Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Moisture levels were calculated by dividing the weight before freeze-drying by the weight after freeze-drying and multiplying this ratio by 100. Oil content was determined by homogenizing 1 g MS 20090895 Submitted 9/11/2009, Accepted 2/7/2010. Authors are finish-fried potato (total weight) with 2 mL dichloromethane uswith J. R. Simplot Co., Simplot Plant Sciences, 5369 West Irving St., ing a bullet blender (2 9 min). After centrifugation for 10 min at Boise, ID 83706, U.S.A. Direct inquiries to author Rommens (E-mail: 3300 rpm, extracts were filtered and then dried over anhydrous crommens@simplot.com). sodium sulfate. The oil percentage was calculated by multiplying
C 2010 Institute of Food Technologists R doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01588.x
H109
ach year, the potato industry converts billions of potato tubers into French fries. The crispness of this important convenience food depends in part on the starch content of the raw material (Kita 2002). Fry color, in contrast, is based on the amount of reducing sugars that accumulates during growth and storage (Iritani and Weller 1974). One of the principal tenets of quality control stipulates that the composition of tubers is influenced by genetic and environmental factors (Li and others 2008). For example, the glucose and fructose content in freshly harvested tubers often falls below 0.1 mg/g fresh weight (FW) but can increase to 8 mg/g FW or more on cold storage (Blenkinsop and others 2002; Matsuura-Endo and others 2006). The accumulated reducing sugars react with amino acids during heat processing and form dark Maillard products that lower the visual appeal of French fries. One Maillard product, acrylamide, also poses potential health issues because it displays neurotoxic activities (Lopachin 2005). Efforts to control color and acrylamide formation in fries by minimizing the variability between tubers have yielded some degree of success (Mackay 1996; Monti and Struik 1999; Matsuura-Endo and others 2006). Little has been done, however, to address the key heterogeneities within tubers, which appear inevitable and contribute to inconsistencies in food quality. Like other stem structures, tubers contain a central pith region with a diameter of 1.5 to 2.5 cm that has relatively large parenchyma cells. These cells accumulate more water and less starch than the compact cells of peripheral layers (Talburt and others 1987; Iranbakhsh and others 2007). Therefore, potato strips from the inner parts are expected to respond disparately to processing than strips from the outer tissue. Further, glucose and fructose concentrations may vary throughout the individual tuber. Many biotic and abiotic stresses trigger the accumulation of such reducing sugars at the
Introduction
apical and basal ends (Thompson and others 2008). The resulting concentration gradient causes local, uneven darkening during processing, generating French fries that often contain brown ends that are perceived as undesirable. In this study, we examined the quality of French fries that were produced from different parts of potato tubers. French fries from the inner cores of tubers were compared with those from outer tissues for sensory characteristics as well as for oil, acrylamide, and antioxidant content. We also evaluated the differences between conventionally produced linear fries and fries with a circular shape that only contained material from the outer tissues.
