if 70% of the course work has been completed. An incomplete grade must be
Policy
p resolved within eight (8) weeks from the first day of the subsequent long semester. If the required work to
complete the course and to remove the incomplete grade is not submitted by the specified deadline, the
incomplete grade is changed automatically to a grade of F.
The goal of Disability Services is to provide students with disabilities educational opportunities equal to
those of their non-disabled peers. Disability Services is located in room 1.610 in the Student Union. Office
hours are Monday and Thursday, 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.; Tuesday and Wednesday, 8:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.;
and Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
The contact information for the Office of Disability Services is:
The University of Texas at Dallas, SU 22
PO Box 830688
Disability Services
absence, preferably in advance of the assignment. The student, so excused, will be allowed to take the exam
or complete the assignment within a reasonable time after the absence: a period equal to the length of the
absence, up to a maximum of one week. A student who notifies the instructor and completes any missed
exam or assignment may not be penalized for the absence. A student who fails to complete the exam or
assignment within the prescribed period may receive a failing grade for that exam or assignment.
If a student or an instructor disagrees about the nature of the absence [i.e., for the purpose of observing a
religious holy day] or if there is similar disagreement about whether the student has been given a reasonable
time to complete any missed assignments or examinations, either the student or the instructor may request a
ruling from the chief executive officer of the institution, or his or her designee. The chief executive officer or
designee must take into account the legislative intent of TEC 51.911(b), and the student and instructor will
abide by the decision of the chief executive officer or designee.
These descriptions and timelines are subject to change at the discretion of the Professor.