To: judy356@msn.com Subject: Re: website removal From: mjwaxy@aol.com CC: i ormalen!o@"otmail.

com #ate: $ed% & Feb '(&' &5:)&:() *(5(( Judy: Thanks for doing this. I shall discuss it with Igor. I can tell you that I am not willing to agree to alter my law firm web site -- www.waxmanlaw.us in any substantial manner, and I shall not permit my client to agree to that. We did not agree to that on the record yesterday, so that may ha e to be specifically excepted. !nd the more I think of it, the less I am con inced that this "ourt has any power o er #$ in any fashion.

_____________________________________________________________________________ _

Pickering Investigations

Pic0erin% $n4esti%ations 77C +' =eech /ill *oad =lue /ill !? "4;14

Phone 82"9: 2;;<92+9 stephenp2>myfairpoint#net Fa( 82"9: '94<';@9

Stephanie Anderson Cumberland County District Attorney's Office 142 Federal Street Portland !aine "41"1 Dear !s# Anderson $ feel compelled to brin% information to your attention that may constitute the crime of Criminal Contempt of Court# On &anuary '1 2"12 at appro(imately 1")'"am in the Portland &udicial Center in Court *oom + a hearin% ,as bein% held# -he presidin% .ud%e ,as the /onorable &effrey !os0o,it1# Attorneys for the defendant ,ere &udy Potter and Ardith 2eith# Attorney for the plaintiff ,as !ichael 3a(man# At the end of the proceedin% defendant's attorney &udy Potter as0ed &ud%e !os0o,it1 about the defendant's ri%ht to ha4e 4isitation ,ith the minor child in 5uestion# &ud%e !os0o,it1 responded that there is a court order in place that allo,s the defendant to see her child# -he attorney for the plaintiff !ichael 3a(man stated that his client ,ill not honor that court order# -he .ud%e responded that there ,as a court order in place and it ,as to be adhered to# -hin%s %ot out of hand at this point and attorney 3a(man stood up pointed his fin%er at the .ud%e and stated 6$'m tellin% you6 that the court order ,ill not be honored# $ ,ill defer to the recordin% and or transcript as to the e(act ,ords and the tenor of the e(chan%e# 3a(man raised his 4oice to the .ud%e and some ,ould describe it as yellin% at the .ud%e#

