The purpose of confusion in laws and regulations is to cause cognitive

dissonance. This is a state of mind where conflicts remain unresolved. It

weakens the subjects with its prolonged uncertainty. People are then subject to
breaking down and having paradoxical conversions. This can be found in
researching the phenomenon of brain washing. It is a potent device for control.
Some references on this can be found in the following article.
DIALECTICS (and the Fate of Medicine)
By Thomas Dorman, M.D. 2000 By DORMAN PUBLISHING
Introduction
In this article, I shall attempt to survey the use of an intellectual process, the dialectic. I will survey a broad
perspective of the subject, concentrating on the failure of philosophy and its harm to our civiliation. I will
then finish the article with a look at the special case of medicine in the context of the dialectical tool ! how
medicine is being destroyed, how the dialectical tool is used increasingly for the purpose, and I will hint yet
again at my increasing conviction that there is a plan behind this evil.1 If we, who are savvy, can recognie
its purpose and identify its means of operation, there is a chance that we can preserve the wonders of our
civiliation.
"s I happen to practice medicine #full time$, as I am dedicated to my work and love helping people #and
yet have to make a living$, it is not mysterious that I am striving to preserve this freedom for my patients, for
myself, for my progeny, and for humanity. %o man and no family live in isolation form society. Therefore, the
welfare of society is essential to our own welfare, let alone the need for exchange through the generations
for the other members of our species.
&e exchange produce, manufactured goods, know!how, and ultimately the sharing of a genetic pool. "yn
'and expressed this concept well with her brief aphorism There is no conflict between rational men. "s we
can see, conflict abounds. So what is wrong( The lack of rationality amongst most men.
If I, through this newsletter, can contribute one drop of rationality to the ocean of irrationality, my efforts will
be rewarded. " rational society is one in which individuals respect each other, exchange with each other for
mutual benefit, strive together for essential inherent joint interests #such as national defense$ and care for
each other based on respect and self!interest. This is the 'epublican form of government that the founders
of this country gave us in )**+.2 The more I study the matter, the more I come to realie that that 'epublican
gift was uni,ue.3 It is the first instance in history where these laisse faire precepts of rationality were made
the foundation of a country, a society, a nation- although fragments of them were available from the history of
&estern .iviliation before beginning with the /agna .arta #)0)1$.
The Diaectic
"s many terms and concept in our civiliation do, this hails to the 2reeks. 3ialectic #also called dialectics$
was originally a form of logical argumentation where two or more sides of a subject were reviewed before
conclusions were drawn. %owadays, it is a philosophical concept of evolution applied to diverse fields
including thought, nature and history.
"mong the classical 2reek thinkers, the meanings of dialectic ranged from a techni,ue of refutation and
debate, through a method for systematic evaluation of definitions, to the investigation and classification of the
relationships between specific and general concepts. 4rom the time of the Stoic philosophers until the end of
the 5uropean /iddle "ges, dialectic was more or less closely identified with the discipline of formal logic.
Immanuel 6ant #)*07 ! )897$ denoted by Transcendental 3ialectic, the endeavor of exposing the illusion
involved in attempting to use the categories and the principals of understanding beyond the bounds of
phenomena and possible experience. 2eorg &ilhelm 4redrich :agel #)**9 ! )8;)$ identified dialectic as the
tendency of a notion to pass over into its own negation as the result of conflict between its inherent
contradictory aspects.
6arl /arx!"# and 4riedrich 5ngels adopted :agel<s definition and applied it to social and economic
processes.$ =.../arx and 5ngels understood materialism as the opposite of idealism, by which they meant
that any theory that treats matter is dependent on mind or spirit, or mind or spirit capable of existing
independently of matter. 4or them, the materialist and idealist views were irreconcilably opposed throughout
the historical development of philosophy.= I ,uoted this text from 5ncyclopedia >ritannica to show you how
the concept itself is muddleheaded. If you felt a little embarrassed reading the last paragraph, not ,uite
understanding it, please ! join the club. 4rom my point of view, the fact that it is gobbledygook is what I am
trying to convey.
