Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
229-261, 1996
Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
S0143-974X(96)00006-$ 0143-974X/96 $15.00 + 0.00
ELSEVIER
J. B. Ibs¢ & H. A g e r s k o v
ABSTRACT
NOTATION
1 INTRODUCTION
Fatigue crack growth under variable amplitude loading was first studied for
aircraft structures. Later on, variable amplitude fatigue was also found to be
relevant to bridges and various structures in industrial fields, such as ships,
cars and offshore structures.
A considerable number of experimental investigations on variable amplitude
fatigue has been carded out over the years, and on the basis of the results
obtained in these investigations, various empirical formulae for fatigue life
Fatigue life prediction 231
2 CRACK CLOSURE
In the following, the significance of crack closure for fatigue crack growth is
investigated. The crack closure model accounts for load interaction effects,
such as retardation and acceleration, under variable amplitude loading.
In a body with crack growth, the crack surfaces remain closed during a
part of the load cycle even under tension-tension loading. Elber 1 was the first
to notice this phenomenon and related an effective stress intensity factor range
for a fully open crack to the fatigue crack growth rate.
The mechanisms of crack closure have been attributed to plasticity-induced
closure, roughness-induced closure and environment-induced closure. In the
present investigation, only plasticity-induced crack closure is considered.
Plasticity-induced crack closure is caused by residual plastic deformations
in the wake of an advancing crack. During the unloading part of a load cycle,
the crack will close (at least partly) before the minimum load level is reached
due to the residual plastic elongations, which are left along the crack surfaces
as the crack grows. After full unloading, compressive residual stresses will
be present in the wake of and ahead of the crack tip.
As a result of the closure of the crack during a part of the applied loading
range, the driving force for fatigue crack growth is the effective value AKeff,
which is the part of the total stress intensity factor range, AK where the crack
is fully open:
232 J. B. Ibsa, H. Agerskov
where Kop is the stress intensity factor representing the value at which the
crack is fully open, i.e. when there is no longer crack surface contact behind
the physical crack tip during the uploading part of a load cycle.
If effective stress intensity factor ranges are considered, the fatigue crack
growth rate in structural steels and steel weld metals may be presumed to
follow a power law of the following form:
dc
= C(aK~f - AKe~n}f,th)
where AKeff,th is the effective threshold stress intensity factor range, below
which no crack growth takes place, considering the effect of crack closure.
The crack growth rate eqn (2) is based on effective stress intensity factor
ranges for a fully open crack. Therefore, when used in this equation, the crack
growth coefficients C and m can be considered as constants for a given
material. The Paris-Erdogan crack growth equation 2,3 is often used for crack
propagation calculations, using full stress intensity factor ranges, AK. How-
ever, the Paris-Erdogan equation has been found not to correlate with fatigue
crack growth rates in the near threshold region, neither does it account for
mean stress effects. Furthermore, the Paris-Erdogan equation has been shown
not to correlate with fatigue crack growth rates of small cracks. Equation (2)
takes account of the near threshold fatigue crack growth through the term,
AKefe,th. Furthermore, the effect of the mean stress on the fatigue crack growth
is taken into account in eqn (2), since it is based on effective stress intensity
factor ranges for a fully open crack. In general, the effective stress intensity
factor range of a stress cycle depends on the stress ratio and the maximum
stress level in the stress cycle. If crack closure can be determined for small
cracks, there is some evidence4'5 that modifying the driving force into AKoff,
this will result in good predictions of fatigue crack growth of small cracks.
In the present study, a strip fatigue crack growth analysis model based on the
Dugdale6-Barenblatt 7 strip yielding assumption is used.
Fatigue life prediction 233
The Dugdale plastic zone size, PDug can be determined by solving eqn (3).
In the present crack closure model, rigid-perfectly plastic material behav-
iour is assumed. For the majority of metallic materials, there is more or less
strain hardening in the plastic deformations. As a first approximation for strain
hardening, a flow stress tro, which is the average value of the yield stress, fy
and the ultimate tensile strength, fu is proposed in the model. The crack surface
displacements, which are used to calculate contact stresses during unloading,
are influenced by plastic yielding (and reversed plastic yielding) at the crack
tip and residual deformations left in the wake of the advancing crack (see
234 J. B. Ibsa, H. Agerskov
S
_JJ I._
I2dY
.~X
%" 2C "~p
2Vt
S
Fig. 1. Centre crack tension specimen with Dugdale plastic zones and residual plastic defor-
mations.
Fig. 1). Upon reloading, the remote applied stress level at which the crack
surfaces become fully open (no crack surface contact) is directly related to
the contact stresses. This stress is called the crack opening stress and it is
denoted So.
