PLAINTIFFS DYSON, INC. AND DYSON TECHNOLOGY LIMITEDS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Dyson, Inc. and Dyson Technology Limited (collectively, Dyson), by their undersigned counsel, move this Court for leave to file the Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement to add U.S. Patent No. D577,163. Dyson has met and conferred with counsel for Defendants Euro-Pro Operating LLC and Euro-Pro Sales Company (collectively, Euro-Pro), and Euro-Pro has indicated in writing that it does not oppose this Motion. In light of this proposed amendment, the parties have worked together to revise the proposed schedule for this case, which is filed concurrently with this motion and sets August 13, 2014 as the deadline for parties to amend pleadings. WHEREFORE, Dyson respectfully requests that this Court enter an order granting Dyson leave to file its Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. A copy of the Amended Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
By: /s/ Bryan S. Hales, P.C. Bryan S. Hales, P.C. (IL Bar No. 6243060) bhales@kirkland.com Ann Marie T. Wahls (IL Bar No. 6275778) awahls@kirkland.com Ian J. Block (IL Bar No. 6299117) ian.block@kirkland.com Jay J. Emerick (IL Bar No. 6312746) jay.emerick@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 North LaSalle Chicago, Illinois 60654 Telephone: (312) 862-2000 Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice) glocascio@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 655 Fifteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-5793 Telephone: (202) 879-5000 Facsimile: (202) 879-5200
Counsel for Plaintiffs Dyson, Inc. and Dyson Technology Limited
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 6, 2014, the foregoing document was filed electronically through the Courts Electronic Case Filing System. Service of this document is being made upon all counsel of record in this case by the Notice of Electronic Filing issued through the Courts Electronic Case Filing System on this date.
AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiffs Dyson, Inc. and Dyson Technology Limited (collectively, Dyson) file this Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement against Defendants Euro-Pro Operating LLC and Euro-Pro Sales Company (collectively, Euro-Pro), hereby demand a jury trial, and allege as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is a civil action for infringement. This action is based upon the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq. THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Dyson, Inc. is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois. 3. Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited is a private limited company organized and existing under the laws of England and Wales, with its principal place of business in Malmesbury, United Kingdom. Case: 1:14-cv-00779 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 05/06/14 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:157
2
4. On information and belief Defendant Euro-Pro Operating LLC is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the state of Delaware with an office and principal place of business located at 180 Wells Avenue, Newton, Massachusetts 02459. 5. On information and belief Defendant Euro-Pro Sales Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Delaware with an office and principal place of business located at 180 Wells Avenue, Newton, Massachusetts 02459. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 7. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Euro-Pro because Euro-Pro has conducted and is conducting substantial business in this Judicial District, both generally and with respect to the allegations in this Complaint, and Euro-Pro has committed one or more acts of infringement in this District. 8. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(c) and 1400(b) because Euro-Pro has regularly conducted business in this District and has committed, and is continuing to commit, acts of patent infringement in this District by making, using, importing, selling, or offering to sell vacuum cleaners, accessories, and parts that infringe Dysons patents. THE PATENTS 9. On September 25, 2012, United States Patent No. D668,010 (the 010 patent), entitled VACUUM CLEANER (Exhibit A), duly and legally issued. 10. Dyson Technology Limited owns all rights, title, and interest in and to the 010 patent and has the right to sue and recover for past, present, and future infringement. Case: 1:14-cv-00779 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 05/06/14 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:158
3
11. Under a license to the 010 patent from Dyson Technology Limited, Dyson, Inc. sells and distributes Dyson vacuum cleaners, accessories, and parts in the United States. 12. On October 9, 2012, United States Patent No. D668,823 (the 823 patent), entitled VACUUM CLEANER (Exhibit B), duly and legally issued. 13. Dyson Technology Limited owns all rights, title, and interest in and to the 823 patent and has the right to sue and recover for past, present, and future infringement. 14. Under a license to the 823 patent from Dyson Technology Limited, Dyson, Inc. sells and distributes Dyson vacuum cleaners, accessories, and parts in the United States. 15. On September 16, 2008, United States Patent No. D577,163 (the 163 patent), entitled CLEANING APPLIANCE (Exhibit C), duly and legally issued. 16. Dyson Technology Limited owns all rights, title, and interest in and to the 163 patent and has the right to sue and recover for past, present, and future infringement. 17. Under a license to the 163 patent from Dyson Technology Limited, Dyson, Inc. sells and distributes Dyson vacuum cleaners, accessories, and parts in the United States.
