Primary Sources: Works Cited Coke, Sir Edward. The Institutes of the Laws of England.

We quoted Sir Edward Cokes viewpoint, quoted from his work, on the Born Alive Rule in our discussion of the historical background of abortion, which was from this set of treatises. This gave us an idea of the legal position of abortions in England, which was integrated into early colonial society. In contrast with beliefs that abortion has been only recently legalized, abortion restrictions only began to be enacted in the 19th century. Comstock, Anthony. Traps for the Young. 1883. We quoted Anthony Comstock, the anti-obscenity crusader of the late 19th century, in our website to illustrate an example of Comstocks views and his rejection of things such as information regarding abortion and contraceptives. "Choice at Risk: Mini Docs & Clips." Choice at Risk. Ed. Dorothy Fadiman. N.p., n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://choiceatrisk.org/videos.shtml>. This website was extremely helpful by providing numerous multimedia resources. Its videos documented personal experiences from women who had been impacted by abortion restrictions before the Roe v. Wade decision. We used excerpts of videos from this website throughout our project to illustrate the pro-choice viewpoint and to give a deeper perspective of abortion prior to the its legalization. Evantanto, Azevedo. Interview by Helen Yang. 17 Feb. 2014. Azevedo Evantanto was a participant of the Youth Rally and Mass for Life. We used this interview to show the pro-choice viewpoint that exists throughout America in the aftermath of the Roe v. Wade case. Kokoski, Paul. Ronald Reagan: Everybody that is for abortion has already been born. New York Times. September 22nd, 1980. Print. This newspaper article displays Ronald Reagans opinion on abortion as well as the new Republican stance on abortion overall, a change that took place in 1980. We

found Reagans quote to be extremely powerful and representative of the central beliefs of those who associate themselves with being pro-life. March for Womens Lives Photographs. N.d. NOWs 1992 March for Womens Lives. NOW. NOW. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.now.org/history/slideshows/marches/index.php?image=George.jpg>. We used these photos from the March For Womens Lives directly from the original archive to show the strength of the pro-choice movement that existed even in the longer-term aftermath of the case. These photos appear on the Long-Term Reception slideshow. McCorvey, Norma, and Andy Meisler. I Am Roe: My Life, Roe V. Wade, and Freedom of Choice. New York: HarperCollins, 1994. Print. We used this to show the plantiff, Norma McCorvey aka Roes first person opinion on the case prior to her decision to become pro-life. This shows her participation in the case as well as her opinion on the right to abortion. NARAL Pro-Choice America. President Obamas Message to NARAL Pro-Choice America Supporters. Youtube. youtube.com, 6 February 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf9njSsFmEg>. We used this video to get a quote showing President Obamas pro-choice support of Roe v. Wade 40 years after the decision of the case was made. It can be found in our long-term reception page. Ney, Philip, Dr. Interview with Dr. Philip Ney. Priests for Life. Priests for Life, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.priestsforlife.org/media/interviewney.htm>. We used this to see the pro-life standpoint on the right to abortions effect on womens health, and the psychological toll that abortion takes on women. "Penal Code of the State of Texas." 1911. PDF file. 28 Feb. 2014. We used this for photos and additional text for reference on the Texas state abortion law

called into question during the Roe v. Wade trial. The source is a primary source, as it is the actual Texas State Penal code in PDF format. Planned Parenthood Executive Office, Adrian. Personal interview. 24 Feb. 2014. We used this to show the opinion of an abortion provider regarding the right to abortion and the open opportunity to provide abortions. Weddington, Sarah. Winning Roe v. Wade: Q&A with Sarah Weddington Read more: Winning Roe v. Wade: Q&A with Sarah Weddington. Interview by Valerie Lapinski. TIME 22 Jan. 2013: n. pag. Print. We used this as interview to see Sarah Weddington, the plaintiffs lawyers viewpoint on the case and its development throughout the years. Whose Choice: How the Hyde Amendment Harms Poor Women. Center for Reproductive Rights. Center for Reproductive Rights, 31 Sept. 2010. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://reproductiverights.org/en/feature/whose-choice-how-the-hyde-amendment-harmspoor-women>. We used this video on our post-Roe cases page to show the effect of the Hyde Amendment on low-income women. It shows the changes to abortion rights that have occurred since Roe.

