0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
34 vistas5 páginas
The world oil price is cyclic in nature, the economic viability of the oil and gas developments is often subjected to a certain risk and sometime unforeseeable. This paper briefly discussed how the use of the Light Weight Structures may reduce the overall project cost thus potentially save the project. The main point of interest will be: what are the technical challenges of the cost saving ideas, such as deviation to Codes and standard and common practices.
Descripción original:
Título original
Use of Light Weight Substructures for Oil and Gas Marginal Field Development
The world oil price is cyclic in nature, the economic viability of the oil and gas developments is often subjected to a certain risk and sometime unforeseeable. This paper briefly discussed how the use of the Light Weight Structures may reduce the overall project cost thus potentially save the project. The main point of interest will be: what are the technical challenges of the cost saving ideas, such as deviation to Codes and standard and common practices.
The world oil price is cyclic in nature, the economic viability of the oil and gas developments is often subjected to a certain risk and sometime unforeseeable. This paper briefly discussed how the use of the Light Weight Structures may reduce the overall project cost thus potentially save the project. The main point of interest will be: what are the technical challenges of the cost saving ideas, such as deviation to Codes and standard and common practices.
Proceedings of the Eleventh (2001) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
Stavanger, Norway, June 17-22, 2001
Copyright 2001 by The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers ISBN 1-880653-51-6 (SeO; ISBN 1-880653-52-4 (VoL I); ISSN 1098-6189 (SeO Use of Light Weight Substructures for Oil and Gas Marginal Field Development Wan Mahmood Wan Ab. Majid MARA Uni versi t y of Technol ogy Kual a Lumpur, Mal aysi a Mohamad Bin Embong Jacobs-Prot ek Engi neers Sdn Bhd Kual a Lumpur, Mal aysi a ABSTRACT As the world oil price is cyclic in nature, the economic viability of the oil and gas developments is often subjected to a certain risk and sometime unforeseeable. The development plans, which were economical at certain time, may no longer be true at other time, especially when the oil price hit the bottom level. Typical example of this type of development is the marginal fields, which require minimal investment and fast recovery in order to remain viable. This is due to the short life span of reservoir, minimal crude reserve and also mostly scattered in various locations. In some cases the development will be put on-hold for the next cycle or when the oil price at the peak or attractive level. Whilst the marginal filed development is commonly simple in term of process facilities, but the structures will remain complex if the design is to adopt a standard or conventional approach. The complexities of the structures are mainly dependent on several factors such as topside loads, environmental conditions, operating philosophy, soil conditions and the water depth. With the structure is relatively more complex than other facilities, the structure cost may out weighted other cost and thus put the total project cost as non-viable to proceed with the development. This paper briefly discussed how the use of the Light Weight Structures may reduce the overall project cost thus potentially save the project. The main point of interest will be: what are the technical challenges of the cost saving ideas, such as deviation to Codes and Standard and common practices, use of state of the arts computer analysis, fit for purpose principal and use of newly developed or non proven technologies. Key Words: Light Weight Structures, deviation, Cost Saving Ideas, viability. I NTRODUCTI ON Various types of Light Weight Structures had been designed and installed world wide today. Generally, these different types of structure may be classified into the following broad categories : Jacket Steel Template, Leg Driven Pile or Skirt Piles. , Free Standing Structure/Caisson. [] Braced Caisson Figure (1) to (3) illustrate a typical sample of the structures. The suitability of the type of Structure to be considered may be selected depending on the design criteria or objective. Regardless of the design criteria or types of structures, most of the weights saving ideas are normally common and applicable to all. Relocatable and Reusability Relocatable and reusability of the structure may be considered as a very important aspect of the structure. These features able to reduce total cost of ownership especially when the service life of a particular reservoir is short and the structure may be easily relocated and reused at the new site. All necessary attachments or mechanisms may be properly designed to suit the structure type in order to ease the removal of the structures later date. For relocation purpose, the designer may use generic data that is likely to be suitable for majority areas and checked for the site specific as to confirm the adequacy. 