Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
South Asian Association for Regional Co-operation in Law (SAARCLAW) was established in
Colombo in 1991. Having the status of a Regional Apex Body of SAARC, it is an association of
the legal communities of the SAARC countries comprising judges, lawyers, academicians, law
teachers, public officers and a host of other law-related persons. It is the product of the desire of
the members of the legal community to establish an association within the SAARC region to
disseminate information and to promote an understanding of the concerns and developments of
the region. The main thrust of its operation since its inception has been to bring together the legal
communities within the region for closer co-operation, development of understanding, promotion
of exchange of ideas and dissemination of information. Another of its fundamental objectives to
use and develop law as an instrument for social change and for building co-operation among the
peoples of the region.
SAARC is a latecomer to the family of third world regional organizations. So also, the RTA
experiment by SAARC is a more or less recent one. Spurred by the Indian market reforms in
early nineties, SAARC has moved to the trajectory of deepening regional integration process.
Much before India liberalized her economy; other countries such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka and
Bangladesh had deregulated their economies in varying degrees. However, given their smaller
economic size and viability, their ability to attract foreign capital, goods and technology
remained limited. Indias market reforms provided the needed thrust to facilitate greater intra and
extra-regional movement of capital, goods, technology and services. Hence, SAARC ventured
rather quickly to facilitate freer movement of the above factors by agreeing on preferential and
free trade arrangements.
SAPTA was the first experiment in pioneering a Regional Trade Agreement (RTA) within the
framework of SAARC. However, SAPTA offered a very limited scope for trade liberalization
and admittedly was not an effective building block to integrating trade between the member
countries. Yet, it had put in motion a pattern of promoting intra-regional trade through a
preferential regime, phase-wise. SAPTAs lessons, in the least led to another improvised regional
trade agreement, the South Asian Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA). SAFTA increased the scope
of regional trade, offered more tariff cuts and registered a modest increase in intra-regional trade
as a result.
However, even this second RTA lacks the mandate and prospect of ensuring greater relaxation of
trade relations between the member countries. In the words of a former Indian senior Foreign
Service bureaucrat SAFTA is a wholly inadequate framework for trade liberalization within
South Asia. According to him very low range of tariff cuts, long periods of tariff reductions and
higher number of goods on the negative list are the major constraints in realizing a genuine free
trade regime in South Asia. (Rajiv Sikri, Challenges and Strategy, Rethinking Indias Foreign
Policy, 2009)
RTAs need to be strongly backed by a fair degree of economic and political complementarities
and more importantly mutual trust between the subscribing countries. RTAs outside the South
Asian region which are widely recognized as successful agencies of regional economic
integration such as the European Union and ASEAN have first succeeded in overcoming their
intra-regional rivalries and suspicions before designing frameworks of regional integration.
SAARC lags much behind these regional groups in subordinating bilateral disputes to the larger
regional goal of promoting mutual interdependence. Above all, it is the regional political
mindset, fear of Indian economic and political domination that restricts trade liberalization
process in South Asia.
SAARCs retarded progress therefore lies in its major political and economic limitations, which
could be defined as structural. Politically, apart from the known security mismatch between
India, the regions predominant power and the lesser powers, more recent global security
discourse into which South Asia, as a major haven for terrorism is drawn, further complicated
the prospect for establishing conducive environment for intra-regional economic interaction.
Secondly, South Asia populated by two thirds of the worlds poor is heavily dependent on the
external economic world. About 90% of the regions economic needs are sourced from outside
the region. Moreover, major regional economies, India and Pakistan, have lesser economic
interest in the region and have developed greater extra-regional economic linkages.
Yet, all the member countries are unanimous on sustaining their only regional organization.
Fortunately, no country in the region so far threatened to leave the SAARC. Their level of
expectations and dependence on the association, though differ. As an implicit admission of
SAARCs limited role as a multilateral choice for increasing regional trade, member countries
are trying to achieve the same through bilateral free trade arrangements such as the India-Sri