Secondary Sources: Works Cited AP Photo. The 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade. 18 Jan. 2013. Photograph. US News. We used these photos for our Title page presentation, and on select pages in the website. They depict the battle for womens right to abortion from the time of the case to the present, 40 years after the case was decided. Boonstra, Heather D. The Heart of the Matter: Public Funding of Abortion for Poor Women in the United States. Guttmacher Institute. Ed. Guttmacher Institute. Guttmacher Institute, 2007. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/10/1/gpr100112.html>. We used this to research the problems with funding abortion clinics that have existed since Roe v. Wade was decided. The problem has grown more and more severe in recent years. Balkin, Jack M., ed. What Roe v. Wade should have said. New York and London: New York UP, 2005. Print. We used this book simply as a reference for opinions on the case in the aftermath of the case especially. It also enlightens us on some of the finer details of the case that the general overviews would miss. CBN News. March for life pushes the Adoption Option. Youtube. youtube.com, 6 February 2013. Web. 22 Jan. 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnMnw95NyeA>. We used this video in our pages to show the pro-life movement against Roe v. Wade 40 years after the decision of the case was made. It can be found in our long-term reception page. Center for Reproductive Rights. Roe v. Wade - Then and Now. Center for Reproductive Rights. Ed. Center for Reproductive Rights. reproductiverights.org, 1 July 2007. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://reproductiverights.org/en/document/roe-v-wade-thenand-now>.

We used this to research the problems that Roe v. Wade faces in todays world, especially regarding changes that have taken place in legislation for abortion and availability of abortion clinics in the United States. Chicago Tribune Company, LLC. Timeline of Abortion Laws and Events. Chicago Tribune. Ed. Chicago Tribune Company, LLC. Chicago Tribune Company, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.chicagotribune.com/sns-abortion-timeline,0,7911413.story>. We used this to create timelines of the before and after effects of Roe v. Wade, as it provides detailed historical information on public reception and legislative efforts by the US House of Representatives and Senate. Christianson, Stephen G., et al. Great American Trials. Detroit: Visible Ink, 1994. Print. We used this book as a reference for general information regarding Roe v. Wade. We were also able to find dissenting opinions and the long-term reception towards this case in this book. Chung, Jamie. 40 years after Roe v. Wade: Inside North Dakotas only abortion clinic. Time U.S. Time, 22 Jan. 2013. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <http://nation.time.com/2013/01/22/40-years-after-roe-inside-north-dakotas-onlyabortion-clinic/photo/01120924_time_clinic_day-1-0239b-crop/>. "Connecticut and the Comstock Law." Connecticut History. Connecticut Humanities, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://connecticuthistory.org/connecticut-and-the-comstock-law/>. This website gave an overview of the Comstock laws, particularly the Comstock law passed in Connecticut. This law was the strictest anti-abortion law during its time period. This website also provided a satirical cartoon of Comstock, which we used in our website to describe America's views on abortion during the 19th century, and a photograph of Comstock, which we also used in our website. Culp-Ressler, Tara. "How Some States Are Rolling Back The Clock To A Time Before Roe v. Wade." ThinkProgress 22 Jan. 2013: n. pag. ThinkProgress. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/01/22/1480281/life-before-roe/>.

