0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
29 vistas9 páginas
Ed husain: I was asked to help promote an upcoming event on the future of Gaza and Israel. He says the final lineup didn't include a speaker I respect, but did include an anchor I didn't know. This person is a pariah for espousing what most people define as anti-Jewish hate speech, he says. Husaein: i'd rather align myself with those who argue facts and morality against aparthei
Ed husain: I was asked to help promote an upcoming event on the future of Gaza and Israel. He says the final lineup didn't include a speaker I respect, but did include an anchor I didn't know. This person is a pariah for espousing what most people define as anti-Jewish hate speech, he says. Husaein: i'd rather align myself with those who argue facts and morality against aparthei
Ed husain: I was asked to help promote an upcoming event on the future of Gaza and Israel. He says the final lineup didn't include a speaker I respect, but did include an anchor I didn't know. This person is a pariah for espousing what most people define as anti-Jewish hate speech, he says. Husaein: i'd rather align myself with those who argue facts and morality against aparthei
was recently asked to help promote an upcoming event to bring an international group of speakers to Seattle on the future of Gaza and Israel. I was interested because It was to include someoneI already read and respect. The final lineup presented to me didn't include the speaker I respect, but did include an anchor I wasn't familiar with. It wasn't until I read some of his work and followed the contextual clues that another picture emerged. I searched his name and the overwhelming response is - this person is a pariah for espousing what most people define as anti-Jewish hate speech by both Palestinians and Jews. I guess it must be bad when a list of scholars signs on to a letter condemning your positions as bigoted. In this case Im willing to trust the wisdom of an entire network of people over that of an individual. (cf: http://is.gd/eciged)
This underscores a common sense equation: If you're Palestinian, and white supremacists approach you to join together to condemn Jews, youd likely say no, because you recognize that hate is the larger enemy. If I condemn what can only be described as racism and apartheid as it exists in Israel today, Im not condemning the race or religion-Im condemning the actions and behaviors that have hurt so many. I can work for an end to the current madness of apartheid, but it would be hypocritical on my part to repeat the same behavior that I condemn in others.
Because I did some basic research I changed my mind and will not be helping these particular people host this particular event. I didnt have an investment in their outcome. Anyone with the most general knowledge of the players in this dialog can figure out who I mean. Id rather align myself with those who argue facts and the morality against apartheid than make a fool of myself by showing my naivete.This was something I had to decide for myself - its not something I can let another decide for me without forfeiting my integrity.
There are a great many Jews who would end the apartheid and racism as it exists in Israel today. Though Seattle is a home to many progressive Jews, as an outsider, I hear Palestinians who feel that progressive Jews can be just as complicit in the politics of settlements and in the endemic prejudice. Im not saying I have all the answers - I think my role is one of trying to appeal to reason and ethics in bringing about change in my own country. I dont have to go all the way back to Viktor Frankl to appeal to ethos, either - many modern Jews would set things right. But it requires Jews to practice the same enumeration of the realities of the injustice, then and now, just as we as Americans must come to grips with the reality of injustice afforded to Native Americans and persons of color right now in order to bring about justice. Lots of people think we became a color-blind society a long time ago, and theyre in denial if you try to convince them otherwise. Most Americans are also in denial that the events in Gaza this summer clearly crossed the line into genocidal actions on the part of Israel.
So to the people coordinating this event without me: Believe what you want to believe. The 51 days of hell in Gaza should not go unchallenged. The ICC is one venue, The court of public opinion is another, and Palestinian resistance continues. Ive been involved in a few actions in my life: The civil rights movement, the antiwar movement, standing against genocide in Central America...even before the 51 days in Gaza this summer, I got involved in the issues of Palestinian statehood and Israeli apartheid. As an American, my solution lies in convincing my government and my countrymen to stop sending bombs to Israel and to start taking actions to reverse the current war dynamic.
Just as in the US, Palestinians live in a time in which grossly unequal access to capital and resources determines who is fabulously wealthy and who lives in desperate poverty. However, the problems in Gaza and the West Bank and Jerusalem make US problems pale in comparison. Imagine if in the US that minority political leaders were imprisoned for simply being the opposition. This and much worse occurs every day in Israel, and the US keeps giving foreign and military aid to a country that uses the resources to practice real apartheid. Few US politicians are willing to acknowledge how severe this situation is, but just like 25 years ago in South Africa, these unjust laws are causing massive social problems for Palestinians - but also for Israelis, who have internalized the massive injustice and endemic racism in a manner that cannot be easily undone.
These failures exist in other places in the world, but rarely in countries the US considers democracies. All too often the problem lies in a group who thinks they are more entitled to allocate wealth than other groups. This most often negatively affects the indigenous population. Our history of colonialism underscores this elitism that can often go hand in hand with militarism. The end effect is a concentration of wealth and political power. The same dynamics that gave us Ferguson and Wounded Knee are not so different from Gaza. The solutions are the same: Demilitarize. Distribute wealth more equally. And allow local autonomy to be more than a charade that covers up a corrupt political process ruled by a few.
We cant get to this awakening without breaking the status quo. Some situations call for civil disobedience. The boycott divestment sanctions movement is also part of the solution. But much of this transformation will have to happen on an individual level - convincing people we might not otherwise engage with to start thinking differently. This is when we need the wisdom of the whole world. Vandana Shiva reminds us that we must turn toward the innate knowledge of seed and nature and turn away from the false science of the corporatists who would define truth in self-serving terms. Our world needs more than simply one day a year to celebrate indigenous peoples - the task is no less than reinventing knowledge to serve people everywhere. I dont think technical education in math and science is going to get us there either.
We have to have this dialog on race and culture and ethos now, everywhere, or were finished as a species. Just as we nearly extinguished ourselves with nuclear weaponry at the height of the cold war, this militarism is destroying the fabric of every society it touches. We must confront the governments of the world who would rule by absolute force of power to disarm and bring about the end of this dominionism. We cannot say we stand for democracy if we support murderous governments in Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, or even Israel. Our national interests do not trump basic human rights. We cannot simply interpret the rule of law and international treaties to mean whatever we want them to mean. We have to stand for something-or well fall for anything. Neal Wells, September 1, 2014, Rose Hill, WA