DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT Each cluster, consisting of a wholesale town, a group of smaller market towns which relate to it, and the barrios that are served by each market town, comprises a watershed district with a habitat and a communal hierarchy evolved over many years. In that sense, it is natural organization. It is also the unit, which is almost meaningful for the management of the development process. This for several reasons: 1. The different microhabitats provide a variation of resources that permit internal specialization and diversification. WHAT IS THE WATERSHED DISTRICT? BACKGROUND In classical economics, the ultimate unit of analysis is the business firm and the individual person. The concept of the firm produci ng a homogenous product makes it possible to elaborate the whole elegant s t r uc t ur e of pr oduc t i on schedules, cost curves, supply curves and supply prices. The concept of the utility-maximizing individual enables us to derive the corresponding demand curves and demand prices, whi ch together determi ne market prices. The par adi gm under l i es devel opment economi cs. Business enterprise has become the pri mary uni t of the development process and the exemplar for all development p r o j e c t s . De v e l o p me n t management has become i denti fi ed wi th enterpri se management. In the real world t hen, t he pr ot ot ype of development is the displacement of the natural community with the company town with the logging, the mining town, or the sugar district. These past modalities of development have not had the desired impact on reducing poverty and providing adequate livelihood for the greater proportions of the population both in the rural areas and in the small towns and in the larger urban centers. With no mor e r esour ce f r ont i er avai l abl e to absorb the population, the deepening poverty has caused serious damage to the nati on' s envi ronment and natural resources. There is a massive pressure to emigrate or to take up arms and join the rebel forces in the mountains. Reforms are required as much to solve these problems as to provide a domestic market base for industrial development. attain goals of increasing agricultural productivity and real incomes for the farmers, a n d g e n e r a t i n g complementary, interlinked, profitably interesting agro- i n d u s t r i a l b u s i n e s s opportunities for the farmers and non-tilling land-owners. It is also a scheme for integrating government and private sector projects in the field where they are designed and phased to become mutually rei nf orci ng. The ECSOM therefore is a potent local resource management system that provides a way by which projects, that singly might not be s e l f - l i qui da t i ng, i n combination are placed in a cost-recovery mode. PURPOSE T h e E c o s y s t e m- b a s e d Community-centred Sustainable Development Organization and Management (ECSOM) i s proposed as the appropriate field organization and management system at the sub-provincial level (using a Watershed District as the unit of production, accounti ng, pl anni ng and analysis) for the implementation of government programs to 2. The population is large enough to achieve some scale economies and to stimulate internal trade. There should be anywhere from 200,000 to 300,000 people in each of the districts. 3. At the same time, it is good organization to balance within the same economic organization the communities that have a stake in resources, which are ecologically symbiotic: e.g. river valleys, brackish water foreshore areas and upland watersheds. LUBANG LOOC PALUAN MAMBURAO STA. CRUZ SABLAYAN CALINTAAN RIZAL SAN JOSE MAGSAYSAY ABRA DE ILOG ECSOM We must view each of these watershed districts as if it were a country since even in classical economics, one integrates at the l evel of the country. The implications are: 1. You define the constituency of each district a notion of district citizenship, and even barrio and town domiciliaries. The citizens at each level have primacy at that level in the benefits from the resources of the community at that level. 2. You establish a principle of subsidiarity. You want maximum self-reliance at each lowest level of community and look to the next level when there are clear economic advantages from the trade-off (terms of trade). 3. You optimize the use of social overhead cost at each level of community. This is somewhat revolutionary and gives you results that are quite different from opti mi zi ng overhead on an enterprise basis. It also means an industry development that is driven by buying rather than selling economics. You do not spawn a chicken growing industry from the need to develop captive markets for a large feed mill. You spawn feed mills from the need of chicken growers to source feed at a lower cost. You reduce the cost of sugar cane growing by spreading farm overhead costs over multiple crops through intensive use of the land; rather than by reducing labor and overhead costs per unit through extensive cultivation and mechanization. 4. This mode of thinking has nothing to do with the polemic between private or free enterprise and socialism. The system does not pose private against state or free agai nst pl anned. It poses community against enterprise as the DOMINANT mode of organizing economic life. It does not eliminate enterprise. It merely views enterprises as being subordinate to community. You don't want towns that are owned by companies. You want companies that are owned by townspeople. In other words you don't want company towns. You do want community companies. 