0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
21 vistas14 páginas
In dreams, imagination, and art the Self is often represented by means of a figure with four sides (i.e. Cross or square) or a circle. The main function of the Self archetype is to restore the psychic balance in the individual or in the community. In people with fragile psyches like psychotics, for instance, it's not rare to see them talking in mythological language.
In dreams, imagination, and art the Self is often represented by means of a figure with four sides (i.e. Cross or square) or a circle. The main function of the Self archetype is to restore the psychic balance in the individual or in the community. In people with fragile psyches like psychotics, for instance, it's not rare to see them talking in mythological language.
In dreams, imagination, and art the Self is often represented by means of a figure with four sides (i.e. Cross or square) or a circle. The main function of the Self archetype is to restore the psychic balance in the individual or in the community. In people with fragile psyches like psychotics, for instance, it's not rare to see them talking in mythological language.
I cannot invite you yet to dinner in a nice restaurant so I write you a
good Jungian analysis. In this email, I make a brief analysis from a psychological perspective about what its going on with ISIS. In order to understand this phenomenon at its root level, we need to employ analytical psychology. This school of psychology says that humans share a collective unconscious, which is filled of primordial images or archetypes and these manifest themselves by means of symbols that appears in dreams or imagination. These primordial images carry a great amount of emotional charge that is released when one of these archetypes is constellated. The most important and powerful archetype is the God archetype, also called the Self. In dreams, imagination, and art the Self is often represented by means of a figure with four sides (i.e. cross or square) or a circle. The Christian Cross, the Buddhist Svastica, the Ying and Yang, the Nanji or the mandalas are some symbols of the Self. The images below convey this idea. Later, you will see why this is important in order to understand ISIS and how it makes sense; bear with me for now.
In the art pictures above, we have seen the Self represented in the art of two different cultures by means of a circle. The main function of the Self archetype is to restore the psychic balance in the individual or in the community. In the image below we can see a mandala drawn by a 7 year- old while she was in psychotherapy. This draw indicates the beginning of psychological stability and recovery.
All the archetypes have implicit two opposite sides. For instance, the religious idea that there is a heaven but also a hell expresses this dual nature of the archetype Self. The reestablishment of the psychological balance of an individual or a community begins after the conscious integration of the two archetypal opposites within archetype; however, this doesnt happen without going through an ordeal and experiencing a good amount of pain. At the individual level, in people with fragile psyches like psychotics, for instance, its not rare to see them talking in mythological language. This happens because psychotics have a very vulnerable ego incapable of differentiating and integrating unconscious contents and they are carried away by the powerful emotional charge of the archetypes coming from the collective unconscious. A very similar effect happens in vulnerable communities or countries that are behind in terms of human evolution and that have been abused, or disrupted their collective psychic balance, like Iraq. The people in these communities do not have enough psychological evolution to separate God from the State; they are theocratic societies, for they collectively live and project the archetype Self or God as a collective external reality. The Svastica Nazi is another perfect example of the constellation of the Self at the collective level. Here we have a symmetrical shape with four sides (quaternio) surrounded by a circle. Notice that the difference between the Buddhist swastika (picture below on the left) and the Nazi swastika (right) lies on the direction of the rotation; while the Nazi symbol rotates clock wise, the Buddhist swastika rotates counter clockwise. Rotation to the right could mean directing energies from the unconscious to the consciousness, which leads to living the symbol fanatically. Counter clockwise directs the energy from the consciousness to the unconscious, which leads to meditation and introspection. The 45 angle inclination in the Nazi symbol could be significant also. It expresses two pair of opposites. One opposition marks verticality; the other, horizontality. The idea of expressing the four directions symbolizes totality. The Christian cross expresses this same idea, and we can see this idea in the Buddhist swastika also with flower-shape form pointing the the four directions. Probably, Hitler, who draw himself the design of this symbol, had in mind to create a political party that substitutes a religion.
l.
