Coloco abaixo as orientaes de Pio XII no que diz respeito ao verdadeiro ecumenismo catlico, n!o o conciliar. "e algu#m se dispuser a traduzir este texto, nos $aria um grande $avor, %& que o meu ingl's # $raquin(o, $raquin(o.... )m abrao a todos, "andro de Pontes I*"+,)C+I-*-* +.E EC)ME*IC/0 M-1EME*+ P,-C0/IME2 34+.E .-04 -55ICE-* 2ECEM3E, 67, 89:9 /n Instruction o$ t(e .ol; -$$ice addressed to t(e ordinaries o$ places, given 2ecember 67, 89:9. +(e Cat(olic C(urc(, alt(oug( s(e does not ta<e part in congresses and ot(er conventions called =ecumenical,= ;et (as never ceased, as is clear $rom man; Ponti$ical documents, nor >ill s(e in $uture ever cease, to $ollo> >it( t(e most intense interest and to promote b; earnest pra;ers to ?od, all e$$orts to>ard t(e attainment o$ >(at is so dear to t(e .eart o$ C(rist -ur 0ord, namel;, t(at all >(o believe in .im =ma; be made per$ect in one.=@8A 5or s(e embraces >it( trul; maternal a$$ection all >(o return to (er as t(e true C(urc( o$ C(ristB and (ence, >ort(; o$ all. praise and encouragement are all t(ose plans and pro%ects >(ic(, >it( t(e consent o$ Ecclesiastical /ut(orit;, (ave been underta<en and are being carried $or>ard, eit(er $or t(e proper Cat(olic instruction o$ $uture converts or $or t(e more t(oroug( training o$ persons alread; converted to t(e $ait(. *o> in man; parts o$ t(e >orld, as a result o$ various external events and c(anges o$ vie>s on t(e part o$ people, but especiall; in consequence o$ t(e common pra;ers o$Ct(e $ait($ul t(roug( t(e grace o$ t(e .ol; "pirit, t(ere (as gro>n constantl; in t(e minds o$ man; persons separated $rom t(e Cat(olic C(urc( t(e desire $or a return to unit; on t(e part o$ all >(o believe in t(e 0ord C(rist. +o t(e c(ildren o$ t(e C(urc( t(is is surel; a cause o$ true and (ol; %o; in t(e 0ord, and at t(e same time an invitation to (elp all t(ose >(o sincerel; see< t(e trut(, b; earnest pra;er to ?od imploring $or t(em t(e grace o$ lig(t and strengt(. .o>ever, some o$ t(e initiatives t(at (ave (it(erto been ta<en b; various individuals or groups, >it( t(e aim o$ reconciling dissident C(ristians to t(e Cat(olic C(urc(, alt(oug( inspired b; t(e best o$ intentions, are not al>a;s based on rig(t principles, or i$ t(e; are, ;et t(e; are not $ree $rom special dangers, as experience too (as alread; s(o>n. .ence t(is "upreme "acred Congregation, >(ic( (as t(e responsibilit; o$ conserving in its entiret; and protecting t(e deposit o$ t(e $ait(, (as seen $it to recall to mind and to prescribe t(e $ollo>ingD I. "ince t(e aboveCmentioned =union= is a matter >(ic( pertains primaril; to t(e aut(orit; and o$$ice o$ t(e C(urc(, it s(ould be attended to >it( special care b; t(e 3is(ops, >(om =t(e .ol; ?(ost (at( placed to rule t(e C(urc( o$ ?od.=@6A +(e; s(ould, t(ere$ore, not onl; diligentl; and e$$ectivel; >atc( over t(is entire activit;, but also prudentl; promote and direct it, $or t(e purpose o$ bot( (elping t(ose >(o see< t(e trut( and t(e true C(urc(, and protecting t(e $ait($ul against t(e dangers >(ic( ma; easil; $lo> $rom t(e activit; o$ t(is =Movement.= .ence t(e; must in t(e $irst place be $ull; a>are o$ ever;t(ing t(at (as been and is being done t(roug( t(is =Movement= in t(eir dioceses. 5or t(is purpose t(e; s(all designate >ellCquali$ied priests >(o, according to t(e doctrine and norms prescribed b; t(e .ol; "ee, $or example b; t(e Enc;clicals ="atis cognitum,=@EA =Mortalium animos,=@:A and =M;stici Corporis C(risti,=@FA s(all pa; close attention to ever;t(ing >(ic( concerns t(e =Movement= and report t(ereon to t(e 3is(ops in t(e manner and at t(e time >(ic( t(e; s(all prescribe. +(e; s(all >atc( >it( special care over publications >(ic( ma; be issued in an; $orm b; Cat(olics on t(is matter, and s(all see t(at t(e canons =on t(e previous censure and pro(ibition o$ boo<s= Gcanons 8EH: seq.I are observed. /nd t(e; s(all not $ail to do t(e same >it( regard to publications o$ nonCCat(olics on t(e same sub%ect, in as $ar as t(ese are publis(ed, or read, or sold b; Cat(olics. +(e; s(all also diligentl; provide >(atever ma; be o$ service to nonCCat(olics >(o desire to <no> t(e Cat(olic $ait(B t(e; s(all designate persons and -$$ices to >(ic( t(ese nonCCat(olics ma; go $or consultationB and a $ortiori t(e; s(all see to it t(at t(ose >(o are alread; converted to t(e $ait( s(all easil; $ind means o$ more exact and deeper instruction in t(e Cat(olic $ait(, and o$ leading a more positivel; religious li$e, especiall; t(roug( appropriate meetings and group assemblies, t(roug( "piritual Exercises and ot(er >or<s o$ piet;. II. /s regards t(e manner and met(od o$ proceeding in t(is >or<, t(e 3is(ops t(emselves >ill ma<e regulations as to >(at is to be done and >(at is to be avoided, and s(all see t(at t(ese are observed b; all. +(e; s(all also be on guard lest, on t(e $alse pretext t(at more attention s(ould be paid to t(e points on >(ic( >e agree t(an to t(ose on >(ic( >e di$$er, a dangerous indi$$erentism be encouraged, especiall; among persons >(ose training in t(eolog; is not deep and >(ose practice o$ t(eir $ait( is not ver; strong. 