Está en la página 1de 9

Intro: The Manual to Debating a Liberal, from a former Liberal SOURCE : http://www.angelfire.com/emo2/republican/Manual.

htm A mere year ago, I was a liberal Democrat. I fell under many of the things I describe below, and I used many of the tactics that I describe below. After my ideology changed (to Republican), thanks to much research and being realistic on my part, I realized that many conservatives simply cannot engage liberals in debates very well. Not because conservatives arent rightbecause I truly believe that they are- but because liberals are very good at playing politics. And included in politics are their tactics in debates. I now present to you the following guide, on how to defeat liberals in debates. Im pretty confident I would have shredded myself apart from a year ago if I tried to debate myself using this guide, and I think youll make good use of it as well. E-mail me at sunnyd1182@yahoo.com if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Sunny S. Sidhu Former Liberal Democrat, Current Conservative Republican, Future Conservative Republican Section 1: The Liberal Mindset In order to debate liberals, we must first understand their mindset. Why they think the way they do, why they believe in their particular stances, and, generally, their world view. This can be summed up rather easily by looking at the types of people who ARE liberals. There are two key groups we must look at (note, however, that there are many exceptions in these groups, but in general, most liberals will fall under at least one of the following categories) ******************************************************* *** The Intellectuals College Students, especially those in Ivy Leagues College Professors, especially those in Ivy Leagues Other teachers, education administrators, and education policymakers Journalists and Media personalities ******************************************************* *** The Victims of the Democratic Playing Card Deck African Americans, Latinos, and other minorities Senior Citizens The poor and middle class, especially those who live in urban areas

Feminists Environmentalists ******************************************************* *** Now, there are undoubtedly other groups that could be considered key players in the Democratic/liberal movement, but the above are the most often cases you will run into. There are distinct reasons for why the aforementioned two groups exist; and these reasons must be understood if you are to properly engage a liberal in a debate. For, once again, we must understand their mindsets. The Intellectuals: The Intellectuals are an interesting group of people. Theyre typically your academics, people who have very strong academic accomplishments, or believe that they do (these can be interchanged). They often think of themselves as smart people, and associate with like-minded smart people. Theyre especially found in Ivy League colleges, though this phenomenon easily exists in non-Ivy League schools as well. It extends beyond just the college and university scene, however; other education institutions have similar groups, and the media is full of such people. These people are usually fairly responsible, fairly intelligent, and are going in a good direction in life- at least academically. However, all of them fall victim to one trap: they believe that everyone else is just as responsible and intelligent as them. Thus, they fall into an ideological world view, which believes that everything can be perfect, and that cases of human nature such as greed simply do not exist. (This explains why far left liberals supported communismthey thought people would be happy with to each according to their needclearly, that did not work) These people believe that things like abortion should be legal, because people will be responsible with it, and not take advantage of it. These people believe that drugs should be legalized, for the same reasons. These people believe that children should be exposed to sex and violence (including things that can be seen as the promotion of them), because children would be responsible with such matters. These people do not think things on television and mass media should be regulated, thinking that all people are responsible enough to handle indecent material. They believe all criminals can be rehabilitated and become responsible like them, and thus they oppose things like the death penalty. The list goes on and on, but the key thing you must know about these people: theyre frequently not in touch with reality itself- theyre like bookworms. They dont realize the problems in the world for what they really are, but think they do. Therefore, they fall victim to an ideological world view which simply does not work in reality: liberalism. Everything these intellectuals do now has been done before, in essence: Karl Marx once presented an ideological leftist world view. It didnt work, but it sure sounded great when he presented his ideology. What looks good on paper may not look good in reality, and that is one thing the intellectual left does not understand.