In the early 1930s when Germany was immersed in a profound socioeconomic crisis brought by Versalles treatys sanctions and the Great Depression, Hitlers fanatic movement appeared. The Nazi movement was successful at first in reducing its great unemployment rate and lifting the country, but fanaticism took place at the collective level. Notice how these archetypal energies represented by the same symbol are also coming back to Western Ukraine with the Maidans Neonazi movement. It seems that these archetypal energies affect the collective psyche of nations or communities more intensively in periods of systemic crises. People loses their faith when they see that the system is not working. In the image below, we can see the collective projection of the Self in two different ways. The image on the Self represents a community with a lower psychological evolution (Iraq), in which the Self is projected collectively on a religion. The image of the right represents a secular society (most Western societies). The Western man has a degraded projection of the Self archetype into ideologies, so it can be said that political ideologies are low-content God projections. The less fanatic a person is in his/her political ideology or religion, the more individualized that person is.
Now lets take a look at ISISs flag because its very self-revealing. Again, we can see the symbol of the Self (round circle) in white color and surrounded by black. The contrast in colors between black and white represents the two extremes implicit on the archetype. This contrast also can be understood as radical fanaticism. The Arabic words "Bqiyah wa- Tatamaddad" means in English language remaining and expanding. The motto of the ISIS flag is truly worrisome. Psychologically speaking, the Self symbol expresses the need for psychic integration and healing for that community . ISIS will exist as long as each one of its members does not become aware that he/she has been abducted by archetypal energies and do psychological work to recover his/her individuality. Economic difficulties brought by this profound crisis may be also factor for the vulnerable European muslin practitioner that could feel marginalized by this troubled economic system. Nonetheless, we must not forget how this terrorist group problem was created: the Western world has greatly abused these people with the Iraq war. A British ex-Jihadist talks for RT in an interview (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrVFflAAM8c ) and he said something very important about the ISIS members for us to understand. He said that these people have no respect for human life. This lack of respect of human life reflects how much these people are being influenced and abducted by the power of archetypal energies. But he also said that ISIS members feel that their religious beliefs are threatened by the Western world. The fact that the image of the Self is in white color, which symbolizes conscious awareness, surrounded by black (shadow, unconscious or unknown) could express this awareness of being completely surrounded by a threat; the threat being the Western world in this case. The US or the NATO do not help by invading and bullying an underdeveloped country, destroying all its structures (political, economical and social) and killing hundred of thousands of people, and pretend that nothing has happened. The Western worldor the Western leaderslike to use double standards and to abuse underdeveloped people. When ISIS kills, it is called brutality. But when Israel, the US or NATO kills underdeveloped people by the thousands, then its okay and most Western media is deaf-mute about it. Now the Western world have a very difficult problem that they dont know yet how to solve it. Each country or community have a different pace of development. Its destructive and negligent to impose or to force the modern Western democracy upon underdeveloped countries with the dark desire of controlling or benefiting from their natural resources. Otherwise, fanatic groups like ISIS will reappear.
Analytical psychology is very rich in theories and nuances. Some of the concepts I have mentioned are quite controversial and not easy to prove from an empirical standpoint. For instance, the idea of the collective unconscious is hard to define in a precise manner, and I have some doubts myself about this concept. I have tried to synthesize just enough concepts to make some sense. I hope you have enjoyed this email. Even though modern societies have very effective repressive measures to neutralize revolutions or generalized violence, we are living in a very exciting but extremely dangerous transitional moment. The word "crisis" comes from the Greek word Krinein meaning to separate or to decide. The crisis of political ideologies, generalized corruption, moral decay, impoverishment are problems in the present but that comes from old structures in past. We are not only transitioning a change in the economic model but also the change of an Aion. The need for the establishment of new ethics is imperative for this time. If you have enjoyed this email, I may write you in the future another email with a short analysis of this historical moment from a multidisciplinary perspective.