Jadwal Kuliah Hari Jurusan Kelas J a m Ruang Senin Akuntansi B 18.30 21.00 2202 Selasa A 18.30 21.00 2202
DESKRIPSI MATA KULIAH: Mata kuliah ini membahas current issues dan basic theory dalam akuntansi keuangan, akuntansi keperilakuan, akuntansi manajemen dan pengauditan. Issues tersebut meliputi kerangka konseptual, standar akuntansi keuangan, dan masalah-masalah akuntansi keuangan dalam perspektif penelitian, budaya, dan sosial, etika profesionalisme akuntan publik serta perkembangan terakhir akuntansi manajemen.
TUJUAN PERKULIAHAN: Setelah mempelajari matakuliah ini mahasiswa diharapkan memiliki wawasan dan kemampuan menganalisis perkembangan akuntansi khususnya masalah current issues dan basic theory bidang akuntansi keuangan, akuntansi keperilakuan, akuntansi manajemen dan pengauditan sehingga mampu mengikuti perkembangan isu-isu prospektif dalam bidang akuntansi.
METODE KULIAH: Kuliah diberikan dalam bentuk ceramah, diskusi dan penugasan terstruktur. Di setiap pertemuan, mahasiswa secara berkelompok mengumpulkan resume materi dan mempresentasikannya di depan kelas. Kelompok diskusi akan ditentukan pada pertemuan awal. Partisipasi mahasiswa selama berlangsungnya diskusi dan penugasan lainnya akan menentukan penilaian akhir semester. Ujian diselenggarakan 2 kali.
SISTEM PENILAIAN: Nilai akhir semester ditentukan dengan memperhatikan komponen dan bobot sebagai berikut:
Komponen Bobot Partisipasi kelas : 20% Penugasan lain (presentasi) : 10% Paper individu : 20% Ujian Kompetensi Dasar I : 25% Ujian Kompetensi Dasar II : 25%
Mahasiswa wajib memenuhi seluruh komponen penilaian. Jika salah satu dari komponen tak terpenuhi, maka dinyatakan tidak lulus. Nilai akhir semester dikonversikan dengan ketentuan sebagai berikut:
Nilai Konversi 80 100 A (4,0) 70 79 B (3,0) 60 69 C (2,0) 40 59 D (1,0) 0 39 E (0,0)
Ball, Ray. 2005. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) - Pros and Cons for Investors Barth and Landsman. 2010. How did Financial Reporting Contribute to the Financial Crisis
#1
#2
2 Ramanna and Sletten. 2009. Why do Countries Adopt International Financial Reporting Standards Laux and Leuz. 2009. The Crisis of Fair Value Accounting Making Sense of the Recent Debate #3
#4
3 Scott. 2003. Accounting Theory 3 rd Edition Ch 12-Standard Setting: Economic Issues Wolk, Dodd and Tearney. 2003. Accounting Theory: Conceptual Issues. 6 th Edition Ch 4 The Economic of Financial Reporting Regulations.
#5
#6
4 Scott. 2003. Accounting Theory 3 rd Edition Ch 8 - Economic Consequences and_Positive Accounting Theory Daske, Hail, Leuz, Verdi. 2008. Mandatory IFRS Reporting Around the World - Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences.]
#7
#8
5 Scott. 2003. Accounting Theory 3 rd Edition Ch 9 Game Theory and Agency Theory Scott. 2003. Accounting Theory 3 rd Edition Ch 13- Standard_Setting-Political_Issues Wolk, Dodd and Tearney. 2003. Accounting Theory: Conceptual_Issues. 6 th Edition Ch 9 Political And Economic Environment #9
#10
#11
6 Allen and Ramanna. 2012. Towards an Understanding of the Role of Standard Setters in Standard Setting. Baskerville .2007. A Game Theory Approach to Research on Lobbying Activities in Accounting Regulation.
#12
#13
KTM MINGGU TOPIK BAHASAN Artikel Kelompok
7 UJIAN KOMPETENSI DASAR I 8 Rencana: 1. Choi_and_Meek_International-Accounting_7e- Reporting_and_Disclosure 2. Healy and Palepu. 2000. A Review of The Empirical Disclosure Literature 3. Cole and Jones. 2005. Magement Discussion and Analysis-A Review and Implications for Future Research 4. Schuster and Oconnell. 2006. The Trend Toward Voluntary Corporate Disclosures
#14
#15
#16
#17
9 1. Mitchell RK, Agle BR and Wood DJ (1997), Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts The Academy of Management Review (22-4), pp. 853- 886. 2. Suhardjanto, D dan Choiriyah, U (2010), Information Gap: Demand Supply Environmental Disclosure di Indonesia Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan (vol 14, No.1), pp.36- 51. #18
#19
10 1. Ullmann AA (1985), Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of US Firms The Academy of Management Review (10-3), pp. 540-557. 2. Roberts RW (1992), Determinant of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory Accounting, Organisation and Society (17-6), pp. 595-612.
#20
#21
11 1. Susan C. B, Welsh, M.J and Wentzel, K (2010), Johnson and Johnson: a Model for Sustainability Reporting. Strategic Finance(September): pp.29-37. 2. Manetti, Giacomo and Toccafondi, Simone. (2012), The Role of Stakeholders in Sustainability Reporting Assurance. J ournal Business Ethics (Vol. 107): pp.363377.
#23
#24
12 1. Eng LL and Mak YT (2003), Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure Journal of Accounting and Public Policy (22), pp.325-345. 2. Ho SSM and Wong KS (2001), A Study of the Relationship between Corporate Governance Structures and the Extent of Voluntary Disclosure Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation (10), pp.139-156. #25
#26
13 1. Olach, T and Weeramantri, S (2009), How COSO Has Improved Internal Controls in the United States. Internal Auditing (Vol.24, No.6): pp.3-12. 2. Fatemi, A and Luft, C, (2002), Corporate Risk Management Cost and Benefits Global Finance Journal (13), pp. 29-38.