This article focused on the socio-economic demographic of women who received abortions, and also spoke about how states have been recently repealing abortion rights, bringing us back to a state similar to that before the Roe v. Wade decision. We used this in our discussion of America's stance on abortion before and after Roe v. Wade. Cushman, Robert F., ed. Leading Constitutional Decisions. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1992. Print. We used this book as a reference for the court case documents of Roe v. Wade. "Dissent from Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton and their Progeny." EndRoe. NCHLA, n.d. Web. 3 Mar. 2014. <http://endroe.org/dissentswhite.aspx>. We used this page to provide information on the dissents of the Supreme Court justices and also for the pictures of the Justices who dissented. Feminism101.com. Timeline: Abortion Rights. Feminism 101. Ed. Feminism101.com. Feminism101.com, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.feminism101.com/timelineabortion.html>. We were able to use this website to display the course of events that have taken place from the beginnings of abortions existence in history to the current day events. This site uses a distinct feminist tone so we were careful to consider this in using the site. Fragile Promise of Choice: Abortion in the US Today. Dir. Dorothy Fadiman. Choice At Risk. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://choiceatrisk.org/videos.shtml>. We used these video clips to show the effects in the aftermath of the case, particularly regarding further court cases and effect on womens lives. Gold, Rachel Benson. "Lessons from Before Roe: Will Past be Prologue?" Guttmacher Institute. Alan Guttmacher Institute, Mar. 2003. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/06/1/gr060108.html>. This website (from the Guttmacher Institute, which is focused on advancing women's

rights regarding sexual and reproductive health) provides a brief overview of abortion prior to Roe v. Wade. It gave me insight about the illegal abortions that were prevalent prior to the landmark decision. The author illustrates her support of the Roe v. Wade decision with graphs illustrating abortion trends and abortion laws over the past few decades. Gold, Rachel Benson. Abortion and Women's Health: A Turning Point for America?, The Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York, 1990. This book contained a relevant image that showed which states had legalized abortion by 1972, right before the Roe v. Wade decision. This image proved to be extremely useful in illustrating the effect of the Model Penal Code, which reformed abortion laws in the years leading up to Roe v. Wade. Greenhouse, Linda, and Reva Siegel. Before Roe v. Wade. 2nd ed. N.p.: n.p., 2012. Print. We found this source to be extremely helpful in researching the historical background of Roe v. Wade, particularly during the years directly before the court decision. It gave a thorough of the perspective women had toward abortion before it was legalized, as well as viewpoints from both pro-abortion and anti-abortion figures. "History of Abortion." National Abortion Federation. National Abortion Federation, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.prochoice.org/>. This website was extremely helpful in giving an overview of abortion both before and after Roe v. Wade. Along with the timeline of the history of abortion, the website also provided some statistics. However, much of the information presented is under proabortion stance, so I was mindful in evaluating the website's content and attempted to lessen the bias as much as possible. Huffington Post Politics. Ill Not Yield - Wendy Davis Takes A Stand In Texas. Youtube. youtube.com, 1 July 2011. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je3lRGs-_AA>. We used this site for the video of Wendy Daviss filibuster in the summer of

2013, in the Long-Term reception page of our website. It was important, as it showed the distinct pressure that has been put on pro-choice activists to maintain their ground against legislation that has been distinctly anti-abortion in recent years. Joffe, Carol. Roe v. Wade and Beyond: Forty Years of Legal Abortion in the United States. Dissent. Ed. Dissent Magazine. Dissent Magazine, 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/roe-v-wade-and-beyond-forty-years-of-legalabortion-in-the-united-states>. We used this website as a reference for the effects that Roe v. Wade had on America, economically, socially, and politically. It was especially important in our AfterEffects page of the website, and we based a lot of our organization off of the article itself. Kliff, Sarah. "Thirteen charts that explain how Roe v. Wade changed abortion rights." Washington Post 22 Jan. 2014: n. pag. Washington Post. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/01/22/thirteen-charts-thatexplain-how-roe-v-wade-changed-abortion-rights/>. This article provided a multitude of graphs that illustrated abortion statistics, along with a brief analysis of each graph. These graphs proved especially relevant as we documented the effect of Roe v. Wade on both the mindsets of Americans and on the legal position on abortion. Levitt, Steven D., and Stephen J. Dubner. Freakonomics. New York: HarperCollins, 2005. Print. We used this book to display the interesting opinion that Roe v. Wade may have enabled the crime rate in America to go down. Levy, Ariel. Lift and Separate. New Yorker. N.p., 16 Nov. 2009. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2009/11/16/091116crbo_books_levy?curr entPage=all>. We used a photo from this article to display the feminist movement while Roe v. Wade was taking place.