5or care must be ta<en lest, in t(e soCcalled =irenic= spirit o$ toCda;, t(roug( comparative stud; and t(e vain desire $or a progressivel; closer mutual approac( among t(e various pro$essions o$ $ait(, Cat(olic doctrineCeit(er in itsB dogmas or in t(e trut(s >(ic( are connected >it( t(emCbe so con$ormed or in a >a; adapted to t(e doctrines o$ dissident sects, t(at t(e purit; o$ Cat(olic doctrine be impaired, or its genuine and certain meaning be obscured. /lso t(e; must restrain t(at dangerous manner o$ spea<ing >(ic( generates $alse opinions and $allacious (opes incapable o$ realizationB $or example, to t(e e$$ect t(at t(e teac(ings o$ t(e Enc;clicals o$ t(e ,oman Ponti$$s on t(e return o$ dissidents to t(e C(urc(, on t(e constitution o$ t(e C(urc(, on t(e M;stical 3od; o$ C(rist, s(ould not be given too muc( importance seeing t(at t(e; are not all matters o$ $ait(, or, >(at is >orse, t(at in matters o$ dogma even t(e Cat(olic C(urc( (as not ;et attained t(e $ullness o$ C(rist, but can still be per$ected $rom outside. +(e; s(all ta<e particular care and s(all $irml; insist t(at, in going over t(e (istor; o$ t(e ,e$ormation and t(e ,e$ormers t(e de$ects o$ Cat(olics be not so exaggerated and t(e $aults o$ t(e ,e$ormers be so dissimulated, or t(at t(ings >(ic( are rat(er accidental be not so emp(asized, t(at >(at is most essential, namel; t(e de$ection $rom t(e Cat(olic $ait(, be scarcel; an; longer seen or $elt. 5inall;, t(e; s(all ta<e precautions lest, t(roug( an excessive and $alse external activit;, or t(roug( imprudence and an excited manner o$ proceeding, t(e end in vie> be rat(er (armed t(an served. +(ere$ore t(e >(ole and entire Cat(olic doctrine is to be presented and explainedD b; no means is it permitted to pass over in silence or to veil in ambiguous terms t(e Cat(olic trut( regarding t(e nature and >a; o$ %usti$ication, t(e constitution o$ t(e C(urc(, t(e primac; o$ %urisdiction o$ t(e ,oman Ponti$$, and t(e onl; true union b; t(e return o$ t(e dissidents to t(e one true C(urc( o$ C(rist. It s(ould be made clear to t(em t(at, in returning to t(e C(urc(, t(e; >ill lose not(ing o$ t(at good >(ic( b; t(e grace o$ ?od (as (it(erto been implanted in t(em, but t(at it >ill rat(er be supplemented and completed b; t(eir return. .o>ever, one s(ould not spea< o$ t(is in suc( a >a; t(at t(e; >ill imagine t(at in returning to t(e C(urc( t(e; are bringing to it somet(ing substantial >(ic( it (as (it(erto lac<ed. It >ill be necessar; to sa; t(ese t(ings clearl; and openl;, $irst because it is t(e trut( t(at t(e; t(emselves are see<ing, and moreover because outside t(e trut( no true union can ever be attained. III. Jit( regard especiall; to mixed assemblies and con$erences o$ Cat(olics >it( nonC Cat(olics, >(ic( in recent times (ave begun to be (eld in man; places to promote =union= in t(e $ait(, t(ere is need o$ quite peculiar vigilance and control on t(e part o$ -rdinaries. 5or i$ on t(e one (and t(ese meetings a$$ord t(e desired opportunit; to spread among nonCCat(olics t(e <no>ledge o$ Cat(olic doctrine, >(ic( is generall; not su$$icientl; <no>n to t(em, ;et on t(e ot(er (and t(e; easil; involve no slig(t danger o$ indi$$erentism $or Cat(olics. In cases >(ere t(ere seems to be some (ope o$ good results, t(e -rdinar; s(all see t(at t(e t(ing is properl; managed, designating $or t(ese meetings priests >(o are as >ell quali$ied as possible to explain and de$end Cat(olic doctrine properl; and appropriatel;. +(e $ait($ul, (o>ever, s(ould not attend t(ese meetings unless t(e; (ave obtained special permission $rom Ecclesiastical /ut(orit;, and t(is s(all be given onl; to t(ose >(o are <no>n to be >ell instructed and strong in t(eir $ait(. J(ere t(ere is no apparent (ope o$ good results, or >(ere t(e a$$air involves special dangers on ot(er grounds, t(e $ait($ul are to be prudentl; <ept a>a; $rom t(e meetings, and t(e meetings t(emselves are soon to be ended or graduall; suppressed. /s experience teac(es t(at larger meetings o$ t(is sort usuall; bear little $ruit and involve greater danger, t(ese s(ould be permitted onl; a$ter ver; care$ul