-he proceedin% ,as disrupted by attorney 3a(man's ,illful disre%ard of &ud%e !os0o,it1's orders and his outburst made it impossible for attorney Potter to en%a%e the .ud%e so she could %i4e her opinion and information# &ud%e !os0o,it1 5uic0ly ad.ourned the hearin% after refusin% to %i4e attorney 3a(man le%al ad4ice as to ,hether his client ,as committin% ci4il contempt or criminal contempt by disobeyin% the .ud%e's court order# As the .ud%e left the courtroom attorney 3a(man turned his ne%ati4e and insultin% comments to attorney Potter and her client 7ori /andrahan# /e referred to /andrahan as 6that ,oman6# Attorney 3a(man unfortunately added you to the mi( by sayin% that he ,as %oin% to file char%es a%ainst you and sue you as ,ell# -his is not an isolated incident# On &une 21 2"11 7ori /andrahan attempted to pic0<up her dau%hter from $%or !alen0o for 4isitation# !alen0o refused contact bet,een mother and dau%hter and contacted attorney 3a(man# /andrahan contacted South Portland police as did !alen0o or attorney 3a(man# One of the respondin% officers Patty !aynard conferred ,ith attorney 3a(man# After the con4ersation she can be clearly heard on a recordin% made by /andrahan usin% phrases such as 6best interest of the child6 and 6super4ised 4isits6# /andrahan ,as told to contact t,o specific case ,or0ers at D//S and to %et an attorney# $ contacted the South Portland Police Dispatch# Officer !aynard ,ould not tal0 to me directly but throu%h the dispatcher she stated that the paper ,or0 that she loo0ed at ,as in fact a le%al document# -he paper that attorney 3a(man sho,ed Officer !aynard ,as a letter dated April 2+ 2"11that stated D//S had unsubstantiated alle%ations of abuse a%ainst $%or !alen0o# Attorney 3a(man used deception and lies to influence the police officer's actions to further aid his client in disobeyin% the court order as it pertains to 4isitation# On &une 29 2"11 $ spo0e ,ith D//S Child Protecti4e Super4isor !ar0 Dalton ,ho ,as specifically mentioned to South Portland Police as a contact person for /andrahan# /e told me that under no circumstances did he tell !ichael 3a(man or $%or !alen0o that /andrahan ,ould be restricted to super4ised 4isits# $ spo0e ,ith D//S Case,or0er *ebecca Austin ,ho stated that she personally told 3a(man that she felt his in4ol4ement in the situation ,as ma0in% matters ,orse instead of better# Attorney 3a(man ,ill tell anyone that ,ill listen that /andrahan cannot see her dau%hter ,ithout bein% super4ised# -here is no such order by the court or D//S# Attorney 3a(man's client $%or !alen0o recently told staff 8?llen =er%: at the !aiden Co4e Daycare in Cape ?li1abeth that /andrahan cannot see her child unless the 4isit ,as super4ised# $t ,as the staff ,or0er's belief that !alen0o ,as 5uotin% a le%al court document# On Au%ust 12 2"11 $ ,as in attorney &udy Potter's office as she ,as en%a%ed in a conference call ,ith !ichael 3a(man and &ud%e !os0o,it1# $ ,as not part of the call but the con4ersation ,as loud enou%h that $ could hear it# -he sub.ect of 4isitation came up and attorney 3a(man stated that his client ,ould not allo, it# $ heard &ud%e !os0o,it1 say 6$ hope you 0no, ,hat you are doin%#6 $ understood this to be a ,arnin% from the .ud%e#

On February 1 2"12 attorney 3a(man sent an e<mail to attorney Potter# $ include a portion of that e<mail here# 6And the more I think of it, the less I am convinced that this Court has any power over ME in any fashion." =oth $%or !alen0o and !ichael 3a(man ha4e threatened /andrahan in ,ritin% ,ith arrest and incarceration if she attempts to see her dau%hter# $t ,ould appear that attorney 3a(man and $%or !alen0o are usin% threats of criminal prosecution to inhibit /andrahan from enforcin% a ci4il order# $ belie4e that both !ichael 3a(man and $%or !alen0o are no, and ha4e been committin% ci4il contempt of court since !ay of 2"11 and they both committed Criminal Contempt of Court on &anuary '1 2"12 by their ,illful disre%ard of the .ud%e's order in his courtroom as the .ud%e ,as affirmin% the order# -han0 you for your consideration of this matter# Contact me anytime if you need more information# Sincerely Stephen &# Pic0erin%
From: +li,abet" -oyes .mailto:li,anoyes@ mail.com/ Sent: $ednesday% February (0% '(&' 3:)) 12 To: anderson@cumberlandcounty.or Subject: 34-#R434-# 245+-67 3+4R8-9

Dear District Attorney Anderson $ ,as ama1ed << but not surprised << to hear today that !ichael 3a(man has filed suit a%ainst you as he said he ,ould immediately after the 1A'1A12 hearin%# $ ,as in court to support my friend 7ori /andrahan# -he .ud%e ,as to rule on !ila<related ,eb acti4ity# 3hat ensued ,as a bi1arre display of 3a(man's patholo%y# /e's un,illin% or unable to 0eep his arro%ance male4olence and creepiness under ,raps# $t ,as studdin% to ,atch and it ,as scary# -he hearin% focused on a medical photo%raph sho,in% an in.ury to !ila's %roin# Althou%h the %enitalia ,ere blac0ed out in the photo 7ori posted for se4eral hours on the ,eb 3a(man and !alen0o insisted the photo sho,ed the child's 64a%ina and anus6# 3a(man repeated this phrase many times# Once it ,as &udy Potter's turn to 5uestion !alen0o and after a fleetin% and mysterious appearance by 3a(man's la,yer Peter *od,ay 3a(man had a lau%hin% fit# &udy Potter as0ed the .ud%e to as0 him stop# Durin% a brief recess 3a(man tried to en%a%e a man he 0ne, to be on the ,itness list for the federal la, suit 3a(man has filed a%ainst 7ori# And then at the close of the hearin% the .ud%e said that the standin% court order %i4in% 7ori unsuper4ised 4isitation should be upheld pendin% the ne(t hearin%# 3a(man said 6$t ,ill not beB6 /e as0ed loudly if defyin% the order ,ould be a ci4il or criminal offense# !os0o,it1 said he ,ould not %i4e 3a(man le%al ad4ice# 6$f it's not it's not 6 the .ud%e said but repeated that there ,as a standin% court order# 3a(man said 6$'m tellin% COD 6 pointin% his fin%er and 4ery