Lewis, J., and O. Shimabukuro. "Abortion Law Development: A Brief Overview." Almanac of Policy Issues. N.p., 8 Jan. 2001. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.policyalmanac.org/culture/archive/crs_abortion_overview.shtml>. This website gave a detailed overview of abortion legislation throughout the years, which was extremely relevant in our research of the historical background behind Roe v. Wade. The authors utilize a professional and relatively neutral tone throughout, and much of the website's content lies on concrete description of legislation and court cases instead of opinionated commentary. The page also includes various citations toward court decisions, indicating in-depth research and supported evidence NRLC. Abortion History Timeline. National Right to Live. Ed. NRLC and PicoSearch. NRLC, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/history/>. This source was used in a similar way to the Feminist101 and Chicago Tribune source, to display the changing opinions and laws regarding abortion that have taken place since Roe v. Wade. NWLC. Roe v. Wade and the Right to Abortion. National Womens Law Center. Ed. National Womens Law Center. National Womens Law Center, 18 Jan. 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.nwlc.org/resource/roe-v-wade-and-right-abortion>. We used this website for general knowledge on the case, as well as for pictures for the Silent No More campaign. Oz8drive, and WarThemedRevolution. Norma McCorvey (Jane Roe from Roe v. Wade) Becomes Prolife. Youtube. Youtube.com, 4 May 2011. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc_TgP3QLE4>. We used this to show Jane Roe aka Norma McCorveys switch to become prolife, showing the effect that the pro-life movement has created. "People & Events: Anthony Comstock's 'Chastity' Laws." American Experience: The Pill. PBS, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevents/e_comstock.html>.

This website described the Comstock laws, which were anti-obscenity laws that severely limited a woman's access to materials regarding contraceptives or abortion. This website gave us an idea of the limited nature of abortions in the 19th and early 20th century. Pichler, Susanne. Roe v. Wade: Its History and Impact. Ed. Deborah Golub, MPH. Planned Parenthood. Ed. Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc. Katharine Dexter McCormick Library, 29 Dec. 2006. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.plannedparenthood.org/resources/research-papers/roe-v-wade-6578.htm>. We used this to research the history and impact of Roe v. Wade, and also called into the Planned Parenthood executive office (See primary sources) for more information. Pickert, Kate. What Choice? Time Magazine. Time, 14 Jan. 2013. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2132761,00.html>. We used this article to show the anti-choice, anti-abortion sentiment that has grown in the past few years. Rovner, Julie. Roe V. Wade Turns 40, But Abortion Debate Is Even Older. NPR. Ed. NPR. NPR, 22 Jan. 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2013/01/22/169637288/roe-v-wade-turns-40-butabortion-debate-is-even-older>. We used this for information on the extent and history of the abortion debate, and as a source for photos. Roe v. Wade and the Right to Abortion. National Womens Law Center. National Womens Law Center, 18 Jan. 2013. Web. 27 Feb. 2014. <http://www.nwlc.org/resource/roe-v-wade-and-right-abortion#factsheet>. We used this website for factual information on Roe v. Wade and the statistics for abortions. Roe v. Wade - Case Brief Summary. Lawnix. Lawnix, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.lawnix.com/cases/roe-wade.html>.