The crack surface displacements are obtained by superposition of the sol-
utions for two elastic problems, a crack subjected to remote applied load and
a crack subjected to a uniform stress applied over a segment of the crack
surface (see Fig. 2). The uniform stress applied over a segment of the crack
surface represents the contact stress for an element along the crack surface or
the residual stress for an element in the plastic zone ahead of the physical
crack tip. The crack displacements of the effective crack surface, that is, the
Y
S
_[_LJ.J_IJ L
17
rill
I. d I
Fig. 2. Crack surface displacements of effective crack.
Fatigue life prediction 235
where Sf(x) is the crack surface displacement at x due to the remote applied
stress S, and og(X,Xo) is the crack surface displacement at x due to a uniform
stress o- acting on a segment of the crack surface with the centre at Xo (see
Fig. 2).
If the effective crack is divided into a number of constant stress bar
elements, and all the elements along the effective crack are considered, the
crack surface displacement at the centre of element i can be calculated from
n
gi = Sf(xi) - Z o'jg(xi'xj) (5)
j=l
n
ojg o = Sfi - Li (6)
j=l
where Li is the length of element i. For elements in the plastic zone and
elements along the physical crack surface, which are in contact, L / i s equal
to the displacement at element i of the effective crack surface (Vi = L3. The
length of a bar element, Li is the amount of permanently deformed material.
For elements along the physical crack surface, which are not in contact, the
crack surface displacement Vi is greater than Li and oi = 0 for these elements.
The plastic deformation, Li only changes, when an element yields in tension
(oi >--oto',,) or compression (O"i ~ - - O ' o ) , assuming rigid-perfectly plastic
236 J. B. Ibs~, H. Agerskov
material behaviour. In eqn (6), functions f and g~j are based on the effective
crack length, d.
To keep the number of elements to a reasonable size (30-60), a lumping
procedure is used. This procedure combines adjacent elements ( i - 1 and i) to
form a single element. In the present modelling, the following criterion of
lumping is used:
~mta
1..t 1.1 kl 1 1
I/Elementn Crack tip
Element i el?mcnt (i=11)
Ln~.~ent 1
X
I 'q-~
w ~,
L i _ l W i _ 1 .t- L i w i
( L i _ 1)new = (8)
Wi-- 1 q" W i
where Pm,x is the size of the plastic zone caused by the maximum applied
stress during the Ac* growth increment. The crack growth increment given
in eqn (9) will result in reasonable computation times and good prediction
accuracy on the calculated results. 5,13 In the simulation, the crack opening
stress level is held constant within each crack extension increment, Ac*.
AKeff = z l S e f f f ~ - ~ (10)
For variable amplitude loading, AS~ff for a stress cycle with a minimum stress,
S m i n and a maximum stress, Smax just following it, is determined as follows 8
The use of eqn (17) is necessary because no crack growth law, when expressed
in terms of a power function with an exponent m =4=1 would sum to the correct
growth increment under variable amplitude loading. Equation (17) is only
238 J. B. Ibsa, H. Agerskov
applied, when Smi n is greater than So, and only when the current maximum
stress is higher than the highest maximum stress occurring since a stress excur-
sion crossed So. Otherwise, when Smin is greater than So, eqn (16) is applied.
For instance, if Smin,k< So < Smax,kfor stress cycle No. k, and the load excur-
sion S~nax,kt o Smin,k+ 1 is extremely small and Smin,k+~is assumed to be greater
than So, then the growth increment (Ack + Ack+~)should be equal to the growth
increment of one stress cycle of range (S~nax,k+~-So), assuming
S. . . . k+l ;> Smax,k+l" On the other hand, if Smin,k+ 1 is less than So, then the growth
increment Acj,+l alone should be equal to the growth increment of one stress
cycle of range (Smax,k+~-- So). Equations (13)-(17) take account of these limit-
ing behaviours.
Different methods for calculating the crack opening stress level, So may be
u s e d . 4'8 In the present modelling, the crack opening stresses are calculated by
a displacement method. The crack opening stress is determined by setting the
displacement at each physical crack surface element due to an applied load
increment (So - Smi,) equal to the displacement at the corresponding element
due to the contact stresses at Smin. The maximum value of (So - & i n ) gives
the load level at which the last element in contact separates.
The displacement at element i along the physical crack surface due to a
remote applied stress increment (So - Smin) is
The displacement at element i due to the contact stresses o) is (see Fig. 3):
V~ = - Z °rjg(xi,xj)" (19)
j=ll
Equating eqns (18) and (19) and solving for (So)i gives
_ ~ %.g(xi,xj)
(So), = Sn n j="7, f(xi) " (20)
The maximum value of (So),. gives the crack opening stress, So. The functions
f(xi) and g(xi,x) in eqns (18-20) are based on the physical crack length, c.
Fatigue life prediction 239
P(kN)
~/NOL = l
35.6
O- I [ a = 1.73
7.