a%%ressi4e 6that it's not %oin% to happen#6 /e ,as tal0in% o4er the .ud%e and mo4in% to,ard him repeatin% that he ,ould not obey the court order# !os0o,it1 told 3a(man o4er and o4er to 6sit do,n !r# 3a(man6 and calm do,n# 3a(man ,ho did not sit do,n 0ept challen%in% the .ud%e and insistin% that he ,ould not obey that his client ,ould not obey# -he .ud%e ad.ourned the court and left hastily# 3a(man ,ent completely off the rails at this point shoutin% and insistin% he ,ould not let the police ta0e !ila he ,ould not allo, that ,oman %et her hands on that child to ha4e !ila's 4a%ina and anus e(amined# /e said somethin% about char%es a%ainst you Stephanie Anderson and suin% you# -hen he flounced out the door as $ recall repeatin% 4a%ina and anus as if brandin% !ila ,ith his ,ords# $ ,ish you all the best ,ith this# /e's challen%in% e4eryone in po,er to stop him# ?li1abeth Eoyes Find attached a letter from 7ori's immi%ration la,yer re) !alen0o's status# ICE ltr 01 !1 .pdf %&'() *iew +ownload
From: Carrie Roc!well Sent: 2onday% February &3% '(&' ):&3 12 To: 4nderson@cumberlandcounty.or Subject: witness to 3earin on Tuesday% :an 3&%'(&' concernin 2ic"ael $axman;s un<ro=essional and t"reatenin be"avior

#ear 2s. 4nderson: 8 was a witness to t"e "earin t"at too! <lace :an 3&% '(&' under :ud e 2os!owit, w"ere 2ic"ael $axman be"aved t"reatenin ly toward everyone <resent includin t"e :ud e. 1lease view t"is as a =ormal com<laint o= 2ic"ael $axman>s un<ro=essional% and disturbin be"avior. 8 was <resent out o= concern =or 5ori 3andra"an and "er dau "ter 2ila% nei "bors and =riends o= mine in Sorrento% 2+. 4s an ex<erienced R- wit" a bac! round in substance abuse and <syc"iatric nursin obtained at :ac!son ?roo! 8nstitute bac! in

t"e late &@0(>s and in t"e last &) years in Re"ab nursin at Sono ee Re"ab and 5ivin +state in ?ar 3arbor% 8 am dee<ly concerned t"at a man ex"ibitin suc" violent% obsessive% contem<tuous out o= control be"avior as 2ic"ael $axman dis<layed is t"e dominatin =i ure in t"e li=e o= 5 year old 2ila% obsessively clin in to t"e c"ild w"ile denyin t"e ri "ts o= 2ila to "ave "er lovin mot"er care =or "er and be in "er li=e. T"e "earin be an wit" 2ic"ael $axman leadin t"e court into con=usion over labelin t"e massive amounts o= documents "e introduced% o= suc" <ro<ortions t"at it was clear no one "ad t"e time to ever read t"em. 3e t"en "aran ued "is client% 8 or 2alen!o% =or over an "our t"rustin at "im <ictures o= 8 or>s dau "ter>s anus and va ina% and readin aloud an email $axman "imsel= wrote to a woman w"om "e met on Faceboo! revealin "is t"ou "ts about w"at could be done to 2ila>s va ina wit" a co!e bottle. 4ll t"is was done to <rove w"at &( <eo<le in t"e room !new and could <rove wit" certainty was a lie. #urin t"e recess t"at =ollowed $axman be an tauntin 2r. ?ob 9ilman% also o= Sorrento% w"o was sittin directly be"ind me. 3e was be"avin li!e a bully tryin to <ic! a =i "t and only sto<<ed w"en it =inally dawned on "im t"at 2r. 9ilman was not oin to ta!e t"e bait.

