Comparison Between CDMA and GSM

Operator LOGO
Comparison Between CDMA and GSM

Version V1.0 Date 2009-03-05 2009-05-31 2010-02-22 Author Li C !n"in# %ian# &ao Li C !n"in# Li C !n"in# Approved By Li M Remarks $ot open to t e t ird part" Add t e 'GV (pdate &emp)ate
. 2009 *&+ Corporation. A)) ri# ts reser/ed. ZTE CO !"DE T"A#$ & is do1!ment 1ontains proprietar" in,ormation o, *&+ and is not to 2e dis1)osed or !sed wit o!t t e prior written permission o, *&+. D!e to !pdate and impro/ement o, *&+ prod!1ts and te1 no)o#ies3 in,ormation in t is do1!ment is s!24e1ted to 1 an#e wit o!t noti1e.
*&+ Con,identia) -roprietar"
. 2009 *&+ Corporation. A)) ri# ts reser/ed.
&ABL+ O5 CO$&+$&S
% Data &er'orman(e Comparison))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) % 1.1 -er,orman1e 0nde6 Comparison............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Con1)!sion............................................................................................................................... 2 * Voi(e Capa(ity Comparison)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) + 2.1 Comparison o, -er,orman1e 0nde6es.......................................................................................' 2.2 Con1)!sion............................................................................................................................... 5 , Covera-e Area and BTSs um.er Comparison))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))/ 3.1 Co/era#e Area......................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Comparison o, B&Ss $!m2er 8e9!ired ,or t e Same Co/era#e.............................................: + Comparison o' CA&E0 and O&E0)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 1 2 Summary %3 / Appendi4$ Emu5ation Do(uments))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) %3 7.1 GSM ; +d#e Data.................................................................................................................. 10 7.2 CDMA1< ; +V-DO Data........................................................................................................ 11 7.3 0ntrod!1tion to t e Voi1e Capa1it" +6pansion &e1 no)o#ies -ro/ided 2" GSM and CDMA1<12 7.3.1 Voi1e Capa1it" +6pansion &e1 no)o#" -ro/ided 2" GSM................................................12 7.3.2 Voi1e Capa1it" +6pansion &e1 no)o#" -ro/ided 2" CDMA1<.........................................13 7.3.3 &e1 ni1a) Comparison...................................................................................................... 15 6 A..reviations))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) %/
00
50G(8+S
Comparison .etween the &eak !orward Se(tor Throu-hput and the Avera-e !orward Se(tor Throu-hput* Comparison .etween the &eak Reverse Se(tor Throu-hput and the Avera-e Reverse Se(tor Throu-hput* Se(tor Voi(e Capa(ity Comparison 7%3 M89 etworkin-:))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))+
Comparison o' the um.er o' BTSs Re;uired 'or the Same Covera-e)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))6 O&E0 < CA&E0 (omparison .etween GSM and CDMA))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))1 Comparision o' various te(hni;ues)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) %3 Di''erent sta-es o' EDGE down5ink peak rate))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))%% %4 and DO the peak rate at di''erent sta-es))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))%% Comparision o' voi(e (apa(ity in %3M=.andwidth)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))%*
&ABL+S
Te(hni(a5 "nde4es Comparison))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) % Se(tor Voi(e Capa(ity Comparison 7%3 M89 etworkin-:))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))+
Comparison o' Covera-e Area o' .etween CDMA Ce55 and GSM Ce55))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))/ O&E0 Data 1 CA&E0 Data))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 1 A..reviations)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) %/
000
1
1.1
Data -er,orman1e Comparison

