Systematics and Biodiversity (2012), 10(3): 267–275

Perspective A quantitative review of the lifestyle, habitat and trophic diversity of dinoflagellates (Dinoflagellata, Alveolata)

´ FERNANDO GOMEZ
Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biolog´ ıa Evolutiva, Universidad de Valencia, PO Box 22085, 46071 Valencia, Spain (Received 16 June 2012; revised 8 August 2012; accepted 9 August 2012) This study reviews the trends in the lifestyle, habitat distribution and trophic diversity of the 2377 described species of dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae). Most of the dinoflagellates inhabit marine waters, whereas 17% of the total species have colonized continental waters. Dinoflagellates are dominated by planktonic species, while benthic forms represented 8% of the species. From the total number of species, 49% are heterotrophic (devoid of plastids), while 51% of the species have been reported with plastids (that does not strictly imply autotrophy). All the basal dinoflagellates (ellobiopsids, Duboscquodinida, Syndiniales) are heterotrophic, with the exception of a few Noctilucales (Spatulodinium). The continental waters are highly dominated by plastid-containing species (88%), while in marine environments there is a slight dominance of heterotrophic species (58%). Most of the dinoflagellates are free-living forms; only 7% of the total species are parasites. The dinokaryotic parasites appear in separate clades, and about 40% of them contain plastids. The beneficial or mutualistic symbionts (21 species, 1%) are photosynthetic species dispersed into at least three clades. Key words: benthic, biodiversity, Dinophyceae, freshwater Dinophyta, heterotrophy, parasite, symbioses, syndineans

Introduction
The dinoflagellates are an important group of protists in marine and freshwaters. Their adaptation to a wide range of environments is reflected by tremendous morphological and trophic diversity (Taylor, 1987). Like their alveolate relatives, apicomplexans and ciliates, the dinoflagellate cortex has a set of flattened vesicles referred to as alveoli. Dinoflagellates possess a ribbon-like transverse flagellum encircling the cell and another longitudinal flagellum. For the dinoflagellate core, the nucleus, dinokaryon, contains large amounts of DNA and unique cytological features such as permanently condensed chromosomes and a lack of typical eukaryotic histones (Spector, 1984; Lin, 2011). Among the basal dinoflagellates, the syndinian nucleus is much closer to the eukaryotic type. Dinoflagellates are both primary producers and consumers in the food web, sometimes at the same time, and best known for their dominant role in causing harmful algal blooms. Furthermore, dinoflagellates can be either ecto- or endoparasites (Chatton, 1920; Cachon & Cachon, 1987; Coats, 1999). As mutualistic symbionts, dinoflagellates provide essential nutrients to most corals and numerous other marine invertebrates, supporting coral
Correspondence to: Fernando G´ omez. E-mail: fernando.gomez@ fitoplancton.com
ISSN 1477-2000 print / 1478-0933 online C 2012 The Natural History Museum http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021

reefs, one of the most diverse ecosystems on Earth (Trench, 1993; LaJeunesse, 2002). Dinoflagellates show a high versatility in the habitat distribution, marine or continental waters, and adaptation to pelagic or benthic environments. They also show a high trophic diversity (reviewed by Gaines & Elbr¨ achter, 1987; Stoecker, 1999; Hansen, 2011). However, no review has ever reported the precise number of species associated with each type of habitat, lifestyle or trophic diversity. This analysis reviews these general trends based on data of each dinoflagellate species. The aim of this study was to provide a general view of the habitat distribution, lifestyle and trophic diversity, using quantitative data of the whole dinoflagellate group.

Materials and methods
The primary source for analysis is the checklist of living dinoflagellates by G´ omez (2012) that listed 2377 described species. The information on each species has been labelled according to its habitat distribution (marine or continental, and planktonic or benthic), lifestyle (free-living, parasitic or mutualistic symbiont), and trophic diversity (heterotrophic and plastid-containing). The database is provided (Table S1, see supplementary material, which is available on the

268

F. G´ omez

Lifestyle, habitat and trophic diversity of dinoflagellates Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021). However, information on a precise species should be verified in the specific literature. There are no examples of dinoflagellate species which are able to proliferate in both marine and oligohaline continental waters. However, the distinction for marine or continental species may be difficult for some species described from estuarine or coastal brackish waters subjected to strong fluctuations in salinity. At these locations, continental and marine species may co-exist. Species described from estuaries and brackish coastal environments (Kryptoperidinium, Oxyrrhis, Pfiesteria) are labelled as marine species. Other habitat distribution concerns the species living in the water column (plankton) or associated with the bottom (benthic). This distinction is not clear-cut because the turbulence may re-suspend the benthic species (tychoplankton), and planktonic species have benthic life stages (e.g. cysts). In the case of the parasites, they are considered planktonic or benthic according to the habitat of their hosts, although the infecting dinospores disperse in the water column. The lifestyle of dinoflagellates is divided into free-living and symbiotic species. The latter are divided into mutualistic symbionts (i.e. both organisms benefit), and parasites (the dinoflagellate benefits at the expense of the host). The distinction between parasitic and heterotrophic dinoflagellate is not immediate. Parasitic dinoflagellates are considered those forms that have morphologically different feeding and reproductive stages and that produce more than two daughter cells after each feeding event (Gaines & Elbr¨ achter, 1987). The dinoflagellates are considered mutualistic symbionts when the dinoflagellate is smaller than the host as occurred in corals, various types of anemones, jellyfish and molluscs of the reef, and in planktonic Acantharia, Foraminifera and Radiolaria (Spero & Angel, 1991). In other cases, the dinoflagellate is larger than the symbiont and it acts as a host (as has occurred in some dinoflagellate–cyanobacteria consortia). This is not considered a symbiotic or parasitic relationship, and the dinoflagellates are labelled as free-living heterotrophic species. Dinoflagellates have been traditionally categorized as autotrophic or heterotrophic, based on the presence or absence