90
85 Moisture content 80 * *
75
70 65
60
In
Out
In
Out
Figure 1 --- Longitudinal (A) and latitudinal (B) diagram of Strips from Strips from cut a potato tuber. Areas shown in lighter gray shades conwhole tubers tubers tain more water and less dry matter than those in darker tones. The grid indicates a conventional knife system designed to produce potato strips. An inner strip is derived Figure 2 --- Moisture content of inner (In) and outer from the central part of the tuber, whereas an outer (Out) strips. Asterisks indicate statistically signicant differences between Out and In (P < 0.05). strip is from more peripheral parts. Table 1 --- Sensory evaluation of French fries from outer, inner, and mixed potato strips. Sensory rating Sample Out In Mix OutMiddle InMiddle Process Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Color 7.6 0.52 6.1 0.35 7.2 0.46 7.1 0.35 5.4 0.46 Color variation 6.1 0.35 6.4 0.52 7.4 0.46 5.5 0.35 5.0 0.35 Crispness 6.5 0.53 4.4 0.52 5.8 0.46 6.8 0.52 4.1 0.52 Mealiness 6.3 0.46 5.3 0.46 5.3 0.46 6.1 0.52 5.1 0.52 Texture variation 5.3 0.35 5.7 0.35 6.6 0.46 5.2 0.46 5.7 0.46 Flavor 7.1 0.64 5.5 0.52 6.0 0.52 7.2 0.46 5.0 0.46
Table 2 --- Optimization of French fry processing using inner potato strips Sensory rating Sample Out (control) In In In In Processa Standard 8:00/4:10 8:00/5:10b 10:00/4:10 10:00/5:10 Color 7.0 0.38 6.9 0.38 7.1 0.38 7.7 0.49 7.9 0.38 Color variation 5.6 0.38 6.7 0.49 6.9 0.38 6.6 0.53 7.1 0.38 Crispness 5.7 0.49 4.7 0.49 6.4 0.53 5.9 0.38 6.7 0.49 Mealiness 6.0 0.00 4.9 0.38 5.6 0.53 5.0 0.0 5.6 0.53 Texture variation 5.4 0.53 6.1 0.38 5.7 0.49 6.4 0.53 6.4 0.53 Flavor 6.8 0.81 5.5 0.50 6.6 0.63 6.0 0.0 6.4 0.85
Ratings for inner (In) fries that are inferior to those for outer (Out) fries are shown in bold (P < 0.05). a Times indicated are for drying/frying. b Optimal times for the processing of inner strips.
H111
Data represent the average ( standard deviation) from 3 sessions. Ratings for outer (Out) and/or inner (In) fries that are superior to those for mixed (Mix) fries are indicated in bold, whereas inferior ratings are shown in italics (P < 0.05). Inner fries from the middle parts of tubers (InMiddle) with lower ratings than outer fries from the middle parts of tubers (OutMiddle) are also shown in italics.
Product recovery
The cost of ring fry production is based, in part, on the percentage of raw material that is turned into rings (the recovery rate). This rate depends on the shape, especially the diameter, of tubers (Figure 7). Tubers that have a diameter below approximately 4.6 cm are generally not considered for conventional French fry processing and are also too narrow for the production of ring fries. Such tubers should be used for alternative applications, such as hash browns and dehydrated potato flakes. A minimum diameter of 4.6 cm
A
1600 1400 Acrylamide (ppb) 1200 *
B
0.1 Anoxidants (mg/g FW) In Out In 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 In Out
1000
800 600 400
200
0 Standard Processing opmized for inner strips processing
Figure 4 --- Biochemical analysis of strips and fries from various parts of potato tubers. (A) Processing-induced acrylamide levels, whereby the asterisk indicates a statistically signicant difference (P < 0.05) between inner fries that were prepared according to a modied process (longer drying and frying time) compared with fries that had been processed according to the standard process, and (B) amounts of ascorbate (black bars) and chlorogenic acid (gray) in strips.
A
Moisture content
60 55
B 14
12
Oil content (%-FW) 10 8 6 4 2 0 *
50 45 40 35 30 * *
In
Out
Standard Processing
In
Out
Standard processing
Figure 3 --- Comparison of inner (In) and outer (Out) French fries. (A) Moisture content. Asterisks indicate statistically signicant differences (P < 0.05) between inner fries that were prepared according to a standard process compared with outer fries that were processed in the same manner and inner fries that were dried and fried for extended periods of time. (B) Oil content of French fries from inner and outer parts of potato tubers. The asterisk indicates a statistically signicant difference (P < 0.05) between outer fries that were prepared according to a standard process compared with the inner fries, regardless of how they had been processed.
H112
Discussion
e have shown that inconsistencies in the color, texture, and taste of French fries are partly due to structural differences within the tuber. The high moisture content of potato strips from the inner tissues delays the cooking process of these strips. Thus, the application of a standard frying process for strips from both the inner and outer parts of the potato produced golden-colored and tasty, but undercooked, fries. The longer drying and frying times that were needed to enhance the sensory characteristics of inner fries resulted in overcooked outer fries that were dry and brown. In
Figure 5 --- Ring strips. (A) Generation of rings through slicing and cutting, (B) 0.7 0.7 cm potato rings with an inner diameter of 3.0 cm, (C) moisture content (the asterisk indicates a statistically signicant difference [P < 0.05] between ring and outer fries compared with inner fries), (D) ring fries, (E) oil content of ring fries compared with linear fries (the asterisk indicates a statistically signicant difference [P < 0.05] between outer and ring fries compared with inner fries), (F) salt content of ring and linear fries, and (G) salt perception as determined by a sensory panel.