Diaectic Conte%&orar' (se
The modern usage of the dialectic has developed from a 2reek form of debate, that was ,uite sensible,
through a ses,uipedalian philosophical rehash by the two famous 2erman philosophers followed by :agel
into a philosophical so!called tool. :agel<s usage is usually abbreviated and summaried? Thesis- antithesis-
synthesis. &hereby a proposition #philosophical or other$ is introduced. Its opposite is introduced promptly
thereafter #"ntithesis$, and then some intermediary position is adopted as the final truth. @ou see, this denies
the existence of absolute truth. It assumes that every issue can be debated. This is the origin of situational!
ethics in philosophy.
The process is simple. The premise is false. :ow is it popularied through our contemporary
ses,uipedalian science( Through using convoluted language that embarrasses the reader who doesn<t
understand, and therefore is shamed into accepting the process. "n important component of this
brainwashing techni,ue is using a part of a subject to generalie, namely pars pro toto.
)o* to read the ne*s
Parenthetically, one might suggest to you that an interesting safeguard in maintaining our rationality and
sanity, when presented with stories in the news is to discipline oneself always to ask? 3oes the illustration
merit generaliation( @ou will find that the answer is usually negative. "ctually, it<s a little more interesting
than that. %ow that you have learnt with me how this tool is used, let<s harden our intellectual armor a little
more.
If you encounter a news story that uses an example to imply a generaliation #take, for instance, guns kill,
therefore guns should be banned$, you need to ask yourself about the motives of the promoter of the story.
The newscaster, the person who paid for the program and, alas, occasionally the political agenda behind the
news #propaganda would be a better word$. %ow regarding the dialectic, you will find that most issues are
discussed on television, etc., where =both sides= are presented. This is the dialectic process on your screen
every night. The mere presentation of both sides implies that there is no absolute truth. /ore importantly, it is
very likely that the absolute truth is exactly what is not debated on whatever program it is you are watching. If
you accept that the purpose of the debate is to bring you into a synthesis #the dialectic ultimate stage$ of
opinion, it is very likely that you have been given two false concepts to debate, and your attention will be
drawn away from what might have been obvious otherwise, that the real issue lies elsewhere. I would
propose to you, even, that the very essence of news casting, programming, advertising, television series,
soap operas, and virtually everything that is promoted by the mass media, uses this extraordinarily effective
tool, the dialectic.
In its modern incarnation, it contains also the concept of the package deal. <The package deal< is a term
"yn 'and coined to imply that something in the discussion is not mentioned but taken for granted, and the
participant, listener, reader is sucked in to accepting this taken!for!granted concept by sleight!of!hand,
unawares as it were.
Aet<s take the example of? 2uns kill, therefore we should ban guns. Is the current debate regarding the
safety mechanism appropriate to guns( Some of the .linton administration<s recommendations for safety
measures are ridiculous. That is not the point. The point is to engage the public in a discussion about the
degree of harm from guns, not the issue that we live in a time when the government is increasingly corrupt
and dangerous, and the Second "mendment ! the right to bear arms ! is in the "merican constitution so that
governments can be defeated militarily as an ultimate protection when they abandon their 'epublican
principles.
4or myself, #though I am not particularly interested in firearms$ I am amaed that even the organiations
that supposedly are =pro!gun= enter into this debate ! the kinds of guns, the number of rounds in the
magaine, the length of the barrel, single, automatic, semiautomatic action, licenses, previous legal record,
registration, duration of waiting before registration and purchase is allowed, the transfer of weapons between
states, and now the pressure on gun manufacturers not to sell to the public, safe ones around schools- can
you not see that these are all examples of the dialectic(
4alse arguments where the key issue is suppressed through this indirect techni,ue( &e all know that
people in countries in which all men are armed have less crime- but the most important issue is a 'epublican
government where the authorities are responsive to, and afraid of, their servants, the public. I have dwelt a
little on this gun issue, which is not my main topic, as an illustration of the dialectic process that is so active
in our media at the present time. I will come to the issue of the destruction of medicine through the dialectical
process presently.