269

of chlorophyll and plastids. It is difficult to establish whether the plastids are sustaining the cell independently, since other sources of carbon, and most photosynthetic species relied on exogenous vitamins (Tang et al., 2010). It has long been recognized that some photosynthetic dinoflagellates have food vacuoles and feed on other protists (Stoecker, 1999; Jeong et al., 2005; Hansen, 2011). For some dinoflagellates, it is not clear whether their photosynthetic machinery is either their own or derived from prey, nor is it clear whether the plastids or endosymbionts need to be periodically replenished through ingestion (e.g. Dinophysis, Garc´ ıa-Cuetos et al., 2010; Pfiesteria, Feinstein et al., 2002). The species devoid of plastids or pigments are labelled as ‘heterotrophic’. It is more difficult to find a term for the species that possess plastids (auxotrophic, autotrophic, mixotrophic, photosynthetic). Thus, the rest of the taxa are pooled as ‘plastid-containing’ species. Many of the original species descriptions did not specify the presence or absence of chloroplasts, or in some cases the food contents were misinterpreted as plastids. This distinction is subjected to the difficulties to determine the trophic character of numerous species.

Results
Trends in habitat distribution
The dinoflagellates have reached high morphological diversity (Fig. 1) and show higher species richness in marine environments. From the total of 2377 described species of dinoflagellates, 1957 species (82%) were described from marine waters (including estuaries and brackish coastal environments) (Figs 2–17). Most of the marine dinoflagellates were free-living and marine parasites encompassed 137 species (Fig. 3). All the described dinoflagellates living in beneficial symbiotic consortia were marine (21 species, 1%). Marine dinoflagellates are dominated by planktonic species (1787 species, 91%), with 170 benthic species (9%) (Fig. 16). The number of heterotrophic species in marine environments was slightly higher (1131 species, 58%) than for plastid-containing species (Table S2, see supplementary material, which is available on the Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online

← − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − Fig. 1. Diversity of major lineages of dinoflagellates: 1. Ellobiopsis; 2. Oxyrrhis; 3. Duboscquella; 4. Syndinium; 5. Kofoidinium; 6. Noctiluca; 7. Spatulodinium; 8. Scaphodinium; 9. Haplozoon; 10. Crypthecodinium; 11. Dinothrix; 12. Peridinium quinquecorne; 13. Durinskia; 14. Phytodinium; 15. Cystodinium; 16. Borghiella; 17. Sphaerodinium; 18. Biecheleria. 19. Symbiodinium; 20. Takayama; 21. Karlodinium; 22. Brachidinium; 23. Pseliodinium: 24. Torodinium; 25. Gynogonadinium; 26. Amphidinium; 27. Gymnodinium; 28. Polykrikos; 29. Warnowia; 30. Erythropsidinium; 31. Dissodinium; 32. Chytriodinium; 33. Prorocentrum s.s.; 34. Dinophysis; 35. Citharistes; 36. Histioneis; 37. Parahistioneis; 38. Ornithocercus; 39. Phalacroma; 40. Amphisolenia; 41. Triposolenia; 42. Sinophysis; 43. Exuviaella/Haplodinium; 44. Peridinium s.s.; 45. Protoperidinium s.s.; 46. Diplopsalis; 47. Thecadinium; 48. Gonyaulax; 49. Spiraulax; 50. Lingulodinium; 51. Amylax; 52. Goniodoma; 53. Gambierdiscus; 54. Ostreopsis; 55. Coolia; 56. Alexandrium; 57. Pyrodinium; 58. Centrodinium; 59. Fragilidium; 60. Pyrophacus; 61. Pyrocystis; 62. Ceratium; 63. Neoceratium; 64. Ceratocorys; 65. Protoceratium; 66. Schuettiella; 67. Blastodinium; 68. Heterocapsa; 69. Amphidiniopsis; 70. Herdmania; 71. Archaeperidinium; 72. Podolampas; 73. Blepharocysta; 74. Roscoffia; 75. Lessardia; 76. Heterodinium; 77. Corythodinium; 78. Gyrodinium; 79. Hemidinium; 80. Glenodinium; 81. Pfiesteria; 82. Scrippsiella; 83. Oodinium.