8-
5- ~ Ac" = O.Ol p
4-
3-
z~
z5.9 se.l 26'.s aa'.5 z6'.? ~6'.0 ~'.1
Crack lenEt, h, c (mm)
Fig. 4. Variation in fatigue crack growth rate in AI 7075-T73 material following a single ten-
sile overload.
(with thickness equal to 1 mm), and the amplitude of the applied load was
relatively high. Under these conditions, the crack tip plane stress state can be
assumed (c~ = 1) for all tests in Ref. 19. The width of the test specimens was
80 mm. The material properties of the A1 2024-T3 material was not given in
Ref. 19, however, the yield stress is assumed to befy = 340 MPa and the ulti-
mate tensile strength is assumed to be fu = 430 MPa based on the properties
tabled in Ref. 16 for the same material.
The comparison of test results and analytical prediction for 40 overload
cycles is shown in Fig. 5. The test results are represented by the solid symbols,
and the solid curve represents the prediction by the crack closure model using
FAWS. As shown in Fig. 5(a), the crack growth prediction by FAWS models
the crack growth behaviour for 40 overload cycles quite well. For the case of
multiple overloads, prediction can only be logically made with a crack growth
model which involves the plastic deformation in the wake of the crack. In
Fig. 5(b), the variation of the crack opening stress is shown as a function of
the crack length. The overloads cause larger-than-stable plastic stretches left
along the crack surface and in the plastic zone. When the stretches move to
the crack surface, larger-than-stable contact stresses will appear on the crack
surface, So will increase [see AB in Fig. 5(b)], and consequently the crack
Fatigue life prediction 241
I, ~/NoL-4O
|, 150
4,
8. \ ~ 3 100
|.
50
I-
I- ~ "Ih'~lieUon
4-
i.
% 1'1 l~ t'a {4
Crack lenlrtb, c (ram)
(a)
s(m~a)
80- SO B
jNOL= 40
A 150
70- (MF'a)
/~ 100
60-
'nl~I
50-
40-
~ ~ 1.0
20
1'0 1'1 l'z 1'a 1'4
Crack length, e (ram)
(b)
Fig. 5. Comparison of experimental and calculated crack growth rates following 40 tensile
overloads. (a) Variation of crack growth rate. (b) Variation of crack opening stress, So.
growth is retarded. The crack opening stress level will recover to the stable
level, when the overload plastic stretches move away from the crack tip [see
BC in Fig. 5(b)].
Figure 6 shows a comparison between analytical prediction and test results
for the crack growth behaviour for the multiple overload case with a single
underload following immediately after the overloads. The test results are rep-
resented by the solid symbols and the analytical prediction is given by the
solid curw~. As can be seen in Fig. 6, there is a very good agreement between
242 J. B. Ibsa, H. Agerskov
~
1-
Prediction
0.1
/"- l
A^^AA
.- Time
Ac = O.Ol p -50 /
NUI,~ 1
0.01 l t i
9 10 Ill 12 13
Crack length, c (ram)
Fig. 6. Comparison of experimental and calculated crack growth rates after multiple tensile
overloads followed by a single compressive underload.
the prediction and the test results. In general, an underload following one
overload or multiple overloads will have a significant influence on the fatigue
crack growth retardation due to the overload(s). When large compression is
applied, the plastic stretches both on the crack surface and ahead of the crack
tip are 'squeezed' flat. The crack surface near the crack tip will then contact
at a lower-than-normal level, and consquently the crack growth is accelerated.
I *_p
I _*p
300
-.~.__ 187.5
_.~.__
,•L
• PL 10x90 5xB
-7oII'0
1.5°Ii
30C
_11 187.5
-'~-~ PL8xB
B=/.O
Meosures in mm
Fig.7. Fatiguetest specimens.
were determined from tension coupons taken from the plates that were used
for the fabrication of the test specimens. 21 The tests of the present investigation
were carried out under either constant amplitude loading or stochastic loading.
The fatigue crack propagation analysis is carded out by a fracture mech-
anics approach employing the crack closure model presented in Section 2. In
the following, only the fatigue life corresponding to the crack propagation is
calculated. The initiation or nucleation period of cracks growing from defects
in welded connections is most often considered to be insignificant in relation
to the crack propagation period. 22
Fatigue fracture
surface
t '
c :crack depth
2b: surface width of c r a c k
Fig. 8. Schematic of semi-elliptical surface crack growing from weld toe.
the welded plate test specimens can be estimated by considering only one
crack growing from the weld toe as shown in Fig. 8. In some cases, this
corresponds to the actual crack growth behaviour observed in the fatigue tests
carried out. However, in other cases it was observed that two or more small
cracks grew together, forming a single fiat crack at an early stage of the fatigue
life. In the crack propagation analysis, crack coalescence at an early stage
may be modelled in an approximate way by considering only one crack with
a low value of the semi-axis ratio, c/b (see Fig. 8).