consideration. +o colloquies bet>een Cat(olic and nonCCat(olic t(eologians, none s(ould be sent but priests >(o (ave s(o>n t(emselves trul; $it $or suc( >or< b; t(eir <no>ledge o$ t(eolog; and t(eir $irm ad(erence to t(e principles and norms >(ic( t(e C(urc( (as laid do>n in t(is matter. I1. /ll t(e a$oresaid con$erences and meetings, public and nonCpublic, large and small, >(ic( are called $or t(e purpose o$ a$$ording an opportunit; $or t(e Cat(olic and t(e nonCCat(olic part; $or t(e sa<e o$ discussion to treat o$ matters o$ $ait( and morals, eac( presenting on even terms t(e doctrine o$ (is o>n $ait(, are sub%ect to t(e prescriptions o$ t(e C(urc( >(ic( >ere recalled to mind in t(e =Monitum, Cum compertum,= o$ t(is Congregation under date o$ F Kune, 89:H.@LA .ence mixed congresses are not absolutel; $orbiddenB but t(e; are not to be (eld >it(out t(e previous permission o$ t(e competent Ecclesiastical /ut(orit;. +(e Monitum, (o>ever, does not appl; to catec(etical instructions, even >(en given to man; toget(er, nor to con$erences in >(ic( Cat(olic doctrine is explained to nonCCat(olics >(o are prospective convertsD even t(oug( t(e opportunit; is a$$orded $or t(e nonCCat(olics to explain also t(e doctrine o$ t(eir c(urc( so t(at t(e; ma; understand clearl; and t(oroug(l; in >(at respect it agrees >it( t(e Cat(olic doctrine and in >(at it di$$ers t(ere$rom. *eit(er does t(e said Monitum appl; to t(ose mixed meetings o$ Cat(olics and nonC Cat(olics in >(ic( t(e discussion does not turn upon $ait( and morals but upon >a;s and means o$ de$ending t(e $undamental principles o$ t(e natural la> or o$ t(e C(ristian religion against t(e enemies o$ ?od >(o are no> leagued toget(er, or >(ere t(e question is (o> to restore social order, or ot(er topics o$ t(at nature. Even in t(ese meetings, as is evident, Cat(olics ma; not approve or concede an;t(ing >(ic( is in con$lict >it( divine revelation or >it( t(e doctrine o$ t(e C(urc( even on social questions. /s to local con$erences and conventions >(ic( are >it(in t(e scope o$ t(e Monitum as above explained, t(e -rdinaries o$ places are given, $or t(ree ;ears $rom t(e publication o$ t(is Instruction,@MA t(e $acult; o$ granting t(e required previous permission o$ t(e .ol; "ee, on t(e $ollo>ing conditionsD 8. +(at communicatio in sacris be entirel; avoidedB 6. t(at t(e presentations o$ t(e matter be dul; inspected and directedB E. t(at at t(e close o$ eac( ;ear a report be made to t(is "upreme "acred Congregation, stating >(ere suc( meetings >ere (eld and >(at experience >as gat(ered $rom t(em. /s regards t(e colloquies o$ t(eologians above mentioned, t(e same $acult; $or t(e same lengt( o$ time is granted to t(e -rdinar; o$ t(e place >(ere suc( colloquies are (eld, or to t(e -rdinar; delegated $or t(is >or< b; t(e common consent o$ t(e ot(er -rdinaries, under t(e same conditions as above, but >it( t(e $urt(er requirement t(at t(e report to t(is "acred Congregation state also >(at questions >ere treated, >(o >ere present, and >(o t(e spea<ers >ere $or eit(er side. /s $or t(e interdiocesan con$erences and congresses, eit(er national or international, t(e previous permission o$ t(e .ol; "ee, special $or eac( case, is al>a;s requiredB and in t(e petition as<ing $or it, it must also be stated >(at are t(e questions to be treated and >(o t(e spea<ers are to be. /nd it is not allo>ed be$ore t(is permission (as been obtained, to begin t(e external preparation o$ suc( meetings or to collaborate >it( nonC Cat(olics >(o begin suc( preparation. 1. /lt(oug( in all t(ese meetings and con$erences an; communication >(atsoever in >ors(ip must be avoided, ;et t(e recitation in common o$ t(e 0ordNs Pra;er or o$ some pra;er approved b; t(e Cat(olic C(urc(, is not $orbidden $or opening or closing t(e said meetings. 1I. /lt(oug( eac( -rdinar; (as t(e rig(t and dut; to conduct, promote, and preside over t(is >or< inN (is o>n diocese, ;et t(e cooperation o$ several 3is(ops >ill be appropriate or even necessar; in establis(ing o$$ices and >or<s to observe, stud;, and control t(is >or< as a >(ole. /ccordingl; it >ill rest >it( t(e -rdinaries t(emselves to con$er toget(er and consider (o> a proper uni$ormit; o$ action and coordination can be obtained. 