$"en it became :udy 1otter>s turn to cross examine% $axman could not control "is snic!erin and disru<tive "ec!lin des<ite a warnin =rom t"e :ud e. :udy as!ed maybe 5 Auestions in order to brin t"e w"ole matter to a close as Auic!ly as <ossible. $"en t"e :ud e announced "e was u<"oldin "is court order to allow =or 5ori>s visits wit" 2ila% 2r. $axman burst into a ra e% and ran at t"e benc" drivin "is =in er towards t"e :ud e% screamin "e would never allow Bt"at woman to see t"at c"ild.C T"e :ud e did not"in ot"er t"an as! "im re<eatedly to sit down. $axman wanted le al council =rom t"e :ud e to !now w"et"er i norin t"e court order would be a civil or criminal matter. T"e :ud e declined to o==er advice. $axman didn>t sto< yellin t"reats at t"e court% at you t"e #4% at 5ori until "e =inally exited t"e "earin room w"ile screamin about 2ila>s <rivate <artsD meanw"ile% everyone sat Auietly stunned. 5ori was unmovin li!e a stone% clearly in s"oc!. 8 was "o<in t"e baili== "ad a taser% just in case 2r. $axman ste<<ed u< t"e r"etoric to actual violence. 8t>s been di==icult even writin t"is as my instinct =or sel= <reservation says to <ut it all be"ind and =ocus on somet"in more <ositive and li=e a==irmin . $ere it not =or 2ila and 5ori% 8 could do t"at. 8 don>t care about 2r. $axman. 8 only wis" t"e <arties concerned would be iven t"e o<<ortunity =or solvin t"eir <roblems wit"out t"e

inter=erence o= an un<ro=essional lawyer% and a clearly disturbed individual. Res<ect=ully% Carrie Roc!well% R-

From: newbold noyes .mailto:newboldnoyes@ya"oo.com/ Sent: 2onday% February &3% '(&' &(:)' 42 To: anderson@cumberlandcounty.or Subject:

!s Anderson $ ha4e ta0en a ,ee0 or so to ponder the an%ry outburst in family court on by !ichael 3a(man on &anuary '1# $ am at a loss to understand ho, this man is permitted to continue to 6practice6 la, in this state# Ob4iously $ am not trained in the la,F in my former life $ ,as a film ma0er directin% and producin% independent documentary film and corporate communications# $ am no, retired and as $ mentioned in an earlier email $ li4e in the same to,n as Dr 7ori /andrahan she has been a friend of our family for more than ten years# $ ha4e been increasin%ly concerned at the stran%e manner in ,hich she has been treated by the Cumberland County Family Court as run by &ud%e !os0o,it1# $t appears to me from the di4orce decree on,ard there has been a distinct animus to,ard her from the bench# One only has to read the decree to see that# $ ,as not in court for her di4orce but ,hether the .ud%mental attitude e(pressed in the di4orce decree is due to the &ud%e's apparent disli0e of her personally or his pro father's ri%hts stance or the incompetence of her la,yer or the mali%n influence of !r 3a(man on the &ud%e's decisions ,heree4er this comes from this ,as not a normal di4orce decree# -he unbalanced beha4iors and decisions ,hich ha4e been made in the subse5uent hearin%s ,hich $ ha4e attended are cause for my concern no, and $ feel should be cause for your concern as ,ell#