270

F. G´ omez

2
CONTAINING

3
PLASTIDHETEROTROPHIC

4
PARASITE
SYMBIOSIS

5
CO
MARINE

FREELIVING

IN NT

EN

TAL
BENTHIC PLANKTON

6

PARASITE

7
PARASITE
HETEROTROPHIC
HET

8
HETEROTROPHIC

CONTINENTAL

PA SYM R

HET

9
CHL

CHL

FREELIVING

FREELIVING

FREE

PLASTIDCONTAINING

FREE-LIVING plastidheterotrophic
CONTINENTAL

MARINE

PLASTIDCONTAINING

PLASTIDCONTAINING

PLANKTON

10
CONTINENTAL

11
MARINE

CONTINENTAL
MARINE

12
PARASITE

CONTINENTAL

PARA SITE

SYM

13
FREELIVING PLANKTON

FREELIVING FREELIVING MARINE

PAR

FRE

MARINE

MARINE FREE-LIVING

plastid-

heterotrophic

14

BE

BENTHIC BENTHIC

15
PLANKTON FREE-LIVING

BENTHIC
PARASITE
PLK

16

BENTHIC

CONTINENTAL

N

17
CO N

PLANKTON

MAR

PLANKTON

PLANKTON

PLANKTON MARINE

MARINE PLANKTON

plastid-

heterotrophic

Figs 2–17. Pie charts of the percent of dinoflagellates (n = 2377 species) according to the trophic classification (heterotrophic or plastidcontaining species), lifestyle (free-living species, parasites or mutualist symbionts) and habitat (marine or continental, planktonic or benthic). CHL: plastid-containing species; HET: heterotrophic; FRE: free-living; PAR: parasites; SYM: mutualistic symbionts; MAR: marine; CON: species living in continental waters; PLK: planktonic, living in the water column; BEN: benthic, living in the benthos.

page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021). All the basal dinoflagellates have been described from marine waters. Among the Dinokaryota, the order Dinophysales is exclusively composed of marine species, and Prorocentrales and Gonyaulacales were highly dominated by marine species (Table S1, see supplementary material, which is available on the Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021). A total of 420 species have been described from continental waters (17% of 2377 species) (Fig. 4). A few

freshwater species were benthic (30 species, 7%), mainly composed of a group of insufficiently known taxa representing the genera, Cystodinium, Stylodinium and Tetradinium. In contrast to the marine species, the continental species were highly dominated by plastid-containing species (88%) (Fig. 8). The few heterotrophic species (48 species, 11%) were little-known species of the genera Gymnodinium, Gyrodinium, Katodinium or Stylodinium. The percentage of parasitic species in continental waters (27 species, 6%) was slightly lower than in marine waters (Fig. 12). Several genera of continental parasites contained plastids

BENTHIC

TIN

EN

L TA
CON

BENTHIC

E IT AS R PA

BENTHIC

HETEROTROPHIC

HET

Lifestyle, habitat and trophic diversity of dinoflagellates (Cystodinium, Crepidoodinium) and others were devoid of plastids (Cystodinedria, Oodinioides and Stylodinium). Concerning the distribution of dinoflagellates in the water column, most were planktonic (2177, 91%) (Fig. 5). These planktonic species were preferentially marine (1787, 91%), and about one half contained plastids (Fig. 9). A total of 127 (5%) species were parasites. There were 200 species described from benthic environments (8% of total), mainly algal epiphytes or sand-dwelling species (episammic). Most of the benthic species were marine (170 species, 85%) and plastid-containing (133 species, 66%) (Table S2, see supplementary material, which is available on the Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021). Benthic species have not been described among basal dinoflagellates, with the exception of Hematodinium, which parasitizes benthic crustaceans. Among the dinokaryonts, the order Gonyaulacales showed a high proportion of benthic species due to the epiphytic genera, Coolia, Gambierdiscus, Ostreopsis and the sand-dwelling Thecadinium. The percentage of benthic parasitic species (37 species, 18%) was higher than for the planktonic species. The benthic parasites belonged to the heterotrophic genera, Haplozoon and Stylodinium, and the plastid-containing Cystodinium. Among the beneficial symbiotic species, Symbiodinium spp. and Amphidinium belauense are associated with benthic organisms (Table S1, see supplementary material, which is available on the Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021).

271

Trends in trophism
The heterotrophic species constituted 49% of the total species (1179 species) (Fig. 2). They slightly dominate in marine waters, while the proportion was low in continental waters with only 48 heterotrophic species. Most of the parasites were heterotrophic (130/164 species) (Fig. 6), and about 30% of the benthic species were heterotrophic (67/200 species) (Fig. 14). All the basal dinoflagellates were heterotrophs, with the exception of a life stage of Spatulodinium, known as Gymnodinium lebouriae that contained plastids (Table S1, see supplementary material, which is available on the Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021). Among the 2280 dinokaryotic dinoflagellates, 1083 species (48%) are heterotrophs. None of the classical major orders (Peridiniales, Gymnodiniales, Prorocentrales, Dinophysales, Gonyaulacales) is exclusively constituted of heterotrophic species. Most of Dinophysales were heterotrophic, with the exception of some Dinophysis and a few Phalacroma. Several families of Peridiniales sensu lato were exclusively heterotrophic species such as Amphidiniopsidaceae, Heterodiniaceae, Podolampadaceae and Protoperidiniaceae. In contrast, the orders Brachidiniales and Prorocentrales were exclusively composed of plastid-containing species, as well as the families Dinotrichaceae, Glenodiniaceae, Heterocapsaceae, Peridiniaceae sensu stricto and Symbiodiniaceae (Table S1, see supplementary material, which is available on the Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021).