These people also fundamentally believe they are right, and will refuse to argue with anyone who they think is of less merit than them; theyre very elitist to a sense, and therefore blindly hold to their ideology despite any arguments thrown at them. It is Ivy League arrogance, journalistic elitism, and whatever else you can name, at its finest. The Victims of the Democratic Playing Card Deck This group makes up the core of the voting element as far as the Democratic Party goes, and thus helps the most to promote the liberal cause. These are the people who think theyve been wrong or disadvantaged, or have been told that theyve been wronged or disadvantaged. Theyre also being told that the opposing parties (Republicans and conservatives) are out to wrong them and disadvantage them even further. These are the things commonly referred to as playing the race/age/gender/class card. This is used VERY often by liberals, so get ready to hear a lot of it. It works, it is effective, and this second group of people- the victims- falls for it very easily. As a result, they become slaves of the liberal mindset. Look no further than how the Democrats try to scare African Americans into believing that Republicans are holding them down, how the Democrats try to scare middle class Americans into thinking Republicans are hurting the middle class, and how the Democrats try to scare women into thinking Republicans are against their rights. Democrats also frequently try to scare Senior Citizens into thinking Republicans want to destroy Social Security. Look at the key words mentioned in these accusations; against,holding down, hurting, destroying. In essence, it is fear mongering targeted at certain groups of people in society, and it works. These Democrats and liberals attempt to spin the issues into backing up this fear mongering, and people listen to it. And as a result, this entire second group is formed- the victims of the Democratic Playing Card Deck. These people often do not know much about the issues, especially as far as fact and reality goes. What they DO think they know, however, is that Republicans and conservatives are completely against them and trying to hold them down (or their issue) in general. They believe the way they do, because of the total spin and fear mongering they hear from Democratic and liberal leaders. They then go out and vote for these said Democrats, and become strong liberals, mostly out of fear and loathing of the other side- values instilled into them. Furthermore, they become very likely to start calling conservatives bigots and racists because of the lies that the liberal left has drilled into their heads. Key Liberal Characteristics Based on the previous two groups, youve got one group of people that is ideological, unrealistic, and elitist. Then youve got a second group that is fearful, angry, resentful, and therefore has a closed mind towards reality- or any other persons opinions if they differ from their own. Section 2: Liberals and their Tactics Now that we understand the two key elements of liberalism, we can now move on to debates themselves. In debates, liberals tend to use a select few tactics very frequently; no matter who

the person is, if theyre a liberal, they always make use of the same arsenal. This is likely due to the fact that theyre all promoting the same unrealistic philosophy, liberalism itself, and that liberalism can only be argued effectively in one manner: through the use of these tactics. The reasoning will be obvious once we are done looking at the weapons themselves. Here they are, in no particular order: Tactic Number One: Interruption This one will be used often, throughout the span of an entire debate. If you, as a conservative (or even moderate), are attempting to make a point- especially if you have numbers, facts, and figures to back your point of view up- the common liberal will use this weapon often. Why? Because it stops you from getting your point across- and if you dont get your point across, you cannot win a debate. The liberal sees this, the liberal knows this, and thus the liberal will interrupt you often. If the liberal has no numbers, facts, or figures to prove their point with (a common occurrence), the liberal will use the interruption tactic even more. The interruption tactic can be used in combination with another rather strong tactic, bomb-throwing, which we cover next. Tactic Number Two: Bomb-Throwing This one is not used as much, as it tends to get offensive, but when it is used, it can lead a liberal to victory in a debate through nothing more than sheer shock-value. It is called bombthrowing, and essentially it is the use of name calling, accusations, and vicious attacks to shut down the opposition. These attacks are usually not even true, but this does not matter- for the attacks are only designed to do three things: (1) Shock the audience and perhaps paint you out to be evil and wrong. (2) Coerce you to change the subject by trying to defend yourself from these attacks (a natural human impulse on your part). (3) Anger you and force you to lose your cool, and thus appear immature and unprofessional. Time and time again, liberals use this tactic, and it is effective, because conservatives are simply not ready for it. Conservatives are also generally more classy, relaxed, and well-mannered than their liberal counterparts, so they often do not know how to respond to such viciousness. This trend it starting to change as conservatives have rebuilt their defenses, but many still fall for this liberal trap of bomb-throwing. Tactic Number Three: Raising the Volume This is yet another tactic that is geared at conservatives in particular, and preys off the fact that conservatives are generally more classy, relaxed, and well-mannered people than liberals. This one makes use of another fact: conservatives are quieter people than liberals, and not anywhere near as fierce. Liberals realize this, and they use it to their advantage when it comes to debate. Essentially, they raise the volume. Theyll yell, scream, talk aggressively, and be particularly

