Storage, Handling, and Preservation

A10
The manufacturer's storage, handling and preservation instructions to be
followed.
Schedule Q,
Att, IV, Sec 5.
A9
A8
Verify that the contractor or it's Saudi Aramco approved third party
inspector performed the quality activities at the supplier and sub-supplier
locations as required by the inspection level assigned for the materials
and equipment identified in SAER-1972 Inspection Requirements.
Schedule Q
Attachment llI
Sec 1.2
A7
Traceability - Instrumentation materials shall be traceable from the
manufacturer and supplier through delivery, storage, fabrication,
erection, installation, repair, modification and use.
Schedule "Q"
Attachment lV
Sec. 3.3
A6
QC Before Installation - Instrumentation materials shall conform to all
applicable requirements, standards, and specifications prior to release to
be used as part of the work.
Schedule "Q"
Attachment lV
Sec 7.1
A5
Free of Damage - Instrumentation materials shall be free of damage. All
Incoming material shall be visually inspected for damage and
conformance to all applicable inspection releases with Material Test
Report (MTR).
Schedule "Q"
Attachment lV
Sec 7.1
Schedule "G"
Sec. 4.1
A4
As Designed - Instrumentation materials shall be in accordance with the
Saudi Aramco-approved project-specific design drawings, diagrams,
schedules, lists, databases, and associated documents.
Schedule "G"
Sec. 4.1
A3 New and Unused - Instrumentation materials shall be new and unused.
A2
Identification - Instrumentation materials shall be identified by using tags,
stamps, color coding, stencils or labels. The location and method of
identification shall not affect the function or quality of the materials.
Schedule "Q"
Attachment lV
Sec. 3.2
A1 Review Quality Documentation for Material Receiving.
Schedule Q,
Att, IV, Sec. 3.1.
FAIL N/A RE-INSP DATE
ITEM
No.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA REFERENCE PASS
SAUDI ARAMCO ID/PID - 3/01/05 - REV 0 (Standards Cutoff - August 2004)
SAUDI ARAMCO INSPECTION CHECKLIST
SAIC NUMBER DATE APPROVED QR NUMBER
PROJ ECT TITLE WBS / BI / J O NUMBER CONTRACTOR / SUBCONTRACTOR
Level-Automatic Tank Gauging (ATG)-Material Receiving. SAIC-J-6304 1-Oct-05 INST
PLANT NO. EQUIPMENT ID NUMBER(S) EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION EQPT CODE SYSTEM ID.
LAYOUT DRAWING NUMBER REV. NO. PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER EC / PMCC / MCC NO.
TRAVEL TIME
SAUDI ARAMCO USE ONLY
SCHEDULED TEST DATE & TIME ACTUAL TEST DATE & TIME QUANTITY INSP. MH's SPENT
SAUDI ARAMCO TIP NUMBER SAUDI ARAMCO ACTIVITY NUMBER WORK PERMIT REQUIRED?
SAUDI ARAMCO INSPECTION LEVEL CONTRACTOR INSPECTION LEVEL
A Document Review and Certification
B1
Purchase Order and Instrument specification sheet criteria shall be
confirmed and compared with instrument stainless steel tags / labels
and nameplates, and shipment checked for damage, prior to acceptance
of the shipment
Schedule Q,
Att IV, Sec. 7.1.
B Material Requirements
B2 Verify that all the instruments are from technically acceptable vendors
SAES-J -002,
Sec. 7
Page 1 of 3
B10
Safety Requirements
The RTG, during normal operation, bench testing or field service, shall
not generate microwave power levels hazardous to humans. The
maximum power level as per API MPMS 3.1B, Appendix B.2.4.2, shall
not exceed 2 milliwatts. The RTG shall have approval from the Federal
Communication Corporation (FCC, USA) and the Saudi Arabian
Standards Organization (SASO). The vendor shall provide certification
documentation to Saudi Aramco, upon request. For additional guidance
refer to API MPMS 3.3, paragraph 2.2.
SAES-J -300,
Sec.8.1.12
B9
Intrinsic Accuracy
For high accuracy applications, the laboratory tested accuracy of the
gauge shall be equal to or better than 1 mm over the entire range of
the RTG. Vendors shall provide certification from a recognized
international agency, such as the Dutch NMI or the German PTB, to
support their claims. Installed accuracy is governed by section 8.3.
For general service, the laboratory tested accuracy of the gauge shall be
equal to or better than 6 mm over the entire range of the RTG.
Vendors shall provide certified test data to support their claims.
SAES-J -300,
Sec.8.1.5
B8
Hazardous Area Classification
Verify that the installation drawings and specification for all equipment,
installation of conduits and cables shall meet or exceed the area
classification requirements, as per SAES-B-068. All enclosures and
conduit sealing shall comply with section 5, SAES-J -902, "Electrical
Systems for Instrumentation".
SAES-J -300,
Sec.8.1.4
B7
Verify that the vendor provides certificate from the manufacturer to prove
that the equipment meets the dimensional and quality specifications of
American Petroleum Institute codes API MPMS 3.1A, 3.1B, 3.3, 7.4, 12
and 16.2
SAES-J -300,
Sec.3.2
Product Temperature Measurement
Permanently installed, multiple spot temperature elements shall be used
whenever the functional specification requires automatic computation of
Gross Standard Volume (GSV) or Net Standard Volume (NSV). The
number of averaging elements will depend on the tank height,
temperature stratification and accuracy requirement. The field mounted
data acquisition unit shall be capable of automatically averaging the
temperature of the submerged probes.