5. This mode does not forswear markets. It views communities as free bargaining agents in a system of free markets. You introduce somewhere between self-seeking individual interests and an obscure national interest, a more clearly perceived and explicitly articulated communal interest in the economic use of natural and capital resources. It is important to define a communal tenure over resources in which there is communal as opposed to merely individual interests lake and ri vers, foreshore and nearshore areas, forest stands on watersheds. Communities enter i nt o al l i ances wi t h ot her communi t i es f or common interest joint vent ur es i n p r o c e s s i n g plants, in water management pr oj ect s, i n transport and communication syst ems, i n m a r k e t i n g facilities. 6. Finally this m o d e o f thi nki ng wi l l r e c o n s t r u c t s o c i a l accounting on a totally different b a s i s . C o mmu n i t y balance sheets that measure community net worth, communi ty i ncome statements that measure current p r o d u c t i o n a n d i n c o me generating transactions become a true measure of community welfare. National accounts that are consolidations of community accounts will measure national welfare the way current GNP accounts do not. UNITS/ SUB-UNITS WITHIN THE WATERSHED DISTRICT The smallest unit of organization and management (and the basic unit of production and analysis) is the Househol d. From the Household, the successively larger units of organization and management ( up t o t he Watershed District) are: HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTION TEAM (FOR RURAL) NEIGHBORHOOD (FOR URBAN) PRODUCTION NETWORK (FOR RURAL) NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORK (FOR URBAN) MARKET DISTRICT ECONOMIC DISTRICT UNITS/ SUB-UNITS BEYOND THE ECONOMIC DISTRICT From the Watershed District, the successively larger units of organization and management (up to the country as an organization/ management unit) are: WATERSHED DISTRICT PROVINCE REGION AREA COUNTRY Each def i ned organi zati on/ management unit would have its c or r es pondi ng manager i al positions and span of control. All these defined managerial positions actually exist and their functions are being performed. However, the perspective is line management, the management technology being utilized is enterprise-based and the management is politically driven rather than through norms of effective/ efficient management. The first organizational levels from the household are the Production Teams in which the management pyramid stands. In the rural areas, groups of households traditionally band together to perform tasks (related to primary production) that are more efficiently/ effectively undertaken by a group rather than by an individual household (e.g. alayon in Cebu, etc.). These groupings have evolved over time and have a natural leader. This is what makes up the Production Team (on the average composed of 20 households). A group of Production Teams (who relates to each other more than with other Production Teams) would form a Production Network (a group of about 7 Production Teams) A group of Production Networks (about 22) relate to the poblacion of a market town and form a Market District. Market Districts (about 4 to 5) form a Watershed District. The additional positions, defined specifically for the alternative and designed for optimizing optimizing efficiency/ effectiveness, are the Watershed District Manager and Market District Area Manager. The managers are really the collective bargai ni ng agents of thei r respective communities, They negotiate on behalf of the communities and are thus agents who seek the optimization of the community's economic, social and ecological interests. THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND TECHNOLOGY 2 ECSOM PRIVATE SECTOR PROGRAMS NATIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT NEEDS FROM GOVERNMENT TO ACTIVATE BUSINESS BUSINESS PROJECTS TAXES DELIVERY OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES PUBLIC SECTOR PROGRAMS PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS HOUSEHOLDS IN AN ECONOMIC DISTRICT RATIONALE FOR DELINEATION OF UNITS The alternative organization/ management units emphasize and utilize the natural relationships and interdependence that exist, have developed from the past, and promise to continue into the future. For example, the Production Team Leader would himself be a farmer who has gravitated to the position of Team Leader, not by his own seeking of the position but by the habitual looking up to and consultation that his farmer-peers have accorded him over a long period. It is not suggested that, when the organization/ management unit of Production Team is defined, some selection process is undergone to name the Production Team Leader. Rather, the alternative organization/ management technology only acknowledges the already Production Team Leader, and proceeds with the organizational and managerial tasks based on what has been the practice. ECSOM MANAGEMENT POSTULATES As necessary conditions to being operative, the Watershed District Management System, establishes a set of organization/ management postulates: Postulate A. Citizenship is defined according to organization/ management units (i.e. local levels) rather than just national (e.g. one is a citizen of the SAMARICA Watershed District as well as being a Filipino). Postulate B. Definition of territory of an organization/ management unit is congruent with the political boundaries of the juridical units corresponding to the defined organization/ management unit. Postulate C. The citizens of the community as an organization/ management unit has jurisdiction over all