Trends in the lifestyle
The dinoflagellates are dominated by free-living species (2192 species, 92%) of which 1143 or 52% are plastidcontaining species (Figs 3, 7). A total of 164 dinoflagellates species (6.8%) were parasites. About one half of the parasites were basal dinoflagellates (77 species), and 87 species were dinokaryotic parasites. Most of the parasites were heterotrophs, with the exceptions of 34 species that contained plastids. The main representatives of the plastid-containing parasites were Blastodinium, a parasite of marine copepods, Crepidoodinium and Piscinoodinium, parasites of freshwater fishes, and the insufficiently known species of Cystodinium, a parasite of freshwater algae (Table S1, see supplementary material, which is available on the Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021). There were 21 species of dinoflagellates living in a mutually endosymbiotic association. The genus Symbiodinium with 15 species and one species of Pelagodinium (family Symbiodinium) constituted the main clade of mutualist symbionts (Table S1, see supplementary material, which is available on the Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021).

Discussion
Trends in the habitat distribution
Most major microbial lineages originated in ancient oceans (e.g. Cavalier-Smith, 2006). Dinoflagellates show a higher species richness in marine environments (four of each five species). Bourrelly (1970) and Taylor (1987, p. 409) reported that approximately only 220 species inhabit freshwater environments. This study listed 420 species living in continental waters. The proportion of marine species could be higher because: (1) for species descriptions, the continental waters have been historically more investigated than the oceans; (2) it could be an excess of species described for several freshwater genera such as Cystodinium, Hemidinium or Tetradinium because they may correspond to life stages of other known species (i.e. Baumeister, 1957; Skvortzov, 1968), as well as many insufficiently known freshwater species of Amphidinium and Gymnodinium; and (3) environmental sequencing of the deep open ocean or deep sediments revealed numerous novel heterotrophic clades dinoflagellates, that have not been morphologically characterized (L´ opez-Garc´ ıa et al., 2001, 2007). They are

272

F. G´ omez Little-known freshwater genera, with an apparent excess of species (Cystodinium, Stylodinium and Tetradinium), may reduce the proportion of benthic species in continental waters. Many of these species are parasites of benthic hosts. They are not highly flattened as typical in benthic dinoflagellates. Only three species of Prorocentrum (= ?Haplodinium antjoliense) and Amphidiniopsis sibbaldii showed flattened morphologies in freshwater environments. Historically, the benthic dinoflagellates have received less attention than the pelagic species. Beyond a few pioneer studies (Herdman, 1924; Balech, 1956), the benthic species have been undersampled for decades. A high number of marine benthic species have been described in the last 20 years, especially species associated with the ciguatera in tropical waters (Coolia, Gambierdiscus, Ostreopsis, Prorocentrum). The sampling coverage of benthic species is nearly restricted to shallow waters as epiphytes of macrophytes, coral reefs or sandy beaches. Environmental sequencing libraries revealed that there may be considerably high diversity of undescribed heterotrophic or parasitic species yet to be described in the deep ocean floor (Moreira & L´ opez-Garc´ ıa, 2003).

often in smaller size fractions (<5 µm) that are difficult to examine and differentiate by classical methods. Several species of dinoflagellates are adapted to high fluctuations of salinity (e.g. Oxyrrhis). However, no species is able to proliferate in both oligohaline and marine waters. Logares et al. (2007) concluded that marine and freshwater dinoflagellates are usually not closely related, several freshwater species cluster into monophyletic groups, only a small fraction of the marine lineages seem to have colonized freshwaters, and most marine–freshwater transitions do not seem to have occurred recently. As an example, the type species of the specious genus Gymnodinium is a photosynthetic freshwater species. The support for the divergence between marine and continental species of Gymnodinium increases in more complete phylogenetic trees, including the families Chytriodiniaceae and Warnowiaceae (G´ omez et al., 2009a, 2009c). Genera such as Amphidiniopsis, Gyrodinium or Prorocentrum contain both marine and freshwater species. However, in some cases, such as Gyrodinium, the addition of more species sequences into the molecular phylogenies could support the generic separation of marine and freshwater species. The molecular phylogeny of the marine and freshwater species supports the generic separation of Ceratium (G´ omez et al., 2010a). The marine species, Neoceratium, reaches a high speciation, while the freshwater Ceratium is restricted to a few species. The present study reveals that continental waters showed a high percentage of plastid-containing species (88%). Dinoflagellates have a lower photosynthetic efficiency than other protist groups (Morse et al., 1995; Tang, 1996). This may constitute a disadvantage to proliferate in the oligotrophic open ocean. In contrast, the higher nutrient concentrations in the continental waters may favour the development of plastid-containing dinoflagellates. Dinoflagellates possess the most diverse array of plastids of any eukaryotic lineage (Saldarriaga et al., 2001; Hackett et al., 2004). However, the pigment composition of the continental species is less diverse than for the marine ones. Common freshwater genera such as Peridinium or Gymnodinium contain the most typical chloroplast of dinoflagellates, which is bounded by three membranes and possess chlorophylls a and c2 as well as peridinin as a major accessory pigment. A few freshwater dinoflagellates, as well as marine species, have a blue pigment, phycobilin, obtained from a cryptophyte endosymbiont (Yamaguchi et al., 2011). Most of the dinoflagellates are planktonic in marine and continental ecosystems. Taylor et al. (2008, p. 408) estimated 160 marine benthic species, and they reported that only one explicitly freshwater benthic species has been described. From the 200 species of benthic dinoflagellates, 85% inhabit marine and 15% continental waters (Figs 2–17, Table S2, see supplementary material, which is available on the Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021).