COUNT I - INFRINGEMENT OF THE 010 PATENT 18. Paragraphs 1 through 17 are incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein. 19. Euro-Pro has manufactured, used, imported, offered for sale, or sold vacuum cleaners, accessories, and parts, including at least the Shark Rocket and its accessories and parts, that directly or indirectly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least the claim of the 010 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. Case: 1:14-cv-00779 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 05/06/14 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:159
4
20. Euro-Pros infringement has damaged and continues to damage and injure Dyson. The injury to Dyson is irreparable and will continue unless and until Euro-Pro is enjoined from further infringement. 21. Euro-Pro has engaged and is engaging in willful and deliberate infringement of the 010 patent. Such willful and deliberate infringement justifies an increase of three times the damages to be assessed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and further qualifies this action as an exceptional case supporting an award of reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285.
COUNT II - INFRINGEMENT OF THE 823 PATENT 22. Paragraphs 1 through 17 are incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein. 23. Euro-Pro has manufactured, used, imported, offered for sale, or sold vacuum cleaners, accessories, and parts, including at least the Shark Rocket and its accessories and parts, that directly or indirectly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least the claim of the 823 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. 24. Euro-Pros infringement has damaged and continues to damage and injure Dyson. The injury to Dyson is irreparable and will continue unless and until Euro-Pro is enjoined from further infringement. 25. Euro-Pro has engaged and is engaging in willful and deliberate infringement of the 823 patent. Such willful and deliberate infringement justifies an increase of three times the damages to be assessed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and further qualifies this action as an exceptional case supporting an award of reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285.
COUNT III - INFRINGEMENT OF THE 163 PATENT 26. Paragraphs 1 through 17 are incorporated by reference as though fully stated herein. 27. Euro-Pro has manufactured, used, imported, offered for sale, or sold vacuum cleaners, accessories, and parts, including at least the Shark Rocket and its accessories and parts, that directly or indirectly infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least the claim of the 163 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. 28. Euro-Pros infringement has damaged and continues to damage and injure Dyson. The injury to Dyson is irreparable and will continue unless and until Euro-Pro is enjoined from further infringement. 29. Euro-Pro has engaged and is engaging in willful and deliberate infringement of the 163 patent. Such willful and deliberate infringement justifies an increase of three times the damages to be assessed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and further qualifies this action as an exceptional case supporting an award of reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Dyson prays that this Court: A. Enter a judgment that Euro-Pro has infringed, actively induced others to infringe, and/or contributorily infringed the 010, 823, and 163 patents; B. Award Dyson damages in an amount sufficient to compensate Dyson for Euro- Pros infringement, active inducement of others infringement, and/or contributory infringement of the 010, 823, and 163 patents, but not less than a reasonable royalty; C. Award Dyson prejudgment interest pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284. Case: 1:14-cv-00779 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 05/06/14 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:161
6
D. Award Dyson the total profits from Euro-Pros infringing sales pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289, by reason of Euro-Pros infringement of the 010, 823, and 163 patents. E. Award Dyson increased damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, in an amount not less than three times the amount of actual damages awarded to Dyson, by reason of Euro-Pros willful infringement of the 010, 823, and 163 patents; F. Enter a permanent injunction enjoining Euro-Pro, its officers, directors, servants, managers, employees, agents, attorneys, successors and assignees, and all persons in active concert or participation with any of them, from further acts of infringement of the 010, 823, and 163 patents, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283; G. Declare this case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 285 and award Dyson its reasonable attorneys fees, expenses, and costs incurred in prosecuting this action; and H. Grant Dyson such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. JURY DEMAND
Dyson hereby demands a jury trial on all issues appropriately triable by a jury.
By: /s/ Bryan S. Hales, P.C. Bryan S. Hales, P.C. (IL Bar No. 6243060) bhales@kirkland.com Ann Marie T. Wahls (IL Bar No. 6275778) awahls@kirkland.com Ian J. Block (IL Bar No. 6299117) ian.block@kirkland.com Jay J. Emerick (IL Bar No. 6312746) jay.emerick@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 North LaSalle Chicago, Illinois 60654 Telephone: (312) 862-2000 Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
Gregg F. LoCascio, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice) glocascio@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 655 Fifteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-5793 Telephone: (202) 879-5000 Facsimile: (202) 879-5200
Counsel for Plaintiffs Dyson, Inc. and Dyson Technology Limited
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 6, 2014, the foregoing document was filed electronically through the Courts Electronic Case Filing System. Service of this document is being made upon all counsel of record in this case by the Notice of Electronic Filing issued through the Courts Electronic Case Filing System on this date.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS DYSON, INC. AND DYSON TECHNOLOGY LIMITEDS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT This Court has reviewed Plaintiffs Dyson, Inc. and Dyson Technology Limiteds (collectively, Dyson) Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Having found that good cause has been shown, this Court hereby GRANTS the motion, and accordingly directs Dyson to file the Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: , 2014 The Honorable John W. Darrah United States District Judge