The installation shall be per API MPMS 7.4, "Static Temperature
Determination Using Fixed Automatic Tank Thermometers."
B3
Displacement type instruments may be used for liquid level ranges up to
and including 1,830 mm.
B5
SAES-J -300,
Sec.7.1.1
SAES-J -300,
Sec.8.1.2
B6
Local Indicators
An electronic local digital indicator shall be provided at the grade level.
The indicator shall display the liquid level in meters-cm-mm or in ft-in-
16th graduations and the product temperature when applicable, in user
configurable units. The local indicator shall be installed 1.4 m above
grade level
SAES-J -300,
Sec.8.1.3
ITEM
No.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA REFERENCE
B4
Free Space Requirements
For initial installation and subsequent maintenance of all gauges,
sufficient space above the tank in the X-Y-Z planes shall be provided to
facilitate easy removal of the gauge. These dimensions should be in
accordance with the vendor's recommendations.
SAES-J -300,
Sec.8.1.1.7
PASS FAIL N/A RE-INSP DATE
SAUDI ARAMCO ID/PID - 3/01/05 - REV 0 (Standards Cutoff - August 2004)
SAUDI ARAMCO INSPECTION CHECKLIST
SAIC NUMBER DATE APPROVED QR NUMBER
PROJ ECT TITLE WBS / BI / J O NUMBER CONTRACTOR / SUBCONTRACTOR
Level-Automatic Tank Gauging (ATG)-Material Receiving. SAIC-J-6304 1-Oct-05 INST
Page 2 of 3
ITEM
No.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA REFERENCE PASS FAIL N/A RE-INSP DATE
SAUDI ARAMCO ID/PID - 3/01/05 - REV 0 (Standards Cutoff - August 2004)
SAUDI ARAMCO INSPECTION CHECKLIST
SAIC NUMBER DATE APPROVED QR NUMBER
PROJ ECT TITLE WBS / BI / J O NUMBER CONTRACTOR / SUBCONTRACTOR
Level-Automatic Tank Gauging (ATG)-Material Receiving. SAIC-J-6304 1-Oct-05 INST
B12
Intrinsic Accuracy
For high accuracy applications, the laboratory tested accuracy of the
gauge shall be equal to or better than 1 mm over the entire range of
the RTG. Vendors shall provide certification from a recognized
international agency, such as the Dutch NMI or the German PTB, to
support their claims. Installed accuracy is governed by section 8.3.
For general service, the laboratory tested accuracy of the gauge shall be
equal to or better than 6 mm over the entire range of the RTG.
Vendors shall provide certified test data to support their claims.
SAES-J -300,
Sec.8.1.5
B11
Intrinsic Accuracy
For high accuracy applications, the laboratory tested accuracy of the
gauge shall be equal to or better than 1 mm over the entire range of
the RTG. Vendors shall provide certification from a recognized
international agency, such as the Dutch NMI or the German PTB, to
support their claims. Installed accuracy is governed by section 8.3.
For general service, the laboratory tested accuracy of the gauge shall be
equal to or better than 6 mm over the entire range of the RTG.
Vendors shall provide certified test data to support their claims.
SAES-J -300,
Sec.8.1.5
2. Schedule Q -- Quality Requirements (Pro Forma Contract), November 2003
4. SAES-J -300, Level, 30 April.2003.
3. SAES-J -002,Technically acceptable instruments, 29 Feb 2004.
4. Labeled - Equipment or materials to which has been attached a label, symbol, or other identifying mark of an approved qualified organization
Work Verified
Saudi Aramco
with product evaluation, that maintains periodic inspection of production of labeled equipment or materials, and by whose labeling the
f
PMT Representative
Test Performed Successfully and Results are Acceptable:
Name, Initials and Date:
Contractor / Third-Party
Technician Performing Test*
Name, Title, Department,
Company, Initials and
Date:
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:
1. Approved - Acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction (i.e., Saudi Aramco ID).
5.SAES-B-057, Safety Requirements: Refrigerated and Pressure Storage Vessels, 30 J anuary 2002
2. Identified - Recognizable as suitable for the specific application by a qualified testing laboratory (i.e., listing and/or labeling).
3. Listed - Equipment and materials included in a list published by an approved qualified organization concerned with evaluation of products
NOTES:
ATTACHMENTS:
QC Record Reviewed
Work Verified T&I Witnessed QC Record Reviewed
T&I Witnessed
QC Inspector PID Representative
Work Verified
Name, Sign and Date:
Quality Record Approved:
Name, Organization,
Initials and Date:
T&I Witnessed
QC Supervisor Proponent and Others
Name, Initials and Date:
Witnessed Test
Y =YES N =NO F =FAILED *Person Responsible for Implementation of Test and Analysis of Results
QC Record Reviewed
Work / Rework May Proceed
Name, Initials and Date:
5. Remarks - For general requirements of level instruments please see SAIC-J -6301 and SAIC-J -6302
or services, that maintains periodic inspection of production of listed equipment or materials or periodic evaluation of services, and whose listing
that the equipment, material, or services either meets appropriate designated standards or has been tested and found suitable for a specified
indicates compliance with appropriate standards or performance in a specified manner.
1. Schedule G -- Material, Tools and Equipment (Pro Forma MP-IK-LS Contract), J uly 1993
Page 3 of 3