Trends in lifestyle
Most of the dinoflagellates were free-living species (92% of 2377). In contrast, the closest relatives to the dinoflagellates, apicomplexans and perkinsids, and nearly all the basal dinoflagellates are parasites (Zhang et al., 2011). Cachon & Cachon (1987) listed 66 parasitic dinoflagellates, and Drebes (1984) estimated about 140 species. Taylor et al. (2008) estimated parasites were 5% of the total species. The present study reported 164 species of parasites (7% of the total 2377 species). About one half of the total species (77 species) belong to the non-dinokaryotic basal dinoflagellates (ellobiopsids, Duboscquodinida, Syndiniales). In the molecular phylogenies, a few free-living species branched among the basal dinoflagellates (Oxyrrhis and Noctilucales) (Saldarriaga et al., 2003; G´ omez et al., 2010b). Oxyrrhis is a free-living species that only proliferates in brackish environments, often associated with the unialgal blooms (Dunaliella). The morphology of Oxyrrhis resembles the dispersive spores of Syndiniales (Chatton, 1920; Skovgaard et al., 2005). To date, environmental sequences of Duboscquodinida (Marine Alveolate Group I) and Syndiniales (Marine Alveolate Group II) have been retrieved exclusively from marine environments (Guillou et al., 2008). Syndiniales are genetically more diverse than Duboscquodinida, and the diversity in the deep-ocean and deep floor is greatly underestimated, because there are more clades than known species (Guillou et al., 2008). All the ellobiopsids were described from marine waters (G´ omez et al., 2009b), although infections by ellobiopsid parasites have been reported in freshwater crustaceans (Bridgeman et al., 2000; Manca et al., 2004).

Lifestyle, habitat and trophic diversity of dinoflagellates The basal dinoflagellates are considerably dominated by parasites, while the proportion of parasites is low (3%) among the typical dinoflagellates. The parasitism in dinokaryotes is restricted to 87 species which were often dispersed among free-living species. Haplozoon is a parasite with a basal position in the dinokaryotic core (Cachon & Cachon, 1987). However, the other clades of parasitic dinoflagellates (Chytriodiniaceae, Oodiniaceae, Piscinoodinium) emerge among free-living forms, and suggest that parasitism is a recent acquisition. So far, the parasitic basal dinoflagellates do not contain plastids, while about 40% of the dinokaryotic parasites contain plastids. Nearly all the species of Blastodinium contain plastids, although the photosynthesis partially covers the cell requirements and the rest being ensured by the assimilation of host digestive substances (Pasternak et al., 1984). The parasites of the family Chytriodiniaceae (Chytriodinium, Dissodinium) emerged among clades of photosynthetic species of Gymnodinium. The parasite of copepod eggs, Dissodinium pseudolunula, possesses plastids, while its closer relatives are heterotrophic species (G´ omez et al., 2009c). This suggests a recent loss of the plastids in Chytriodiniaceae, more than a recent acquisition in D. pseudolunula. The presence of plastids seems to be a reminiscent of its photosynthetic ancestor in Dissodinium and Blastodinium, the latter with a peridinioid ancestor (Skovgaard et al., 2007). The phototrophy may be primarily a mechanism to increase survival during dispersal of the infective spores. The richness of parasites in continental waters is relatively low, and in general freshwater parasites are less harmful than marine ones. Cystodinedria, Cystodinium and Stylodinium appear to rely on photosynthesis during much of their life cycle and were long believed to be strict autotrophs (Cachon & Cachon, 1987; Popovsk´ y & Pfiester, 1990). The number of species of freshwaters parasites could be overestimated, because numerous life stages of known species may have been described as separate species. Crepidoodinium spp. cause little damage to their hosts and may be ectocommensals, rather than true parasites (Lom et al., 1993). The plastid-containing parasite Piscinoodinium belongs to the main clade of mutualist symbionts (Symbiodinium) (Siano et al., 2010). The number of mutualist symbiotic species (21 species, <1% total species) is low, and all species are exclusively known from warm oceans. The 15 species of Symbiodinium have a high ecological relevance in the coral reefs. Symbiodinium displays a high genetic diversity, which suggests a high number of undescribed species (McNally et al., 1994). Dinokaryotic dinoflagellates are characterized by huge genomes (Spector, 1984; Lin, 2011). In contrast, Symbiodinium has a very small genome, which may be a possible adaptation to the symbiotic lifestyle (LaJeunesse et al., 2005). Mutualist symbionts associated with planktonic rhizarians (Acantharia, Foraminifera and Radiolaria) have been reported under the genera

