0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
6 vistas3 páginas
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL COMES NOW. ROY TURNER and MADELINE CONNOR make claim against INA for breach of a marine insurance contract. INA maintains its principal place of business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Descripción original:
Título original
TURNER et al v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA complaint
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL COMES NOW. ROY TURNER and MADELINE CONNOR make claim against INA for breach of a marine insurance contract. INA maintains its principal place of business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL COMES NOW. ROY TURNER and MADELINE CONNOR make claim against INA for breach of a marine insurance contract. INA maintains its principal place of business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
DEFENDANT, INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICAS NOTICE OF REMOVAL
COMES NOW the Defendant, INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA (INA), by and through its undersigned counsel and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332; 1441 and 1446 and hereby files its Notice of the Removal of the captioned matter from the Circuit Court of the Sixth J udicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida to this Honorable Court for the following reasons and authorities: 1. On September 2, 2014, ROY TURNER and MADELINE CONNOR (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Plaintiffs) filed their Complaint for Breach of Contract and Demand for J ury Trial in the Circuit Court of the Sixth J udicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, Florida. (See the Plaintiffs Summons and Complaint, as well as the Defendants Notice of Appearance and Motion for Enlargement of Time attached hereto as Composite Exhibit 1).
Case 8:14-cv-02411-SDM-MAP Document 1 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID 1 Case No.:
2
2. The Plaintiffs make claim against INA for breach of a marine insurance contract for physical damages sustained to their 2001 47 Silverton vessel. The subject policy provides an agreed value of $276,000.00 in the event of a total loss to the vessel, subject to a $5,520.00 deductible. 3. INA is corporation organized and existing under the laws of Pennsylvania; is a citizen of the State of Pennsylvania and maintains its principal place of business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (See Florida Department of State Division of Corporations Detail by Entity print out attached hereto as Exhibit 2). 1
4. Attached hereto as Composite Exhibit 3 is a copy of the Declarations Page and insurance policy that was issued by INA to the Plaintiffs in order to insure risks on the subject vessel. 2
5. In Paragraph 11 of their Complaint, the Plaintiffs allege that [o]n or about March 17, 2012, TURNER and CONNORs vessel and personal property situated therein which were insured pursuant to the terms and conditions as set forth in Exhibit C suffered accidental direct physical loss and damages. The Plaintiffs do not, however, plead the actual amount of damages that they are seeking in this cause. 6. On April 9, 2012, Plaintiff, MADELINE CONNOR, signed and verified a Vessel Owners or Masters Protest attesting that the estimated cost to repair the subject vessel was $300,000.00. (Exhibit 4).
1 In Paragraphs 1 and 2 of their Complaint, the Plaintiffs allege that they are citizens of the State of Florida and that INA is organized and existing under the laws of the state other than Florida. Accordingly, there is a complete diversity of citizenship between the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332. 2 For reasons which will become clearer during the discovery phase of this case, INA notes that it had inadvertently provided the Plaintiffs with the wrong policy form MA-14558a (04/05) in response to their request for insurance information. However, as noted in the Declarations Pages contained in Exhibits 1 and 3 hereto, the actual policy form that was provided to the Plaintiffs to insure risks on the subject vessel was MA-14588b (04/10). Case 8:14-cv-02411-SDM-MAP Document 1 Filed 09/24/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID 2 Case No.:
3
7. INA received an Estimating Worksheet stating that it would cost $258,893.17 to repair the subject vessel. (Exhibit 5). 8. Given that the agreed value for the subject vessel under the INA policy sued upon is $276,000.00; that Plaintiff, MADELINE CONNER, executed a document noting estimated repair cost of $300,000.00 and that INA received an estimate to repair the subject vessel in the amount of $258,893.17, it is clear that the Plaintiffs are seeking to recover an amount from INA in excess the $75,000.00 jurisdictional threshold of this Honorable Court. WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, INA respectfully submits that jurisdiction of this cause is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332 and hereby requests this Honorable Court to accept jurisdiction thereof. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing electronically filed with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ecf system this 23 rd day of September, 2014, which will send a notice of electronic filing to: Bob G. Freemon, Esq. and Ron A. Hobgood, Esq., Freemon & Miller, P.A., 8381 Gunn Highway, Tampa, Florida 33626, e-mail: Eservice@FreemonMiller.com.
MARLOW, ADLER, ABRAMS NEWMAN & LEWIS 4000 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 570 Coral Gables, Florida 33146 Tel: (305) 446-0500 Fax: (305) 446-3667 Email: bmarx@marlowadler.com
By:_/s/ Bruce R. Marx______________ BRUCE R. MARX Florida Bar No. 0914177
Case 8:14-cv-02411-SDM-MAP Document 1 Filed 09/24/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID 3