K = Fs.FE.FT.FG.S. (21)
where Fs is the (front) free surface correction factor, FE is the elliptical crack
shape correction factor, Fv is the finite plate thickness (or width) correction
factor, Fc is the stress gradient or geometry correction factor, S is the remote
applied stress and c is the crack depth. The stress intensity factor corrections
in eqn (21) may be found from Refs 11, 22 and 23:
C
Fs = 1.12 - 0 . 1 2 . ~ (22)
C "] -- 1/2
FE = 1 + 4.5945(~)1"65J (23)
and
Fatigue life prediction 245
FT = x/sec('n'cl2t) (24)
/c r O'r,X, (25)
where o'rC0 is the welding residual stress distribution in the uncracked body
at the line of potential crack growth.
Fatigue crack growth in residual stress fields may be analysed by using the
crack closure model presented, if the following procedure is employed. The
residual stress field is transformed into an equivalent, remote uniform stress,
which results in the same stress intensity factor at the crack tip as the residual
stress field. The method used to take into account the effect of the residual
stresses is based on the concept that the primary effect of the residual stress
field is to change the local mean stress. Thus, the effect on crack closure and
hence on the fatigue crack growth of the change in the mean stress caused
by the residual stress field is considered.
The stress intensity factor due to a remote, uniformly distributed stress, S~a
is given by
Equating the expressions in eqns (25) and (26) gives the equivalent stress of
the residual stress field:
_ 2 I O'r(X)_..dx
For the welded plate test specimens analysed, the through thickness variations
of the residual strains and stresses have been determined. 12,25 In Ref. 25, the
neutron diffraction technique was used to measure the true bulk values rep-
resentative of the bulk state of strains and stresses in the welded plate test
specimens. On the basis of the residual strain measurements on the welded
plate test specimens, discrete values of the residual stresses were estimated.
The residual stress distributions through the thickness of the specimen are
shown as open and solid symbols in Fig. 9 for the test specimen of thickness
16 mm (DTH16) and 8 mm (DTH08), respectively.
The estimated residual stress fields as shown in Fig. 9 are used in the calcu-
lation of the fatigue crack growth life of the welded plate test specimens in
Sections 3.2-3.3.
30o ~ ~ 300
~ ~ DTHI6 zT-
250-~ ~, : : : : : DTH08 /~250
200 , ¢, 200
150 , / - 150
1 O0 , .100
~ 50
m
5 0
° 0 ............ ~ ...... ,. . . . . . -/ ............ o
-150 [ -150
0.0 0.'I 0.'2 0.~3 0.'4 0.50.f6 0.'70.r8 0.'9 1.0
x/t
Fig. 9. Estimateddistribution of residual stresses, ~r acting in loading direction, as a function
of relative position xlt in plate.
Fatigue life prediction 247
m = 3.1 (28)
m
C = 5.1- 10-12iMPax/-~)31. (29)
The values of m and C obtained in Ref. 26 and given in eqns (28)-(29) may
be considered as being only minimally influenced by crack closure due to the
high stress ratio applied, R = 0.6 and the plane strain condition, which may
be assumed to exist in the test specimen used in Ref. 26.
For the material investigated, AKeff,th was estimated as
'~~.
5-
1 i I tent data (DTEI08) [ I[i
I I Letff" I IIIllJ
IJl[I
N
lOOg
e
¢11 JtJJ IIIII IIIIll ~ -7~'t-.1-11
Illtl I I IIII I Iq"tl
Iflfl IIIII1 Illll
,llll IIIIII
Jlfll
IIIII
IlllJ
IIIlll
~'J Ei
c/b = 1/4
IO
10
I I I IIII
i0 5 I0 ~
rl I0
N u m b e r of c y c l e s
Fig. 10. Influence of initial crack size on calculated fatigue lives for the welded plate test
specimen, D T H 0 8 .
line from the test series on the 8 mm thick specimens under CA loading at
R = - 1 is also shown in Fig. 15. 20 As may be seen in Fig. 10, there are con-
siderable differences between the calculated fatigue lives and the mean fatigue
lives of the test data. The main reasons for this discrepancy are--to the
authors' opinion--that the effect of crack closure is not included in the calcu-
lations shown in Fig. 10, and that the residual stresses are overestimated by
using a value equal to +fy throughout. In Fig. 11 is shown the possible scatter
100001 i i i ill
B I[
t
I
I
I
I Ill
Illl I Illll I I I::iiii
7
e I
5
I
I
I
I Illl
Illll ,! Ilrtl
i !!Mean S-N line of~4~
i i I I IIIII
lOOg
!!
II I I I ~",,,,ET'I'~I.J I I I
II
o I Jill
m
fi
4
II II[ll
tllll
II
II } IlJll
e~ = 0.1 m m
10 I II IIIIIJ
10 5
........ II 10 o
, IIIIJ
i ill I
10 7
10'
Number of cycles
Fig. 11. Influence of crack shape on calculated fatigue lives for the welded plate test specimen,
DTH08.