-er,orman1e 0nde6 Comparison
&a2)e 1 &e1 ni1a) 0nde6es Comparison
CDMA %0 C anne) 2andwidt 1.25 M=>
EV=DO Rev)A 1.25 M=>
EV=DO Rev)B $ 6 1.25 M=> Se1ond a), o, 2009
Ed-e 200 ?=> 0t as 2een p!t into 1ommer1ia) !se on a )ar#e s1a)e. +d#e is 1ompati2)e wit GSM in t e same 1arrier.
Ed-e evo 2 6 200 ?=>
+stimated time o, 1ommer1ia) !se
0t as 2een p!t into 1ommer1ia) !se on a )ar#e s1a)e.
2009
5orward 1ompati2i)it" mode
O/er)a" networ? wit CDMA1<
O/er)a" networ? wit CDMA1 <
+d#e e/o wi)) 2e 1ompati2)e wit GSM in t e same 1arrier.
$etwor?in# mode -ea? rate @?2psB $!m2er o, 1 anne)s per se1tor -ea? rate o, se1tor @?2psB A/era#e rate o, se1tor @?2psB ote$ Down)in? (p)in?
0ntra-,re9!en1" networ?in# 71' 71' 330:2 13C00 '3915 13C00
0nter-,re9!en1" networ?in# @1A3 re!seB ':' ':' 13900 9':
>p5ink %)*2 M89 networkin- and down5ink %)*2 M89 networkinDown)in? (p)in? Down)in? (p)in? 1 71' 71' 235 to 350 250 to 310 1 330:2 13C00 13250 to 13500 500 to 5'0 1 '3915 13C00 23100 500 to 5'0 2 9': 9': 300 300 2 13900 9': 7'0 300
& e CDMA1< data and +V-DO data 1ontained in &a2)e 1 are ta?en ,rom CDG and D!a)1omm. & e +d#e-re)ated data 1ontained in &a2)e 1 is ta?en ,rom GSA and +ri1ssonE Evolution of Edge @2" +ri1sson 200:B and Edge Evolution @2" GSA 200:B. & e +d#e
. 2009 *&+ Corporation. A)) ri# ts reser/ed. 1
e/o data 1ontained in &a2)e 1 is t e data o, t e se1ond p ase. 0n t e ,irst p ase3 +d#e e/o s!pports on)" ten times)ots and 17DOM and t e pea? rate is 700 ?2psF in t e se1ond p ase3 +d#e e/o s!pports 17 times)ots and 32DOM and t e pea? rate is 1.9 M2ps. 5i#!re 1 s ows t e 1omparison 2etween t e pea? ,orward se1tor t ro!# p!t and t e a/era#e ,orward se1tor t ro!# p!t.
5i#!re 1 Comparison 2etween t e -ea? 5orward Se1tor & ro!# p!t and t e A/era#e 5orward Se1tor & ro!# p!t
5i#!re 2 s ows t e 1omparison 2etween t e pea? re/erse se1tor t ro!# p!t and a/era#e re/erse se1tor t ro!# p!t.
5i#!re 2 Comparison 2etween t e -ea? 8e/erse Se1tor & ro!# p!t and t e A/era#e 8e/erse Se1tor & ro!# p!t
1.2
Con1)!sion
Based on &a2)e 1 3 5i#!re 1 and 5i#!re 23 it 1an 2e 1on1)!ded as ,o))owsE
Comparison o, ,orwardAre/erse @down)in?A!p)in?B pea? rateE & e pea? rate o, +d#e is )ower t an t at o, CDMA1<. & e pea? rate o, +d#e e/o is ,ar )ower t an t at o, +V-DO 8e/.A and 8e/.B.
Comparison o, ,orwardAre/erse pea? rate @!p)in? 1.25 M=> networ?in# and down)in? 1.25 M=> networ?in#BE & e ,orwardAre/erse pea? rate o, t e +d#e se1tor is a )itt)e i# er t an t at o, CDMA1<. & e ,orwardAre/erse pea? rate o, t e +d#e e/o se1tor is ,ar )ower t an t at o, +V-DO 8e/.A and 8e/.B.
Comparison o, a/era#e ,orwardAre/erse rate @!p)in? 1.25 M=> networ?in# and down)in? 1.25 M=> networ?in#BE & e a/era#e ,orwardAre/erse rate o, t e +d#e se1tor is 2asi1a))" e9!a) to t at o, t e CDMA1< se1tor. & e a/era#e ,orwardAre/erse rate o, t e +d#e e/o se1tor is ,ar )ower t an t at o, t e +V-DO 8e/.A se1tor and 8e/.B se1tor.
S!mmar"E & e data per,orman1e o, +d#e is 1)ose to and a )itt)e )ower t an t at o, CDMA1<. & e data per,orman1e o, +d#e e/o is i# er t an t at o, CDMA1<3 2!t ,ar )ower t an t at o, +V-DO 8e/.A and 8e/.B.
0n most app)i1ation s1enarios3 t e 1omparison 2etween +d#e and CDMA1<G+V-DO is as ,o))owsE Rura5 area and su.ur.an areaE As 1ompared wit t e !r2an area3 t e s!2s1ri2er densit" o, t e r!ra) and s!2!r2an areas is sma)) and t e demand ,or t e data ser/i1e is ,ar )ower. & e 1o/era#e area o, se1tor is t e ,irst 1on1ern in t is t"pe o, networ?. $o matter w et er CDMA1< or +d#e is !sed ,or networ?in#3 t e t ro!# p!t o, t e data ser/i1e 1an satis," t e needs in t e r!ra) area and s!2!r2an area. >r.an areaE 0n t e !r2an area3 t e s!2s1ri2er densit" is i# and t ere is a #reat demand ,or t e data ser/i1e. 0, +d#e and GSM s are ,re9!en1" reso!r1es in t e !r2an area3 t e DoS o, t e /oi1e ser/i1e 1on,)i1ts wit t e DoS o, t e data ser/i1e. 0, a CDMA1< G +V-DO o/er)a" networ? is 2!i)t in t e !r2an area3 t e DoS o, 2ot t e /oi1e ser/i1e and data ser/i1e 1an 2e ens!red easi)".
Voi1e Capa1it" Comparison