273

Amphidinium, Aureodinium, Gloeodinium, Gymnodinium, Gyrodinium, Prorocentrum, Pyrocystis and Scrippsiella (Spero & Angel, 1991). However, the precise identification of many of these species and its interpretation as mutualist symbionts is doubtful. The molecular phylogenies support the polyphyletic origin of dinoflagellate-invertebrate symbiosis (McNally et al., 1994). Mutualist symbionts are separated into at least three clades (Table S1, see supplementary material, which is available on the Supplementary tab of the article’s Taylor & Francis Online page at http://dx.doi/10.1080/14772000.2012.721021). In addition to Symbiodinium, the family Symbiodiniaceae, contain numerous free-living species, and Piscinoodinium, a plastid-containing species that is parasitic on freshwater fishes, and the symbionts of planktonic foraminifera Pelagodinium (formerly Gymnodinium) (Siano et al., 2010). The family Endodiniaceae, including Endodinium, have reported under the genera Amphidinium, Gloeodinium, Scrippsiella and Zooxanthella (Spero & Angel, 1991). A third clade is composed of a single species, Amphidinium belauense, living in a flatworm, closely related to free-living photosynthetic species of Amphidinium sensu stricto (McNally et al., 1994). Dinoflagellates show a high proclivity for endosymbiosis, which is largely reported for plastids (Saldarriaga et al., 2001; Hackett et al., 2004). A single dinoflagellate cell may harbour plastids from different algal groups (Phalacroma mitra; Nishitani et al., 2012). Several dinoflagellates of the family Dinotrichaceae are known to possess an endosymbiotic diatom or diatom-like alga that is separated from the dinoflagellate cytoplasm by a single unit membrane (Takano et al., 2008). Other symbionts have been reported in Amphisolenia, Amylax, Noctiluca, Podolampas (see references in Hansen, 2011), and cryptophytes in Gymnodinium (Yamaguchi et al., 2011). This study has excluded as mutualist symbiosis the associations where the dinoflagellate acts as host. Numerous dinophysoid dinoflagellates contain unicellular cyanobacteria which live in a hollow chamber formed by a cingular list, and Ornithocercus also harbour diazotrophic heterotrophic bacteria attached to the sulcal list (Farnelid et al., 2010). The same symbiont cyanobacteria appear in a variety of dinophysoid hosts, and a single dinoflagellate host may harbour mixed assemblages of cyanobacteria (Foster et al., 2006). The host dinoflagellate ingests the cyanobacteria along with other prey items (Tarangkoon et al., 2010). The population of symbiont cyanobacteria is favoured by the protection, buoyancy and excretion products of the dinoflagellate host. However, the relationship is not mutually beneficial for a cyanobacteria cell that is ingested by the host. All basal dinoflagellates are heterotrophic, with the exception of a noctilucoid genus (Spatulodinium; G´ omez et al., 2010b). For the dinokaryotic dinoflagellates, 1083 (47%) are heterotrophic, and 1197 (52%) are plastidcontaining. We can expect that the number of heterotrophic

274

F. G´ omez
FOSTER, R.A., COLLIER, J.L. & CARPENTER, E.J. 2006. Reverse transcription PCR amplification of cyanobacterial symbiont 16S rRNA sequences from single non-photosynthetic eukaryotic marine planktonic host cells. Journal of Phycology 42, 243–250. ¨ , M. 1987. Heterotrophic nutrition. In: GAINES, G. & ELBRACHTER TAYLOR, F.J.R., Ed., The Biology of Dinoflagellates. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 224–268. IA-CUETOS, L., MOESTRUP, Ø., HANSEN, P.J. & DAUGBJERG, GARC´ N. 2010. The toxic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata harbors permanent chloroplasts of cryptomonad origin, not kleptochloroplasts. Harmful Algae 9, 25–38. ´ , F. 2012. A checklist and classification of living dinoflagGOMEZ ellates (Dinoflagellata, Alveolata). CICIMAR Oce´ anides 27, 65–140. ´ -GARC´ ´ , F., LOPEZ IA, P. & MOREIRA, D. 2009a. Molecular GOMEZ phylogeny of the ocelloid-bearing dinoflagellates Erythropsidinium and Warnowia (Warnowiaceae, Dinophyceae). Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 56, 440–445. ´ -GARC´ ´ , F., LOPEZ IA, P., NOWACZYK, A. & MOREIRA, D. GOMEZ 2009b. The crustacean parasites Ellobiopsis Caullery, 1910 and Thalassomyces Niezabitowski, 1913 form a monophyletic divergent clade within the Alveolata. Systematic Parasitology 74, 65–74. ´ -GARC´ ´ , F., MOREIRA, D. & LOPEZ IA, P. 2009c. Life cycle GOMEZ and molecular phylogeny of the dinoflagellates Chytriodinium and Dissodinium, ectoparasites of copepod eggs. European Journal of Protistology 45, 260–270. ´ -GARC´ ´ , F., MOREIRA, D. & LOPEZ IA, P. 2010a. Neoceratium GOMEZ gen. nov., a new genus for all marine species currently assigned to Ceratium (Dinophyceae). Protist 161, 35–54. ´ ´ -GARC´ GOMEZ , F., MOREIRA, D. & LOPEZ IA, P. 2010b. Molecular phylogeny of noctilucoid dinoflagellates (Noctilucales, Dinophyta). Protist 161, 466–478. GUILLOU, L., VIPREY, M., CHAMBOUVET, A., WELSH, R.M., KIRKHAM, A.R., MASSANA, R., SCANLAN, D.J. & WORDEN, A.Z. 2008. Widespread occurrence and genetic diversity of marine parasitoids belonging to Syndiniales (Alveolata). Environmental Microbiology 10, 3349–3365. HACKETT, J.D., ANDERSON, D.M., ERDNER, D.L. & BHATTACHARYA, D. 2004. Dinoflagellates: A remarkable evolutionary experiment. American Journal of Botany 91, 1523–1534. HANSEN, P.J. 2011. The role of photosynthesis and food uptake for the growth of marine mixotrophic dinoflagellates. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 58, 203–214. HERDMAN, E.C. 1924. Notes on dinoflagellates and other organisms causing discolouration of the sand at Port Erin. IV. Transactions of the Liverpool Biological Society 38, 75–84. JEONG, H.J., YEONG, D.Y., PARK, J.Y., SONG, J.Y., KIM, S.T., LEE, S.H., KIM, K.Y. & YIH, W.H. 2005. Feeding by phototrophic red-tide dinoflagellates: five species newly revealed and six species previously known to be mixotrophic. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 40, 133–150. LAJEUNESSE, T. 2002. Diversity and community structure of symbiotic dinoflagellates from Caribbean coral reefs. Marine Biology 141, 387–400. LAJEUNESSE, T.C., LAMBERT, G., ANDERSON, R.A., COFFROTH, M.A. & GALBRAITH, D.W. 2005. Symbiodinium (Pyrrhophyta) genome sizes (DNA content) are smallest among dinoflagellates. Journal of Phycology 41, 880–886. LIN, S. 2011. Genomic understanding of dinoflagellates. Research in Microbiology 162, 551–569. LOGARES, R., SHALCHIAN-TABRIZI, K., BOLTOVSKOY, A. & RENGEFORS, K. 2007. Extensive dinoflagellate phylogenies