It is important for all of us. &e are all mortals, we are all subject to disease, and we may all re,uire
medical attention. I think, however, that is it particularly important for doctors to understand this issue. The
doctor who is swept into a misunderstanding of his role as a :ippocratic healer may, probably inadvertently,
develop habits of treatment that may not be in his customerBpatient<s interest. "ccordingly, I shall continue
in this article to look at a few other examples of where we are going in contemporary "merica with this
dialectic process. &hen all is said and done, the destruction of medicine is, after all, only a case in point.
+ationa Defense
The .linton administration in the C.S., and the >lair government in >ritain, have increasingly demobilied
and decommissioned the military. =&e no longer need defense against the Soviet Cnion, which has
collapsed.= &rong. The military might of the .ommunist 5mpire has not diminished., There is subtlety in
camouflaging their strength. They are pretending that there are no longer closed ones in 'ussia. Disitors
do, however, report their existence. This is where military development progresses apace.
The Soviets< ability to distort perceptions in the &est has improved #if that is the correct word$ by an order
of magnitude since the introduction of perestroika. This =renewal= coincided with /ikhail 2orbachev<s move
from being .hairman of the .ommunist politburo ! via name change ! to the presidency. %ow he is the
informal head of the %ew &orld Erder co!chaired by /aurice Strong.- The anticipated non!governmental
organiation club, scheduled to propose a revision of the Cnited %ations .harter in September 0999, is a
large step towards the %ew &orld government.." 1/"11"12
&hat are we debating regarding national defense in "merica( &hether we are at risk for missiles from
Iran or %orth 6orea. 3o you see how the essential point is avoided( The world .ommunist conspiracy,
based in /oscow and Peking, aims at complete takeover of us all through world government.13"1! The fact
that this is not being debated indicates two things? )$ &e are being subjected to concerted disinformation. 0$
There is a plan afoot to use the outcomes #the synthesis$.
Testing
Incidentally, I think that there is a third rather amusing aspect to recogniing this phenomenon. It is what I
call the test dialectic. In order to bring us all under the %ew &orld Erder, preferably thinking we like the plan,
Sun Tsu<s1# method of changing the enemy<s mind to accept the change, not recogniing defeat, is the
goal.1$ :ow do you achieve it( This has not been done before.
&ell, it<s necessary to conduct some experiments. &e know, from the business of advertising, that the
skilled promoters send out test mailings with nuances and variations of the promotional material to test target
audiences and have a feedback mechanism whereby they learn how effective their propaganda is. >y a
series of negative feedbacks, finally they hope to arrive at their ultimate goal by influencing the minds of as
large an audience as possible.
@ou see, we are coming to a slow realiation that the whole business of world affairs is mind control. It is
one thing to control the bodies of your slaves. :ow much better it is to control their mindsF1,"1-
The %inds of sodiers
The emasculation of the fighting spirit, idealism for country and culture, is predicated on destroying the
concepts of honor, valor, absolute truths, community responsibility, pride and dignity. "ll these destructions
flow from relative morals and situation ethics. Philosophically, they flow from the dialectic and most
specifically from the antecedent of :agel<s dialectic from Immanuel 6ant<s philosophy that truth is only in the
mind of the believer. There is no independent objectivity.
Personally, I doubt whether Immanuel 6ant, the pedantic philosopher, saw himself as a tool of evil, a
destroyer of our civiliation. 4or all I know, he merely enunciated the philosophy that was somehow ready.
%onetheless, the objectivists, and I think rightly, see his work as emblematic of this change. The social
techni,ue of promoting permissiveness in personal and sexual relationships between individuals, might be
seen as the thesis, based on this precept. There are no absolute values.
.ontrariwise, the =protection of the weak= is used as a propaganda whip to with which punish these very
acts, #the antithesis$ thereby putting military men in impossible situations, the situation of cognitive
dissonance whereby they cannot perform their duties in a confident and free state of mind. This is the tool
that is responsible for the mass resignation of naval pilots from the "merican carrier force, etc.1. The
outcome is the synthesis, in this case the emasculation of the military. &ho benefits( Eur enemies. &ho are
they( Those who would control humanity as a herd.
