By Hui Bian Office for Faculty Excellence

 K-group between-subjects MANOVA with SPSS Factorial between-subjects MANOVA with SPSS How to interpret SPSS outputs

How to report results

 We use 2009 Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance

System (YRBSS, CDC) as an example.

YRBSS monitors priority health-risk behaviors and

the prevalence of obesity and asthma among youth and young adults. The target population is high school students Multiple health behaviors include drinking, smoking, exercise, eating habits, etc.

 MANOVA
We focus on K-group between subjects design. Assess the effects of one independent variable (K-group)

on two or more dependent variables simultaneously. Dependent variables are correlated and share a common conceptual meaning. MANOVA uses Pillais trace, Wilkslambda, Hotellings trace, and Roys largest root criterion

 Why use MANOVA

Single dependent measure seldom captures completely a

phenomenon being studied. MANOVA provides some control over the overall alpha level or type I error. Multiple univariate t tests or ANOVA can inflate the operational alpha level. MANOVA considers dependent variable intercorrelations. MANOVA helps indentify dependent variables that produce the most group separation or distinction.

 When NOT use MANOVA

If the dependent variables are not correlated. If the dependent variables are highly correlated. It

will produce the risk of a multicollinearity condition.

Use subscales together with the total scores of the scale

as dependent variables The dependent variable is computed from one or more of the others. Using baseline and posttest scores would create linear dependence.

 Assumptions
Independence: the participants that compose the levels

of an independent variable must be independent of each other. Homogeneity of covariance matrices

Boxs M test from SPSS is used to assess equivalence of

covariance matrices.
Homogeneity of variance When the sample size is fairly equal across the group, violation of homogeneity produces minor consequences. The group sizes are approximately equal (largest/smallest 1.5). Multivariate normality Check univariate normality for each dependent variable.
7

 Example:
Research design: four-group between-subjects design Research question: whether grade levels affect high

school students sedentary behaviors.

One independent variable: Grade with 4 levels: 9th, 10th, 11th,

and 12th grade (Q3r). Two dependent variables: sedentary behaviors: Q80 (physical activity) and Q81: (How many hours watch TV). Higher score of Q80 = More days of physically active. Higher score of Q81 = More hours on watching TV.

 Initial data screening

Stem-and-Leaf Plots: use the original data values to

display the distribution's shape. Normal Q-Q Plots: the straight line in the plot represents expected values when the data are normally distributed. Box Plots: is used to identify outliers.

 Select Analyze

Descriptive Statistics

Explore Move Q80 and Q81 Move Q3r Click Plots

10

 Stem-and-Leaf Plots (Q80 for 9th grade)

Leaves Stem

11

 Stem-and-Leaf Plots (Q81 for 9th grade)

12

 Normal Q-Q Plots: the straight line in the plot represents

expected values when the data are normally distributed.

13

 Box Plots

Kurtosis

75th percentile Median

25th percentile Minimum value

14

 Normality of our dependent variables

The plots obtained from SPSS look reasonably normal. We judge these variables ready for multivariate analysis.

MANOVA using SPSS

Select Analyze

General Linear Model

Multivariate

15

 Options and Post-hoc

16

 Post hoc tests:

A follow-up analysis Following a significant multivariate effect. The purpose of post hoc tests is to discover which

specific dependent variables are affected.

17

 SPPS Outputs
Descriptive statistics

18

The non-significant Boxs M indicates homogeneity of covariance matrices

SPSS Outputs

Significant result indicates sufficient correlation between the dependent variables.

19

 SPSS Outputs

20

 SPSS Outputs: univariate test results

21

 SPSS Outputs: estimated marginal means

22

 SPSS Outputs

23

P values

SPSS Outputs

24

 Plots

25

 Results
The mutivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was

conducted to assess grade differences on two sedentary behaviors: physical activity and hours of watching TV and. A non-significant Boxs M test (p = .12) indicates homogeneity of covariance matrices of the dependent variables across the levels of grade. The multivariate effect was significant by grade levels, F(6,31322) = 28.11, p < .01, partial 2 = .01. Univariate tests showed that there were significant differences across the grade levels on physical activity, F(3,15662) = 24.80, p < .01, partial 2 = .01, and hours of watching TV, F(3,15662) = 27.00, p < .01, partial 2 = .01 .
26

 Results
Tamhane post hoc tests suggested 12th graders (M =

3.96, SD = 2.53) had less days of physical activity than 9th-11th graders did. However, 9th graders (M = 4.43, SD = 2.61) exercised more than 11th graders (M = 4.24, SD = 2.57). Tukey HSD tests showed 9th (M = 3.91, SD = 1.76) and 10th (M = 3.83, SD = 1.76) graders spent more hours of watching TV than 11th (M = 3.65, SD = 1.71)and 12th graders (M = 3.61, SD = 1.71)did.

27

 Two-way MANOVA design

The effects of two independent variables on several

dependent variables are examined simultaneously. A two-way design enables us to examine the joint effect of independent variables. Interaction effect means that the effect of one independent variable has on dependent variables is not the same for all levels of the other independent variable.

28

 Example:
Research design: two-way between-subjects design Research question: whether grade levels and ever use

cigarettes jointly affect high school students sedentary behaviors or Whether the grade differences on sedentary behaviors are moderated by ever use.
Two independent variable: Grade with 4 levels: 9th, 10th, 11th,

and 12th grade (Q3r); ever use cigarettes (Q28) with two levels: female and male. Two dependent variable: sedentary behaviors: Q80 (physical activity), and Q81 (hours of watching TV).

29

 Analysis using SPSS

Select Analyze

General Linear Model

Multivariate

30

 Options and Plots

31

 SPSS Outputs

32

 SPSS Outputs

So, we dont have homogeneity of variance and covariance matrices across combination of two independent variables.

33

 SPSS Outputs: multivariate results

34

 SPSS Outputs: univariate results

35

 SPSS Outputs: marginal means

36

 SPSS Outputs: plots

37

 Post hoc tests

If we use ever use (two levels: Yes and No) as a

moderator, we want to know the relationship patterns of grade and sedentary behaviors from Yes and No groups. Run one-way MANOVA for Yes group (select cases: Q28 = 1/Yes). Run one-way MANOVA for No group (select cases: Q28 = 2/No)

38

 Plots

Yes

No

39

 Other analyses
We want to know which pairs of combinations of two

independent variables are significantly different. Create a new variable: Grade_Smoke Go to Transform Compute Variable Click If

40

 Type Q28 = 1 & Q3r = 1 (means Yes/9th grade)

41

 Then click Ok. Now you create a new variable with

only one category (Yes to smoking and 9th graders). Next, you need to continue adding other five categories to the same variable. Go to Transform Compute Variable

42

 Use If button to change conditions Type Q28 = 1 & Q3r = 2 (Yes/10th graders)

43

 After click Continue than OK, you get this small

window, click OK. The same procedure for adding all categories. Type Q28 = 1 & Q3r = 3 Type Q28 = 1 & Q3r = 4 Type Q28 = 2 & Q3r = 1 Type Q28 = 2 & Q3r = 2 Type Q28 = 2 & Q3r = 3 Type Q28 = 2 & Q3r = 4 A new variable with 8 levels.
44

 Use ANOVA to examine if there is a difference across 8

levels of new variable on Q80.

45

P values

Post hoc tests

46

 Results
Similar to the results from one-way MANOVA. But we need to report Pillais trace multivariate test

result because we dont have equal variance and covariance matrices across the groups. The grade and ever use significantly affected sedentary behaviors. The relationship of grade and sedentary behaviors were moderated by ever use behavior. 9th and 10th graders who had not ever use cigarettes exercised more than other students.
47

Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

48

49