We used this website for general information on Roe v. Wade. Roe v. Wade. Cornell Law. Cornell University, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113>. We used this source for general information on Roe v. Wade and for specific insight into the case (using the papers from the case and the transcribed arguments). "Roe v. Wade: Its History and Impact." Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.plannedparenthood.org/resources/research-papers/roe-v-wade-6578.htm>. This website helped us develop our understanding of the history behind Roe v. Wade. It includes some cases that lead to the development of the Roe v. Wade decision, as well as the legality of abortion prior to the decision. The website also gives statistics that describe abortion conditions prior to legalization and afterward, which helped give us an idea of the effect of the legalization of abortion. RSF Review. The Rise of Women: Seven Charts Showing Womens Rapid Gains in Educational Achievement. Russel Sage Foundation. Ed. RSF. Russel Sage Foundation, 21 Feb. 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.russellsage.org/blog/rise-women-sevencharts-showing-womens-rapid-gains-educational-achievement>. We used this to show the gains in achievement that women have made since Roe v. Wade was decided in the aftermath portion. Scheidell, Dora. "Pioneers of women's rights movement reflect on Roe v. Wade anniversary." CNY Central 22 Jan. 2013: n. pag. CNY Central. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.cnycentral.com/news/story.aspx?id=851055#.UxZdVfldWSo>. The reporter of this article interviewed women who had experienced the effect of abortion legalization speaking about the importance of a woman having the right to abortion. We used a clip of this video in our website to illustrate the pro-abortion viewpoint prior to the Roe v. Wade decision. Silent No More Campaign. SPUC. SPUC, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.

<https://www.spuc.org.uk/about/snm/>. We used this website for photos on the Silent No More campaign, which displays the psychological toll that abortion takes on women. "Slide Show: Roe V. Wade and the Struggle for Legalized Abortion." New Yorker [New York]: n. pag. New Yorker. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/01/slide-show-roe-v-wadeand-the-struggle-for-legalized-abortion.html>. This article provided ten photographs, along with captions and sources, that illustrated the pro-abortion versus anti-abortion debate, from as far as 70 years ago to the present. We used these photographs throughout our website, such as in our homepage. Supreme Court Cases. Oyez. Chicago-Kent College of Law, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_18>. We used this website for information on the Supreme Court cases for quotes and images for our pages for During and After the case. Thomson Reuters. STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA, et al. v. CARHART. FindLaw. Ed. FindLaw. Thomson Reuters, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=530&invol=914>. We used this for information on a later Supreme Court case that was affected by roe, Stenberg v. Carhart. TIME. 40 Years After Roe: Inside North Dakotas Only Abortion Clinic. Time U.S. Ed. TIME. TIME, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://nation.time.com/2013/01/22/40-years-afterroe-inside-north-dakotas-only-abortion-clinic/photo/01120924_time_clinic_day-1-0239bcrop/>. We used this for information on the limitations that exist on Roe v. Wade 40 years after the case took place. Ushistory.org. Roe v. Wade and Its Impact. U.S. History Online Textbook. Ed.

Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://www.ushistory.org/us/57d.asp>. We used this for general information on the impact of Roe v. Wade in the United States in the aftermath of the decision. Whose Choice: How the Hyde Amendment Harms Poor Women. Center for Reproductive Rights. Ed. Center for Reproductive Rights. reproductiverights.org, 13 Sept. 2010. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. <http://reproductiverights.org/en/feature/whose-choicehow-the-hyde-amendment-harms- poor-women>. This site provided us with a video on how the Hyde Amendment, which took place after Roe v. Wade, hurt low-income women, as they were unable to get abortions, which worsened their financial situations. Youth Rally & Mass for Life Company. 2014 Event Recap. Youth Rally & Mass for Life. Ed. Youth Rally & Mass for Life Company. Archdiocese of Washington, n.d. Web. 4 Mar. 2014. We used this for information on the pro-life movement and the arguments that they make regarding restrictions on abortion from a religious standpoint. We also talked to several students about these restrictions.