OPTIMIZE AND REDUCE YOUR NETWORK INVESTMENT

COMPANYCOMPANY - Background
Founded: Management: 2001 Extensive experience from suppliers Ericsson, Nokia, Lucent, MSI, Allgon, LGP and Powerwave Stockholm, Sweden

Location:

COMPANYCOMPANY - Facilities

HQ, Tby Gddede

Visby

COMPANYCOMPANY - Antenna Products

Main Drivers are: To deliver the cheapest dBs on the market High efficiency Green power Performance

COMPANYCOMPANY - Technology Advantage

Gain (dBi)

Gain (dBi) Vs Horizontal Beamwidth Main Antenna Manufacturers

33 degree 65 degree

25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 30

CellMax CellMax

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

Horizontal Beam width (Degrees)

Source: InCode Wireless / VeriSign

COMPANYCOMPANY - Antenna Products

Extremely Efficient Broad Band feeding network Technology; High performing Negligible losses, (WYSIWG) Unparalleled PIM performance Minimal soldering No cables Advanced reflector structures for high performance performance, Front to Back ratio and superior orthogonality

COMPANYCOMPANY - Antenna Products

Cellmax Technology strengths are: High gain with full beam shaping Antenna A t pattern tt excellence ll Antenna null fill control Upper side lobe suppression High Gain stability Gain tracking Beam width control over frequency Tuning free production Gain efficiency versus size No in production or post production tuning 100% reproducibility

Wh Hi Why High h Effi Efficiency i ?

WHY HIGH EFFICENCY? - Gain Evolution

MH MHz System 450 NMT 850/900 1800/1900 2100 3G 2500/3500 WiMax AMPS/GSM GSM/PCS

dBi

12 15

12 15 18

12 15 18

12 15 18 21 24

12 15 18 21 24 >24

WHY HIGH EFFICENCY? Increased EIRP

Standard 18 dBi Antenna

CellMax 21dBi Antenna

Coverage Increase up to 40% Increased SS in entire cell BTS reduction up to 30%

ANTENNA Nice Site Reduction

47 Standard 18 dBi Antenna sites

P di ti Predictions by b

37 CellMax 21dBi Antenna sites

ANTENNA Brussels Site Reduction

66 Standard 18 dBi Antenna sites

P di ti Predictions by b

50 CellMax 21dBi Antenna sites Coverage C probability b bilit i increased d signifficantly with 24% fewer sites

WHY HIGH EFFICENCY? Market drivers

CAPEX and OPEX reductions main drivers for operators 3G demand all available power to support high bandwidth services Swiftest and most cost effective means of optimization and quality improvement

Wh C Why CellMax? llM ?

Mission - To increase data rate and coverage

BW 100M 10M
More upp/down link power, (higher C/N & C/I)

LTE/ WiMax HSPA

Data rate is NOT limited by technology, but by received power / interference ratio

1M

UMTS
100k 10K
Indoor local Wide area

Why CellMax CellMax? ? Efficiency Comparison (2m)

GSM PCS UMTS

Why CellMax? Conventional Feed network

Why CellMax? Conventional Dipoles

Why CellMax? Received SS Comparison

CellMax 21dBi 4 deg vs. Typical 18dBi 2 deg, Sub Urban
5 dB stronger level of null-fill

Same range Improved QoS Reduced Interference

Design Criteria Serving Cell

Why CellMax? Traffic Increase (rural)

Before Higher Signal Strength Better Penetration Fewer dropped calls Improved Call Set up Increase in Traffic 10-50% Rural, Sub-urban & Urban
11 Erl.

After
17 Erl.

54% increase

Why CellMax? Traffic Increase (sub(sub-urban)

30% increase

Cellmax average 417 E

Kathrein average 321 E

Antenna swap

Why CellMax? - Increased 3G Throughput

7.5 km

11 km

+47% range increase

The nodeB subject to the change antenna is indicated in figure with one arrow. Configuration RF has not been changed in the period considered for the tests (weeks 49 and 50) Sctors CPICH Qqualmin 48911 35 dBm -22 22 dB 48912 33 dBm -22 dB 48913 34 dBm -22 dB 48914 35 dBm -22 dB 48915 34 dBm -22 dB 48916 34 dBm -22 22 dB

Why CellMax? - Increased 3G Throughput cont

Without CELLMAX antenna
WEEK 49
Service VOICE VIDEO PS @ 64 PS@ @ 128 PS@ 384 Traffic [milliErlang] 2625355 131705 649931 64524 32541 Service Performance Cell MAX VOICE VIDEO PS @ 64 PS @ 128 PS @ 384