!y thou%hts are these) the la, and courts e(ist to arbitrate bet,een parties in dispute ,hether the case ci4il family or criminal# As the opposin% parties are emotionally in4ol4ed and anythin% but ob.ecti4e la,yers e(ist to present each parties position ,ith reason and clarity and one assumes ,ithout emotional outbursts snic0erin% baitin% ,itnesses or other,ise actin% irrationally and demeanin% to the court or to the opposin% party# -he .ud%e is there to 0eep the la,yers on trac0 to mediate points of la, and ar%ument and maintain decorum in the court# $n .uried cases the .ud%e really seems to ha4e limited po,ers basically decidin% ,hether ob.ection can be o4er ruled or sustained the ,itness is directed to ans,er the 5uestion etc# $n family court ,ith no .ury the .ud%e's po,er is more profound in that the .ud%e has is ultimate authority in determinin% the outcome of custody disputes di4orce decrees etc# And it seems there is no a4enue for appeal to a hi%her authority in family court # nor a mechanism by ,hich matters of a criminal nature can become matters for a criminal court rather than a family court# -he incidents $ ha4e seen and recorded in the hearin%s $ ha4e attended in the !alen0oA/andrahan case leadin% up to !r 3a(man's outburst on the '1st ha4e deeply disturbed me# -he accounts of the t,o hearin%s ,hich $ for,arded to you are replete ,ith instances in ,hich his contempt for his opposin% la,yer for Dr /andrahan for the fe, ,itnesses Dr /andrahan's la,yers ha4e mana%ed to %et admitted the e4idence they ha4e pro4ided and the &ud%e himself are blatant and to me far e(ceed the 4i%orous defense of his client the system re5uires of a la,yer# -he e4idence ,hich Dr /andrahan's la,yers ha4e attempted to introduce ,hich the &ud%e follo,in% !r 3a(man's lead has denied is compellin% professional and s,orn to su%%estin% physical as ,ell as se(ual abuse of this child yet custody ine(plicably ,as %ranted to the father# -his simply ma0es no sense# -he only time $ ha4e e4er seen the &ud%e stand up to !r 3a(man on any si%nificant point ,as ,hen the 5uestion ,as as0ed by !s Potter re%ardin% ,hether or not the court ordered 4isitation schedule should be enforced to ,hich the &ud%e ans,ered that yes it should at ,hich point !r 3a(man be%an his esclatin% tirade# -he &ud%e's response ,as not to 5uiet !r 3a(man do,n althou%h he did re5uest that !r 3a(man sit do,n and calm do,n ,hich !r 3a(man in his tantrum simply i%nore or did not hear as he ,as shoutin% to loudly# -he &ud%e did not attempt to discuss the 4isitation schedule nor to find out ,hy his order had not been follo,ed for nine months nor to find !r 3a(man in contempt for his uncontrolled outburst in4ol4in% shouted threats to deny the court ordered 4isitation# *ather the &ud%e chose abruptly to ad.ourn the court and flee the bench lea4in% his court in chaos ,ith !r 3a(man continuin% to shout and threaten# &ud%e !os0o,it1 has permitted !r 3a(man to act out in an increasin%ly troublesome manner ,ithout cautionin% this attorney in any meanin%ful ,ay# -hat is bad enou%h as all a &ud%e really has the po,er to do other than ma0e decisions from the bench is to 0eep control of his court# &ud%e !os0o,it1 has been unable to do that and the result is a la,yer ,ho e(presses contempt ,ith impunity# $t is as if the &ud%e ,ere afraid of !r 3a(man# 3hat disturbs me more is that if !r 3a(man's outbursts and an%er are typical ,hen he is th,arted ,a4in% his arms and shoutin% out of control red in the face literally spittin% his contempt for the .udicial process that for once ran contrary to his ,ishes if he can scare a &ud%e ri%ht off the bench and literally stun the se4eral

adults in a court room ,hat effect must this beha4ior ha4e on a child li0e !ilaG !r 3a(man says he has considerable contact ,ith her has de4eloped a deep attachment for her an affection so deep in fact that it is he ,ho states that he refuses the court order the permit this child to e4en see her mother ne4er mind spend any time ,ith her and ,ishes to erase any memory of her mother from this child's mind# At ,hat point does this beha4ior merit serious in4esti%ation and possible criminal char%es if not no,G $t seems to me that this case ,hich should be about !ila and her ri%ht to be ,ith her mother as the &ud%e ordered has become all about !r 3a(man and ,hat he ,ill permit# /is continuin% threats ha4e scared off se4eral la,yers from representin% Dr /andrahan ,itnesses ha4e chan%ed their testimony after a ha4in% a con4ersation ,ith !r 3a(man and no, he is re5uestin% a protection from abuse order to protect !ila and $%or !alen0o and himself from Dr /andrahan from the 4ery &ud%e ,ho fled his ,rath in the court room at the last hearin%# -his is preposterous and ,ould be funny if it ,ere not so serious# $t is Dr /andrahan ,ho should be %ranted a protection order from this out of control la,yer# $t is !$la ,ho should be ta0en from a threatenin% and documented dan%erous en4ironment in ,hich the family court $%or !alen0o and !ichael 3a(man ha4e placed her and !r 3a(man and !r !alen0o continue to 0eep her in 4iolation of the court o,n orders# -o me the entire .udicial process has abused this child and her mother from the 4ery be%innin%# $t is time for that to stop and for !ichael 3a(man to be called to account for ,hat amounts to 0idnappin% 4iolatin% court orders interferin% ,ith 4isitation ri%hts %ranted by the court to that mother and child contempt of court filin% harassin% and fri4olous la, suits ,itness tamperin% .ust to name a fe, char%es# So $ am filin% a complaint to you as District Attorney of Cumberland County to brin% to this matter some shred of decency ci4ility fairness reason and .ustice deli4ered rather that .ustice denied for that child and her mother# -he manner in ,hich !r 3a(man has beha4ed and ,hich the Court is by its silence sanctionin% means that not only is !ila in dan%er ,e all are for then there is no rule of la, and an outra%eous la,yer can do ,hat he ,ishes ,ithout conse5uence# -his is the ne%ation of ,hat $ thin0 you and other officers of the court stand for and ha4e s,orn to uphold# *espectfully Ee,bold Eoyes
From: Sent: $ednesday% February (0% '(&' &:(6 12 To: 5ori 3andra"anD Ste<"en 1ic!erin Subject: my version

"a#man
$%& % recipient

,how +etails

+ear #s. !ndersen, -lease accept this e-mail as official notice of complaint as to the beha ior of #ichael Waxman

on the (%st of January, .&%., at the "umberland "ounty "ourthouse. There are three ma/or areas of concern, hopefully your office can address one if not all of them. 0eginning with the blatantly false testimony #r. Waxman solicited from his alleged client, there are se eral phrases that come to mind, i.e. per/ury, suborning per/ury, falsifying e idence, conspiracy to commit a fraud upon the court, etc. I refer to his client as 1alleged1 because I belie e they ha e acted together and therefore should be iewed as co-defendant2s with their attorney-client pri ilege se ered. ,econd, I am listed as a witness in Waxman2s 3ederal lawsuit set to be heard this coming July. 4e knows full well he is not to contact me, yet on the morning of that Tuesday while the "ourt was on a short break he turned around in his chair and began 5uestioning me as I sat in the back row of the courtroom. I did not respond to any of his slimy pro ocations but I and the other people there stared at him in disbelief. The 5uestions kept coming for se eral minutes interspersed with commentary on what an honest fellow he is. This was nothing short of witness tampering and a iolation of /udicial and social ethics. 3inally, #r. Waxman2s bi6arre screaming at the close of the hearing, /ust before and after the /udge left the room, these were the rantings of a sociopath. I cannot understand why the /udge let this go on and then hurried away from the bench lea ing it going on, much akin to a court ersion of the 1Jerry ,pringer ,how1. I don2t know what, if anything, you can do with this information, but I do know #ichael Waxman is not acting as an agent of the "ourt and should not be licensed by the ,tate to perform e en the most mundane task. If there is more you re5uire of me I can be reached at this e-mail address or 7.&89:..;<=<. >obert 3. ?ilman ,ulli an, #aine