1II. ,eligious "uperiors are bound to >atc( and to see to it t(at t(eir sub%ects ad(ere strictl; and $ait($ull; to t(e prescriptions laid do>n b; t(e .ol; "ee or b; t(e local -rdinaries in t(is matter. In order t(at so noble a >or< as t(e =union= o$ all C(ristians in one true $ait( and C(urc( ma; dail; gro> into a more conspicuous part o$ t(e entire care o$ souls, and t(at t(e >(ole Cat(olic people ma; more earnestl; implore t(is =union= $rom /lmig(t; ?od, it >ill certainl; be o$ assistance t(at in some appropriate >a;, $or example t(roug( Pastoral 0etters, t(e $ait($ul be instructed regarding t(ese questions and pro%ects, t(e prescriptions o$ t(e C(urc( in t(e matter, and t(e reasons on >(ic( t(e; are based. /ll, especiall; priests and religious, s(ould be ex(orted and >arml; encouraged to be zealous b; t(eir pra;ers and sacri$ices to ripen and promote t(is >or<, and all s(ould be reminded t(at not(ing more e$$ectivel; paves t(e >a; $or t(e erring to $ind t(e trut( and to embrace t(e C(urc( t(an t(e $ait( o$ Cat(olics, >(en it is con$irmed b; t(e example o$ uprig(t living. ?iven at ,ome, $rom t(e .ol; -$$ice, 67 2ec., 89:9. //" :6C8:6B .ol; -$$ice, Instruction, 67 2ec., 89:9. Periodica, E9C67: G.urt(IB Monitor Ecclesiasticus, 89F7, p. 68 G3o;erIB +(e Kurist, 87 G89F7I, p. 67L. E*2*-+E" @8A 8 Ko(n 8MD6E. @6A /cts 67D6H. @EA /cta 0eonis XIII, 1ol. 8L G8H9MI, p. 8FM. @:A //", 1ol. 67 G896HI, p. F. @FA Ibid., 1ol. EF G89:EI, p. 89E. @LA //" :7C6FMB reported above in t(is same volume, under canon 8E6F. @MA +(e date o$ publication is E8 Kanuar;, 89F7. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO On Dec. 6,1953, His Holiness addressed a discourse to the National Convention of Italian Catholic Jurists. Our Holy ather s!o"e in Italian on the !ro#le$s of reli%ious li#erty in the %ro&in% co$$unity of nations. 'he follo&in% is the (atican )ress Office translation of his re$ar"s. It gives )s great satis$action, beloved sons o$ t(e )nion o$ Italian Cat(olic Kurists, to see ;ou gat(ered round )s (ere and to bid ;ou (eart$elt >elcome. In t(e beginning o$ -ctober anot(er congress o$ %urists, dealing >it( international penal la>, gat(ered in -ur summer residence. 4our convention is rat(er national in c(aracter, but t(e sub%ect it is treating, =+(e *ation and t(e International Communit;,= touc(es again t(e relations bet>een peoples and sovereign states. I$ is not b; c(ance t(at congresses are multipl;ing $or t(e stud; o$ international questions, be t(e; scienti$ic, economic or political. +(e clear $act t(at relations bet>een individuals o$ various nations and bet>een nations t(emselves are gro>ing in multiplicit; and intensit; ma<es dail; more urgent a rig(t ordering o$ international relations, bot( private and publicB all t(e more so since t(is mutual dra>ing toget(er is caused not onl; b; vastl; improved tec(nological progress and b; $ree c(oice but also b; t(e more pro$ound action o$ an intrinsic la> o$ development. +(is movement, t(en, is not to be repressed but $ostered and promoted. I In t(is >or< o$ expansion, communities o$ states and peoples, >(et(er alread; existing or onl; a goal to be ac(ieved, (ave naturall; a special importance. +(e; are communities in >(ic( sovereign states, t(at is to sa;, states >(ic( are subordinate to no ot(er state, are united into a %uridical communit; to attain de$inite %uridical ends. It >ould give a $alse idea o$ t(ese %uridical communities to compare t(em to >orld empires o$ t(e past or o$ t(e present, in >(ic( di$$erent racial stoc<s, peoples and states become $used, >(et(er t(e; >ant it or not, into a single conglomeration o$ states. In t(e present instance, (o>ever, states, remaining sovereign, $reel; unite into a %uridical communit;. In t(is connection, t(e (istor; o$ t(e >orld, >(ic( s(o>s a continuous succession o$ struggles $or po>er, no doubt mig(t ma<e t(e establis(ment o$ a %uridical communit; o$ $ree states seem almost utopian. +(e con$licts o$ t(e past (ave too o$ten been motivated b; a desire to sub%ugate ot(er nations and to extend t(e range o$ oneNs o>n po>er, or b; t(e necessit; o$ de$ending oneNs libert; and oneNs o>n independent existence. +(is time, on t(e contrar;, it is precisel; t(e >ill to prevent t(reatening con$licts t(at urges men to>ard a supranational %uridical communit;. )tilitarian considerations, >(ic( certainl; carr; considerable >eig(t, point to>ard t(e >or<ing out o$ peaceB and $inall;, per(aps, it is precisel; t(is mingling o$ men o$ di$$erent nations because o$ tec(nological progress t(at (as a>a<ened t(e $ait(, implanted in t(e (earts and souls o$ individuals, in a (ig(er communit; o$ men, >illed b; t(e Creator and rooted in t(e unit; o$ t(eir common origin, nature and $inal destin;. II +(ese and ot(er similar considerations s(o> t(at advance to>ard establis(ing a communit; o$ peoples does not loo<, as to a unique and ultimate norm, to t(e >ill o$ t(e "tates but rat(er to nature, to t(e Creator. +(e rig(t to existence, t(e rig(t to respect $rom ot(ers and to oneNs good name, t(e rig(t to oneNs o>n culture and national c(aracter, t(e rig(t to develop onesel$, t(e rig(t to demand observance o$ international treaties, and ot(er li<e rig(ts, are exigencies o$ t(e la> o$ nations, dictated b; nature itsel$. +(e positive la> o$ di$$erent peoples, also indispensable n t(e communit; o$ states, (as t(e o$$ice o$ de$ining more exactl; t(e rig(ts derived $rom nature and o$ adapting t(em to concrete circumstances, also o$ ma<ing ot(er provisions, directed, o$ course, to>ard t(e common good, on t(e basis o$ a positive agreement, >(ic(, once $reel; entered into, (as binding $orce. In t(is communit; o$ nations, t(en, ever; state becomes a part o$ t(e s;stem o$ international la>, and (ence o$ natural la>, >(ic( is bot( $oundation and cro>n o$ t(e >(ole. +(us t(e individual nation no longer isPnor in $act >as it everP=sovereign,= in t(e sense o$ being entirel; >it(out restrictions. ="overeignt;= in t(e true sense means sel$Crule and exclusive competence concerning >(at (as to be done and (o> it is to be done in regard to t(e a$$airs o$ a de$inite territor;, al>a;s >it(in t(e $rame>or< o$ international la>, >it(out (o>ever becoming dependent on t(e %uridical s;stem o$ an; ot(er state. Ever; state is immediatel; sub%ect to international la>. "tates >(ic( >ould lac< t(is $ullness o$ po>er, or >(ose independence o$ t(e po>er o$ an; ot(er state >ould not be guaranteed b; international la>, >ould not be sovereign. 3ut no state could complain about a limitation o$ its sovereignt; i$ it >ere denied t(e po>er o$ acting arbitraril; and >it(out regard $or ot(er states. "overeignt; is not a divinization o$ t(e state, or omnipotence o$ t(e state in t(e .egelian sense, or a$ter t(e manner o$ absolute %uridical positivism. III +(ere is no need to explain to ;ou students o$ la> (o> t(e setting up, maintenance and operation o$ a real communit; o$ states, especiall; one t(at >ould embrace all peoples, give rise to man; duties and problems, some o$ t(em extremel; di$$icult and complicated, >(ic( cannot be solved b; a simple ;es or no ans>er. "uc( >ould be t(e question o$ race and origin, >it( t(eir biological, ps;c(ological and social consequencesB t(e question o$ languageB t(e question o$ $amil; li$e, >it( its relations, var;ing according to nation, bet>een (usband and >i$e, parents, t(e larger $amil; groupB t(e question o$ t(e equalit; or equivalence o$ rig(ts in >(at regards goods, contracts and persons $or t(e citizens o$ one sovereign state >(o eit(er live $or a s(ort time in a $oreign state or, retaining t(eir o>n nationalit;, establis( permanent residence t(ereB t(e question o$ t(e rig(t o$ immigration or o$ emigration, and ot(er li<e questions. +(e %urist, t(e statesman, t(e individual state, as >ell as t(e communit; o$ states s(ould (ere ta<e account o$ all t(e inborn inclinations o$ individuals and communities in t(eir contracts and reciprocal relationsB suc( as t(e tendenc; to adapt or to assimilate, o$ten pus(ed even to an attempt to absorbB or contrari>ise, t(e tendenc; to exclude and to destro; an;t(ing t(at appears incapable o$ assimilationB t(e tendenc; to expand, to embrace >(at is ne>, as on t(e contrar;, t(e tendenc; to retreat and to segregate onesel$B t(e tendenc; to give onesel$ entirel;, $orget$ul o$ sel$, and its opposite, attac(ment to onesel$, excluding an; service o$ ot(ersB t(e lust $or po>er, t(e ;earning to <eep ot(ers in sub%ection, and so on. /ll t(ese instincts, eit(er o$ sel$Caggrandizement or o$ sel$Cde$ense, (ave t(eir roots in t(e natural dispositions o$ individuals, o$ peoples, o$ races, and o$ communities, and in t(eir restrictions and limitations. -ne never $inds in t(em ever;t(ing t(at is good and %ust. ?od alone, t(e origin o$ all t(ings, possesses >it(in .imsel$, b; reason o$ .is in$init;, all t(at is good. 5rom >(at Je (ave said, it is eas; to deduce t(e $undamental t(eoretical principle $or dealing >it( t(ese di$$iculties and tendenciesD >it(in t(e limits o$ t(e possible and la>$ul, to promote ever;t(ing t(at $acilitates union and ma<es it more e$$ectiveB to remove ever;t(ing t(at disturbs itB to tolerate at times t(at >(ic( it is impossible to correct but >(ic(, on t(e ot(er (and, must not be permitted to ma<e s(ip>rec< o$ t(e communit;, $rom >(ic( a (ig(er good is (oped $or. +(e di$$icult; rests in t(e application o$ t(is principle. IV In t(is connection, Je >is( to treat >it( ;ou >(o are (app; to pro$ess ;ourselves Cat(olic %urists, concerning one o$ t(e questions >(ic( arises in a communit; o$ peoples, t(at is, t(e practical coCexistence GQconvivenzaRI o$ Cat(olic >it( nonC Cat(olic states. 2epending upon t(e religious belie$ o$ t(e great ma%orit; o$ citizens, or b; reason o$ an explicit declaration o$ la>, peoples and member states o$ t(e international communit; >ill be divided into t(ose t(at are C(ristian, nonCC(ristian, indi$$erent to religion or consciousl; >it(out it, or even pro$essedl; at(eist. +(e interests o$ religion and moralit; >ill require $or t(e >(ole extent o$ t(e international communit; a >ellCde$ined rule, >(ic( >ill (old $or all t(e territor; o$ t(e individual sovereign memberCstates o$ t(e international communit;. /ccording to probabilit; and depending on circumstances, it can be $oreseen t(at t(is ruling o$ positive la> >ill be t(us enunciatedD >it(in its o>n territor; and $or its o>n citizens, eac( state >ill regulate religious and moral a$$airs b; its o>n la>s. *evert(eless, t(roug(out t(e >(ole territor; o$ t(e international communit; o$ states, t(e citizens o$ ever; memberCstate >ill be allo>ed t(e exercise o$ t(eir o>n belie$s and et(ical and religious practices, inso$ar as t(ese do not contravene t(e penal la>s o$ t(e state in >(ic( t(e; are residing. 5or t(e %urist, t(e statesman and t(e Cat(olic state arises (ere t(e questionD can t(e; give t(eir consent to suc( a ruling >(en t(ere is question o$ entering and remaining in an international communit;S *o>, in regard to religious and moral interests, a t>o$old question arisesD t(e $irst deals >it( t(e ob%ective trut( and t(e obligation o$ conscience to>ard >(at is ob%ectivel; true and goodB t(e second deals >it( t(e practical attitude o$ t(e international communit; to>ard t(e individual sovereign state and t(e attitude o$ t(e individual state to>ard t(e international communit; in >(at regards religion and moralit;. +(e $irst question can (ardl; be a matter $or discussion and legal ruling bet>een t(e individual states and t(e international communit;, especiall; in t(e case o$ a pluralit; o$ di$$erent religious belie$s >it(in t(e international communit;. -n t(e ot(er (and, t(e second question can be o$ extreme importance and urgenc;. V *o> to give t(e rig(t ans>er to t(e second question. /bove all, it must be clearl; stated t(at no (uman aut(orit;, no state, no communit; o$ states, >(atever be t(eir religious c(aracter, can give a positive command or positive aut(orization to teac( or to do t(at >(ic( >ould be contrar; to religious trut( or moral good. "uc( a command or suc( an aut(orization >ould (ave no obligator; po>er and >ould remain >it(out e$$ect. *o aut(orit; ma; give suc( a command, because it is contrar; to nature to oblige t(e spirit and t(e >ill o$ man to error and evil, or to consider one or t(e ot(er as indi$$erent. *ot even ?od could give suc( a positive command or positive aut(orization, because it >ould be in contradiction to .is absolute trut( and sanctit;. /not(er question, essentiall; di$$erent, is t(isD could t(e norm be establis(ed in a communit; o$ statesPat least in certain circumstancesPt(at t(e $ree exercise o$ a belie$ and o$ a religious or moral practice >(ic( possess validit; in one o$ t(e member states, be not (indered t(roug(out t(e entire territor; o$ t(e communit; o$ nations b; state la>s or coercive measuresS In ot(er >ords, t(e question is raised >(et(er in t(ese circumstances =non impedire= or toleration is permissible, and >(et(er, consequentl;, positive repression is not al>a;s a dut;. Je (ave %ust adduced t(e aut(orit; o$ ?od. Could ?od, alt(oug( it >ould be possible and eas; $or .im to repress error and moral deviation, in some cases c(oose t(e =non impedire= >it(out contradicting .is in$inite per$ectionS Could it be t(at Qin certain circumstancesR .e >ould not give men an; mandate, >ould not impose an; dut;, and >ould not even communicate t(e rig(t to impede or to repress >(at is erroneous and $alseS / loo< at t(ings as t(e; are gives an a$$irmative ans>er. ,ealit; s(o>s t(at error and sin are in t(e >orld in great measure. ?od reprobates t(em, but .e permits t(em to exist. .ence t(e a$$irmationD religious and moral error must al>a;s be impeded, >(en it is possible, because toleration o$ t(em is in itsel$ immoral, is not valid Qabsolutel; and unconditionall;.R Moreover, ?od (as not given even to (uman aut(orit; suc( an absolute and universal command in matters o$ $ait( and moralit;. "uc( a command is un<no>n to t(e common convictions o$ man<ind, to C(ristian conscience, to t(e sources o$ ,evelation and to t(e practice o$ t(e C(urc(. +o omit (ere ot(er "criptural texts >(ic( are adduced in support o$ t(is argument, C(rist in t(e parable o$ t(e coc<le gives t(e $ollo>ing adviceD let t(e coc<le gro> in t(e $ield o$ t(e >orld toget(er >it( t(e good seed in vie> o$ t(e (arvest Gc$. QMatt.R 8ED6:CE7I. +(e dut; o$ repressing moral and religious error cannot t(ere$ore be an ultimate norm o$ action. It must be subordinate to Q(ig(er and more generalR norms, >(ic( Qin some circumstancesR permit, and even per(aps seem to indicate as t(e better polic;, toleration o$ error in order to promote a Qgreater good.R +(us t(e t>o principles are clari$ied to >(ic( recourse must be (ad in concrete cases $or t(e ans>er to t(e serious question concerning t(e attitude >(ic( t(e %urist, t(e statesman and t(e sovereign Cat(olic state is to adopt in consideration o$ t(e communit; o$ nations in regard to a $ormula o$ religious and moral toleration as described above. 5irstD t(at >(ic( does not correspond to trut( or to t(e norm o$ moralit; ob%ectivel; (as no rig(t to exist, to be spread or to be activated. "econdl;D $ailure to impede t(is >it( civil la>s and coercive measures can nevert(eless be %usti$ied in t(e interests o$ a (ig(er and more general good. 3e$ore all else t(e Cat(olic statesman must %udge i$ t(is condition is veri$ied in t(e concretePt(is is t(e =question o$ $act.= In (is decision (e >ill permit (imsel$ to be guided b; >eig(ing t(e dangerous consequences t(at stem $rom toleration against t(ose $rom >(ic( t(e communit; o$ nations >ill be spared, i$ t(e $ormula o$ toleration be accepted. Moreover, (e >ill be guided b; t(e good >(ic(, according to a >ise prognosis, can be derived $rom toleration $or t(e international communit; as suc(, and indirectl; $or t(e member state. In t(at >(ic( concerns religion and moralit; (e >ill also as< $or t(e %udgment o$ t(e C(urc(. 5or (er, onl; .e to >(om C(rist (as entrusted t(e guidance o$ .is >(ole C(urc( is competent to spea< in t(e last instance on suc( vital questions, touc(ing international li$eB t(at is, t(e ,oman Ponti$$. VI +(e institution o$ a communit; o$ nations, >(ic( toda; (as been partl; realized but >(ic( is striving to be establis(ed and consolidated upon a (ig(er and more per$ect level, is an ascent $rom t(e lo>er to t(e (ig(er, t(at is, $rom a pluralit; o$ sovereign states to t(e greatest possible unit;. +(e C(urc( o$ C(rist (as, in virtue o$ a mandate $rom (er 2ivine 5ounder, a similar universal mission. "(e must dra> to (ersel$ and bind toget(er in religious unit; t(e men o$ all races and o$ all times. 3ut (ere t(e process is in a certain sense t(e contrar;D s(e descends $rom t(e (ig(er to t(e lo>er. In t(e $ormer case, t(e superior %uridical unit; o$ nations >as and still is to be created. In t(e latter, t(e %uridical communit; >it( its universal end, its constitution, its po>ers and t(ose in >(om t(ese po>ers are invested are alread; establis(ed $rom t(e beginning, b; t(e >ill and decree o$ C(rist .imsel$. +(e dut; o$ t(is universal communit; $rom t(e outset is to incorporate all men and all races Gc$. Matt. 6HD89I and t(ereb; to bring t(em to t(e $ull trut( and t(e grace o$ Kesus C(rist. +(e C(urc(, in t(e $ul$illment o$ t(is (er mission, (as al>a;s been $aced and is still $aced in large measure b; t(e same problems >(ic( t(e $unctioning o$ a communit; o$ sovereign states must overcomeB onl; s(e $eels t(em more acutel;, $or s(e is obligated to t(e purpose o$ (er mission, determined b; (er 5ounder .imsel$, a purpose >(ic( penetrates to t(e ver; dept(s o$ t(e spirit and (eart o$ man. In t(is state o$ a$$airs con$licts are inevitable, and (istor; s(o>s t(at t(ere (ave al>a;s been con$licts, t(ere still are, and, according to t(e >ords o$ t(e 0ord, t(ere >ill be till t(e end o$ time. 5or t(e C(urc( >it( (er mission (as been, and is con$ronted >it( men and nations o$ marvelous culture, >it( ot(ers o$ almost incredible lac< o$ civilization, and >it( all possible intermediate degreesD diversit; o$ extraction, o$ language, o$ p(ilosop(;, o$ religious belie$, o$ national aspirations and c(aracteristicsB $ree peoples and enslaved peoplesB peoples t(at (ave never belonged to t(e C(urc( and peoples t(at (ave been separated $rom (er communion. +(e C(urc( must live among t(em and >it( t(emB s(e can never declare be$ore an;one t(at s(e is =not interested.= +(e mandate imposed upon (er b; (er divine 5ounder renders it impossible $or (er to $ollo> a polic; o$ nonCinter$erence or QlaissezC$aire.R "(e (as t(e dut; o$ teac(ing and educating in all t(e in$lexibilit; o$ trut( and goodness, and >it( t(is absolute obligation s(e must remain and >or< among men and nations t(at in mental outloo< are completel; di$$erent $rom eac( ot(er. 0et )s return no>, (o>ever, to t(e t>o propositions mentioned aboveD and in t(e $irst place to t(e one >(ic( denies unconditionall; ever;t(ing t(at is religiousl; $alse and morall; >rong. Jit( regard to t(is point t(ere never (as been, and t(ere is not no>, in t(e C(urc( an; vacillation or an; compromise, eit(er in t(eor; or in practice. .er deportment (as not c(anged in t(e course o$ (istor;, nor can it c(ange >(enever or >(erever, under t(e most diversi$ied $orms, s(e is con$ronted >it( t(e c(oiceD eit(er incense $or idols or blood $or C(rist. +(e place >(ere ;ou are no> present, Eternal ,ome, >it( t(e remains o$ a greatness t(at >as and >it( t(e glorious memories o$ its mart;rs, is t(e most eloquent >itness to t(e ans>er o$ t(e C(urc(. Incense >as not burned be$ore t(e idols, and C(ristian blood $lo>ed and consecrated t(e ground. 3ut t(e temples o$ t(e gods lie in t(e cold devastation o$ ruins (o>soever ma%esticB >(ile at t(e tombs o$ t(e mart;rs t(e $ait($ul o$ all nations and all tongues $erventl; repeat t(e ancient Creed o$ t(e /postles. Concerning t(e second proposition, t(at is to sa;, concerning tolerance in determined circumstances, toleration even in cases in >(ic( one could proceed to repression, t(e C(urc(Pout o$ regard $or t(ose >(o in good conscience Gt(oug( erroneous, but invincibl; soI are o$ di$$erent opinionP(as been led to act and (as acted >it( t(at tolerance, a$ter s(e became t(e "tate C(urc( under Constantine t(e ?reat and t(e ot(er C(ristian emperors, al>a;s $or (ig(er and more cogent motives. "o s(e acts toda;, and also in t(e $uture s(e >ill be $aced >it( t(e same necessit;. In suc( individual cases t(e attitude o$ t(e C(urc( is determined b; >(at is demanded $or sa$eguarding and considering t(e Qbonum commune,R on t(e one (and, t(e common good o$ t(e C(urc( and t(e "tate in individual states, and, on t(e ot(er, t(e common good o$ t(e universal C(urc(, t(e reign o$ ?od over t(e >(ole >orld. In considering t(e =pro= and =con= $or resolving t(e =question o$ $acts,= as >ell as >(at concerns t(e $inal and supreme %udge in t(ese matters, no ot(er norms are valid $or t(e C(urc( except t(e norms >(ic( Je (ave %ust indicated $or t(e Cat(olic %urist and statesman. VII +(e ideas Je (ave set $ort( ma; also be use$ul $or t(e Cat(olic %urist and statesman >(en, in t(eir studies or in t(e exercise o$ t(eir pro$ession, t(e; come in contact >it( t(e agreements GConcordats, +reaties, /greements, QModus vivendiR, etc. I >(ic( t(e C(urc( Gt(at is to sa;, $or a long time no>, t(e /postolic "eeI (as concluded and still concludes >it( sovereign states. +(e Concordats are $or (er an expression o$ t(e collaboration bet>een t(e C(urc( and "tate. In principle, t(at is, in t(eor;, s(e cannot approve complete separation o$ t(e t>o po>ers. +(e Concordats, t(ere$ore, must assure to t(e C(urc( a stable condition in rig(t and in $act in t(e "tate >it( >(ic( t(e; are concluded, and must guarantee to (er $ull independence in t(e $ul$illment o$ (er divine mission. It is possible t(at t(e C(urc( and t(e "tate proclaim in a Concordat t(eir common religious convictionB but it ma; also (appen t(at a Concordat (ave, toget(er >it( ot(er purposes, t(at o$ $orestalling disputes >it( regard to questions o$ principle and o$ removing $rom t(e ver; beginning possible matters o$ con$lict. J(en t(e C(urc( (as set (er signature to a Concordat, it (olds $or ever;t(ing contained t(erein. 3ut, >it( t(e mutual ac<no>ledgment o$ bot( (ig( contracting parties, it ma; not (old in t(e same >a; $or ever;t(ing. It ma; signi$; an express approval, but it ma; also mean a simple tolerance, according to t(ose t>o principles >(ic( are t(e norm $or t(e coCexistence GQconvivenzaRI o$ t(e C(urc( and (er $ait($ul >it( t(e civil po>ers and >it( men o$ anot(er belie$. +(is, beloved sons, is >(at Je intended to treat o$ >it( ;ou rat(er $ull;. 5or t(e rest, Je are con$ident t(at t(e international communit; can banis( ever; danger o$ >ar and establis( peace, and, as $ar as t(e C(urc( is concerned, can guarantee to (er $reedom o$ action ever;>(ere, so t(at s(e ma; be able to establis( in t(e spirit and (eart, in t(e t(oug(ts and actions o$ men, t(e Tingdom o$ .im >(o is t(e ,edeemer, t(e 0a>giver, t(e Kudge, t(e 0ord o$ t(e >orld, Kesus C(rist, >(o rules as ?od over all t(ings, blessed $orever GQ,om.R 9DFI. J(ile >it( -ur paternal good >is(es Je $ollo> ;our >or< $or t(e greater good o$ nations and $or t(e per$ecting o$ international relations, $rom t(e $ullness o$ -ur (eart Je impart to ;ou, as a pledge o$ t(e ric(est divine graces, t(e /postolic 3enediction.