With CELLMAX antenna

WEEK 50
Traffic [milliErlang] 3585491 192406 939897 117412 62897

VOICE VIDEO PS @ 64K PS @ 128K PS @ 384K

+36.6% +46.1% +44.6% +82 0% +82.0% +93.3%

COST SAVING SAVING- Antenna pos. on Mast

100, 0 90, 0 80, 0

Mast He eight in Me eters

70, 0

60, 0

50, 0 21 dB i 18 dB i 40, 0

30, 0

20, 0

10, 0

0 0 0, 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 350

Measured at Distance from site

ANTENNA - CMACMA-B/6521
Freq. Band: Gain [dBi]: HBW: VBW: VSWR: Isolation: F/B: USLS: 1st Null Fill: XPD: LxWxD (mm): 1710 - 2170 MHz 20.4 / 20.7 / 21.2 66.0o / 65.0o / 63.5o 4.6o / 4.2o / 3.9o < 1.5:1 >30dB >25dB >18dB <20dB >20dB (10dB 60o 2060 x 196 x 92

ANTENNA Vertical Pattern

1st Upper Sidelobe Suppression pp

Nullfill

ANTENNA Received SS Comparison

First Null >30 dB stronger

5 % range increase

Design Criteria

ANTENNA - CMACMA-B/3324
Freq. Band: Gain [dBi]: HBW: VBW: VBW VSWR: Isolation: F/B: USLS: 1st Null Fill: XPD: LxWxD L W D( (mm): ) 1710 - 2170 MHz 23.2 / 23.6 / 24.0 35o / 33o / 31o 4.6 4 6o / 4 4.2 2o / 3 3.9 9o < 1.5:1 >30dB 30dB >30dB >18dB <20dB >20dB (10dB 30o) 2070 x 288 x 128

ANTENNA Cellmax 6 6-sector solution

BuildsupontheWorld WorldRecord Record Cellmax24dBi,33deghighgain antenna GSM900MHzoverlaywithsame UMTSsitelocations dBs stoatraditional18dBi +6dB linkbudget Theoretically2.7timesthecoverage fromastandard3sectorsitemeans practicalsitesavingsof60%

CellMax test facilities - SAAB Aerospace

CellMax test facilities - AerotechTelub

Environmental Testing
Specification of Environmental Tests for Telecommunications Equipment: ETSI 300 019-2-4: Class T4-1E Non-weather protected locations Extended. ETSI 300 019-2-1: Class T1.2 Weather protected locations - not temperature controlled. ETSI 300 019-2-2: Class T2.2 Careful transportation. p

Environmental Tests
IEC68-2-1 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Tests Ab: Cold IEC68-2-2 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Tests Bb: Dry Heat IEC68-2-14 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Nb: Change of Temperature IEC68-2-30 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Db: Damp Heat, Cyclic IEC68 IEC68-2-52 2 52 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Kb: Salt Mist Mist, Cyclic IEC68-2-6 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Fc: Vibration (Sinusoidal) IEC68-2-29 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Eb: Bump IEC68-2-18 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Tests Rb: Water IEC68-2-32 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Ed: Free Fall (Procedure 1) IEC68 IEC68-2-56 2 56 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Cb: Damp Heat

Environmental Testing - Institutes

All environmental testing is performed by the following independent test-institutes: test institutes: STFI Packforsk AB Stockholm-Kista, Sweden SP, SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Bors, Sweden UV-test is performed by Polykemi AB in Malm, supplier of the ASA material for the antenna radome radome.

Vibration Test Sinus (5 (5-200 Hz, 10 m/s m/s)

Shock & Bump Tests (100 m/s m/s x 100 b.)

Salt Mist Test, Cyclic (40C, (40C, 72 hours)

Conclusion
Increased efficiency:

up to 30 % increase in coverage 30 % fewer sites cost optimized RF chain antenna position on mast mast, size and wind loading and cost of tower site power and cooling swifter ift roll-out ll t Fewer transmission hops

Reduced CAPEX:

Conclusion - Cont
Increased Traffic: 30% or more increase in revenue improved indoor penetration improved call-set up longer mean holding times of calls increased traffic reduced interference, i increase of fd data t th throughput h t Thanks to reduced number of sites (site rental, utilities, service org. etc)

Reduced OPEX:

Thank You