Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
N
,where B=[Matrix ]and
N=[N
(0)
(2),N
(0)
(3),...,N
(0)
(N)]
T
(3)
(0)
(N+1) = [s
(0)
(1) b/a]e
-aN
x (1 e
a
) (4)
and so the predictive RSS =
(0)
(N+1). In a typical heterogeneous network environment, it is possible to specify
constant with values different from the characteristics of certain network type.
2.2 Evaluation of Vertical Handover Decision
The quantitative evaluation of handover decision (QDV) has become necessary when three metrics are considered
to be integrated. For the handover decision to be optimized, weight of every metric of a candidate of the present
network has to be adjusted to conform to the relative priority of other attributes in different networks. This will show
that the weights dynamically represent the importance and relationships of the constantly changing qualitative
evaluations under predictable wireless environment thereby raising the dominant-difference among candidate
networks.
N
i
RSS
RSS
QDV
N
QDV
1
) 1 (
1
(5)
2
1
) (
1
1
RSS
N
i
RSS
i
RSS
QDV QDV
N
(6)
QDV
RSS
- average QDV of RSS. The smaller the value, the more significant is the RSS factor and the bigger the
assigned weight of RSS.
RSS
- Standard deviation of QDV of RSS., the larger weight of RSS is assigned, the larger will be the
RSS
.
Therefore, the key factor of RSS is;
RSS
= )
(
RSS
i
QDV
e
RSS
(7)
118 Abubakar M. Miyim et al. / Procedia Technology 11 ( 2013 ) 114 121
3. The Proposed Prediction Technique (DRIMA)
The proposed prediction algorithm comprises of network QoS monitoring, which decides the possibility of
handover triggering and network selection to choose the appropriate access network. It is a fact that handover trigger
is associated with both the measured and the predicted RSS, whereas network selection is tied to user preference.
This makes the types of service application (real and non-real time) to be in agreement with period of RSS
measurements. In Figure 1, when a UE happens to be in 3GPP network, the Predictive RSS (PRSS) assist the UE
determine if it is moving toward the target network during response time by comparing the PRSS with the
maximum threshold (RSSmax_th_WL/WM). When a UE stays in LTE-A/WiMAX, it begins to sense if the RSS of the
current serving network is less than the minimum threshold (RSSmin_th_WL/WM). Both the upper and lower levels of
the computed response time tend to be short for real time applications. This was possible for the handover delay to
be minimized; otherwise it will take longer time for non-real applications. Thereafter, the UE cross check to
determine how strong the PRSS of every target network is when compared to the maximum threshold
(RSSmax_th_WL/WM). However, when their merit values surpass the current serving network, the target networks
become candidates to be handed over.
DRIMA model is based on mathematical statistics and random process, which exert the current value and the
historical value of the time series to predict the future value. The model draws on the advantages of differential
regression analysis and consider the prediction errors in calculation process, giving it a smaller prediction error
variance and suitable for short term prediction. User equipment (UE) periodically scans the signal frame from the
RBS to get the RSS and then computes the parameters of the DRIMA model according to the obtained RSS making
possible the prediction of the next RSS for the link layer triggering event. During the process of prediction, the
mechanism is not only considered for the dependence of signal power value on time series, but also considered as
prediction error thereby making the accuracy of predicted signal high. Based on this idea, the moment parameters of
the link layer achieve a pre-set threshold, a messages is sent to activate the network layer handover. However, as the
threshold is significantly small, the efficiency of the handover is reduced causing ping-pong with large threshold.
The algorithm is based on the predicted RSS value, which could set a smaller threshold whenever the predicted
value is smaller than the threshold of the link layer triggering which might lead to being activated. So handover is
performed before RSS becomes weak to avoid ping-pong as depicted in the flow chart of Figre 3.
119 Abubakar M. Miyim et al. / Procedia Technology 11 ( 2013 ) 114 121
Fig. 2. Flow chart of Proposed Intelligent Handover Mechanism from WiMAX to LTE-A
4. Simulation
4.1 Simulation Parameters
Two overlapping network technologies (IEEE802.16 and 3GPP) depict the simulation scenario as shown in
Figure 1. The hexagon represents LTE-A network, while the circles are WiMAX network topologies. The route
from Location A to Location B shows the trajectory of a moving UE which is assumed to follow a certain pattern as
demonstrated in the Figure, where the simulation parameters of the mobile user are given in the table 1.
