Newspapers and blogs: Closer than we think?

ABOUT
Search

BLOGS

SEMINARS

SPEAKERS
April 23, 2007

HOW TO APPLY

TRAINING & RESOURCES

CONTACT

OJR: THE ONLINE JOURNALISM REVIEW Newspapers and blogs: Closer than we think?
A content analysis of newspapers and blogs covering the Iraq War illuminates differences, and similarities, in sourcing.
By David Vaina 5 comments |

Archive Link

David Vaina is a research associate at the Project for Excellence in Journalism. Back in the mid-1850s, the English philosopher John Stuart Mill argued that a citizenry could not, would not, flourish unless it was nourished by the full spectrum of voices that exist among the people: It is, however, obvious that law and authority have no business with restraining either [side or sides of the debate], while opinion ought, in every instance, to determine its verdict by the circumstances of the individual case, condemning every one, on whichever side of the argument he places himself, in whose mode of advocacy either want of candour, or malignity, bigotry, or intolerance of feeling manifest themselves; but not inferring these vices from the side which a person takes, though it be the contrary side of the question to our own; and giving merited honour to every one, whatever opinion he may hold, who has calmness to see and honesty to state what his opponents and their opinions really are, exaggerating nothing to their discredit, keeping nothing back which tells, or can be supposed to tell in their favour. This is the real morality of public discussion. Well over one hundred years later, the blogosphere came into our lives, allowing us, in the words of Jerome Armstrong and Markos Moulitsas Zniga, to "hear voices that had been shut out of the corporate media outlets." These old "corporate media outlets," refusing to fade away, have held their ground. According to William Dietrich, a writer with the Seattle Times Sunday magazine, the sacred purpose of the newspaper reporter "is to fulfill an essential function of our democracy not just by disseminating information but also by analyzing it, detecting patterns, spotting trends, and increasing societal understanding." Indeed, bloggers may generate a more democratic Public Square, but can they facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of how political events are most likely to evolve, the Old Guard worries and wonders. In other words, Mill might not be enough. To contribute to this Great Debate, I decided to conduct a content analysis of how blogs and newspapers covered the Iraq War during one week in late March 2007. By looking at how the two media have sourced their news stories, I hoped to offer insights into what exactly the American public "hears" from newspapers and blogs. More specifically, my research, by examining five major newspapers and six popular political blogs, sought to answer three questions: Which media platform uses more sources? Which offers a more diverse range of sources? And which types of sources are more prevalent in each platform?

Findings
Overall, the data showed that blogs included a higher number of total sources and a slightly wider range of sources. Blogs included an average number of nine sources per blog posting, compared to an average of just six for newspapers stories. The gap between newspapers and blogs was considerably narrower when evaluating the types of sourcing. Still, blogs were slightly more diverse in their sourcing, with four sources per posting compared to an average of three in newspaper stories. Digging deeper, which types of sources were the two media most likely to use? Both blogs and newspapers were likely to include traditional Washington sources, both political and intellectual. But blogs and newspapers did diverge in several key ways. Compared to newspapers, blogs were considerably less likely than newspapers to include official Iraqi sources.

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/070423_vaina/[4/1/2011 12:14:09 AM]

Newspapers and blogs: Closer than we think?

And perhaps as a tell-tale sign of what the mainstream press really thinks of the blogosphere, just two percent of newspaper stories used a blog as a source. Not surprisingly, bloggers used other bloggers as sources at almost the same frequency as they used the mainstream press.

Sourcing in Blogs
Seven in ten (69%) blog postings included a mainstream media outlet (e.g. Washington Post, AP, The New York Times) as a source and 64% used other bloggers as sources. Political Washington was well represented. Thirty percent of all stories had a source from a Democratic politician or party strategist, 28% included one from a Republican or GOP operative, and 23% included a source from the White House. Meanwhile, a quarter (25%) included sources from the Pentagon, a soldier fighting in Iraq, or an immediate member of a soldier's family. Ten percent of all blog postings had a source from other government officials, such as analysts from the State Department or the American embassy in Iraq. Furthermore, 16% of all postings included a government document as a source, such as a hyperlink to a PDF of a legislative bill or the complete voting results for a particular bill from the Office of the Clerk at the U.S. House of Representatives. Considerably fewer blog postings, however, included sources from Iraqi government officials (11%), such as local police and security forces and hospital administrators, and an even smaller number offered sources from Sunni or Shiite politicians (five percent). And only two percent of all postings included a source from the Iraqi insurgency. Five percent of posts included sources from Iraqi civilians, and eight percent had sources from U.S. civilians. Finally, a quarter (25%) offered a source from a non-partisan, non-governmental entity, such as a think tank, polling organization, or university.

Sourcing in Newspapers
Turning to newspapers, the most frequent source was a U.S. military official or family member. Over half (53%) of all newspaper stories included a source from this cohortmore than double the percentage in blogs. The second most common source was a Democratic one; more than three in ten stories (32%) offered a Democratic source. A quarter (24%) included a source from the Bush Administration, and another 16% had a source from other Republican politicians or strategists. Another 22% included a source from other government officials outside the halls of Congress, the White House or the Pentagon. Newspapers were also likely to offer an Iraqi point of view. Thirty-one percent of all stories included sources from the Iraqi authorities. Two in ten (20%) stories included sources from either Shiite or Sunni politicians. An additional seven percent was from sources coded as insurgents. At the non-political level, newspapers were more likely to quote an Iraqi civilian, with ten percent of all stories offering this point of view. Half that percentage (five percent) included sources from U.S. civilians who were not family members of an American solider fighting in Iraq. Twenty-three percent used a poll, statement from a non-partisan think tank, or academic as a source. Finally, eight percent of stories used a mainstream media outlet as a source, and just two percent included blogs.

Conclusion
Much of the current debate in journalism that centers around how sourcing is used in blogs concerns the issues of verification of information not reported in the mainstream press. But for now, this doesn't appear to be their raison d'etre. The function of blogs may be an equally important one, however, offering a more nuanced, synthesized perspective not found anywhere else on the Web. Perhaps what's most at stake for blogs is to evaluate which voices are being synthesized. According to the data for this study, an admittedly limited one, bloggers may be missing perhaps the most important piece of the political puzzle when we acknowledge the realpolitik of Iraq. Both the American and Iraqi people are growing increasingly weary of the American military presence in Iraq, according to public opinion polls in both countries. If there is one point Democrats and Republicans can agree on it is that Iraq's future success rests on the further strengthening of Iraq's political institutions. Right now, it may be that the traditional pressrepresented by newspapers here-has picked up on this better than blogs. The data shows that roughly four times as many stories in newspapers included sources from leading Sunni and Shiite politicians as did blogs. Where blogs excelled, with more bloggers, media sources and original texts as sources, is perhaps more easily to duplicate for newspapers on their websites. What cannot be mimicked so easily is the ability to discern which way the political winds are blowing in Baghdad and Washington. One might dismiss this conclusion as an elitist, Lippmanian one. Regardless, it begs the question of whether or not the public most benefits from a traditional journalist sensibility that, despite its flaws and declining commitment

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/070423_vaina/[4/1/2011 12:14:09 AM]

Newspapers and blogs: Closer than we think? to foreign affairs, can still be found at the country's best newspapers. Perhaps all those years of having boots on the ground overseas still colors, positively, newspaper coverage. However, one should keep in mind that only a third (34%) of all bloggers considers their blog a form of journalism, according to a study from the Pew Internet & American Life Project. So my insights may be a case of trying to fit a round peg into a square hole. Furthermore, until the mainstream press can better understand that media consumption and production are increasingly conversational, collaborative activitieswhere bloggers and citizens talk to each otherperhaps the best advice I can give is to take the time to read a newspaper and a blog or two.

About the Study

For this study, I counted the number of sources over seven days in late March 2007 (March 23-March 29). Only stories with the war in Iraq as the dominant story (50% or more of the story) were coded. Overall, 172 newspaper stories and blog postings--the units of analysis--were coded. Sources did not have to be original. For example, a blog that quoted an interview from Senator John McCain that originally appeared in the Washington Post would be counted as a source, even though the actual reporting was not done by the blogger. Original sources, though in small numbers, could be found in blogs, most notably in Greg Sargent's postings on Talking Points Memo. First, I looked at five major newspapers: Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, The New York Times, USA Today, and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Wire stories that appeared in newspapers were included. A total of 111 newspaper stories were coded. Second, I conducted an analysis of three major blogs from the left and three from the right. They included: Talking Points Memo, Political Animal (the Washington Monthly blog), Daily Kos, Michelle Malkin, Powerline, and Hugh Hewitt. A total of 61 blog postings were analyzed for the research. For blogs, a source was defined as those that were available either on the homepage posting or those on secondary pages within one mouse click from the original blog posting. Then, sources within these secondary pages were coded as well (e.g. links to other news sources, bloggers, and government documents). This methodology was employed in order to measureas much as possiblethe total available number of sources that are consumed by the typical blog reader, and not just those that appear in the original blog posting. Sources within tertiary pages (and beyond) were not coded because I felt that only a small number of blog readers would actually read this deep into a blog posting. Nevertheless, these tertiary (and beyond) pages theoretically expand the number of potential sources and should be kept in mind before forming any firm conclusions about the nature of sourcing in blogs.

More about: Comments (5) Responses via Share on Email to a friend Technorati Digg Google Blog Search

del.icio.us

COMMENTS:

From Eric Connelly on April 26, 2007 at 7:35 AM Since most bloggers are people who post in their spare time, its not surprising that major newspapers, which can devote larger amounts of resources and reporters, have more official Iraqi sources. But does counting a source mean that the news thats reported more accurate? I dont think so. Just because a source is cited doesnt that persons opinion is reflective of the entire society or situation. And often, stories are written with the sources that get back to them first so a reporter can make a deadline, not necessarily the most qualified person to comment. And do bloggers citing other bloggers and newspapers really count as reporting news? I dont think so. They arent breaking any news, theyre just analyzing what theyve read. Its a useful service, and I think its still journalism, but its not the same as a wire story about the days events. Because I dont think including wire stories with blog posts is a valid way to make a comparison, I find fault with the study. However, I do think a valuable conclusion can be made about the nature of blogs v. newspapers. Blogs arent the place to go for hard news reporting, but they are excellent for analysis of what hard news is saying. Much of the argument on blogs is more informative and thoughtful than local newspaper columnists. This is a trend that can and will change sooner than later, but for now, go to blogs for opinions and stick with the morning paper for hard news.

From Jon Garfunkel on April 29, 2007 at 3:25 PM

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/070423_vaina/[4/1/2011 12:14:09 AM]

Newspapers and blogs: Closer than we think? Interesting study. Is this a preliminary piece of research, or the whole of it? I'd need to see more of your data published. *Which* newspapers and *which* blogs did you look at? How many? How many articles? Since blogs are highly diverse, wouldn't it be helpful for you to list the "deepsourced" ones as a helpful guide to us OJR readers? Also, it's certainly fair to say that a dedicated interest blog is much more similar to a special interest trade journal than a newspaper. Why not compare to Stars & Stripes and the military Times (for one or all four of the branches)? This sentence caught my eye: "And perhaps as a tell-tale sign of what the mainstream press really thinks of the blogosphere, just two percent of newspaper stories used a blog as a source." That's a bit of editorializing, wouldn't you agree? I spoke to a Pentagon correspondent last year when doing research for a report on milblogs. I asked her about whether she followed any blogs. She did follow Riverbend in Iraq, but couldn't quite distinguish among many of the stateside blogs, many of which were mostly derivative (quoting another blogger quoting a newspaper, etc.) There is NO STANDARD WAY in RSS for a publisher to mark whether a story is original or derivative. That explains why it's difficult to find original reporting within the blogosphere.

From Jill Zimon on April 30, 2007 at 10:13 AM Another aspect of using links has to do with giving the reader a chance to decide for himself or herself. Printed news makes it hard to immediately go and check to see, hmm, do I think the source said the same thing? But blogs offer the ability for a reader, a news consumer, to immediately check out a source and decide for themselves. No more "it's too complicated" to explain types of responses, no more concern about there not being enough room to say more. Just provide a link to the source and let the reader determine what is being said. Newspapers with online counterparts could do a better job at offering such tools for the reader to use.

From Jon Garfunkel on April 30, 2007 at 7:23 PM Jill: All online articles can include hyperlinks, not just blogs. It would be useful to compare the number of hyperlinks in an online version vs. a blog version. Granted, if a reporter quotes a source *directly* than that quote is the *primary source* so there is no place to hyperlink to.

From Jon Garfunkel on May 2, 2007 at 8:48 PM Forgive me: I missed the "About the Study" section. I must have skipped right down to the comments. It wasn't fair of me to comment without reading the whole piece. Still, something struck me about the piece, and now that I read it, this is what got me-- the fact that you were counting the sources from the media piece the blog itself sourced. That doesn't seem like an equitable comparison. "This methodology was employed in order to measureas much as possiblethe total available number of sources that are consumed by the typical blog reader, and not just those that appear in the original blog posting." I think that's a huge assumption to take. This article has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.

KDMC BLOGS
LEADERSHIP 3.0 BLOG
March 31, 2011

How search is evolving, and why news orgs must keep up

KDMC NEWS
March 29, 2011

Finding photo fakes; Getting started in podcasting

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/070423_vaina/[4/1/2011 12:14:09 AM]

Newspapers and blogs: Closer than we think?

OJR
JOIN OJR
Log-In Register

RECENT POSTS
March 28, 2011

Online communities need leadership: Will journalists provide it, or will someone else? By Robert Niles
March 24, 2011

An ad buyer's SEO advice for online news publishers By Brian McDermott

March 22, 2011

Q&A with Overheard in the Newsroom's Kevin Cobb By Robert Hernandez

March 21, 2011

Broadcast journalists also should learn to report what they do best and 'link' to the rest By Robert Niles
March 17, 2011

The paywall debate: The challenge of charging By Aaron Chimbel

TOP TAGS
entrepreneurial journalism social media management revenue tools grassroots journalism newsroom convergence journalism education ethics usability search engine optimization website design multimedia newspaper blogs discussion boards online video Google elections OJR conference political blogs

BROWSE THE ARCHIVES

2011 Jan. Feb. Mar. 2010 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2009 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2008 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2007

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/070423_vaina/[4/1/2011 12:14:09 AM]

Newspapers and blogs: Closer than we think? Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2006 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2005 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2004 Oct. Nov. Dec. Before Oct. 2004 Business Ethics Mark Glaser Stacy Kramer Law Spike Report Technology Workplace

FEED
RSS Feed

BEST OF OJR
How a 1995 court case kept the newspaper industry from competing online You've got to know what you stand for to survive in journalism online Readers owe nothing to publishers How, and where, to hyperlink within a news story Doing journalism in 2010 is an act of community organizing Thinking about starting an online news business? Here's your start-up checklist The four parts of an optimized online news website How to optimize your news website for better Google AdSense revenue The ethical journalist's guide to selling ads on a website: Part One Part Two Part Three

RSS Feed Twitter: @KDMC @KNIGHTFDN Site Map

The Knight Digital Media Center is a partnership between:

2011 Knight Digital Media Center | Funded by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/070423_vaina/[4/1/2011 12:14:09 AM]