Fatigue life prediction 249
in the fatigue life due to the variation in the crack shape parameter, c/b for
the fixed value of ci = 0.1 m m and cf = 4 mm. As may be seen in Fig. 11, the
crack shape parameter, c/b has a considerable influence on the calculated
fatigue lives. The two extreme cases in Fig. 11 are c/b = l, which corresponds
to a half circular surface crack, and c/b = 0, which corresponds to a tunnel
crack.
In the final calculations of the fatigue life of the welded plate test specimens
given in Sections 3.2 and 3.3, an initial crack size of ci = 0.1 mm and a crack
shape parameter of c/b -- 1/4 were used.
lO00t I Illl
Illl II
] IIIII
IIIll II
i'
I
?-
6 I Illll
IIIII I
IIIII II
~ 3
JI
(1)/ l
~ 2
I00 IIlII
IIIll . "~"~,J III
71 ]1111
IIIII I
, , i,,,g, lllll
'~'6', .~
I, I , ! !ll
10 ' 10 5 10 6 10 7
Number of cycles, N
Fig. 12. Crack growth calculations for DTH08 test specimen under CA loading at R = - 1 ,
considering the effect of welding residual stresses. (1) Full stress ranges. (2) Actual welding
residual stresses applied. (3) Mean SN-line of fatigue test series.
250 J. B. Ibsa, H. Agerskov
i J
';"J J i ....
~D
100 9
7
6
I
I il li J i
I I ' ~ i I II
['T'~
I]li
5 r
.... ~
l illl
, ,~ , ~ , ~ , ~
lO ' 10 ~ 10 6 .tO 7
N u m b e r of cycles, N
Fig. 13. Crack growth calculations for D T H I 6 test specimen under CA loading at R = - 1 ,
considering the effect of welding residual stresses. (1) Full stress ranges. (2) Actual welding
residual stresses applied. (3) Mean SN-line of fatigue test series.
'°°°'I
6"f
IIJl Fi
i~ll
rl
Jl
~ liIJ'"Cd
10 ' 10 5 10 6 10 7
N u m b e r of cycles, N
Fig. 14. Comparison of experimental and predicted fatigue lives for DTH08 test specimens
under CA loading at R = - 1 .
Fatigue life prediction 251
welded plate test specimens considering the effect of the residual stresses. In
the calculations, it is assumed that there is no plastic deformation remaining
ahead of and behind the physical crack tip. Thus, Kop = 0 is assumed for all
applied stress intensity factor ranges. For comparison, the mean SN-lines from
the fatigue test series under CA loading at R = - 1 are plotted in Figs 12 and
13. These figures also show the SN-lines resulting from crack growth calcu-
lations using (full) applied stress ranges, i.e. assuming the residual stresses to
be equal to +fy.
As may be seen in Figs 12 and 13, the residual stresses have a considerable
influence on the calculated fatigue life for the high applied stress ranges,
especially for the small test specimens. However, for the low applied stress
ranges approaching the threshold level or fatigue limit, the effect of the
residual stresses diminishes, and the calculated curves converge at the thres-
hold level. Figures 12 and 13 also show that there are considerable differences
between the calculated results and the mean SN-line for the fatigue test series,
when crack closure is not considered in the calculations. The largest differ-
ences exist for the calculation using the (full) applied stress ranges.
Figures 14-16 also show the prediction results and the fatigue test results
for the constant amplitude test series. However, for the predictions shown in
Figs 14-16, both the influence of crack closure and of the actual welding
residual stresses on the fatigue crack growth are considered. In these and in
the following predictions, Irwin's plane strain constraint factor, ot = 1.73 is
used. For the prediction shown in Fig. 16 (CA, R = 0), the crack shape para-
meter, c/b was chosen to 1/3 based on the experimental observations of the
crack shape using the dye marking technique. 12
As may be seen in Figs 14-16, there is very good agreement between the
prediction results and the fatigue test results for the welded plate test speci-
mens investigated. Furthermore, it may be seen from Figs 14 and 16 that both
the test results and the prediction for the small test specimens show signifi-
cantly shorter fatigue lives at R = 0 than at R = - 1 , especially for the high
applied stress ranges. The main reason for these differences in fatigue life is
that the effective stress ranges and stress intensity factor ranges are larger for
the case of R = 0 than for R = - 1, due to the relatively low tensile residual
stresses present in the small test specimens.
,I IIII II Irlr
I
,o 8
Iltl ,.~ Illl IIIrll
I
lOOg
2
!!- I111
8
I1:
[ III
Ill[
;111
IIII
IIII
Illl
"..11 I I I I
F ' M III
Iltl [trill
2
10' 2 , e~O e
Number of c y c l e s , N
Fig. 15. Comparison of experimental and predicted fatigue lives for DTH16 test specimens
under CA loading at R = - 1 .