Education
The human animal is different from other creatures. It has a mind. In order to use people as a human
resource it is =necessary= #from the point of view of those who would control us$ to do something about this
independent mind. In other words, to suppress it. It is somewhat difficult to suppress the independence of
people who have been reared free. The obvious recourse is to wait patiently and train the next generation.
@es, =train= is the correct word, and for this Skinnerian or Pavlovian techni,ues are used.2/"21"22
I have discussed this issue in the past. It is called operant conditioning. "n essential part of this is the
dialectic techni,ue. 4or instance, in the town where I live, I recently saw a new notice on the highway =3o not
drink and drive? ero tolerance under 0)=. I have come to recognie that the word education means dumbing
down, and the words =ero tolerance= mean control, through the dialectic techni,ue, with fear. I first
encountered this cunning expression in the context of the supposed control of sexual molestation of patients
by doctors, which turned out to be a cleverly imposed dialectical techni,ue of compelling doctors to abandon
their personal relationships with their patients and kowtow to authoritarian mandates. The fact that a
woman<s mere accusation can destroy a career was a potent whip with which to frighten the partly
brainwashed doctors into complete obedience.23
The s&ecia roe of the %edia0
@ou will have gathered from this that in order to change the world, in order to influence the public at large
control- and, by that, I mean vise!like complete control of the media is necessary, nay, absolutely essential.
The .ommunist dictatorship in the Soviet Cnion had censorship. So did the :itlerite regime in the Third
'eich.2! These were impressive experiments which were, by and large, successful. The censor, however,
was an official of the government, and the population knew formally that censorship existed. This led to
underground newsletters in the Soviet Cnion called Samisdat and, of course, following news sources from
other outside and free countries.
:ow could a regime tighten the control on the media and close this escape!hatch( The answer is through
)$ direct ownership and control of the media, 0$ control and intimidation of newscasters, etc. ;$ stacking the
ranks of the media with controlled idiots,2# 7$ infiltrating the opposition groups and using them for the
dialectic.
5xamples of this are the 'epublican Party in .ongress and almost certainly a number of more or less
widely acclaimed and used =conservative= news sources. That this would be the strategy of such a plan is
not mysterious. It is self!evident. &ell, is it indeed the case(
Evidence
&hen wanting to study phenomena, when wanting to test a hypothesis empirically, there are two tools? )$
.onduct a prospective experiment with controls, 0$ predict.
5ach tool is suitable for different circumstances. In the case of historical or social forces, the tool of
prediction is the correct one. "lthough in a circumstance where the operator has certain control, prospective
experiments are very useful. I gave an example from advertising, and I propose to you that some of the
events we have seen recently fall into this category. It is, however, critically important for the experimenter
not to tell his victimBsubjects that they are being experiment on. There has been one exception to the secrecy
on this issue, the admission by the leftist organiation who created the alar scare about a decade ago.2$"2,
I think that several of the recent wars have been designed to experiment with new techni,ues of
controlling the population, mind control for propaganda, illness control through vaccines, population control
through poisoning the environment and, finally, tests for new, less conventional war!making machines ! flying
and other.
&ould it be useful to conduct some experiments in population control which, if successful, ratchets
society into the direction favored and, if they fail, provide a lesson( Ef course it would. I think that much of
the legislation we have seen recently, signally, the :illary :ealth .are legislation of )GG;, was a case in
point.2-
1h' Medicine2
I have touched on this in previous newsletters. I have not seemingly made any impact. Therefore, I think
some repetition is in order. In a laisse!faire ideal society, each person is an independent, competent and
self!controlling entity. The word citien is often used for this concept, and correctly. &eaker members of our
society may not ,ualify for this independent status. There is a gradation between what I call in this context,
citienship on the one hand, and dependency, on the other. The middle!aged entrepreneur, executive and
head of family in bourgeois society represent the citien. In his youth, he might have been a sickly child. In
old age, he may be senile. 3uring his active career, he might be ill. :ere are instances where his
independence and robustness are impaired. The whole gamut of human misery, disease and failure can, at
some time or other, afflict people. In these vulnerable phases, our normal societal habit is to rely on family.
