Q.

The testing is done taking Background of Women age and frequency of Their Preference to Various Sectors
Bank Student House Wife Working Women Retired Women Total 15 0 5 0 20 Insurance 15 0 10 0 25 Automobile Communication Academic 5 5 0 0 10 3 7 0 0 10 0 12 0 3 15 Retail 8 6 6 0 20 Total 46 30 21 3 100

INTERPRETATION: Any individual has a lots of choice of sector for the job but we have selected major sector such as, banking, insurance, automobile, communication, academic and retailing. Research shows that out of 100 respondent 25 wants to join an insurance as their interested area for job while, retail and banking having equal scope of interested of respondents. But communication and automobile is sector in which people are not much interested to work. From above chart, we can say that an insurance sector occupy vital place for attaining the job.

TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS
H0 = RESPONDENTS ARE NOT AWARE ABOUT VARIOUS SECTOR. H1 = RESPODENTS ARE AWARE ABOUT VARIOUS SECTOR.

ANOVA Source of Variation SS Rows( Sectors) 161 Columns(Occupation) 45.83333333 Error 348.5 Total 555.3333333

df

MS F P-value F crit 3 53.66667 2.3099 0.117818 3.287382 5 9.166667 0.394548 0.844946 2.901295 15 23.23333 23

(At 5% significance level)

For rows calculated value is 2.3099<3.287382 tabulated value.

From the above table we can see that in rows i.e. frequency of their Preference to Various sectors calculated value is less than tabulated value i.e. Fc<Ft. so, the null hypothesis. i.e. there is no significant difference in various sectors is Accepted. It means that Respondents Are not Aware About various Sectors

For columns calculated value is 0.394548 <2.901295 tabulated value . In column i.e. Occupation of Women calculated value is less than tabulated value i.e. Fc<Ft. so the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference within the selected sample of respondents is accepted . It means that there is no significant difference between Occupation of Women And their Preference to Various Sectors.

Q.8 The testing is done taking Background of Women and frequency of Their Preference to Career With Insurance Sector.
Yes 20 0 10 0 30 No 26 30 11 3 70 Total 46 30 21 3 100

Students House Wife Working Women Retired Women Total

INTERPRETATION: Above question was asked to know that are respondent ready to start their career with the insurance sector? The chart shows that only 30 respondents ready to start their journey in an insurance sector while 70 respondents refuse to start their career in insurance sector. There can be any reason for this result like other sector, lack of knowledge of working in insurance at starting phase of career, so that maximum number of people will not going to start their career in insurance sector.

TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS
H0 = RESPONDENTS ARE NOT READY TO START CAREER WITH INSURANCE SECTOR. H1 = RESPODENTS ARE READY TO START CAREER WITH INSURANCE SECTOR. ANOVA Source of Variation Rows Columns Error Total

SS 483 200 273 956

df 3 1 3 7

MS F P-value F crit 161 1.769231 0.325462 9.276628 200 2.197802 0.234827 10.12796 91

For rows calculated value is 1.769231<9.276628 tabulated value. From the above table we can see that in rows i.e. Ready to start Career With Insurance calculated value is less than tabulated value i.e. Fc<Ft. so, the null hypothesis is accepted. It means that more number of respondents not ready to start career with insurance Sector. For columns calculated value is 2.197802<10.12796 tabulated value. In column i.e. Occupation of Women calculated value is less than tabulated value i.e. Fc<Ft. so the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the occupation of women within the selected sample of respondents is accepted It means that there is no significant difference between occupation of women and career with insurance.

Q.9 The testing is done taking Background of Women and frequency of Their Preference for Opportunity Insurance Sector.
Yes 15 17 8 0 40 No 31 13 13 3 60 Total 46 30 21 3 100

Students House Wife Working Women Retired Women Total INTERPRETATION:

The main purpose behind these whole research study was to evaluate the opportunity for women in an insurance sector. Thus result shows combined feedback or the opportunity of women is less compared to man in the sector namely insurance. Because 60 respondents were not found an opportunity for women while remaining 40 respondents were enhancing the opportunity of women in an insurance sector. TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS
H0 = THERE IS NO OPPORTUNITY FOR WOMEN IN INSURANCE SECTOR. H1 = THERE IS OPPORTUNITY FOR WOMEN IN INSURANCE SECTOR..

ANOVA Source of Variation Rows Columns Error Total

SS 483 50 103 636

df

MS F P-value F crit 3 161 4.68932 0.118281 9.276628 1 50 1.456311 0.313996 10.12796 3 34.33333 7

For rows calculated value is 4.68932 < 9.276628 tabulated value. From the above table we can see that in rows i.e. Opportunity in Insurance calculated value is less than tabulated value i.e. Fc<Ft. so, the null hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is no opportunity fro women in insurance sector. For columns calculated value is 1.456311 <10.12796 tabulated value. In column i.e. Occupation of Women calculated value is less than tabulated value i.e. Fc<Ft. so the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the occupation of women within the selected sample of respondents is accepted It means that there is no significant difference between occupation of women and opportunity for women in insurance sector.

Q.10 The testing is done taking Background of Women and frequency of Their Preference for secure & satisfy Employment Opportunity.
Goveren ment Students House Wife Working Women Retired Women Total 16 0 13 3 32 Corporat MultiNati Public e onal 0 15 0 0 15 15 8 0 0 23 10 0 0 0 10 Self Employm ent 5 5 6 0 16 Franchi see 0 2 2 0 4

Total 46 30 21 3 100

INTERPRETATION:

Above pie chart showing the review of each sector with the context of job security and the satisfaction of employee. From above chart, 32 respondents believe that only government sector will give job security and satisfaction. While 23 respondents were in favour of corporate sector for the same . And public sector and self employment showing approximately same opportunity . but only 4% of total respondent were believe that the franchisee provides job security and satisfaction opportunity to the employee. TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS
H0 = THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANCE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VARIOUS SECTORS FOR SECURE AND SATISFY EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY H1 = THERE IS SIGNIFICANCE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VARIOUS SECTORS FOR SECURE AND SATISFY EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ANOVA Source of Variation Rows Columns Error Total

SS 161 120.8333 443.5 725.3333

df

MS F P-value F crit 3 53.66667 1.815107 0.187656 3.287382 5 24.16667 0.817362 0.555829 2.901295 15 29.56667 23

For rows calculated value is 1.815107 < 3.287382tabulated value. From the above table we can see that in rows i.e. Secure & Satisfy employment opportunity calculated value is less than tabulated value i.e. Fc<Ft. so, the null hypothesis is accepted. It means that THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANCE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VARIOUS SECTORS FOR SECURE AND SATISFY EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. For columns calculated value is 0.817362 < 2.901295tabulated value. In column i.e. Occupation of Women calculated value is less than tabulated value i.e. Fc<Ft. so the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the occupation of women within the selected sample of respondents is accepted It means that there is no significant difference between occupation of women and secure & satisfy employment opportunity...