fierce and provoking throughout the debate. They do this to anger their opposition and try to throw them off, and they also do it to try to weaken the conservatives resolve. They also want to engage the opposition in a shouting match, as this plays to a liberals favor, since they already do it (and since it makes the audience think of the opposition badly). Additionally, this tactic serves another purpose: it motivates other liberals and gets them pumped up, to the point where they might even get involved in the debate (see tactic five). Tactic Number Four: The Populist Bomb This one is a tactic that seems to have been developed by one group of liberals to promote the growth of another; essentially, the intellectual left employs the Populist Bomb often to get people to join the droves of the Victims of the Democratic Playing Card Deck group. Of course, these said people do not realize theyre being dragged into such a group, but the liberals know it, as theyre trying to get more people on their side. So what is a Populist Bomb? Its something known as telling people what they want to hear. It employs frequent use of the race card, the class card, and all sorts of other things that we covered earlier- the same very things that created the second group of liberals, the Victims of the Democratic Playing Card Deck. It frequently attacks Republicans and any other opposition for the screwing over of certain groups (even though these attacks are usually totally false), and it also makes excessive use of spin. By spin I mean the Populist Bomb will present some sort of god-like plan to give people some benefits, such as health insurance, while also saying things about how taxes wont be raised. While these two things contradict each other when one looks into the finances behind such proposals, common people dont know this, and therefore theyll believe both statements, and will applaud the liberal who presents them- the Populist Bomb at its finest. The Populist Bomb is a tactic used by liberals to get people to think they care about the common man and other select groups, and it often is unrealistic and can be countered strongly. It is pandering to the crowd, and liberals use it often to make themselves come off as genuinely caring about the public- when in reality it is merely intended to get more votes and support over to their side. Tactic Number Five: The Liberal Army This tactic is one that is employed almost everywhere youll go, almost in any debate you get into, unless you control the environment of the debate. This tactic speaks volumes about liberals and how truly wrong their philosophy is- yet it is a tactic that is so effective because of sheer numbers. The Liberal Army tactic is simple: youre in a debate, trying to make your point, and liberals outnumber you and shut you down. They will often try to surround you and put you in the center of the debate, so they can gun you from all angles. They will combine all of the previously mentioned tactics (especially interruption, raising the volume, and bomb-throwing), and since they have the numbers advantage, you will be unable to respond or make any of your points. It is a pile on top of the ball carrier tactic that has a 99% success rate, unless the conservative is prepared.

Often, the conservative is not, and they lose the debate out of being totally and completely overwhelmed, as long as being shocked and dazed after being attacked from so many sides. Section 3: The Counterattack As with any tactic, there are counter-tactics. Conservatives can easily win debates with liberals, but they must first know about the liberal tactics, which we have just went over. Not only this, but they must know how to effectively respond to the tactics. It is what occurs in response to liberal tactics that leads to liberal victories in debates; it is NOT the liberals tactic in itself. Liberal tactics are designed to get conservatives to make mistakes; therefore, conservatives can, with a proper response, eliminate this possibility and take away the liberals advantage. Counterattack to Interruption: This one is simple, and will really make the liberal come off as unprofessional, and immature. It could even make the difference in who holds the upper ground in the debate, and may shift an entire audiences views regarding the people in the debate. Essentially, you must let the liberal finish their points (or lack thereof), and then respond. When you respond, they will attempt to interrupt you often as weve already mentioned; let this happen a few times (ask them to stop interrupting if you want), and then when they do it again, step up and say listen, if youre going to continue interrupting me and preventing these people <the audience> from hearing both sides of the story, it is pointless to debate anything with you. You can also throw in something about how the liberal is preventing the audience from hearing facts, figures, and numbers that the liberal is probably afraid of letting them know about. Challenge them. Say Are you afraid of my point? Are you afraid of the truth? They will respond with a no, to which you say then let me finish, and then you can have your chance. Do not be particularly aggressive; do not throw around attacks, stay calm, cool, and professional throughout. This will give you the upper hand over a liberal every time- especially when theres a good open-minded audience. Counterattack to Bomb-Throwing: Bomb-throwing is something thats hard to deal with, as it tries to trick the audience AND you at the same time; it tries to make the audience think of you in a negative light, and it tries to get you angry and to throw you off. It may actually be one of the hardest tactics to respond to, and liberals realize this. This is why they use it. The response, however, is simple when you think about it. You must turn the bombs around, by staying calm, collected, and cool. You must turn the bombs around, by questioning why the liberal is throwing them in the first place. A relaxed response is something liberals do not expect; when you respond in such a professional manner, the bomb-throwing tactic is immediately nullified. It is further nullified when you ask why the liberal is throwing the bombs; even speak directly to the audience and say I question why my opponent here says these things about me, when they