C
70 Moisture content (%-FW) 60
50
* 40 30 20 10 0 Ring
Out
In
E
14 12 Oil content (%-FW) 10 8 6 * Salt (mg/g) *
F
6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 * Salness
G
7
6 5 4 3 2 1 Mixed Ring
4
2 0
In
Out
Ring
0.0
Mixed
Ring
Table 3 --- Sensory assessment of conventional and ring fries. Sensory rating Sample Conventional Ring fries Process Standard Standard Color 6.5 0.35 7.0 0.46 Color variation 6.5 0.52 5.5 0.52 Crispness 5.0 0.35 6.4 0.55 Mealiness 5.3 0.41 5.8 0.41 Texture variation 5.7 0.52 5.0 0.46 Flavor 6.5 0.55 6.8 0.55
Ratings for ring fries that are superior to those for conventional fries are indicated in bold (P < 0.05).
H113
A
4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
In Asparagine (mg/g FW)
B
Reducing sugars (mg/100 g FW) 200 175 150 125 100 75 50
25
0 In Ring
Ring
C
1000 Acrylamide (ppb) 800 600 400 200
D
0.1 Anoxidants (mg/g FW) Ring Out In 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 In Ring
Figure 6 --- Biochemical analysis of potato rings and ring fries. (A) Asparagine levels of inner strips compared with ring strips, (B) amounts of glucose (gray bars) and fructose (black) in inner strips compared with potato rings, (C) accumulated acrylamide levels in inner fries and ring fries, and (D) amounts of ascorbate (gray bars) and chlorogenic acid (black) in rings and strips. An asterisk indicates a statistically signicant difference (P < 0.05).
80 70
60 50 40 30 20
200 180 160 140
* 155 117.6
mg/g DW
10 0
120 100 80 60 40
40
50
60
70
80 mm-diameter
14.71 Figure 7 --- Calculated average recovery rate for ring strips 10.02 20 from Russet Burbank potato tubers with a specied minimum diameter. Tubers that have a diameter below 0 approximately 4.6 cm cannot be used for the rings deIn Out scribed in this study. In the calculations, we assumed that the removed tuber ends and skin/cortex regions represented 20% of the tuber volume for small tubers Figure 8 --- Total free amino acids (black bars) and protein (gray) content of inner and outer tuber tissues. (4.6 cm) and 15% for large tubers (7.8 cm dia).
H114 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCEVol. 75, Nr. 4, 2010
Conclusions
e demonstrated that fries from outer potato strips were crispier and tastier than those from inner strips. They also absorbed less fat, formed less acrylamide, and contained more antioxidants. Furthermore, the outer fries had a more consistent and uniform golden color and crispness compared to fries from entire peeled tubers. We further improved fry quality by using circular rather than linear tuber cuts. The resulting ring fries were generated from the outer parts of tubers and had a low surface-to-volume ratio. Ring fries shared excellent sensory properties with outer fries while absorbing less fat and accumulating less acrylamide.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Pradeep Shrestha, Josh Sutherland, and the Plant Sciences Sensory Panel are acknowledged for excellent technical assistance. This study was financially supported by J. R. Simplot Co.
References
Amrein TM, Limacher A, Conde-Petit B, Amado R, Escher F. 2006. Influence of thermal processing conditions on acrylamide generation and browning in a potato model system. J Agric Food Chem 54:59106. Bilanovic D, Malloy S, Remeta P, inventors; Bemidji State Univ. Foundation, assignee. 2006. Solid or semi-solid fermentation of xanthan on potato or potato waste. U.S. Patent Application nr 11/598,907.
H115