I III
Illll I Ill
i,l~,
~'~" ~ ..... J ,,,
~. . . . . . I ~,~, ~,1 4
10" 10 5 i0 e 10 7
Number of c y c l e s , N
Fig. 16. Comparison o f experimental and predicted fatigue lives for D T H 0 8 test specimens
under C A loading at R = 0.
Fatigue life prediction 253
(31)
where
k = number of different stress range levels
n; = number of cycles of stress range AS~
AS~ = variable amplitude stress range
From the constant amplitude (CA) test series at R = - 1, the values of mcA
were determined as mCA = 2.85 and mCA = 3.10 for the test series on the small
test specimens (t -- 8 ram) and the large test specimens (t = 16 mm), respect-
ively. The cycle counting method used in Refs 20 and 21 was the rainflow
counting method.
For the crack growth calculations, the same sequence and magnitudes of
the applied stresses are used as for the fatigue tests carried out. In the crack
growth calculations for variable amplitude loading, the same values of the
initial crack size, ci, semi-axis ratio, c/b, crack growth coefficients C and m,
etc., as used in the crack growth calculations for CA loading at R = - 1 are
applied. Thus, the influence of crack closure and the welding residual stresses
on the fatigue life under both constant amplitude and stochastic loading are
focused.
Comparisons between predictions and fatigue test results for the small plate
test specimens (DTH08) for stochastic loading are shown in Figs 17-19. As
can be seen in these figures, there is in general a good agreement between
prediction and fatigue test results for all three spectra analysed. For the large
plate specimens (DTH16), similar results are presented in Figs 20-22. As may
be seen in Figs 20-22, there is very good agreement between prediction and
fatigue test results for the high applied stress ranges. However, for the low
applied stress ranges, the test results show shorter fatigue lives than the predic-
tion. The exact reason for the deviations at the low applied stress ranges has
not been clarified. However, possible differences between the crack shape
under CA loading and stochastic loading may explain the results at the low
applied stress ranges. Thus, in Ref. 28 it was experimentally observed that
VA tests gave more initiated cracks than CA tests at the low applied stress
ranges, resulting in a higher degree of crack coalescence. The lower crack
semi-axis ratios for VA loading will lead to higher crack growth rates as
compared to CA loading.
In Tables 2 and 3 are given the predicted values of NvA/NcA for different
equivalent constant amplitude stress range levels. NCA is the number of cycles
to failure at constant amplitude loading at R = - 1, and NVA is the number of
cycles to failure at variable amplitude loading including all stress cycles (i.e.
no truncation), at the same stress level. For comparison, the corresponding
ratios of NvA/NcA determined from the linear regression lines of the fatigue
test series are also given in Tables 2 and 3. 2°'21 As can be seen in these tables,
the predicted values of NvA/NcA are less than 1 in all cases. This is also the
case for the experimental values of NvA/NcA except for one case.
The predicted results given in Tables 2 and 3 show that the value of
NvA/NcA increases with decreasing values of the equivalent constant amplitude
stress range. At the higher equivalent stress ranges, the higher magnitudes of
the maximum applied tensile stresses and in particular the higher magnitudes
Fatigue life prediction 255
4
1111 I1111
Ilil[ Ill
<1
O9
Q)
1006
0
7
IIIII 1]11
:.
8
5
4 8 8 4 6 ~ 2 4
10 5 4 6 ~0 6
10 4 10 ~
N u m b e r of cycles, N
Fig. 17. Comparison of prediction and fatigue test results for small test specimens with NAR-
ROW64 spectrum.
II
O~
III 1
M
I00 IIII
I
I
Illl
IIII •
: illl
I!ll
,'Ill
tl II
L 1
2 ~'''~ . . . . .
10 ' 10 5 10 6 10 7
N u m b e r of cycles, N
Fig. 18. Comparison of prediction and fatigue test results for small test specimens with
PMMOD64 spectrum.
256 J. B. Ibsa, H. Agerskov
IIIII i
1111.
IIIII i iiii
!!!!! ! .....
f/3
"0
a) IIIII "~,~ .I III
iiiii i "~
09 lO0 : !11 I IIII • I
i,III
!!
. . . . . .
7' , i i i i i
,~ , ~, . ,,;,~
10 ' 10 5 10 ~ 10 7
Number of c y c l e s , N
Fig. 19. Comparison of prediction and fatigue test results for small test specimens with
B R O A D 6 4 spectrum.
1000~
6
JrrI' [i
7
lli i Ill]
i I j i IIII
4
L. I
<1
r~
u~ 100
FI ..
i
"h'l',
II
rJ ~.1 III
IIIII
6
5 I II
10 4 4 6 ~.05 2 4 6 ~0 ~ • . 10 7 2 4
Number of c y c l e s , N
Fig. 20. Comparison of prediction and fatigue test results for large test specimens with N A R -
ROW64 spectrum.