Bot +V-DO and +d#e s!pport t e pa1?et-2ased Vo0- ser/i1e. 0n t is 1ase3 t e /oi1e 1apa1it" o, Vo0- is in dire1t proportion to t e data t ro!# p!t. As des1ri2ed in C apter 13 t e 1omparison o, data t ro!# p!t 2etween +V-DO and +d#e a)so re,)e1ts t e 1omparison o, /oi1e 1apa1it" 2etween t em. C apter 2 #i/es a 1omparati/e ana)"sis o, t e /oi1e 1apa1it" o, CDMA1< and GSM.
2.1
Comparison o, -er,orman1e 0nde6es

&a2)e 2 and 5i#!re 3 #i/e a 1omparison o, se1tor /oi1e 1apa1it" 2etween CDMA1< and GSM w en 2ot t e !p)in? 2andwidt and down)in? 2andwidt are 10 M=>.
&a2)e 2 Se1tor Voi1e Capa1it" Comparison @10 M=> $etwor?in#B
GSM CDMA%0
Con,i#!ration Capa1it" @+r)B Con,i#!ration Capa1it" @+r)B
+58AD-CAD&< 7: Ori#ina) 1C5
AM8 1'2 'GV 2'9
AM83 D5CA3 S-5=3 =8 1:0 'GVG0C 350
5i#!re 3
Se1tor Voi1e Capa1it" Comparison @10 M=> $etwor?in#B
ote$ & e 1apa1it" o, GSM in 2ot &a2)e 2 and 5i#!re 3 are 2ased on t e ,o))owin# ass!mptionE 8e!seH1A1 and 5ra1tiona) Loadin# H 25I. & e ass!mption is an idea)
'
1ondition and is a)most impossi2)e in rea)it". 5or GSM3 t e t"pi1a) i# re!se 1oe,,i1ient is 'A12 or 1A3 and t e ,re9!en1" re!se 1oe,,i1ient is 0.1 to 0.33. A,ter an a##ressi/e ,re9!en1" re!se te1 no)o#" @,or e6amp)e3 S5= or D5CAB is adopted3 t e pro2a2)e ,ra1tiona) )oad is a2o!t 0.' @t e ,re9!en1" re!se 1oe,,i1ient is 0.7B i, re!se is e9!a) to 1A1. 0n t is 1ase3 t e /oi1e 1apa1it" o, GSM is #reat)" red!1ed.
2.2
Con1)!sion
&a2)e 2 and 5i#!re 3 s ow t at t e /oi1e 1apa1it" o, CDMA1< is ,ar i# er t an t at o, GSM in t e same app)i1ation s1enario. & e i# -1apa1it" ,eat!re o, CDMA1< 2rin#s t e ,o))owin# 2ene,its to t e operatorsE 8i-h spe(trum uti5i9ation$ S!pport more s!2s1ri2ers t ro!# t e same 2andwidt and t !s e6pand t e s!2s1ri2er 1apa1it" o, t e networ?F 1an 2rin# potentia) re/en!e to operators and red!1e t e spe1tr!m-re)ated e6pense. A i# -1apa1it" networ? 1an red!1e t e e6penses in networ? dep)o"ment and maintenan1e3 sa/e t e e6pense in t e e6pansion o, /oi1e 1apa1it"3 and e)p operators )a" down a more 1ompetiti/e ser/i1e 1 ar#in# po)i1"3 t !s #ainin# more re/en!e. Jins a di,,erentia) ad/anta#e in t e mar?et 1ompetition and #ain additiona) re/en!e 2" pro/idin# t e more 1ompetiti/e 2road2and data ser/i1e. Ad4!sts t e dataA/oi1e 1apa1it" o, t e ,i6edAmo2i)e ser/i1e !nder t e same networ? ar1 ite1t!re.
3
3.1
Co/era#e Area and B&Ss $!m2er Comparison

