0 calificaciones0% encontró este documento útil (0 votos)
50 vistas3 páginas
Simon Belmont has been charged with violating PD 1866 for unauthorized possession of a firearm. His lawyer has filed a Demurrer to the Prosecution's Evidence, arguing that the prosecution has failed to meet its burden of proof. Specifically, the prosecution did not present any evidence that Belmont lacked a license to carry a firearm, which is a necessary element of the crime. As such, Belmont remains presumed innocent and the case against him should be dismissed. The lawyer is requesting that the court acquit Belmont of the charged crime.
Descripción original:
legal document
Título original
Motion to Acquit by Way of Demurrer to the Prosecution's Evidence
Simon Belmont has been charged with violating PD 1866 for unauthorized possession of a firearm. His lawyer has filed a Demurrer to the Prosecution's Evidence, arguing that the prosecution has failed to meet its burden of proof. Specifically, the prosecution did not present any evidence that Belmont lacked a license to carry a firearm, which is a necessary element of the crime. As such, Belmont remains presumed innocent and the case against him should be dismissed. The lawyer is requesting that the court acquit Belmont of the charged crime.
Simon Belmont has been charged with violating PD 1866 for unauthorized possession of a firearm. His lawyer has filed a Demurrer to the Prosecution's Evidence, arguing that the prosecution has failed to meet its burden of proof. Specifically, the prosecution did not present any evidence that Belmont lacked a license to carry a firearm, which is a necessary element of the crime. As such, Belmont remains presumed innocent and the case against him should be dismissed. The lawyer is requesting that the court acquit Belmont of the charged crime.
- versus - Criminal Case No. 10101 FOR: Violation of PD 1866
SIMON BELMONT, Accused, x ---------------------------------------------- x
URGENT MOTION TO ACQUIT BY WAY OF DEMURRER TO THE PROSECUTIONS EVIDENCE
THE ACCUSED, by counsel, with leave of court previously obtained, respectfully submits this Demurrer to the Prosecutions Evidence on the ground that the prosecution has patently failed to adduce sufficient evidence of his guilt to overcome the presumption of innocence and shift the burden of proof:
1. Under the Constitution, the accused is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. The effect of this presumption is that it entitles the accused to not say anything in his defense and places the burden directly on the prosecution to prove everything relative to his guilt. Thus, the prosecution must rely on the weight of its evidence and not merely wait for the accused to offer any defense. It is only in the event that the prosecution, after resting its case, has adduced sufficient evidence of guilt that the burden of proof shifts to the accused.
2. The prosecution has failed to adduce sufficient evidence of guilt that would effectively shift the burden of proof.
2.1. The accused is charged with violation of PD 1866; the gravamen of the offense is unauthorized possession of a firearm. Suffice to say, this means that the prosecution must prove that the accused had no legal authority to possess any firearm.
2.2. The prosecution has failed to show that the accused had no license to carry a firearm. The proof of the negative element is indispensable to proof of a violation of PD 1866. Without proof of this negative element, the crime is not proven.
3. Absent proof of the negative element, i.e., absence of a license, the offense is not proven. The accused is innocent; he must, thus, be acquitted as the procedure of law so provides.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, the accused most respectfully prays to the Honorable Court that the Information against him be DISMISSED and that he be ACQUITTED of the crime charged.
City of San Fernando; 26 September 2012.
(Sgd.) Atty. Rommelito Francisco E. Macarayo Counsel for the Accused 13-69 Barracks Building, Marikina IBP NO. 87123-7/19/12-AC PTR NO. 669913/21/12-AC Roll No. 99998 MCLE Exempt (Admitted to the bar: April 6, 2012)
NOTIFICATION AND COPY FURNISHED:
ANTONIO ANTONIO L. SANTOS City Prosecutor City of San Fernando Pampanga
The Branch Clerk of Court RTC Branch 16 City of San Fernando Pampanga
Greetings!
Please submit the foregoing for the consideration and resolution of the Honorable Court immediately upon receipt hereof.
Atty. Rommelito Francisco E. Macarayo
EXPLANATION
The foregoing Urgent Motion to Discharge an Accused to be a State Witness is being filed with this Honorable Court and served on the opposing counsel by registered mail in view of the impracticability of personal filing and service due to distance considering that the office of this Honorable Court is at the City of San Fernando, while undersigned counsel holds office in Marikina.
Atty. Rommelito Francisco E. Macarayo
COPY FURNISHED:
Atty. Antonio Antonio L. Santos City Prosecutor City of San Fernando Pampanga