149 Paper No. 2001- JSC- 260 In some instances, the weight saving ideas may contradict to the relocatable and reusable concept. In this case, the designer and the owner shall balance between the weight savings and the importance of the features. The subsequent sections will briefly discussed the weight saving ideas, individually or a combination of them may produced a significant weight saving. Non-conventi onal Desi gn Approach Design using conventional codes and standards ensures safe and sound structures. However, various safety factors built in the code checking and conservative assumptions somehow resulting the structures are well exceeded "fit for purpose" during their entire service life. Use of state of the arts computer analysis such as finite element based program; non-linear analysis may contribute to a significant weight saving. Non-linear analysis utilised the benefit or the reserve strength in the plastic limit zone instead of elastic limit. The analysis do not check the structure in compliance to the codes and standards but will be checked for buckling or yielding and collapse behavior of the structure. This is to ensure that there is no danger of platform progressing collapse during the anticipated extreme design loading. Often this approach raise a concern on safety and reliability issues by certain parties, especially Platform Operator. Hazard scenarios and effect to the platform shall be investigated to weigh the acceptable risk taken. This approach requires an ordered and systematic approach by experience designers who can interpret the result accurately and to be reviewed by specialist third party. Codes and Standards Selective deviation to the codes and standards or recommended practices, if properly rationalized based on its real needs may results in considerable weight saving while maintaining the integrity of the structures. Some typical examples where the codes and standards may be rationalized: Relax slenderness ratio limitation to 180 instead 120. Most of the members are governed by slenderness ratio limitation not stress level. By increasing slenderness ratio, considerable saving may be achieved. However members has to be designed and checked for stresses, fatigue and vortex shedding due to current. API RP 2A joint check caps the yield stress to 2/3 of tensile (Fyc, clause 4.1). The JIP "assessment criteria, reliability and reserve strength tubular joints" by MSL, UK recommended this could be relaxed to 0.8. Use of 3D CAD Use of 3D-CAD model often help the designer in the design process to monitor and ensure the cost and weight saving ideas implemented are practical and do not contribute to unacceptable safety risks. The model may be developed to identify clashes, fabrication and installation related problem and operational constraints at the early stage of the design. Continuing use of 3D CAD in fabrication may result in considerable saving, i.e. less re-work, shorter schedule, reduce surplus and wastage. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Design concept and approach is remains as the important factors in determining the final result, which is meeting the design objective; i.e. Light Weight Structure. The subsequent sections briefly discussed some of the design approach or concept, which may be considered in designing Light Weight Structures. Use of Fy 450 vs Fy 350 MPa steel Use of Extra High strength steel (450 MPa) could contribute the significant weight saving, provided that the components are not governed by buckling (slenderness ratio), fatigue or deflection. The cost penalty is approximately 10% of High Strength Steel (350 MPa). However this is normally out weighted by the benefits of weight, weld and fabrication saving. Use of GRP or Al umi num Some of the component of the structures, especially non-load bearing may adopt to use GRP or Aluminum instead of carbon steel. Typical example is using of GRP/Aluminium gratings for jacket walkway, thus eliminating maintenance. However GRP may deteriorate in UV unless is properly UV protected. Mudmat, which is served as a temporary foundation prior to the piling may adopt to use aluminum. This will provide a lighter structure and reduce cathodic protection requirement for the structures. Estimated saving of 30kg/m ^2 when using aluminum and fabrication saving, also avoiding re-galvanising after cutting, banding etc. Internal ring stiffener Internal Ring stiffeners to strengthen joints are much more expensive than increasing can sizes, provided PWHT can be avoided. Casti ng Joints Use of casting joints may improve fatigue and weight, however since the joints has to be specially tailored, it will become long lead items and expensive compares to normal joints. 150 Paper No . 2001-JSC-260 Overlapped Joints Although overlapped joints marginally stronger than simple joints, simple tubular joints with gaps are much easier to fabricate and cost effective. Overlapped joints often complicate underwater inspection during the service life; thus it is not advisable to adopt the use of overlapped joints. Cathodic Protection The structure, which is submerged underwater, needs a protection against corrosion. Providing sufficient anodes will ensure there is no corrosion will take place in the structure during the service life. However, often anodes are designed with safety factor by increase of design life by double. The designed of anode to a specific operational life without safety factor or minimal contingency may contribute to a significant weight and cost saving. The anodes may be replaced or renewed prior to reuse of the structures. Thermal Sprayed Al umi num Coating The structures in the splash zone, normally defined in the range of (+) 4m above and below sea water level are subject to heavy corrosions. Normal practice is to provided a splash zone coating and at the same time to provide a corrosion allowance up to 12mm. This allowance provides no structural strength but contribute to a significant weight penalty. Use of thermal sprayed al umi num coating at splash zone may avoid the corrosion allowance or to an absolute minimum. Top of Jacket Outside Splash Zone. Avoiding placing the structure framing in the splash zone provides an alternative solution to the corrosion allowance; i.e. top of jacket framing above splash zone However the weight penalty due to the higher structure has to be balanced with the saving from the