"n extended family is the community. It is here that the concepts of laisse!faire independence are
vulnerable. 3oes the man who is #hopefully temporarily$ ill lose his rights( 3oes he lose his dignitas, as I
discussed in a recent newsletter(2.
&ith the advent of effective medicine, sometime around the turn of the 09th century, the ancient medical
tradition has assumed a new and greater role because of the new scientific tools that came its way. This
profession has the potential of controlling a lot of society because of its now important role in the affairs of
the weak. It is interesting that in bygone eras it was the priesthood that played that role.3/ %otice how the
significance of the church is declining as that of =scientific= medicine is ascending and particularly that of
psychiatry. Is this a coincidence( @ou be the judge. Hust as the church controlled belief in order to maintain
its power, so we find that the state has to control medicine for the same purpose. This is a scourge of our
era. In a curious way it is also a side effect of the scientific method, the new effectiveness of medicine.
%ow you will understand the background for the reason that medicine is coming under control of the
bureaucrats for the first time in human history. It is our generation of physicians who are facing the first major
challenge to the :ippocratic principle. It is true that the notions of the philosopher king in Platonic medicine
hail back to the 2reek area. It is, however, in these days that we are hearing that the :ippocratic Eath needs
to be revised.
&hy now, two and one!half millennia after its enunciation( &e are facing the issue of control through the
dialectical techni,ue. This is a challenge no generation of physicians has faced since :ippocrates< times.
The destruction of %edicine
&hat needs to be destroyed #from the hopeful controllers< point of view$? )$ The confidence the physician
has in himself, 0$ his independent thinking, ;$ his absolute commitment to his patientBclient, 7$ the privacy of
the relationship because 7$ the dignity of the individual is predicated on maintaining secrecy regarding is
weaknesses.
&e all have weaknesses. The medicaliation of the mind, of education, of moralityBimmorality of habits
and vices, even of criminality, were necessary to wrest moral support from the priesthood, exemplified in the
confessional. %ow in the secular realm, the patient becomes a human resource #notice the significance of
words($ for the %ew &orld Erder agenda. It is my belief that this task allocated to the .linton administration
was just that. 3ue to the valiant efforts of The "ssociation of "merican Physicians and Surgeons, the :illary
plan of )GG; failed. This administration has used the techni,ue of gradualism to introduce the same horrors
piecemeal. They have also revved up the propaganda machine.
4or instance, I recently encountered a physician at a meeting who was outraged that 7*I of "mericans
=can<t afford= health insurance. I, of course, look at things differently. I celebrate that at least 7*I of the
population realie that =health insurance= is a device to control them through the dialectic? )$ 4ear of
catastrophes, thinking that asset protection is health insurance, 0$ an attempt at tax avoidance by negotiating
=benefits= from an employer instead of wages,31 ;$ and above all, signing up for insurance, through :/Es,
with the subtle implication that the patient gets to exploit the physician through the insurance contract for low
premiums.32
This greed factor is so potent that the public at large is moving from fee!for!service insurance to capitation
and :/E insurance.33"3! The premiums are indeed lower. 3oes it not occur to any of these people that
they get what they pay for( 5vidently not. The particular thing they get is control by managers who compete
by rationing. The rationing is achieved through foul means, and claim denials, claim delays, arcane coding
systems, and intimidation of physicians with the fascist system of imprecise coding!regulations.3#"3$
The tort legal system and the threat of lawsuits aggravate the problem. The massive publicity for the
extraordinary outcome of lawsuits aggravates the fear factor. &ould any sane person want to get intimate,
detailed professional advice from a doctor whose mind is subject to all these pressures( It is no wonder that
the situation is worsening.
%ext we hear the government lament that there are )99,999 serious complications nationally yearly in
health care. There will be ero tolerance for these mistakes and, yes, you guessed it, your .linton
administration is going to protect you from these incompetent doctors. "s no one else has, let me point out to
you clearly that the state of mind, the cognitive dissonance, that leads to these bad choices is a result of the
previous slew of government rules, mandates, regulations, and private public partnerships, such as with the
"/" and the 'obert &ood Hohnson 4oundation, and the =solution= is no more than the antithesis in the
dialectic process.