Channel propagation model used is given as
RSS(d)[dBm] = P
t
[dBm] PL(d)[dBm], P
t
transmitting power and PL Free space path loss of the link
Table 1 Simulation parameters and scenario definition for channel characteristics
Parameter 3GPP WiMAX
Cell Radius (m) 600 100
Transmit Power (Watts) 1 0.001
RSS_min_Th [dBm]
RSS_max_Th [dBm]
MS speed [m/s]
Frequency band [GHz]
Simulation duration [s]
-100
-80
10
2.6
100
-102
-84
10
2.4
100
Fading () 4
120 Abubakar M. Miyim et al. / Procedia Technology 11 ( 2013 ) 114 121
4.2 Results and Analysis
Figure 3 displays the movement of UE in the overlayed network, where the changing curves of current RSSs from
RBS and APs varies with the changing location of UE. It can be figured out that the position of AP is almost at the
midpoint of the simulation time, but might not necessary be the midpoint of the distance between the RBS and AP
as shown; rather AP could be nearer the RBS than to the AP. Therefore in the first handover procedure, the
condition of the network for UE outperforms that of the second handover. That is to say that the performance
evaluation of the networks in the first handover looks bigger than that of the second handover. Figure 4 shows the
locations where handovers occur are shown in. It illustrates the proposed algorithm can execute accurate handovers
and eliminate the ping-pong effect.
Fig. 3. Predicted RSS Curve of UE in two different networks (WiMAX & LTE-A)
Fig. 4 . Results of Vertical Handover Decisions as UE roam the Networks
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
-105
-100
-95
-90
-85
-80
-75
Time(s)
R
S
S
(
d
B
m
)
The Received Signal Strength of Two Networks
LTE
Wimax
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Time(s)
M
a
r
k
o
f
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
LTE
Wimax
State of UE in LTE and Wimax Network
121 Abubakar M. Miyim et al. / Procedia Technology 11 ( 2013 ) 114 121
The UE seems to hold on for almost 40s in the LTE-A network before handing over to the first WiMAX network
which took less than 10s to stay in it. In the second handover between the LTE-A and the second WiMAX, the
period UE stays a little bit less than the first handover (about 20s) before the RSS drops and eventually changing to
the LTE-A network again.
5. Conclusion
An intelligent vertical handover algorithm in heterogeneous wireless networks has been presented. The
proposed handover scheme takes into cognisance velocity, current RSS and predicted RSS of candidate networks as
the network parameters. The algorithm adopts predictive RSS, capable of triggering a handover in advance. For the
network to accurately trigger handover and filter out the unnecessary data, a pre-decision process is applied before
the handover decision module. The novel algorithm can save time and identify the best candidate network among
them, the results of which show that the new technique provides good ground to minimize ping-pong in
heterogeneous network which can be executed intelligently to decide the dynamism of the network conditions.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial contributions from UKM Grant: DPP-2013-006 for the funding
and support given to the publication of the research work in this conference.
References
[1] Lu, L., Wu, J. C. Handoff Prediction by Mobility Characteristics in Wireless Broadband Networks. Proceedings of the 6
th
IEEE International
Symposium on a world of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM)05. 2005.
[2] Zdenek B. Efficiency of Handover Prediction Based on Handover History. Journal of Convergence Information Technology Vol. 4, No. 4.
2009. p.41-47.
[3] Dionysia Triantafyllopoulou, Nikos Passas and Alexandros Kaoxylos. Integration of Handover in a Cross-Layer Mechanism for Mobile
Multimedia Systems, Proceedings of IEEE Communications society. 2009.
[4] Xiaoyu Cheng and Duyan Bi, Real-Time Adaptive Link Layer Trigger Based Cross Layer Fast Handoff Mechanism in IEEE802.11 WLANs
Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, 2009. p. 443-447.
[5] Liu Xia, Ling-ge Jiang and Chen He., A Novel Fuzzy Logic Vertical Handoff Algorithm with Aid of Differential Prediction and Pre-
Decision Method, Proceedings of IEEE Communications Society(ICC 2007; 2007. p. 5665-5670
[6] Sunisa Kunarak and Raungrong Suleesathira. Predictive RSS with Fuzzy Logic Based Vertical Handoff Algorithm in Heterogeneous
Wireless networks, Proceedings of International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies; 2010. p. 1235-1240
[7] Liu Xia, Jiang Ling-ge, Chen He and Liao Hong-Wei., An Intelligent Vertical Handoff Algorithm in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks,
Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Network and Signal Processing; 2008. p. 550-555
[8] Miyim, A. M., Mahamod Ismail and Rosdiadee Nordin. Prioritized Network-Based Handover Decision in Multi-Access Wireless
Networks, Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications; 2012. p. 828-833
[9] Tae-Hyong Kim, Qiping Yang, Jae-Hyoung Lee,Soon-Gi Park and Yeon-Seung Shin. A Mobility Management Technique with Simple
Handover Prediction for 3G LTE Systems, Proceedings of 66th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference; 2007. p. 259-263
[10] SuKyoung Lee, Kotikalapudi Sriram, Kyungsoo Kim, Yoon Hyuk Kim and Nada Golmie, , Vertical Handoff Decision Algorithms for
Providing Optimized Performance in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 58, No. 2,
February 2009. p. 865-881.