corrosion allowance. Using of this device may reduce wave and current loading due to the existence of marine growth. However the maintenance and performance of the devices always a concern by operators or owner. Jacket Template Structure, Use of Skirt Piles vs. Leg Driven Piles Use of Leg driven pile with grout connection may reduce natural period and possibility of reducing leg joint can thickness. Improve boat impact and fatigue performance. However this will hamper a useful feature, relocatable. Some of the advantage of using skirt piles are: Weight saving on piles above mudline. Leg sizes are independent of pile diameter which is a function of soil parameters and penetration limitation. May optimised leg sizes to resist service load only. These advantages are normally out weighted the disadvantages in achieving the objectives, i.e. light weight structures and relocatable feature. Typical example of disadvantages of adopting skirt piles are as fol l ows: [] Requires chaser pile. Pile driving needs extra precautions against pile buckling due to a long stick-up. [] Grouting operations for skirt pile. [] Jacket levelling needs underwater gripper or suitable devices, i.e. padeyes. Relatively difficult operations, underwater However, the above can easily be resolved or minimised the risk with appropriate design and installation measures as follows: Underwater hammer or conventional hammer together with chaser pile may be use to overcome pile driving problem. [] Appropriately designed and checked the chaser for buckling and installation measures may be provided, i.e. piles guides, etc. [] Grouting operations is minimal compares to the total installation time. [] Levelling mechani sm or padeyes near mudline can be designed and provided for jacket levelling purpose. [] Specific requirement of offshore installation contractor may be incorporated at the early stages of the design. Use of Surplus Materials Make use of surplus materials may contribute a significant cost saving. However, this may contribute to weight penalty and design constraint due to the limited sizes available and thus hamper the design objective; Light Weight Structure. Use of Marine Growth Removal Device Several devices are available where it continuously remove the marine growth to the structure by the action of wave and current forces. APPURTENANCES For the small structure, the weight of the appurtenances or secondary structures would contribute to the significant weight of the structure. The importance of these items may be rationalized to a bare mi ni mum required for safe operations. Some of the typical sample of the items are discussed in the following : Use of top of jacket elevation as sump pump deck Instead of designing an additional intermediate level, sump pump deck to use the top of j acket elevation. 151 Pa pe r No. 2 0 0 1 - J SC- 2 6 0 Eliminate top of jacket perimeter wal kway and handrailing. Eliminating top of j acket wal kway and handrailing. This will reduce wave loading on the j acket and maintenance costs. However, if nodes inspection is required or possible access to clamps, scaffolding is to be erected. Eliminate staircase Adopt vertical (GRP) ladder or eliminate stairways altogether. Provide access to water line through escape chute. Minimal one staircase to be provided from deck to the jacket walkway/boatlanding. Eliminate sump caisson Consider use of drain vessel hung underneath deck. Reduce wave loading to the substructure. Process consideration is required to justify the suitability of the scheme. Eliminate riser guard Reduced the cost of riser guard, maintenance and reduce wave load. Safety cases may confirmed the risk associated with this approach. SUMMARY The Light Weight Structure is considered met its ultimate objective i f weight saving idea or combination of ideas contribute to a significant weight reduction while maintaining its safe operations. "Fit for Purpose" design shall be considered as main criteria in designing light weight structures. One possibility to further maximise cost saving is to plan the installation of the structure to be coinciding with the available barges or rigs for other activities at nearby site, such as drilling, pipe laying and maintenance works. These barges and jack-up drilling rigs are normally equipped with a lifting crane with a limited capacity in the range of 300 to 500 tonnes, which may be used sufficient to install Light Weight Structure. OPERATI ONAL CONDI TI ON Relax the environmental from 1 year to 1 month due to short operational life. Saving on pile and jacket. Requires operating philosophy change. I NSTALLATI ON Two hook upending Eliminate floatation phase, closure diaphragm, buoyancy and flooding system. OIC liaison Early discussion with Offshore Installation Contractor on load- out/floatation and installation may contribute to more effective weight saving ideas. Loadout by lifting Consider loadout by lifting instead of skidding. Eliminate jacket to be designed for loss of support to simulate skidding and bridging or limit the deflection of the loss of support. Eliminate loadout steel frame however crane requires to be mobilised to the yard. 152 Pa pe r No. 2 0 0 1 - J SC- 2 6 0 Ref erence [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ s ] American Petroleum Institute - API RP 2A American Institute Steel Construction Structural Analysis Computer System Manual (SACS), Engineering Dynamic Inc. 1999 Worldwide Survey of Minimal Offshore Fixed Platform & Decks for Marginal Fields, January, 1999. The JIP "assessment criteria, reliability and reserve strength tubular joints" by MSL, UK Figure (2) Typical sample- Free Standing Structure/Caisson Figure (1) Typical Sample- Jacket Steel Template Structure- 2D Figure (3) Typical Sample-Braced Caisson 153