1here is This 3oing2
The Hacobins brought on the 4rench 'evolution to the then most civilied 5uropean country in )*G;.
'obespierre<s career is emblematic of the righteousness of a tyrant.3, /ussolini introduced fascism to Italy
circa )G00 and "dolph :itler, in the name of %ational Socialism, gave the word %ai the implication we are all
familiar with. The most important major revolutionary experiment was, however, Aenin<s. The Ectober
'evolution of )G)* in then Imperial 'ussia developed in phases. :e had a fairly easy task. The middle class
and the intelligensia were few and were immensely influenced by &estern 5urope. The rest of the huge
empire was controlled easily once the intellectuals were in his trap.
The mind bending, used so successfully in that experiment, has been made into a documentary film by
"yan 'and3- which, though somewhat slow moving to a modern moviegoer, contains all the signals and
information you need to understand the process. It is well worth the three hours it takes to view.
4ur E5&eri%ent
The experiment we are living through has been called, by Tony >lair and &illiam .linton, The third way. This
is a fascistic experiment of private!public partnership. /onopoly charters are given, sometimes unofficially or
by sleight!of!hand, to organiations or business that manages the public. They mas,uerade, usually, as
voluntary associations, private organiations, citiens clubs, or professional associations. These front
organiations for the %ew &orld Erder multiply by the day.3."!/"!1
Medica Front 4rgani6ations
The "merican /edical "ssociation #"/"$ functions, at least in part, as such an organiation, and the
clear evidence for this is their monopoly in providing the .PT codes. These codes are mandatory for
insurance billing, including and in particular insurance billing to government insurances such as /edicaid
and /edicare. This monopoly is profitable for the "/", but why did the 3epartment of :uman :ealth and
Services not arrogate to itself the right to manufacture these codes(
The reason is clear ! the semblance of voluntarism. "fter all, doctors join the "/" voluntarily. It is
therefore very encouraging for me to learn that the roles of membership are declining. "t least some doctors
have the wisdom or, perhaps more likely, the intuition to understand that this organiation is partaking in a
private!public partnership #read fascism$ to the detriment of the interest of its members and the public.
>efore leaving the subject of coding in hospital and doctor bills, let us ask why is coding necessary( "fter
all, it creates a lot of work, confusion, computer programming and argumentation. The reason, of course, is
control. .ontrol of a lot of people and a lot of details call for modern databases. "ll the rest of the discussion
is, I propose to you, merely dialectic.
Concusion
The dialectic techni,ue of debate that has been developed, by the illuminati, into a powerful instrument for
the control of the mind of humanity? Hust as guns do not kill, criminals do- so the dialectic is but a tool. &e
should look at the causes for criminality in studying both.
!Thomas 3orman, /.3.
7eferences8
1 The 'apture .ult. 'obert A. Pierce. Signal Point Press. );8
.unningham Aane. Signal /ountain, T% ;*;**. )G**. "vailable from
The Hohn >irch Society.
2 3emocratic 3ictatorship? The emergent constitution of control.
"rthur Selwyn /iller. 2reenwood Press, &estport, .% )G8).
IS9+ /:313:22-3$:10
3 The Aaw. 4rederic >estiat. "vailable from The .enter for the
Study of /arket "lternatives. 4reedom Plaa. P.E. >ox )99). .aldwell, I3
9;+91. Published by The 4oundation for 5conomic 5ducation, Inc.
Irvington!on!:udson. %@ )91;;. )G19.
! The 'ed Prussian? The life and legend of 6arl /arx. Aeopold
Schwarschild. .harles Scribner J Sons. )G7*.
1 /arx and Satin. 'ichard &urmbrand. .rossway >ooks. &estchester,
IA. "vailable from 'ichard &urmbrand. Published by .rossway >ooks, a
division of 2ood %ews Publishers, &estchester, IA +9)1;. )G8+,
IS9+ /:/.1/,:3,.:#.
$ I have slightly paraphrased these definitions from the recent
issue of 5ncyclopedia >ritannica. &eb? http?BBwww.britannica.com
, .ambodia<s @ear Kero. 4ranLois Ponchaud. Pub. :olt, 'inehart and
&inston. %@ )G**. IS9+ /:/3:/!/3/$:#.