Fatigue life prediction 257
[llii
illli
IL IIIII
IIIII
IIIII
v
Illl IIItl
o llli
il L
100 I
IIIII
IIIII
I1111
Illl
"- [illi
ilill
iilii
IIlll
2 4
II
6 8 2 4 @ 8 ~ 4
illll
6 8 2 4
10' 10 5 10 6 10 ~
N u m b e r of cycles, N
Fig. 21. Comparison of prediction and fatigue test results for large test specimens with
PMMOD64 spectrum.
Illll Illl tl
LilIIL liii
[BIB
L
~oo i
Lql
lilli III1 "~
hi
Lilli
i]lil lill lllli
IIIII
iiilL
e:
4
tllll
6 8 2 4
i111
Illl
6 8 2 4
II
6 8 2 4
10' 10 ~ 10" 10 7
N u m b e r of cycles, N
Fig. 22. Comparison of prediction and fatigue test results for large test specimens with
BROAD64 spectrum.
258 J. B. Ibsa, H. Agerskov
TABLE 2
Values of NvA/NcA at Different Stress Range Levels, ASequfor Small Test Specimens (DTH08)
TABLE 3
Values of NvA/NcA at Different Stress Range Levels, ASoqufor Large Test Specimens (DTH16)
of the applied compressive stresses for the variable amplitude load cases play
a dominant role, and this results in a significant acceleration of the crack
growth as compared to constant amplitude loading. In particular, at small crack
depths, where the plastic stretches in the wake of the crack are being built
up, the higher magnitudes of both the tensile and compressive stresses for the
spectra analysed result in an acceleration of the crack growth as compared to
CA loading.
Different studies in the literature--both experimental and theoretiqal--have
also shown that crack behaviour, and in particular the short crack behaviour
depends not only on AK, but also on the applied load level, especially at low
applied stress ratios, see e.g, Refs. 4, 29 and 30.
At the lower equivalent stress ranges, a larger part of the applied stress
ranges becomes effective and contributes to the crack growth. This particularly
applies for the stress ranges under CA loading. This effect is due to the tensile
residual stresses present in the welded plate test specimens. At the lower
applied equivalent stress ranges, the predicted load interaction effects are
therefore less pronounced for the welded plate test specimens analysed.
Fatigue life prediction 259
4 CONCLUSIONS
The analyses of the present study have shown that crack closure mechanisms
are of paramount importance for the physical understanding and explanation
of fatigue crack growth under various load conditions and under different
stress states. Fatigue crack growth phenomena such as delayed retardation
following a single tensile overload, crack growth acceleration following a
compressive underload and crack growth retardation following multiple tensile
overloads may be explained on the basis of crack closure analyses.
The parametric studies of the crack growth behaviour of surface cracks at
welded joints show that the following factors are of great importance, and
thus in general they all ought to be included in fatigue life predictions of
welded joints:
-- welding residual stresses
-- crack closure
stress concentrations
-- crack shape.
It is possible to include stress concentrations and welding residual stresses
in the fracture mechanics analysis. Methods to include in the analysis of the
influence of stress concentrations and welding residual stresses upon crack
closure and fatigue crack growth have been developed in the present study.
Using a crack closure model as presented herein and including the influence
of stress concentrations and welding residual stresses results in good agree-
ment between predictions and fatigue test results under CA loading at R = 0
and R = - 1 for the welded plate test specimens analysed. On the other hand,
using full stress ranges in the crack growth calculations, i.e. neglecting the
influence of crack closure and assuming the residual stresses to be equal to
the tensile yield stress, results in a significant underestimation of the fatigue
life under CA loading at R = - 1 for the plate test specimens.
The analytical results for stochastic loading show that acceleration effects
dominate the fatigue crack growth for the load spectra analysed. This main
result is in good agreement with the findings of the experimental investi-
gations. The main reason for the differences in the damaging effect between
the load spectra analysed, and between the load spectra and CA loading at
R = - 1, respectively, is the differences in the magnitudes of the applied
stresses, especially the differences in the magnitudes of the applied compress-
ive stresses. In particular at small crack depths, where the plastic stretches in
the wake of the crack are being built up, the higher magnitudes of both the
tensile and the compressive stresses for the load spectra analysed result in an
acceleration of the crack growth as compared to constant amplitude loading
at R = - I .
260 J. B. Ibsa, H. Agerskov
REFERENCES
1. Elber, W., The significance of fatigue crack closure. ASTM STP 486 (1971)
230-242.
2. Paris, P. C. & Erdogan, F., A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J. Basic
Engng, Trans. ASME D85 (1963) 528-534.
3. Paris, P. C., Gomez, M. P. & Anderson, W. E., A rational analytic theory of
fatigue. The Trend in Engng, 13 (1961) 9-14.
