Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
The Stolen Generations (also Stolen children) is a term used to describe those
children of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent who were
removed from their families by the Australian Federal and State government
agencies and church missions, under acts of their respective parliaments. The
removals occurred in the period between approximately 1869 and 1969, although in
some places children were still being taken in the 1970s.
The extent of the removal of children, and the reasoning behind their removal, are
contested. Documentary evidence, such as newspaper articles and reports to
parliamentary committees, suggest a range of rationales. Motivations evident
include child protection, beliefs that given their catastrophic population decline after
white contact that black people would "die out", fears of miscegenation and a desire
to attain white racial purity. Terms such as "stolen" were used in the context of
taking children from their families – the Hon P. McGarry, a member of the Parliament
of New South Wales, objected to the Aborigines Protection Amending Act 1915
which enabled the Aborigines' Protection Board to remove Aboriginal children from
their parents without having to establish that they were in any way neglected or
mistreated; McGarry described the policy as "steal[ing] the child away from its
parents". In 1924, in the Adelaide Sun an article stated "The word 'stole' may sound
a bit far-fetched but by the time we have told the story of the heart-broken
Aboriginal mother we are sure the word will not be considered out of place."
Indigenous Australians in most jurisdictions were "protected", effectively being
wards of the State. The protection was done through each jurisdictions' Aboriginal
Protection Board; in Victoria and Western Australia these boards were also
responsible for applying what were known as Half-caste acts.
More recent usage was Peter Read's 1981 publication of The Stolen Generations:
The Removal of Aboriginal children in New South Wales 1883 to 1969. The 1997
publication of Bringing Them Home - Report of the National Inquiry into the
Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families
brought broader awareness of the Stolen Generations.
The acceptance of the term in Australia is illustrated by the 13 February 2008
formal apology to the Stolen Generations, led by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, and
passed by both houses of the Parliament of Australia. Previous apologies had been
offered by State and Territory governments in the period 1997–2001.
However, there remains opposition to acceptance of the validity of the term "Stolen
Generations". This was illustrated by the former Prime Minister John Howard
refusing to apologize and the then Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Affairs, John Herron controversially disputing the usage in April 2000. Others who
dispute the validity of the term include: Peter Howson, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs
in 1971–72, Keith Windschuttle and Andrew Bolt Others argue against these critics,
responding to Windschuttle and Bolt in particular.
Australian federal parliament apology
Apology text
At 9:30am on February 13, 2008, Rudd presented the apology to Indigenous
Australians as a motion to be voted on by the house. The form of the apology was
as follows:
Today we honor the Indigenous peoples of this land, the oldest continuing cultures
in human history.
We reflect on their past mistreatment.
We reflect in particular on the mistreatment of those who were Stolen Generations -
this blemished chapter in our nation's history.
The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia's history by
righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future.
We apologize for the laws and policies of successive Parliaments and governments
that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians.
We apologize especially for the removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
children from their families, their communities and their country.
For the pain, suffering and hurt of these Stolen Generations, their descendants and
for their families left behind, we say sorry.
To the mothers and the fathers, the brothers and the sisters, for the breaking up of
families and communities, we say sorry.
And for the indignity and degradation thus inflicted on a proud people and a proud
culture, we say sorry.
We the Parliament of Australia respectfully request that this apology be received in
the spirit in which it is offered as part of the healing of the nation.
For the future we take heart; resolving that this new page in the history of our great
continent can now be written.
We today take this first step by acknowledging the past and laying claim to a future
that embraces all Australians.
A future where this Parliament resolves that the injustices of the past must never,
never happen again.
A future where we harness the determination of all Australians, Indigenous and non-
Indigenous, to close the gap that lies between us in life expectancy, educational
achievement and economic opportunity.
A future where we embrace the possibility of new solutions to enduring problems
where old approaches have failed.
A future based on mutual respect, mutual resolve and mutual responsibility.
A future where all Australians, whatever their origins, are truly equal partners, with
equal opportunities and with an equal stake in shaping the next chapter in the
history of this great country, Australia.
Rudd followed the apology with a 20-minute speech to the house about the need for
the apology, which was widely applauded among both Indigenous Australians and
the non-indigenous general public.
Senate consideration
Later that day, a motion for an apology in identical terms was considered by the
Senate. The Leader of the Greens, Senator Bob Brown, attempted to amend the
motion to have it include words committing parliament to offering compensation to
those who suffered loss under past indigenous policies, but was not opposed by all
the other parties. The original motion was passed unanimously.
A real story
Bruce Trevorrow
The judge agreed, ruling that he had been falsely imprisoned. By way of
compensation, Bruce was awarded A$525,000 (£220,000, $447,000), the first such
payout to a member of the Stolen Generations in Australian legal history.
"I never thought I would win, but just wanted some answers in my life," said the
father of four. "I just wanted to know who I was and where I came from."
In a decision which has earned plaudits from Aboriginal groups, the South Australian
government has decided not to appeal the award of compensation, despite arguing
in court that the now defunct Aboriginal Control Board was not part of the
government.
Unchallenged, the ruling could pave the way for hundreds of further cases.
Bringing Them Home, a landmark study published in 1997, found that at least
100,000 Aborigines had been taken from their parents and placed in the care of
institutions, religious missions or white foster parents.
They were part of a nationwide ethnic assimilation programme, now discredited,
which started in the early twentieth century and lasted until the beginning of the
1970s.
Unique case
So will this open the floodgates?
Not necessarily. Bruce succeeded where others have failed partly because there was
a clear paper trail: the letters exchanged between his mother and the Aboriginal
Control Board, which documented the deceit.
Thousands of Aboriginal
children were taken from
their families
"It was unusual to have that amount of evidence," says Claire O'Connor, who was
part of his legal team. "We could prove that the Aboriginal Control Board had been
negligent."
In other cases, much of the paperwork has been destroyed.
In claiming his life had been destroyed, Bruce could also compare his experience
with that of his three Aboriginal siblings, all of whom have enjoyed very successful
lives.
"We could make such a stark contrast because his Aboriginal brothers were such
high achievers," says Claire O'Connor, "and they had stayed with the parents."
In the legal pantheon, she claims the ruling can be placed alongside the famed
Mabo decision in 1992, when the Australian High Court delivered an enormous
boost to Aboriginal land rights by overturning the doctrine of terra nullius - the
notion that Australia belonged to no one before being colonized by the British.
Flushed with victory, Bruce hopes that others will tread the same legal path.
"We've won a case, and there are lots of people out there who lived the same life as
me. Hopefully, they'll get some compensation.
"But you can't put a value on what happened. You can't put a dollar sign on that.
Most of my life has been lost to me."