dinoflagellates is underestimated. The coloured dinoflagellates have received more attention, especially those responsible for red-tides. The high availability of material from the red tide species or the possibility to establish cultures allow detailed morphological, ultrastructural and molecular phylogeny studies. In contrast, the heterotrophic species are less visible, and usually the scarce material available restricts the species description. Consequently, our knowledge of the dinoflagellate is highly heterogeneous. Because of their ecological and evolutionary importance, dinoflagellates have a relatively welldeveloped taxonomy for certain groups such as the toxic species of Gonyaulacales (Alexandrium), and others (Symbiodinium). A greater effort is needed to investigate the unknown diversity, especially at greater ocean depths and the deep-ocean floor.

Acknowledgements
F.G. is supported by the contract JCI-2010-08492 of the Ministerio Espa˜ nol de Ciencia y Tecnolog´ ıa.

References
´ BALECH, E. 1956. Etude des dinoflagell´ es du sable de Roscoff. Revue Algologique, n. ser. 2, 29–52. BAUMEISTER, W. 1957. Neue Dinococcalen aus dem niederbayerischen Hiigelland zwischen Isar und Inn (I). Archiv f¨ ur Protistenkunde 102, 21–43. ` la BOURRELLY, P. 1970. Les algues d’eau douce. Initiation a syst´ ematique. Tome III: Les algues bleues et rouges. Les ´ Eugl´ eniens, Peridiniens et Cryptomonadines. Editions N. Boub´ ee et Cie, Paris. BRIDGEMAN, T.B., MESSICK, G. & VANDERPLOEG, H.A. 2000. Sudden appearance of cysts and ellobiopsid parasites on zooplankton in a Michigan Lake: a potential explanation of tumorlike anomalies. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57, 1539–1544. CACHON, J. & CACHON, M. 1987. Parasitic dinoflagellates. In: TAYLOR, F.J.R., Ed., The Biology of Dinoflagellates. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 571–610. CAVALIER-SMITH, T. 2006. Cell evolution and Earth history: stasis and revolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences 361, 969–1006. ´ 1920. Les P´ CHATTON, E. eridiniens parasites: morphologie, reproduction, e erimentale et ´ thologie. Archives de Zoologie Exp´ G´ en´ erale 59, 1–475. COATS, D.W. 1999. Parasitic life styles of marine dinoflagellates. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 46, 402–409. DREBES, G. 1984. Life cycle and host specificity of marine parasitic dinophytes. Helgol¨ ander Meeresuntersuchungen 37, 603–622. FARNELID, H., TARANGKOON, W., HANSEN, G., HANSEN, P.J. & RIEMANN, L. 2010. Putative N2 -fixing heterotrophic bacteria associated with dinoflagellate–Cyanobacteria consortia in the low-nitrogen Indian Ocean. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 61, 105–117. FEINSTEIN, T.N., TRASLAVINA, R., SUN, M.-Y. & LIN, S. 2002. Effects of light on photosynthesis, grazing, and population dynamics of the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Pfiesteria piscicida (Dinophyceae). Journal of Phycology 38, 659–669.