Co/era#e Area
5or a 1omm!ni1ation s"stem or wire)ess )o1a) )oop3 it is t e 2asi1 re9!irement to o,,er an appropriate 1o/era#e area. & e 1o/era#e area o, ea1 1e)) is a,,e1ted 2" t e )in? 2!d#et si#ni,i1ant)". Based on t e determined )in? 2!d#et3 "o! 1an 1ompare t e 1e)) radi!s and t e re9!ired n!m2er o, Base &rans1ei/er Stations @B&SsB ,or t e di,,erent air inter,a1e te1 no)o#ies. &a2)e 3 #i/es a 1omparison o, 1o/era#e area 2etween CDMA and GSM !nder t e same en/ironment.
&a2)e 3 Comparison o, Co/era#e Area o, 2etween CDMA Ce)) and GSM Ce))
&arameter Area o, CDMA 1e)) @?m2B Area o, GSM 1e)) @?m B Comparison o, 1o/era#e area ote$
2
Dense >r.an Area 1.': 0.3 '.C2E1
>r.an Area 3.'9 0.79 5.0CE1
Su.ur.an Area 31.'0 7.': '.C5E1
Rura5 Area 3:5.3: :C.05 '.C1E1
& e 1omparison in &a2)e 3 is 2ased on t e norma) parameters o, GSM and CDMA as ,o))owsE 8e/erse )in? 2!d#et & e termina) power o, GSM is 2 J3 and t e termina) power o, CDMA is 0.2 J. & e ,re9!en1" o, GSM is C90 M=>3 and t e ,re9!en1" o, CDMA is C25 M=>. 5or GSM3 t e re1ei/er sensiti/it" o, t e B&S is -10C dBm. 5or CDMA3 t e re1ei/er sensiti/it" o, CDMA is -12: dBm. +61ept t e GSM-re)ated s"stem parameters and CDMA-re)ated s"stem parameters3 ot er pre1onditions are t e same3 ,or e6amp)e3 t e B&S ei# t is t e same @30 meters in t e dense !r2an area3 '0 meters in t e !r2an area3 and 50 meters in t e r!ra) area and s!2!r2an areaB3 and t e antenna #ain is 1: dBi.
& e 1omparison in &a2)e 3 s ows t at t e re9!ired n!m2er o, CDMA 1e))s is at )east C0I )ess t an t at o, GSM 1e))s i, t e 1o/era#e area is t e same. 5a1ts a)so s ow t at CDMA 1o/ers a wider area t an GSM.
3.2
Comparison o, B&Ss $!m2er 8e9!ired ,or t e Same Co/era#e

5i#!re ' s ows a 1omparison o, t e n!m2er o, B&Ss re9!ired ,or t e same 1o/era#e area 2etween CDMA and GSM @2ased on t e 1ommer1ia) networ?s o, C ina (ni1om in Bei4in# and 0nner Mon#o)iaB.
5i#!re '
Comparison o, t e $!m2er o, B&Ss 8e9!ired ,or t e Same Co/era#e
As s own in 5i#!re '3 t e re9!ired n!m2er o, CDMA B&Ss is 39I )ess t an t at o, GSM B&Ss ,or t e same 1o/era#e area in Bei4in#3 and t e re9!ired n!m2er o, CDMA B&Ss is 52I )ess t an t at o, GSM B&Ss ,or t e same 1o/era#e area in 0nner Mon#o)ia. As 1ompared wit GSM3 CDMA 1an de1rease t e re9!ired n!m2er o, B&Ss si#ni,i1ant)". As a res!)t3 operators 1an 1!t down t e initia) e6penses in networ? 1onstr!1tion @in1)!din# t e e9!ipment e6pense and en#ineerin# imp)ementation e6penseB3 #ain a i# er inp!t-o!tp!t ratio3 and )a" down a more ,)e6i2)e 1 ar#in# po)i1".
'
Comparison o, CA-+< and O-+<

& e data in &a2)e ' 3 &a2)e 5 and is ta?en ,rom t e 1ommer1ia) networ?s o, C ina (ni1om.
&a2)e ' O-+< Data
"nter(onne(tion and interworkine4pense 2.':I 2.15I '.72I
E4pense o' network operation and maintenan(e
Manpower e4pense
Sa5es (ommission
!inan(ia5 e4pense
Depre(iation and amorti9ation
#easin- e4pense
Mana-ement e4pense
Tota5
GSM CDMA &ota)
&a2)e 5
GSM CDMA &ota)
5i#!re 5
&a2)e ' 3 &a2)e 5 and s ow t e ,o))owin# pointsE & e tota) O-+< o, t e CDMA networ? is near)" 'I )ower t an t at o, t e GSM networ?. & e O-+< o, CDMA is 1omp)ete)" )ower t an t at o, GSM in t e ,o))owin# respe1tsE inter1onne1tion and interwor?in# e6pense3 manpower e6pense3 e6pense o, networ?
Type
'.'CI 3.50I :.9CI
12.53I 2.71I 15.00I 1.23I 2:.53I 3.C'I
:.25I 5.13I
0.'3I 1.9CI 20.10I 51.C'I 0.31I 1.C3I 19.01I 'C.17I
12.3CI 0.:'I 3.C1I 39.11I 100.00I
CA-+< Data
Type 72.17I 3:.C'I 100.00I
CA&E0
O-+< ; CA-+< 1omparison 2etween GSM and CDMA
operation and maintenan1e3 mana#ement e6pense3 )easin# e6pense3 ,inan1ia) e6pense3 and depre1iation and amorti>ation. & e tota) CA-+< o, t e CDMA networ? is 2'I )ower t an t at o, t e GSM networ?.
Con(5usion$ As 1ompared wit GSM3 CDMA 1an red!1e 2ot Operation +6pendit!re @O-+<B and Capita) +6pendit!re @CA-+<B #reat)".
S!mmar"
Genera))"3 it 1an 2e 1on1)!ded as ,o))owsE 0n t e r!ra) and s!2!r2an areas3 2ot CDMA and +d#e 1an 1ater to t e needs o, t e data ser/i1e. 0n t e !r2an area3 t e CDMA1< G +V-DO o/er)a" networ? pro/ides a i# er D!a)it" o, Ser/i1e @DoSB ,or t e /oi1e ser/i1e and data ser/i1e t an +d#e and GSM. (nder t e same te1 ni1a) app)i1ation s1enario3 t e /oi1e 1apa1it" o, CDMA is ,ar i# er t an t at o, GSM. CDMA 1o/ers a wider area t an GSM. As 1ompared wit GSM3 CDMA red!1es t e re9!ired n!m2er o, B&Ss si#ni,i1ant)". Bot O-+< and CA-+< o, CDMA are )ower t an t at o, GSM.
0n spite o, remar?a2)e optimi>ation and impro/ement o/er t e past "ears3 GSM sti)) )a#s ,ar 2e ind CDMA1< and +V-DO in t e /oi1e ser/i1e and data ser/i1e.
7
7.1
Appendi6E +m!)ation Do1!ments

GSM ; +d#e Data
5i#!re 7
Comparision o, /ario!s te1 ni9!es
10
5i#!re :
Di,,erent sta#es o, +DG+ down)in? pea? rate
7.2
CDMA1< ; +V-DO Data
CDMA*333 CDMA*333 Roadmap %0

D#$ %2, k.ps >#$ %2, k.ps 7%)*2 M89? !DD:
%0 Enhan(ements
EVRC=B A B#"C A BO! ew Channe5 Card
%)20 in(rease in voi(e (apa(ity% D#<>#$ %2, k.ps 7%)*2 M89? !DD:
+0 in(rease in voi(e (apa(ity* D#<>#$ ,36 k.ps 7%)*2 M89? !DD:
%4EV=DO
Re5) 3
%4EV=DO
Rev) A
EV=DO Enhan(ements Mu5ti(arrier EV=DO

SCD 8CD SCD M"MO
D#$ *)+ M.ps >#$ %2, k.ps 7%)*2 M89? !DD:
D#$ ,)% M.ps >#$ %)1 M.ps 7%)*2 M89? !DD:
D#$ @), D#$ %+)6 M.ps, M.ps+ >#$ 2)+ M.ps >#$ 2)+ M.ps 72 M89? !DD: 72 M89? !DD:
D#$ ,* M.ps2 >#$ %*)+ M.ps 7+4%)*2 M89? !DD:
5i#!re C
16 and DO t e pea? rate at di,,erent sta#es
11
5i#!re 9
Comparision o, /oi1e 1apa1it" in 10M-2andwidt
7.3
0ntrod!1tion to t e Voi1e Capa1it" +6pansion &e1 no)o#ies -ro/ided 2" GSM and CDMA1<
Voi(e Capa(ity E4pansion Te(hno5o-y &rovided .y GSM
GSM was standardi>ed ,ar ear)ier t an CDMA3 so )ots o, GSM te1 no)o#ies were not app)ied in t e initia) /ersion. &o impro/e t e /oi1e 1apa1it" and ,re9!en1" re!se 1oe,,i1ient3 GSM 1amp as a)wa"s 1onsidered t e step o, optimi>ation and impro/ement. Adapti/e M!)ti-rate spee1 trans1odin# @AM8BE AM8 1an mana#e t e /oi1e 9!a)it" and 1ontro) errors d"nami1a))"3 t !s ens!rin# i# /oi1e 9!a)it" e/en in a poor wire)ess en/ironment. AM8 1an e6pand t e /oi1e 1apa1it" 2" :0I. =a), rate @=8BE in1)!din# +58-=8 and AM8-=8. =8 ena2)es t e transmission o, two /oi1e 1 anne)s o/er one times)ot. 5or t e minim!m =8 mode @AM8-=8 pro/ides !p to si6 rate modesB3 t e /oi1e 1apa1it" 1an 2e impro/ed 2" 100I at most. A##ressi/e ,re9!en1" re!se te1 no)o#" Dynami( &ower Contro5 7D&C:$ D-C impro/es t e power 1ontro) rate @2.0C =>B and pre1ision and red!1es 1o-,re9!en1" inter,eren1e. 0n 1on4!n1tion wit ,re9!en1" oppin#3 D-C 1an attain t e optima) e,,e1tF ,or e6amp)e3 impro/in# t e 1apa1it" 2" 50I.
/),)%
12
!re;uen(y 8oppin- 7!8:$ 5= 1an swit1 t e ,re9!en1" o, t e /oi1e ser/i1e 1 anne) 9!i1?)"3 t !s impro/in# t e ,re9!en1" re!se 1oe,,i1ient to as i# as 1 @w en t e 5= te1 no)o#" is app)ied3 t e 1)o1?s o, t e entire networ? s o!)d 2e s"n1 roni>ed3 t at is3 t e S5= te1 no)o#" s o!)d 2e app)iedB. J en t e 5= te1 no)o#" is !sed in 1on4!n1tion wit D"nami1 -ower Contro)3 AM83 and dis1ontin!o!s &ransmission3 t e ,ra1tiona) )oad 1an amo!nt ,rom '0I to 70I3 t at is3 t e ,re9!en1" re!se 1oe,,i1ient is 0.' to 0.7.
Dis(ontinuous Transmission 7DT0:$ 0t is simi)ar to t e /oi1e a1ti/ation te1 no)o#" o, CDMA. J en t e s!2s1ri2er is not ta)?in# 3 t e s!2s1ri2erKs tra,,i1 1 anne) 1an stop transmission to red!1e t e inter-,re9!en1" inter,eren1e. & e /oi1e a1ti/ation 1oe,,i1ient is !s!a))" 0.'5 to 0.5. 0n t is 1ase3 t e /oi1e 1apa1it" 1an 2e e6panded 2" 30I i, D&< is app)ied sin#)". Dynami( !re;uen(y and Channe5 A55o(ation 7D!CA:$ 0, t e D5CA te1 no)o#" is app)ied3 t e 1)o1?s o, t e entire networ? s o!)d 2e s"n1 roni>edF ,or CDMA3 t e G-S 1)o1?s are !sed ,or s"n1 roni>ation o, t e entire networ?. & e s!2s1ri2erKs tra,,i1 1 anne) and t e 1 anne) a))o1ated !pon ando/er 1an 2e a))o1ated d"nami1a))" a11ordin# to t e ,re9!en1" and wire)ess stat!s o, t e 1 anne). 0, t e D5CA te1 no)o#" is !sed sin#)"3 t e s"stem 1apa1it" 1an 2e e6panded 2" a2o!t 50I. 0, AM8 and 5re9!en1" oppin# a/e 2een !sed3 t e 2ene,it o, DVCA is #reat)" red!1ed. Mo.i5e Re(eive Diversity 7MR4D: 0nter,eren1e Can1e))ation @0CB Sin-5e Antenna "nter'eren(e Can(e55ation 7SA"C:$ SA0C is an 0C te1 no)o#" @4oint demod!)ationE one o, t e ?e" te1 no)o#ies !sed 2" &D-SCDMAB. J en a mo2i)e p one as on)" one re1ei/in# antenna3 SA0C 1an 2e !sed to in1rease t e ,orward #ain @w en t e SA0C te1 no)o#" is app)ied3 t e 1)o1?s o, t e entire networ? s o!)d 2" s"n1 roni>edF t e SA0C te1 no)o#" is estimated to impro/e t e /oi1e 1apa1it" 2" at )east 50IB. 5orward inter,eren1e 1an1e))ation @50CB 8e/erse inter,eren1e 1an1e))ation @80CB
Transmit Diversity$ &ransmittin# di/ersit" o, B&S antennaF t ro!# s!1 1odin# modes as spa1e time 1odin# and s"n1 rono!s 1odin#3 t e B&S !ses two transmittin# antennas to impro/e t e ,orward 1apa1it".
/),)*
Voi(e Capa(ity E4pansion Te(hno5o-y &rovided .y CDMA%0

Lots o, GSM te1 no)o#ies @,or e6amp)e3 D&<3 and d"nami1 power 1ontro)B are re9!ired in t e ,irst /ersion o, CDMA1<. 0n addition3 CDMA 1ontin!o!s)" tries to impro/e t e se1tor /oi1e 1apa1it" o, CDMA1<. +GV=EVRC=BE0t is simi)ar to A8M te1 no)o#" o, GSM. As a 't #eneration /o1oder trans,orm a)#orit m o, CDMA /oi1e3 it is a 1ore /oi1e 1ode1 s!ite. A11ordin# to
13
d"nami1 priorit" settin#s ,or /oi1e 9!a)it" and s"stem 1apa1it"3 t e 1on/ersion 2etween t e i# /oi1e 9!a)it" and t e i# s"stem 1apa1it" 1an 2e rea)i>ed. =owe/er 'GV app)i1ation does not mean t at t e de1)ine in /oi1e 9!a)it".'GV te1 no)o#" pro/ides C rate )e/e)s3 t e" are CO-0-CO-: @,rom i# to )owB. & e sim!)ation and *&+ ,ie)d tests in 0ndia s ow t at t e /oi1e 9!a)it" wit a )ower rate CO-7 )e/e) is simi)ar to t ose wit +V8C. At t e same time3 t e a/era#e rate o, sin#)e-!ser 1an )ower a2o!t 30I wit CO-7 t an t ose wit +V8C. & e o/era)) s"stem 1apa1it" 1an 2e !p#raded 2" a2o!t 20 I. Most o, t e 1!rrent CDMA termina) s!pport 'GV te1 no)o#". 8a5' Rate 78R:$ CDMA1< s!pports t e transmission o, /aria2)e-rate /oi1e. & e /oi1e a1ti/it" ,a1tor" is 0.53 so t ere are sti)) 50I ,!))-rate /oi1e pa1?ets. & ere,ore3 t e s"stem 1an d"nami1a))" 1 oose to s!pport a),-rate /oi1e a11ordin# to t e se1tor /oi1e 1apa1it". Genera))"3 t e CDMA s"stem 1an impro/e t e se1tor /oi1e 1apa1it" 2" 20I. "nter'eren(e Can(e55ation 7"C:$ 0n1)!din# D(ALCOMM Linear 0nter,eren1e @DL0CB and re/erse 1o-,re9!en1" inter,eren1e 1an1e))ation te1 ni9!e @8L 0CBF CDMA is se),-inter,eren1e s"stem. CDMA ,orward 1an re1ei/e si#na) inter,eren1e ,rom nei# 2or 2ase stations and t eir m!)tipat si#na) inter,eren1e3 so inter,eren1e 1an1e))ation te1 no)o#" is t e most e,,e1ti/e and dire1t wa" to en an1e t e 1apa1it" o, CDMA s"stem. & e 0C te1 no)o#" 1an impro/e t e /oi1e 1apa1it" o, CDMA1< 2" 50I. 5or detai)s3 re,er to t e 0C te1 no)o#" o, GSM. Dua5 R0$ D!a)-antenna re1ei/er termina) te1 no)o#" 1an e,,e1ti/e)" in1rease t e re1ei/e di/ersit" #ain3 impro/e si#na) to noise ratio to re1ei/e o, t e re1ei/e si#na) and red!1e t e dept de2i)itatin# e,,e1ts o, t e ,orward si#na). D!a)-antenna termina)s 1an re1ei/e at )east 3dB #ain3 at t e same time3 t e ,orward )in? 1apa1it" 1an !p#rade a2o!t 2.5dB3 and t e ,orward )in? #ain 1an en an1e :0I. CDMA16 1apa1it" is )imited 2" t e ,orward 1apa1it". & ere,ore t e 2ene,its o, D!a) 86 te1 no)o#" to CDMA are ,ar more t an t e 2ene,its o, M86D to GSM. & e most o, D!a)1omm termina) 1 ips3 as we)) as a)) 16A+VDO d!a)-mode termina) 1 ips a)read" s!pport termina) re1ei/e di/ersit" te1 no)o#". Transmit Diversity 7TD:$ &ransmittin# di/ersit" o, B&S antennaF t ro!# s!1 1odin# modes as spa1e time 1odin# and s"n1 rono!s 1odin#3 t e B&S !ses two transmittin# antennas to impro/e t e ,orward 1apa1it". As a matter o, ,a1t3 t e &D te1 no)o#" as 2een de,ined in t e initia) /ersion o, CDMA1<. ew RC$ $ew 8C 1on,i#!ration 1an en an1e wire)ess 1apa1it". A new 1on,i#!ration o, t e 8C w i1 are t e ,orward )in? !ses t e 8C11 and t e re/erse )in? !ses 8CCin is introd!1ed in 16 Ad/an1e. 0n t e new 1on,i#!ration3 a series o, te1 no)o#ies are introd!1ed to impro/e spe1tr!m e,,i1ien1"E Smart B)an?in# te1 no)o#"3 red!1e t e power 1ontro) rate3 +ar)" &ermination and so on.
1'
/),),
Te(hni(a5 Comparison
CDMA and GSM te1 no)o#ies e6perien1ed #reat impro/ements3 2!t not a)) t e impro/ed te1 no)o#ies 1an 2e p!t into 1ommer1ia) !se easi)". +spe1ia))"3 )ots o, impro/ed GSM te1 no)o#ies re9!ire 1)o1? s"n1 roni>ation o, t e entire networ?. 5or e6amp)e3 S5=A5=3 D5CA3 and SA0C are t e t ree 1riti1a) GSM te1 no)o#ies t at impro/e t e ,re9!en1" re!se 1oe,,i1ient3 2!t t e" re9!ire pre1ise 1)o1? s"n1 roni>ation @s"m2o) s"n1 roni>ationB o, t e entire networ?3 w i1 is "et to 2e imp)emented in a 1ommer1ia) networ?. As a matter o, ,a1t3 t e ,irst 1ommer1ia) CDMA1< standard impro/ed GSM te1 no)o#ies. as in1orporated )ots o,
D!CA$ & e 0S95-1omp)iant CDMA as !sed pre1ise G-S 1)o1? s"n1 roni>ation as a re9!ired te1 no)o#"3 and as introd!1ed t e so,t ando,, te1 no)o#". Dynami( varia.5e=rate vo(oder a5-orithm$ & e 0S-95-1omp)iant CDMA s!pports t e 1odin# mode in w i1 t e /aria2)e rate is !sed a11ordin# to t e /oi1e 9!a)it". & is a)#orit m 1ontains t e D&< and =8 te1 no)o#ies o, GSM3 2!t is more ad/an1ed t an as 1ompared to t e ones !sed in GSM. D&C$ & e 0S95-1omp)iant CDMA s!pports ,ast power 1ontro) at a rate o, C00 M=>3 w i1 is '00 times i# er t an t e D-C rate o, GSM @2.0C =>B.
& e ,o))owin# te1 no)o#ies a/e not 2een app)ied in t e two standards on a )ar#e s1a)e. =owe/er3 t e" 2rin# t e same 2ene,its to s"stem 1apa1it"E AM8 @'GVB - A new #eneration o, /oi1e 1odin# te1 no)o#" MR4D @D!a) 86B $ & e ,orward 1apa1it" o, t e CDMA1< s"stem is )imited. Certain)"3 t e CDMA1< s"stem 1an #ain a i# er 1apa1it" i, t e D!a) 86 te1 no)o#" is !sed sin#)". 0n addition to t e M86D3 owe/er3 GSM a)so re9!ires t e dedi1ated te1 no)o#" o, e6pandin# t e re/erse 1apa1it". TD$ & e ,irst 1ommer1ia) CDMA1< standard as de,ined and standardi>ed t e &D. Genera))"3 t e &D te1 no)o#" 2rin#s more 2ene,its to CDMA1< t an GSM. "C$ 0n1)!din# 50C and 80C.
15
A22re/iations
&a2)e 7 A22re/iations
AM8 B&S CA-+< D5CA D-C D&< 5= 50C =8 0C M86D O-+< DoS SA0C &D
Adapti/e M!)ti-rate spee1 trans1odin# Base &rans1ei/er Station Capita) +6pendit!re D"nami1 5re9!en1" and C anne) A))o1ation D"nami1 -ower Contro) Dis1ontin!o!s &ransmission 5re9!en1" =oppin# 5orward inter,eren1e 1an1e))ation =a), 8ate 0nter,eren1e Can1e))ation Mo2i)e 8e1ei/e Di/ersit" Operation +6pendit!re D!a)it" o, Ser/i1e Sin#)e Antenna 0nter,eren1e Can1e))ation &ransmit Di/ersit"
17

Comparison Between CDMA and GSM - 20100222

Cargado por

Información del documento

Título original

Derechos de autor

Formatos disponibles

Compartir este documento

Compartir o incrustar documentos

Opciones para compartir

¿Le pareció útil este documento?

¿Este contenido es inapropiado?

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Comparison Between CDMA and GSM - 20100222

Cargado por

Copyright:

Formatos disponibles

Operator LOGO