JOURNAL ARTICLE 2 Until this course started, scientific inquiry was a totally new word for me. As I did not know the meaning of scientific inquiry, I looked up the term in an online dictionary. Wilfred Franklin, a biology laboratory instructor at Humboldt State University in CA, wrote in his web page that scientific inquiry is inquiry based approaches to science education focused on student constructed learning as opposed to teacher-transmitted information. Then, I recalled a good example for that. When I was a middle school student, I did an experiment in a science class. It was an experiment to know acidity and alkalinity with litmus papers. I remembered that various solutions such as lemon juice and thinned ammonia were prepared in beakers and we dripped droplets of various solutions on litmus papers to see changing of colors. I just followed what the science teacher instructed us with tools prepared by a teacher in an unfamiliar laboratory where I rarely visited. Although I did not know about the meaning of scientific inquiry at first, I knew that it was different from what I experienced in the science class. To know the meaning of scientific inquiry, I chose an article from a journal named Science and Children issued in September 1999. This article was written by two writers, Hedy Moscovici, an assistant professor at California State University, and Christine Cardy, a fifth-grade teacher at Carl Cozier Elementary in Bellingham, Washington. The title of article is Developing Inquiring Minds: Students use chromatography to separate the colors in leaves. In this article, Moscovici and Cardy write that many elementary teachers tend to involve their students in activitymania which means implementation of a series of disconnected, short, hands-on experiences these days. However, what Moscovici and Cardy suggest in the article is that classes of scientific inquiry should be not activitymania but the practice of inquiry. In classes of scientific inquiry, students should decide to investigate scientific questions with their interests. Their interest questions should be a springboard for scientific inquiry. Scientific inquiry is implement the practice of inquiry (Moscovici & Carty, 1999). There are five steps when students implement scientific inquiry: planning, experiments, JOURNAL ARTICLE 3 data analysis, and finalizing the conclusion and discussion. Eventually, students are required to write laboratory report including a hypothesis, needed materials, a procedure, and results. Students should understand scientific inquiry by completing those five steps (Moscovici & Carty, 1999). In addition, students should use inquiry in the classroom with being organized into groups of four to six and a group consists of five to seven students. Students should use scientific inquiry as group activities in the classroom to solve scientific questions. Each member plays an important role for the scientific inquiry. Each student has responsibility such as a writer, an actor, a reader, and an observer. In the article, Moscovici showed his students information about color change on autumn trees. With students interest in natural color change of trees, students themselves created questions and planned their experiment by group. (Moscovici & Carty, 1999). Position Statement of National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) clearly describes regarding scientific inquiry. The scientific inquiry means activities through which students develop knowledge and understanding of scientific ideas. In the process to learn the strategies of scientific inquiry, students ask questions and use evidence to answer them. Students implement investigation and collect evidence, make an explanation from the collected data, find conclusion. Those are the same ideas as the article I introduced as the third and forth items in the previous paragraph (National Scientific Teachers Association, 2004). Now I understand that the scientific inquiry was not an easy experiment without understanding as I experienced when I was a middle school student. After I read the article in Science and Children and NSTA Position Statement about scientific inquiry, I clearly acquire how scientific inquiry should be implemented by students. Scientific inquiry includes several academic steps: students ask questions to scientific phenomena, build a hypothesis, collect evidences, develop an explanation, and find conclusion. According to National Institute of Medical Science, it is reported that different types of questions require different types of JOURNAL ARTICLE 4 researches and investigations. Scientific inquiry is flexible. It affects scientific students skill (Fuchs, 2005). Eventually, students write a report to communicate their conclusion to others. As teachers, we can help them successfully learn scientific inquiry for each step as described in NSTA Position Statement. It is one of examples to give them useful scientific terminology so that students easily tell scientific contents. (National Scientific Teachers Association, 2004). When I read both the article written by Moscovici and Cardy in Science and Children and NSTA Position Statement and compare them, I noticed that the core concept is identical. It is that students find questions, and do experiments to find answers. All elements such as question, experiments, and answers are created by students themselves. The article shows four detail advices for teachers to help students learning about scientific inquiry: teachers should be reflective for each scientific inquiry in a class, teachers should encourage planning group inquiry after group negotiation, teachers should give resources for students challenges, and teachers need to have rubrics for assessment which can facilitate individual growth (Moscovici & Carty, 1999). Those advices put what NSTA recommends science teachers in Declarations into effect (National Scientific Teachers Association, 2004). When I ask myself at the end of this assignment what I learned about the scientific inquiry, my answer is that the scientific inquiry is activities by students to develop understanding of scientific ideas, which includes several academic steps such as questioning, making hypothesis, implementing investigation, collecting evidence, analyzing the data, finding a conclusion, and making a report to tell the conclusion to others. Those are not just to follow teachers instruction like I did. Those ideas of scientific inquiry may help students understand and be interested in science. JOURNAL ARTICLE 5
References Franklin, W. (n.d.). Inquiry based approaches to science education: theory and practice. Web Page. Retrieved from http://www.brynmawr.edu/biology/franklin/ InquiryBasedScience.html Fuchs, B. (2005). Doing science: the process of scientific inquiry. National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Retrieved from http://science.education.nih.gov/supplements/ nih6/inquiry/guide/nih_doing-science.pdf National Scientific Teachers Association. (2004, October). Scientific inquiry. NSTA position statement. Retrieved from NSTA website: http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/inquiry.aspx Moscovici, H., & Carty, C. (1999, September). Developing inquiring minds. Science and Children, 38-43. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Chiaki/Downloads/Scientific% 20inquiry%20journal%20article%20assignment%20(1).pdf