360 Appraisals Format

Name of the Organisation Period of Appraisal: From To:

Name of the Employee Empl.Code No. Department/Section:
I. First Level Appraisal Self Appraisal! To "e completed "y employee concerned!
#. $ole %odel: &o' far yo( are a $ole %odel to yo(r S(")ordinates*
Spea+ the Tr(th!
P(nct(ality Total/Partial $easons thereof!
Personal Cleanliness ,
&o(se)+eeping ,
Sharing -no'ledge/Teaching/Training ,
Participati.e Approach ,
/n)"iased $elationship ,
Confidence in yo(r s(")ordinates ,
Time %anagement ,
Stress Control ,
0. %anagement S(pport: Pl tic+! Total/Partial $easons thereof!
1hat S(pports that yo( got to perform 'ell*
%an)po'er/Systems/En2oy)'or+ing/Delegation/Confidence/%oti.ation/
3eadership/Comm(nication/Training
Can yo( 4(antify in 5ge/any n(merical .al(e on
6o(r 7al(e Addition to the Organisation/Department 8oals*
9f so s(pply the n(merical .al(e. m(st match 'ith e.idences!
1hat pre.ented yo( that yo( co(ld not perform 'ell or at times*
To 'hat e:tent!
;. S(ggestions:
For Self: Training Needs 9dentified "y self!
Department<s Proced(res/Systems/
From %anagement: =e specific and gi.e e.idential s(pport!
%an)po'er/Systems/A(tomation/%echanisation/Training/
-no'ledge Aids/1elfare/Asserti.eness for ne:t higher position/
Change in >o" Description/Designation/$ole Clarify/Addl.
$esponsi"ility ? A(thority
Signat(re:
Dated:
99 Second Level of 360 Degree Appraisal
To "e apprised "y S(")ordinates!:
E:cellent @A ) B.A &a.e f(llest Satisfaction and (nderstanding
8ood B.A C ;.A =etter "(t needs impro.ement =e specific!
Poor ;.@ ) @ Strained $elations =e specific!
E.idences for negati.e rating need not e:plained hereD "(t it can "e sorted o(t
At the time of Performance co(nseling "y the S(periors.
S. No. Traits $ating
#. Approach to'ards s(")ordinates
0. Sharing -no'ledge
;. Participati.e Approach
B. Confidence Posed on them
A. Comm(nication (nderstood/reached 'ell!
E. Ta+ing concern on s(")ordinates
F. /n)"iased Approach
G. $ole %odel
H. Time Planning
#@. 3istening S+ill
##. $igid/Fle:i"le
#0. 8ood Team 3eader ho' far!
6o( can add as per yo(r re4(irement according to the role played "y the appraisee
Total $atings:
$emo.e Negati.e )! .al(es separately to "e done "y &$ Department!
for disc(ssions and co(nseling.
Signat(re: 9f necessaryD other'iseD no need!
Data collected from the s(")ordinate le.el is .ery importantD "(tD at the same timeD it
cannot "e ta+en as totally tr(e (nless it is properly s(pported "y data/incidentsD "eca(se
of the mat(rity le.el.
999 3e.el of Appraisal:

=y lateral le.el &ODs/F(nctional &eads 'here.er the appraisee has cross)
f(nctional co)ordination in e:ec(ting the 'or+/Pro2ect!
The rating can "e decided "y the indi.id(al cross)f(nctional &ODs or a gro(p of
Appraisers depending (pon the %anagement<s decision:
Name ? Designations of Appraisers Select the Appraisers to 'hom the Appraisee has
contacts or co)ordinates almost fre4(ently. For e:ampleD Prod(ction Chief 'ith IC Chief
and %aterials ChiefD or &$ %anager 'ith all &ODsD %aterials Chief 'ith
Prod(ction/maintenance/IC/Acco(nts li+e that. $are Coordination need not "e ta+en
into consideration. For e:ampleD &$ 'ith Finance %anager or Company Secretary. For
this &$ m(st do gro(nd 'or+ in deciding the 8ro(p of Appraisers.
Ratings: Definition as given in II Level appraisals.
Sl.No. Name of the Traits $ating
#. Comm(nication S+ill =e specific on re4(irements!
0. Co)ordination S+ill
;. Sharing Concern 3istening S+ill!
B. -no'ledge of Other Department<s 1or+ systems
A. Team 3eader
E. Presentation S+ill
F. Time Planning
G. &o(se+eeping
H. Ta+ing concern on Organisation De..
#@. Sharing -no'ledge
Total
Ta+e o(t the negati.e $atings for Co(nseling. S(pport 'ith E.idences at the time of
Co(nseling.
Signat(re: Appraiser!
Pl Note: !ile Rating" t!e Appraiser m#st $eep in mind as to !o% t!e appraisee&s
f#nctions affected t!e performance of ot!er Departments 'ot! positive or negative.
P#rpose of Ratings is to foc#s to%ards t!e (#alit)*S)stems*Proced#res*+mplo)ee
Inter,personal Relations.
-. Fo#rt! Level of Appraisal .if re/#ired0
This is the appraisal to "e done "y o(tside Agencies s(ch as C(stomersD 7endorsD
DealersD 8o.t. Agencies 'here the concerned employee has more contacts on "ehalf of
the Organisation.
Traits can "e selected s(ch as
C(lt(reD Comm(nicationD Co)ordinationD 3eadership I(alitiesD Time PlanningD
P(nct(alityD SatisfactionD Stress Control and so on.
The Appraisal form can "e s(pplied to the indi.id(als in a simple and o"2ecti.e type
'here all re4(ired traits are incorporated. =etter let it "e 1es or No I(estion Type.
Sample C(somer/7endor can "e selected instead of sending the forms to all the contacts.
$ating can "e lin+ed at the final stage of ;E@ Degree Appraisal appropriately.
A. FIF23 L+4+L 5F APPRAISAL =y the S(periors!
1hile 8i.ing $atingsD all a"o.e ; or B le.els of $atings m(st "e s("mitted to him
"efore he gi.es his $atings.
Traits can "e selected accordingly 'hich are "ased more on data. 4(antified!.$atings
m(st "e defined in relation to targeted data and achie.ed data.
S.No. Traits $ating
#. Personality from the .ie' point of Attit(de!
0. Comm(nication from the .ie' point of Presentation!
;. Time Planning
B. 7al(e Addition
A. &o(se+eeping if needed!
E. Team mem"er 3eadership I(alities!
F. Organisation/Corporate C(lt(re Practices
G. Systems ? Proced(res
H. Contin(o(s 9mpro.ement
#@. Fit)in ,I(ality policyJ
##. Potential
#0. Scope for higher le.el
6o( add/delete Traits as per yo(r organiKation re4(irements.
Total
A. FINAL L+4+L 5F APPRAISAL I(antification of $atings!
To "e done "y Appraisal Committee represented "y Senior 3e.el %em"ers!
Co(nseling to "e done "efore final and a(thentic ratings are incorporated
Add: $atings: 3e.el 9D 3e.el 99D 3e.el 999D 3e.el and 3e.el 97. Decide the Traits
Accordingly and fit)in the $atings o"tained from a"o.e accordingly.
Apply 'eightage accordingly at different le.els. For e:ampleD
$ating gi.en on Comm(nication at le.el 0 is B and at le.el B is ;D
Then deri.e a form(la on 'eightageD "eca(se these 0 le.els are
Not identical in the sense of %at(rity and -no'ledge. AccordinglyD
Care m(st "e ta+en "y the &$ manager in deciding the 'eightage.
Final $atings o"tained from all le.els m(st "e lin+ed 'ith the $atings decided for
$e'ards s(ch as incrementD merit a'ardD promotionsD TrainingD etc.
Pl Note: All Strengths and 1ea+nesses m(st "e informed to the appraisee either thro
Co(nseling or 'riting. S(ggest 'ays for 9mpro.ement.
1e ha.e gi.en a sample format and start)(p for designing yo(r o'n ;E@
Degree Appraisals. 9nitially ma+e the forms so simple and easily
/nderstanda"le. 9n co(rse of timeD do the impro.ement "y e:periences.
9t is good to implement ;E@ Degree AppraisalsD "(t only 'ith the interest and
in.ol.ement of &$ %anagersD this system can get a s(ccess and s(r.i.al D other'iseD in
many organiKationsD it got failed "eca(se of lac+ of in.ol.ement sho'n "y 3ine
%anagers.