the natural and other resources within the defined territory of the organization/ management unit and the Manager is the collective bargaining agent of the community who ensures that the transactions between the community with its own stakeholders and with non-citizens redound to the welfare of the whole community as depicted in its Social Accounting Matrix. Postulate D. The Primary beneficiaries in any utilization/ exploitation of the natural resources of a territory (as defined in Postulate B) are the citizens (as defined in Postulate A) of the territory. Postulate E. Decision-making potential is first exhausted at the lowest level efficiently/ effectively feasible, before decision-making at a higher level is involved. POSTULATES A/B/D. Definition of citizenship and territory according to organization/ management unit enables the formulation of Postulate D (definition of primary beneficiaries) and identifies for whose benefit economic and development management is undertaken all the way down to the most fundamental organization/ management units. Congruence of the organization/ management unit with political boundaries also facilitates relating of the unit's accounts to fiscal budgets or to legal requirements. POSTULATE C. Postulate C establishes that the manager of a defined organization/ management unit has responsibility for ensuring that the natural and other resources within the defined territory of the organization/ management unit are used in a manner that optimizes the benefits for the community as a whole as shown by the Social Accounting Matrix. it is also understood that the manager will not have complete control over the resources and that governance is practiced through a participatory system.. The manager will be faced with 3 aspects with regard to control (whether the subject of control is a resource, territory, people, etc.): a) aspects that are fully and directly controllable; b)aspects that are not directly controllable, but over which some influence may be exercised; and c)aspects that can neither be controlled nor influenced but affect the effectiveness/ efficiency of the organization/ management unit and its manager. The non-controllable and non-influential aspects require organizational/ managerial systems for generating prognoses and properly evaluating the effects of these aspects on the organization/ management unit (including its program, strategies, people, etc.) so that provisions for appropriately coping with these effects, with the most advantage or the least loss, become regular operating functions rather than ad-hoc, sporadic, unplanned reactions. POSTULATE E. Postulate E is a statement of a principle of subsidiarity and is a reaction to the inefficiencies/ ineffectiveness of a centralized/ hierarchical organization. Postulate E also enables the alternative management technology to carry out a true decentralization (a ground-up approach). In contrast to the type of decentralization where the center/ top gives up some authorities/ decision-making to lower levels at the peripheries, the decentralization that Postulates E fosters establishes that a higher level really has no decision- making authority unless a lower level had decided that particular decision-making capacities are more effectively/ efficiently carried at the higher level than at its own level. In another sense, Postulate E ultimately places the seat of authority in the household. As the most fundamental organization/ management unit, it is also the basic seat of decision-making, where all decision-making potentials are first exhausted before decision-making at the Production Team Level is involved. Postulate E is also an enabling condition for participatory democracy of the most extensive/ intensive kind. THE SOCIAL ACCOUNTING MATRIX The community's interest is articulated in a pro- f or ma c ons ol i dat ed balance sheet and income statement that account for the consol i dated assets of the community compr i sed by t hei r natural , capi tal and financial resources and t h e c r e d i t o r a n d ownership claims of non- community members to show the community's networth or wealth. The stream of production and direct and indirect costs to community in the process of production measure the net value of the community's income after allowing for capital depreciation and the restoration of natural capital to its original state. T h e o b j e c t i v e o f management then is to maxi mi ze communi ty income and augment its networth to ensure an adequate lifestyle for the s t a k e h o l d e r s a n d preserve the capital for the future generations. The role of the managers as collective bargaining agents is to ensure that the interest of their p r i n c i p a l s , t h e c o mmu n i t i e s , a r e protected and optimized i n t h e i r i n t e r n a l operations and their deal i ngs wi th other communities. , ECOSYSTEM - BASED COMMUNI TY- CENTRED SUSTAI NABL E DEVEL OPMENT ORGANI ZATI ON AND MANAGEMENT 3 -local government officials (governors and mayors) can de s i gn a nd i ns t i t ut e province- and municipality- wide economic development and poverty-combati ng programs, using powers and instruments already provided in the Local Government Code of 1991, such as the st at ut ory aut hori t y of municipalities and provinces to confederate to undertake j oi nt pr oduc t i on and infrastructure projects (Book I, Title 1, Ch.1, Sec. 3(f) of Republic Act 9184), or at local levels to enter into joint v e n t u r e s wi t h l o c a l cooperatives and private sector business (Book I, Title 1, Ch.1, Sec. 3(l) and (Book I, Title 1, Ch.4, Sec. 35), to raise financing through loans and floating of municipal or provincial bonds (Book II, Title 4, Sec. 299). - i mpl ement er s of t he Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program can design compensation for landowners to take the form of substitute Pr oduct i on and I ncome Possibility Schedules Defined as Engines of Growth. The explicit identification of the range of pr oduct i on and i ncome possibilities given by any set of endowments (natural resource, technol ogi cal and human resource) should be couched in terms of entire production systems. Each of these systems to qualify as part of the possibility schedule should have undergone at least a pre- f easi bi l i t y scr eeni ng t o establish a prima facie case for techni cal , economi c and financial feasibility. At that point they can be considered among the range of options of engines of growth. The identification and screening process itself dictates a whole t echni cal pr ot ocol t hat combines four major areas of analysis: a) The natural resource assessment that derives the schedule of technical and economic production capabi l i ti es wi th the ECSOM ECONOMIC MODEL Simply stated, the organization and management mission is: MAXIMIZE FUTURE CONSUMPTION OF THE CITIZENS OF ORGANIZATION/ MANAGEMENT UNIT WHILE PRESERVING AND ENHANCING THEIR CONSOLIDATED NETWORTH FOR THE BENEFIT OF FUTURE GENERATIONS. The alternative economic model will serve the following functions: a) Descriptive The model will constitute the scientific basis for understanding precisely how the households/ communities operate as organizations and as systems. Just as the economic theory of the firm provides a schematic picture of how the enterprise functions, mobilizes and combines resource inputs into the most economic mix, determines production volumes/ patterns in response to markets; converts product into sales and profit, and finally determines the optimum use of profit for growth and diversification, the alternative economic model will serve the same purpose for househol d and communities: how household/ c ommuni t y r es our c es ar e mobilized, how the production processes mix (to meet the needs and wants) are determined, how the optimum modes of transforming resources into incomes are defined (i.e. direct production for local consumption versus production of tradeable commodities to exchange for goods for the community's use), etc.
b) Normative The models can establish the precise roles that each agent within the household/ community must play to achieve desired levels of economic performance. (In this function, the models also serve as the means for communicating to the community how each of the agents/ factor/ sector relates to the whole system, how the performance of each in the management of resources within each one's control impacts the whole community, how mutually rewarding benefits from joint/ cooperative effort are achieved, etc.). In their normative function, the models also make possible the definition of goals for each agent/ factor/ sector and the community as a whole, and the targets that are achievable over different time horizons together with the precise paths towards these targets. These goals/ targets are expressed in precise and measurable terms. Thus, the models provide the quantitative measure for the system's performances at every level establish unambiguous standards for judging periodic performance of the system and those responsible for its direction. c) Evaluative The models can identify the best/ optimal choices possible given a set of controllable factors, constants/ constraints, relationships. d) Predictive The models can forecast alternative scenarios (behaviors, performances, outcomes) when a set of policies, strategies, etc. are implemented. techni cal i nput-output coefficients of each type of resource use. b) The range of process technologies required for the transformati on of primary materials into end- products of given market specifications, with the techni cal i nput-output coefficients of each process. c) The various market parameters that translate phys i c al out put i nt o economic values at each appropriate geographical level. d) The complement of infrastructure and social- overhead type capital that would be required directly b y t h e p r o d u c t i o n / distribution processes, and that could be supported as a result of the primary and secondary income effects of the production/ income generation resulting from the resource usage and system installation. ECSOM AND LIVELIHOOD SYSTEMS investment projects (as a result of ECSOM planning) that are more attractive f i nanc i al l y t han l and ownership; and can help farmer-beneficiaries with a complement of investments to realize the potential of intensive cultivation and translate these into family incomes that liberate them from the poverty trap. - planning officials and agencies (from provincial to national levels) can be guided in genuine planning of viable, effective projects from the district upwards to national projects. -sectoral agencies of the National Government can plan infrastructure and services delivery systems in a systematic, coherent, and efficient manner around the ECSOM generated and approved projects, improved s uppo r t s e r v i c e s f o r agri cul ture, and deri ve potenti al i nfrastructure investment and tertiary WITH ECSOM 4 ECSOM COMMUNITY NATURAL RESOURCES P E O P L E C A P I T A L DISTRICT PROVINCE REGION NATION MAXIMO T. KALAW INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1402-A West Tower, PSE Centre, Exchange Road, Ortigas Center, Pasig City 1605 PHILIPPINES Phone: (632)631-7989; TelefaOx: (632)6317084; E-mail: mtkisd@mtkalawinstitute.com