4. Newman, J. C., Jr., A nonlinear fracture mechanics approach to the growth of
small cracks. AGARD, CP-328 (1983).
5. Wang, G. S. & Blom, A. F., A strip model for fatigue crack growth predictions
under general load conditions. Engng Fracture Mechanics, 40 (1991) 507-533.
6. Dugdale, D. S., Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J. Mech. Phys. Solids,
8 (1960) 100-104.
7. Barenblatt, G. I., Adv. Appl. Mechanics, 7 (1962) 55-129.
8. Newman, J. C., Jr., A crack closure model for predicting fatigue crack growth
under aircraft spectrum loading. ASTM STP, 748 (1981) 53-84.
9. Dill, H. D. & Saff, C. R., Spectrum crack growth prediction method based on
crack surface displacement and contact analyses. Fatigue Crack Propagation
Under Spectrum Loads, ASTM STP, 595 (1976) 306--319.
10. Fuehring, H. & Seeger, T., Structural memory of cracked components under
irregular loading. Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP, 677 (1979) 144-167.
11. Tada, M., Pads, P. C. & Irwin, G. R., The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook.
Del Research Corporation, MO, 1973.
12. Ibs~, J. B., Fatigue life prediction of welded joints based on fracture mechanics
and crack closure. Ph.D. thesis, Report No. R 322, Department of Structural
Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 1995.
13. de Koning, A. U. & Liefting, G., Analysis of crack opening behavior by appli-
cation of a discretized strip yield model. ASTM STP, 982 (1988) 437-438.
14. Wheeler, O. E., Spectrum loading and crack growth. J. Basic Engng, ASME, 94
(1972) 181-186.
15. Willenborg, J., Engle, R. M. & Wood, H., A crack growth retardation model
using an effective stress intensity concept. AFFDL-TM-FBR-71-1, Air Force
Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH, USA, 1971.
16. Nowack, H., Trautmann, K. H., Schulte, K. & Ltitjering, G., Sequence effects
on fatigue crack propagation; mechanical and microstructural contributions. Frac-
ture Mechanics, ASTM STP, 677 (1979) 623-628.
17. Chanani, G. R., Effect of thickness on retardation behavior of 7075 and 2024
aluminum alloys. Flaw Growth and Fracture, ASTM STP, 631 (1977) 365-387.
18. Irwin, G. R., Plastic zone near a crack and fracture toughness. Proc. 7th Saga-
more Conf., 1960, pp. IV, 63-77.
Fatigue life prediction 261
19. Jacoby, G. H., Nowack, H. & van Liepzig, H. T. M., Experimental results and
a hypothesis for fatigue crack growth under variable-amplitude loading. Fatigue
Crack Propagation Under Spectrum Loads, ASTM STP, 595 (1976) 172-183.
20. Ibs¢, J. B. & Agerskov, H., Fatigue Life of Offshore Steel Structures under Stoch-
astic ~gading. Dept of Structural Engineering, Technical University of Denmark,
Lyngby, Denmark, Report No. R 299, 1992.
21. Pedersen, N. T. & Agerskov, H., Fatigue Life Prediction of Offshore Steel Struc-
tures under Stochastic Loading. Dept of Structural Engineering, Technical Uni-
versity of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, Report No. R 274, 1991.
22. Fatigue Handbook. Offshore Steel Structures. Ed. A. Almar-N~ess, Tapir Pub-
lishers, Trondheim, Norway, 1985.
23. Albrecht, P. & Yamada, K., Rapid calculation of stress intensity factors. J. Struct.
Div., 103, No. ST2, Proc. Paper 12742, (1977) 377-389.
24. Yamada, K. & Agerskov, H., Fatigue Life Prediction of Welded Joints Using
Fracture Mechanics. Dept of Structural Engineering, Technical University of
Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, Report No. R 255, 1990.
25. Lorentzen, T. & Ibs¢, J. B., Neutron diffraction measurements of residual strains
in offshore welds. Materials Sci. Engng, A197 (1995) 209-214.
26. Br0ndsted, P., Slind, T. & Solin, J., Fatigue Testing. Ris¢ National Laboratory,
Denmark, Report: Rise-M-2714, 1988.
27. Yamada, K. & Nagatsu, S., Evaluation of scatter in fatigue life of welded details
using fracture mechanics. Struct. Engng/Earthquake Engng, JSCE 6 (1989)
13-21
28. Slind, T., Long life testing of welded 370 MPa YS steel specimens in air and in
seawal:er with cathodic protection. Proc. Nordic Conf. Fatigue, ed. A. F. Blom,
EMAS Publishers, UK, 1993, pp. 91-105.
29. Wang, G. S., The plasticity aspect of fatigue crack growth. Engng Fracture Mech-
anics, 46 (1993) 909-930.
30. Blom, A. F., FFA TN 1988-50. The Aeronautical Research Institute of
Sweden, 1988.