Lifestyle, habitat and trophic diversity of dinoflagellates
indicate infrequent marine-freshwater transitions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolutioin 45, 887–890. ´ , I. 1993. Crepidoodinium australe LOM, J., ROHDE, K. & DYKOVA n. sp., an ectocomensal dinoflagellate from the gills of Sillago ciliata an estuarine fish from the New South Wales coast of Australia. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 15, 63–72. ´ -GARC´ ´ -ALIO ´ , C. IA, P., RODR´ IGUEZ-VALERA, F., PEDROS LOPEZ & MOREIRA, D. 2001. Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic phytoplankton. Nature 409, 603–607. ´ -GARC´ IA, P., VERESHCHAKA, A. & MOREIRA, D. 2007. LOPEZ Eukaryotic diversity associated with carbonates and fluid–seawater interface in Lost City hydrothermal field. Environmental Microbiology 9, 546–554. MANCA, M., CARNOVALE, A. & ALEMANI, P. 2004. Exotopic protrusions and ellobiopsid infection in zooplanktonic copepods of a large, deep subalpine lake, Lago Maggiore, in northern Italy. Journal of Plankton Research 26, 1257–1263. MCNALLY, K.L., GOVIND, N.S., THOME, P.E. & TRENCH, R.K. 1994. Small-subunit ribosomal DNA sequence analyses and a reconstruction of the inferred phylogeny among symbiotic dinoflagellates (Pyrrophyta). Journal of Phycology 30, 316–329. ´ -GARC´ IA, P. 2003. Are hydrothermal MOREIRA, D. & LOPEZ vents oases for parasitic protists? Trends in Parasitology 19, 556–558. MORSE, D., SALOIS, P., MARKOVIC, P. & HASTINGS, J.W. 1995. A nuclear-encoded form II RuBisCO in dinoflagellates. Science 268, 1622–1624. NISHITANI, G., NAGAI, S., HAYAKAWA, S., KOSAKA, Y., SAKURADA, K., KAMIYAMA, T. & GOJOBORI, T. 2012. Multiple plastids collected by the dinoflagellate Dinophysis mitra through kleptoplastidy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78, 813–821. PASTERNAK, A.F., ARASHKEVICH, Y.G. & SOROKIN, Y.S. 1984. The role of the parasitic algal genus Blastodinium in the ecology of planktic copepods. Oceanology 24, 748–751. ´ , J. & PFIESTER, L.A. 1990. Dinophyceae (DinoflagellPOPOVSKY ida). In: ETTL, H., GERLOFF, J., HEYNIG, H. & MOLLENHAUER, D., Eds., S¨ usswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Vol. 6. Gustav Fischer, Jena and Stuttgart, pp. 1–272. SALDARRIAGA, J.F., TAYLOR, F.J., KEELING, P.J. & CAVALIER-SMITH, T. 2001. Dinoflagellate nuclear SSU rRNA phylogeny suggests multiple plastid losses and replacements. Journal of Molecular Evolution 53, 204–213. SALDARRIAGA, J.F., MCEWAN, M.L., FAST, N.M., TAYLOR, F.J.R. & KEELING, P.J. 2003. Multiple protein phylogenies show that Oxyrrhis marina and Perkinsus marinus are early branches of the dinoflagellate lineage. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 53, 355–365. SIANO, R., MONTRESOR, M., PROBERT, I., NOT, F. & DE VARGAS, C. 2010. Pelagodinium gen. nov. and P. beii comb. nov., a

275

dinoflagellate symbiont of planktonic foraminifera. Protist 161, 385–399. ´ , V. & SAIZ, E. 2005. SKOVGAARD, A., MASSANA, R., BALAGUE Phylogenetic position of the copepod-infesting parasite Syndinium turbo (Dinoflagellata, Syndinea). Protist 156, 413–423. SKOVGAARD, A., MASSANA, R. & SAIZ, E. 2007. Parasitic species of the genus Blastodinium (Blastodiniphyceae) are peridinioid dinoflagellates. Journal of Phycology 43, 553–560. SKVORTZOV, B.V. 1968. New and little known Peridineae from northern Manchuria, China. Quarterly Journal of the Taiwan Museum 21, 79–114. SPECTOR, D.L., Ed. 1984. Dinoflagellates. Academic Press, New York. SPERO, H.J. & ANGEL, D.L. 1991. Planktonic sarcodines: Microhobitat for oceanic dinoflagellates. Journal of Phycology 27, 185–195. STOECKER, D.K. 1999. Mixotrophy among dinoflagellates. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 46, 397–401. TAKANO, Y., HANSEN, G., FUJITA, D. & HORIGUCHI, T. 2008. Serial replacement of diatom endosymbionts in two freshwater dinoflagellates, Peridiniopsis spp. (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae). Phycologia 47, 41–53. TANG, E.P.Y. 1996. Why do dinoflagellates have lower growth rates? Journal of Phycology 32, 80–84. TANG, Y.Z., KOCH, F. & GOBLER, C.J. 2010. Most harmful algal bloom species are vitamin B1 and B12 auxotrophs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107, 20756–20761. TARANGKOON, W., HANSEN, P. J. & HANSEN, G. 2010. Spatial distribution of symbiont bearing dinoflagellates in the Indian Ocean in relation to oceanographic regimes. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 58, 197–213. TAYLOR, F.J.R., Ed. 1987. The Biology of Dinoflagellates. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. TAYLOR, F.J.R., HOPPENRATH, M. & SALDARRIAGA, J.F. 2008. Dinoflagellate diversity and distribution. Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 407–418. TRENCH, R.K. 1993. Microalgal–invertebrate symbioses: a review. Endocytobiosis Cell Research 9, 135–175. YAMAGUCHI, H., NAKAYAMA, T., KAI, A. & INOUYE, I. 2011. Taxonomy and phylogeny of a new kleptoplastidal dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium myriopyrenoides sp. nov. (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyceae), and its cryptophyte symbiont. Protist 162, 650–667. ZHANG, H., CAMPBELL, D.A., STURM, N.R., DUNGAN, C.F. & LIN, S. 2011. Spliced leader RNAs, mitochondrial gene frameshifts and multi-protein phylogeny expand support for the genus Perkinsus as a unique group of Alveolates. PLoS ONE 6(5), e19933.

Associate Editor: Elliot Shubert

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful