Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
-+
.J
Enclosed.is acopy of the order/decision of the Immigration Judge.
All papers filed with the Court shall be accompanied by proof
of service upon opposing counsel.
Sincerely,
Immigra Clerk
cc: PAULETTE TAYLOR, ASSISTAT CHIEF COUSEL
333 SOUTH MIAMI AVE, SUITE 300
MIAMI, FL 33130
U
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t
&
R
e
f
u
g
e
e
A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
|
w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
1MLMA'n'ER OF:
JORGE ENRIQUE TORRS
Respondent
A-099-925-343
l
EXPEDITE MOTION TO RECONSIDER
YOUR DECISION DATED FEBRUARY 10, 2010
DENYING THE MOTION TO REOPEN
G
.. G
::
>
::
I
w
"
=:
N
COMES NOW, the Respondent, by and through his undersigned Attorney; and c
respectfully moves this Court to Reconsider the above mentioned case of Respondent,
JORGE ENRIQUE TORRES, in which the Immigration Judge of Miami, Florida, on
January 05, 2010 entered an Absentia Order of Removal fom the Unites States, and
aferwards on February 10, 2010 denied the Motion to Reopen, and alleges as fllows:
1
v
. Respondent as stated in our original Motion to Reopen fed on February 5,
2010 is a Citizen and National of Argentina who entered the United States, on c
May 21, 2000 at Miami, Florida, as a B-2 Nonimmigrant, fr a Temporary [:
Stay not to exceed November 20, 2000. Aferwards an L-1 A. Non Immigrant
|^Q
c
:.
Petition was fled on his behalf, by Grisines Savio Group Inc. Said Petition
was approved, with a Change of Non Immigrant Status, fom B-2 to L-1, valid
up to June 06, 2002. An Extension of Stay fom the same company was fled,
and said Petition was denied. But on August 27, 2002, an Appeal was fled to
the Commissioner. Said Appeal was transfrred to the Appeal Ofice of
Washington, DC. Various inquiries has been made on this case, but according
to records, said Appeal is still pending.
2. As stated above on January 05, 2010, you entered an Absentia Order in the
case of Respondent Hlnot attending an Immigration Hearing at the Court of
Miami, Florida. Aferwards we fled our Motion to Reopen on February 05,
2010. Then on or about February 10, 2010 you rendered a decision, denying
the Motion to Reopen on this case. You stated that among other things, that
with our Motion, we did not submit the documents to Support our Motion. But
5 days later, wc submited various document in support of our Motion, they
were submitted, according to your stamped records on February 10, 2010, the
date you rendered the decision and then afterwards mailed to us. We did not
submitted originally the documents with our Motion, as we did not have at the
time all the documents needed, and we did not want to wait any longer to fle
:
.
. )
.,
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t
&
R
e
f
u
g
e
e
A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
|
w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
V. Respondent is in need that his case be Reopen in order to continue with his
Immigration Case in the United States. During all this time, he has been an
Executive of the Grisines Savio Group Inc.
I 0. Attached, please fnd new copies of the fllowing documents in support of our
Original Motion to Reopen, which were submitted to the Court. Febary
IO, 2010, as fllows :
5 .-:2S
D
_
.:- 8
a. Afdavit of Respondent, marked as Exhibit "A"
:
.=,F
b. Various copies of the I-129 L1 , the Appeal fled andJotiof
Pending decision, marked as exhibit "B"
J
f
C
- rC
,
Respondent, be Reconsider and Reopen in order fr him to prove his case, and tce able:g
to remain in the United States.
..
Respectflly submitted,
ALEJ DRINA G. CRUZ, ESQ.
Attorey fr Respondent
6303 Blue Lagoon Dr. Suite 400
Miami, Florida 33126
(305) 445-1013
HERBY CERTIFY, that a true and correct copy of the fregoing Motion was given to
the ofce
.
of t?e Oistrict Counsl, located at 333 S. Miami Avenue, 2"
d
foor, Miami, Fl
33126, this day of _z-/ 2010.
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t
&
R
e
f
u
g
e
e
A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
|
w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t