Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Measuring development
There are many indicators of development that tell us about countries and allow us to compare them. GDP = Gross domestic product. This is the total value of all goods produced in a country in a year. It is equal to the total consumer, investment and government spending plus exports minus imports. GNP = Gross national product. It is the value of everything a country produces measured in US dollars. GNP measures the output generated by a country's enterprises, whether physically located domestically or abroad, whereas GDP measures the total output produced within a country's borders - whether produced by that country's own firms or not. GNI per capita = Gross national income per capita. It is peoples average income in a country (US dollars). Infant mortality rate = the number of babies (0-12 months) dying per 1000 live births. HDI = Human development index. Life expectancy, GNI per capita and literacy rate are used to calculate it. Limitations of indicators However, each individual measure has its limitations. Each indicator is an average, and fails to account for differences/variations within the country. Also, some aspects of a country will develop faster than others, and using only one indicator will not show this. Some poorer countries may not show accurate figures, especially for economic measures. This may be because in LEDCs, a lot of employment is in the informal sector, and these figures are not recorded by the government.
Womens place in society affects development. If women are equal to men, then they are more likely to be educated and can work. Women who are educated and work have a better quality of life, and the country has more to spend on development as more people are contributing to the economy. Child education levels affects development. More children attending school means they will get a better education, which will result in better jobs. This improves their quality of life and it means the government has more money to spend on development. Water As well as mentioned above, a lack of water can force a country to import water, and imports reduce the GDP of the country and increase their debt. This will slow down development. Biodiversity can be affected vegetation relies on water, but if it is not there, they will die. Desertification can also occur due to water scarcity, which could increase poverty levels.
Advantages
Helps to save lives. It is a lifeline for people in need.
Disadvantages
It is a short term solution. It does not help in the long term.
Example
Cyclone Sidr (Bangladesh) in Nov 2007 killed 500 and left 5 million people without food. Aid helped people survive and recover. Uganda - Community Youth Empowerment scheme. A water tank was built. Gave education, improved life skills and sexual health awareness. Taught energy conservation methods. However, some locals cant afford school fees.
Leads to development of education, agriculture and healthcare. Involves the community, and it is more likely to be sustainable.
Voluntary Aid
Non-government organizations give money. They are funded
Aid is more effective as it works with local people. Money is not lost due to
May result in tied aid. Donor countries place restrictions on aid, which benefits them. Local people may not have training to operate senior posts e.g. lack of money for fuel. Agricultural change may not be sustainable too much technology. May not be enough to sustain hospitals/schools. Local people may lose land for development projects. Most NGOs are very small and they face a huge challenge.
by donations. They work with local communities and their aid is more effective.
Bilateral Aid
Aid given by one country to another. This is sometimes used for a long term project.
corruption. Once it works, the project can expand due to the government. Sometimes used for large scale projects (e.g. dams). A country gets advice and technology of a country.
The aid given by NGO fluctuates a lot as it relies on public donations. Donor countries can place restrictions on how the money is used (tied aid). Recipient countries may be forced to buy the donor countries products, which mean the money comes back home. Many countries give aid for political reasons. Few countries meet the target of 0.7% of GNI. Sometimes criticized for being out of touch of the peoples needs. The Cahora Bassa Dam in Mozambique. It was set up by the Portuguese in the 1960s. However, it has not helped too many people. Has impacted on fishing industry.
Multilateral Aid
Money from governments is given to international agencies e.g. World Bank. Money is used for development.
Top-down Aid
Co-ordinated by government or international organizations. Giving to the government to improve infrastructure and effects will be passed down.
Bottom-up Aid
NGO aid. Aid is given to locals to improve basic sanitation, health and education.
Makes donor feel in control. Money is not lost to corruption. Aims to improve the country as a whole. Large projects improve infrastructure. NGOs/Individuals give to charity; feel good factor. Feeling of direct link between donor and recipient. Appropriate technology is installed = sustainable. Money not lost by corruption. NGOs work with the communities, who have input.
Projects use large amounts of money, and donors may feel it is wasted. Most ordinary people do not directly benefit. Charity funds may reduce during a recession.
BILATERAL AID CASE STUDY Cahora Bassa Dam The Cahora Bassa dam in Mozambique is an example of bilateral aid. It was built by the Portugese in 1960s, but civil war prevented completion of the However, only 1% of homes in Mozambique have a direct electricity supply, and this HEP scheme has not changed this amount by very much. Most of the power is sold to South Africa, which boosts the economy but does not benefit citizens. It could meet most of Mozambiques power needs. On the whole, the dam has increased the economy of the country, but it could produce more than it currently does. Also, it does not benefit the citizens of the country. River flow is very low because water is being held in reservoirs. The local shrimp industry has been destroyed. The local residents have had their livelihoods destroyed and they have not gained at all from the project.
Small and medium scale projects are much more effective. They involve the local community, and money is not lost due to corruption.
Debt relief some debt that poorer countries owe can be written off. This means they will have more money to spend on developing. Conservation swap this is an agreement where a poorer countrys debts are written off in exchange for undertaking environmental conservation projects. This can also bring in ecotourism to the country, which mas many benefits to locals and the environment. Fair trade this is where farmers in the developing world get paid a fair price for their goods. They also get some extra money to use more effective ways of growing crops, which has long term benefits, as production is maximized. This is a solution if reducing the levels of poverty around the world. European Union Inequality Case Study: France vs Romania France and Romania are two contrasting EU countries. There are massive differences in the development of these two countries. Here are a few key statistics: France Romania GDP (Per Capita) $40,591 $7,391 Life Expectancy (at Birth) 81.09 72.18 Urban population 77%+ 55.2% Infant mortality rate 3.2 per 1000 live births 10 per 1000 live births GDP growth rate -2.6% -7.1% th HDI ( classification + ranking) 0.872 (very high) (14 ) 0.767 (high) (50th) EU member since 1957 2007 These statistics clearly show a massive different in development between these two countries. In Europe, there is a clear east/west divide between the countries. This is because many East European countries were part of the Soviet communist regime. This totally stalled economic growth, as communist policies are anti-capitalism. France is very developed because of early industrialization. It was one of the first countries to industrialize. Therefore, while the rest of the world (Romania) was still producing primary products, France was manufacturing secondary and tertiary products, which have a much higher value. This boosted the money generated from exports, which led to fast GDP growth.
Imperialism is another factor that aided Frances development in the past. France was able to exploit colonies, and gain resources and workers. The fact that France has been an EU member for longer also shows why it is more developed. France has established better trade links earlier than Romania, and this is important for development. How has the EU tried to reduce inequality? Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) this subsidises EU farmers to produce certain crops, so that there is enough food for the EUs population. It ensures a fair price for farmers, and ensures a good standard of living for them. However, with so many new countries added to the EU, it will be hard to continue paying farmers to produce certain goods. The CAP also places high import taxes on goods from outside the EU, and therefore countries are discouraged to buy from them. However, this has bad effects for poorer countries, which are unable to export their goods. This will mean that EU countries benefit as the expense of others. Structural funds money is given to regions with a GDP per capita lower than 75% of the EU average. This money accelerates economic development so that these regions catch up with others. Employment is provided, which increases the regions GDP per capita. Structural funds and the CAP account for most of the EUs spending.