Agent theory Cest la vie Aff-fairness narrow it down to keep it fair so the neg cant run whatever they

chose Neg-education try to make the topic bigger so they can run more argument so they can educate people Agent o Good o Bad Predictability-there are hundreds of agents that people can do because there are the 3 main branches and then they devolve into more and more killing the education in the round because they can pick any random agent they want.(fairness and education) Not germane to the topic-you dont learn anything new because you learn all that you need to learn in the first year or so on the topic.(education and fairness) Interpretation Allowed to have a agent or so because we have a solvency advocate Standerds They kill predicatability cause they can pick any agent they want Not germane to the topic it kills education because we spend all the time learning about the same cp Start with the standard then link it then impact it They kill predictability which kills fairness which kills education Order Interp first Standards/voters start with 1 or so points than extend and expanded it into why this is bad for education. Why the neg needs all of the standards it presents good Bad

Real world- if we disscuss real world agents then it allows us to vote for pragmatic bills.(education) Forces them to defend their agent(education) Neg flex- allows neg to be prepared against small affs(fairness) Checks small affs (education and fairness)

o o

Pics o Real world Increase specific education and it encourages the you to go more in depth Steals aff ground Kills debate focused in trivial debate and can pic out of one person or something because it is bad Infinitely regressive there are so many things that can be piced out of that kills fairness

Agent theory Cest la vie

Plan plus o You can perm counterplan and is functionally competitive Plan minus o Contextually different Word pic-taking out some word in the plan o Textual-difference in text of plan and cp Bad If plans are legit off of the context because it s infinitely regressive and allows for vague aff plans Not predictable-all words have a arbitrary meaning and it is impossible to know each persons conation Real world congress looks at the function not the context Search for the best the best policy option. Good Should be able to defend each and every word Bright line- decrease judge intervention o Functional-changes aff implementation good Real world education-learn about real world polices and the congress looks for the best policy Best policy option-dont look at some arbitrary standard Best clash Delay(to make it context than take out should and replace it with ought) o Sever out of the inmetinace of the plan(plan -) Can just stand up and say that we never specified when the lan would be done You define resolved that means that your plan would happen immediately they create a moving target .A perm would be intrinsic because it adds the element of time Interp the cp needs to be both contextually and functionally o Even if scenario- if we lose our interp then read context is bad and read funtucal completion good

Agent theory Cest la vie States o Bad Good Not real world No lit base Inf regressive-no cap on what you can fiat Logical policy Not germane to the topic Up aff ground on DAs Test intrincness Reciprocal fiat Neg flex

Condo o Interp Aff o Neg Standards bad Good Limits-depth over breadth Perf. Con Time skew Logical policy makers do it all the time weigh options Strategic thinking Structural bias Should be able to test the agent, methodology, and intrinsicness Limit them down to 2 arguments a cp and a K creating one condo world

Notes o Neg should read more theory than the aff o Really explain how it the other team kills your standards and how they are good for the debate o Adv counterplan would solve for one of the affs counter plans 2ac can read add ons the only way to answer is to prove the cp can solve or straight turn it Perming would be a da to the aff