Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Department of Justice
Naini, Jamie B., Esq. Law Offices of Jamie B. Naini 6075 Stage Road Memphis, TN 38134
OHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel - MEM 167 N. Main St., Suite 737A Memphis, TN 38103
A 200-662-702
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case. Sincerely,
DOWtL ct1JVL)
Donna Carr Chief Clerk
Enclosure
Panel Members: Guendelsberger, John
Cite as: Cresencio Araujo-Navarro, A200 662 702 (BIA Oct. 18, 2013)
U.S.
Department of Justice
File: In re:
Memphis, TN
Date:
OCT 18 2013
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
APPEAL ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: ON BEHALF OF DHS: Jamie B. Naini, Esquire
APPLICATION: Voluntary departure The respondent, a native and citizen of Mexico, has appealed from the Immigration Judge's decision dated January 12, 2012, to the extent that the Immigration Judge denied the relief of voluntary departure. The record will be remanded to the Immigration Judge. Nonetheless, under the circumstances
of this case, where the respondent had not illegally entered the United States in the past 5 years and where he was the beneficiary of an approved visa petition, we find it appropriate to remand the record to the Immigration Judge to reconsider the respondent's eligibility for voluntary departure. We note that the respondent testified that he would leave the United States if granted voluntary departure and that the Immigration Judge did not make a determination that the respondent was not credible. departure. We also note that the respondent was not otherwise statutorily ineligible for voluntary
In addition, we would not conclude that a discretionary denial would be appropriate
including evidence related to the respondent's current eligibility for other relief. Accordingly, the following order will be entered. ORDER: The record is remanded to the Immigration Judge for further proceedings consistent
with the foregoing opinion and for the entry of a new decision.
Cite as: Cresencio Araujo-Navarro, A200 662 702 (BIA Oct. 18, 2013)
/ (
\,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION COURT MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
File:
A200-662-702
January 12,
2012
In the Matter of
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
CHARGES:
APPLICATIONS:
Voluntary departure,
pre-completion.
WILLUM VERMELL
JONATHAN M. LARCOMB
ORAL DECISION AND ORDER OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE On November 30, 2010, the Department of Homeland Security
filed a Notice to Appear against the above named respondent with the Immigration Court. The filing of this charging document
admitted into evidence as Exhibit 1. Respondent appeared in court on June 16, 2011 and conceded
Based upon
respondent's concessions and the certificate of service attached to the Notice to Appear, properly served. the Court finds that the respondent was
before appearing before an Immigration Judge, regulation. Respondent also appeared on June 16,
factual allegations contained in the Notice to Appear, he is not a citizen or national of the United States, a citizen and national of Mexico,
paroled after inspection by an Immigration Officer, that he entered the United States in 1983.
The resp9ndent
further conceded his removability pursuant to INA Section 212(a)(6) (A)(i). Based upon the respondent's admissions and concession, Court has sustained the charge and finds the respondent removable. In that, the Department of Homeland Security has by the
clear and convincing evidence established the alienage of respondent and that respondent has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is lawfully present in the United States pursuant to a prior admission. 24 0(c) (2) (B); 8 C.F.R. Section 24 0.8(c). To qualify for Section
A200-662-702
January 12,
2012
proceedings under INA Section 240 have been or will be initiated . Respondent must also show that he has not been
granted voluntary departure and that he is willing and has the means to depart immediately, matter of discretion . that he deserves the relief as a
Discretionary considerations of an
application include the weighing of all factors including the alien's prior immigration history, the length of residence in business and 14 I&N
Matter of Gamboa,
Respondent has testified on direct examination that he will leave the United States if he is granted voluntary departure, that he has the money to leave the United States, and that his
only arrest was his arrest in connection with these Immigration proceedings . Respondent, however, on cross-examination
testified that he initially came into the United States in 1983, but has had many entries into the United States, annually before the year 2000, immigration border. at least
indicated that he has only a brother in the United States and is married, but his wife is in Mexico . He also has six children in
Mexico and the reason that he has come to the United States is because he supports his children in Mexico .
A200-662-702
January 12,
2012
(
\
The Court has weighed all of the factors, the immigration history of the respondent.
and in particular
come to the United States as he has testified in order to support his family and returns every year, approximately the last five years or so. with the exception o f The Court i s not
convinced that the respondent has the willingness to depart the United States and to remain in Mexico should voluntary departure be granted, given the fact that the respondent has been
traveling in and out of the United States since 1983 and has, notwithstandin the fact that he has been stopped at the border _ on many occasions, Therefore, returned repeatedly to the United States.
the Court is not convinced that the respondent will remain outside of the United States or that he intends to leave as well as in its discretion. ORDERS Based upon the foregoing, the following order will enter:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent be removed to Mexico on the charges stated in the Notice to Appear.
:
4
January 12,
2012
(
I
CERTIFICATE PAGE
I hereby certify that the attached proceeding before JUDGE REBECCA L. HOLT, in the matter of:
CRESENCIO ARAUJO-NAVARRO
A200-662-702
MEMPHIS,
TENNESSEE
is an accurate,
.
by the Executive Office for Immigration Review and that this is the original transcript thereof for the file of the Eecutive Office for Immigration Review.
Inc .
2012
:!
(Completion Date)
', 1
.'ii' -