- Soviet "nalyst, 4ebruary 0999. &orld 'eports, Atd. )98
:orseferry 'oad, &estminster, Aondon, 5ngland S&)P 054.
. The Shadows of Power? The .ouncil of 4oreign 'elations and the
"merican decline. Hames Perloff. Pub. )G88. &estern Islands. P.E.
>ox 8979, "ppleton, &I 7G);. Ph? 7)7!*7G!;*8;. IS9+ /:--2,.:13!:$.
1/ Secret 'ecords 'evealed? The men, the money and the methods
behind the %ew &orld Erder. 3ennis Aaurence .uddy, Ph.3. :earthstone
Publishing, Atd. 199 >eacon 3r. Eklahoma .ity, E6 *;)0*. Ph?
791!*8G!;881. 899!+10!))77. 4ax 791!*8G!+190. IS9+ 1:#,##-:/31:!.
)) Target the &est? Terrorism in the world today. @ossef >otansky.
)GG;. SPI >ooks. Shapolsky Publishers, Inc. );+ &. 00nd St. %ew
@ork, %@ )99)). IS9+ 1:#$1,1:2$.:-.
12 4inancial Terrorism? :ighjacking "merica under the threat of
bankruptcy. Hohn 4. /c/annus. )GG;. The Hohn >irch Society. P.E.
>ox 8979. "ppleton, &I 17G); Ph? 7)7!*7G!;*89. IS9+ 1:--1/1/:/2:1.
13 The >lack >ook of .ommunism? .rimes, terror, repression.
StMphane .ourtis, et. al. :arvard Cniversity Press. .ambridge, /". Aondon,
5ngland )GGG. IS9+ /:$,!:/,$/-:,.
1! Syndrome of .ontrol. Aindsey &illiams, )G8+. "vailable from
&orth Publishing .o. P.E. >ox G). The 3alles, E' G*918. "vailable from
P.E. >ox *, 6asilof, "6 GG+)9
1# Sun Tsu. The "rt of &ar. 5dited by Samuel >. 2riffith. Exford
Cniversity Press, Aondon, )G+;
1$ Psychic &arfare, 4act or 4iction( "n investigation into the use
of the mind as a military weapon. 5dited by Hohn &hite. )G88. The
5,uarian Press. IS9+ /:-#/3/:$!!:2.
1, :umanist /anifestos, Ene and Two. Premetheus >ooks. *99 5.
"mhurst St., >uffalo, %@ )70)1. )G;; #:umanist /anifesto Ene$ )G*;
#:umanist /anifesto Two$. IS9+ /:-,.,#:/13:$.
1- :umanist /anifesto 0999? " call for a new planetary humanism.
3rafted by Paul 6urt. Premetheus >ooks 1G Hohn 2lenn 3r.,
"mhurst, %@. )7008!0)G*. 0999. IS9+ 1:#,3.2:,-3:;.
1. 4act, 4iction and 4raud. Sept. )GGG, Dol. 7?G. >rainwashing and
3umbing 3own? "ction #2erald "tkinson$. T. 3orman. &eb Site? http?BBwww.dormanpub.com.
2/ >rain &ashing in the :igh School. 5. /errill 'oot.
3evin!E<3are .ompany. %@ )G1G.
21 >asics in 5ducation? I. The Aeipig .onnection. Paolo Aeonni.
"vailable from 5missary Publications. G091 .lackamas 'd., N)**+.
.lackamas, E' G*9)1 #19;!807!0919$. )GG8. Published by The
3elphian Press. 09G19 S& 'ock .reek 'd. Sheridan, E' G*;*8.
22 5ducating for the %ew &orld Erder. >.6. 5akman. :alcyon :ouse,
Portland, E' )GG). IS9+ /:-.!2/:2,-:2.
23 4act, 4iction and 4raud? .ontrol of 3octoring? Through the
dialectic with sex. Huly )GG0. T.3orman. &eb Site? http?BBwww.dormanpub.com.
2! &ho 4inanced :itler? The secret funding of :itler<s rise to
power )G)G!)G;;. Hames Poole and Suanne Poole. The 3ial Press, %@. Ene
3ag :ammarskjold Plaa, %ew @ork, %@ )99)*. )G*8. IS9+ /:-/3,:./3.:2.
2# 3ossier? The secret history of "rmand :ammer. 5dward H.
5pstein. )GG+. .arroll and 2raf Publishers, Inc. )G &. 0)st St. %ew @ork, %@
)99)9!+891. IS9+ /,-$,:/$,,:#.
2$ http?BBwww.carnell.comBenvironmentOhealthBalar
2, Trashing the 5conomy. 'on "rnold and "lan 2ottlieb. 4ree
5nterprise Press. >ellevue, &" )GG7. IS9+ /:.3.#,:1:1,:;.
2- /edical Sentinel? The official journal of The "ssociation of
"merican Physicians and Surgeons. )+9) %. Tucson >lvd., Ste G.
Tucson, "K 81*)+ Ph? 899!+;1!))G+. &eb page http?BBwww.aapsonline.org.
2. 4act, 4iction and 4ad in /odern /edicine. Dol 1, %o ;. /arch 0999.
3/ 2allileo? Inaugerating the "ge of 'eason, Part ;. 3avid :arriman
in The Intellectual "ctivist? "n objectivist review. Dol.)7?1 /ay
0999. TI" Publications, Inc. P.E. >ox 0+0, Aincroft, %H 9**;8!90+0.
31 This is a peculiarity of the tax code introduced by the
'oosevelt administration called The /c.erran!4erguson act.
32 The dialectic in action here is the argument about fees- the
hidden agenda, the synthesis is control.
33 The 3angers of Socialied /edicine. 5dited by Hacob 2.
:ornberger and 'ichard /. 5beling. The 4uture of 4reedom 4oundation. ));19
'andom :ills 'd., Ste 899. 4airfax, D" 009;9 IS9+ /:.$!/!!,:/:$.
3! The "ppalling Story of Ineptitude, /alfeasance, %eglect, and
"rrogance? /edicine on trial. .harles >. Inlander, Aowell S. Aevin
and 5d &einer. Prentice!:all Press. %@ )G88. IS9+ /:13:#,3#!!:/.
3# /ediacracy? "merican parties and politics in the communications
age. 6evin P. Phillips. 3ouble 3ay and .o., Inc. 2arden .ity, %@
)G*1. IS9+ /:3-#:/!.!#:#.
3$ The /edical /afia? :ow to get out of it alive and take back
your health and wealth. 2uylaine AanctPt. "vailable from P.E. >ox 00;.
/organ, DT 9181; Ph? 890!8G1!7G)7. 4ax 890!8G1!7++G. )GG1.
IS9+ /:.$!!12$:/:-
3, 'obespierre? The Doice of Dirtue. Etto H. Scott. /ason J
Aipscomb Publishers. %ew @ork )G*7. IS>% 9!88791!98;!).
3- &e the living. "yn 'and )G8G "ngelika 4ilms J video, 0)119
Exnard St N0G9, &oodland :ills ." G);+*.
3. Trashing the 5conomy. 'on "rnold and "lan 2ottlieb. 4ree
5nterprise Press. >ellevue, &" )GG7. IS9+ /:.3.#,:1:1,:;.
!/ Target the &est? Terrorism in the world today. @ossef >otansky.
)GG;. SPI >ooks. Shapolsky Publishers, Inc. );+ &. 00nd St. %ew
@ork, %@ )99)). IS9+ 1:#$1,1:2$.:-.
!1 Secret 'ecords 'evealed? The men, the money and the methods
behind the %ew &orld Erder. 3ennis Aaurence .uddy, Ph.3. :earthstone
Publishing, Atd. 199 >eacon 3r. Eklahoma .ity, E6 *;)0*. Ph?
791!*8G!;881. 899!+10!))77. 4ax 791!*8G!+190. IS9+ 1:#,##-:/31:!.
C93 than<s Dr0 Dor%an for the &er%ission to &ost this fine artice0
Exploring Issues of Philosophy, Principle and Conscience in Health Care
Back to Citizens for Better Government
Aast /odified /arch 1,