have no proof, evidence, or fact to back up their statements and something to the sort of I believe everyone should remain professional and relaxed in a debate, and speak about the issues, instead of attacking one another. The latter statement is very effective with the audience, and actually turns the bomb-throwing tactic around, flinging it right back at the liberal. The bomb-throwing tactic is immature and unprofessional in the first place, and by responding to it in the above described manner, the audience immediately realizes the liberal is immature and unprofessional. Counterattack to Raising the Volume: The entire reason for liberals to use the raising volume tactic in the first place is to anger you and engage you in a shouting match. Liberals are used to shouting, yelling, and screaming, and responding in such a manner shifts the debate into one that is on their terms; this leads them to victory. It makes you look like a hothead who cannot handle pressure, and the audience starts to see you in a negative light. It also makes the liberal look bad, but they try to counteract this by using the Populist Bomb, combined with this tactic. Therefore, they make it seem like theyre yelling, not because theyre immature, but because theyre yelling for the people. It is a very effective trap. The response? First of all, do not lose your cool. Do not yell back, do not raise your voice, and remain calm and collected. Let them scream and yell. Secondly, defuse their Populist Bombs (see next counterattack), remaining calm and collected the whole time. The result will be obvious: without the Populist Bomb to legitimize the liberals yelling and screaming, the audience will start to see the liberal as unprofessional and immature, and as a total hothead, similar to Howard Dean or Al Gore himself. The tactic is thus nullified, but if the liberal continues to use it, it will only make them look worse. Counterattack to the Populist Bomb: The Populist Bomb, while daunting at first (since it turns the audience effectively against you), is easy to diffuse. First off, remain calm and cool, and do not get overly defensive. Defensiveness signals weakness, and makes the audience think that the liberal actually is right, which they are not. The best response is to take the Populist Bomb, and make your own modification to it. Youre going to take the Populist Bomb and turn it into a Realistic Republican Populist Bomb of your own. How can you do this? Simple. You take the strengths of the liberals Populist Bomb, and you apply your realistic philosophy and knowledge upon it. This can best be illustrated in an example: ******************************************************* **** Liberal Populist Bomb: "You Republicans do not care about Social Security, and youre going to destroy it, at the expense of every senior citizen in America. You want to privatize it so that big business and the stock market can get more money, while playing games with the American peoples tax dollars,

tying it into the market. You are messing with peoples retirements! We will not let you Republicans destroy peoples retirements!!!" Liberal Populist Bomb Finale: "Quit robbing senior citizens and Americans of their social security money! Stop messing with peoples futures for the sake of your own benefit! We will not let you succeed!" Conservative Response: "Every American citizen should have the best possible opportunity for a strong and stable retirement. The current Social Security system gives senior citizens money for retirement, but I ask you all: can their retirement funding be improved? The answer is a resounding yes: let people control their own social security money in a private account, which the government can never mess with; let people invest that money in the stock market if they CHOOSE to. This gives people an opportunity which they never could have had before: an opportunity to have much more money for retirement than what plain old basic Social Security gives them! Current Social Security only yields a 2% return on investment once a person retires; privatization could raise that amount exponentially!" Conservative Response Finale: "It is your money, your retirement, and you should be able to do with it what you please- and when youre done with it, pass it on to your heirs- something you cannot do under the current system!" ******************************************************* **** Observe how youre taking the strength (the benefits for senior citizens and Americans) straight out from the playbook of the liberals own Populist Bomb. Youre taking the same emotional and idealistic plea out of their statement, and putting it in your own. However, instead of going on the offensive and throwing around attacks (something liberals will often do in these bombs remember their use of the playing card deck , youre going to be positive. Youre going to present a realistic, strong case. A perfect Realistic Republican Populist Bomb. Heavy artillery! Counterattack to the Liberal Army: The first thing you probably ask to yourself when this comes up is how am I supposed to outdebate ten people at once?!? That is a good question, and there really is no good answer, unless you happen to be Ronald Reagan himself, who probably could have out-debated the entire Democratic Party back in his time. But for us common folk, there is a solution, albeit a simpler one: Change the environment. What does that mean? Well, you need to make sure youre NOT outnumbered to begin with. When you engage in a debate, set the terms that it is one-on-one early; this negates the advantage of the liberal army. If liberals violate these rules, walk out and refuse to debate with

them until they comply to your one-on-one request. If they refuse to, ask if youre allowed to bring in more conservatives to back you up. If they challenge your strength and resolve, challenge their strength and resolve; after all, they already have the numbers advantage. If theyre so right, why do they need it? Ask them that. Challenge them. Liberals have large egos and are provoked easily. When you challenge them and imply that theyre being cowardly by not debating you one-on-one, they will likely respond by accepting your challenge of a one-on-one. And if they dont, well, they prove your point that they are being cowardly. It is simple. You can even try to ask for a moderator to make sure your debate stays one-on-one, and that it remains under control. Moderation negates many liberal tactics, and gives you the edge, just like a one-on-one debate does. Section 4: Conclusion, and Good Luck! Taking all youve learned in the above sections into account, you are now well-armed to outdebate any liberal. You now understand their mindset, their tactics, and how to counter those tactics. However, there are a few final universals that you should remember, and they are listed below. Good luck in your debates, and prove to the world how wrong liberals truly are! Do not get angry, ever. Remain calm, cool, collected, and relaxed. Be professional. Use facts, figures, and statistics, but never excessively. Use a decent amount of emotion- show people you really do care. Be realistic- always imply that youre the more realistic one, because you are.

También podría gustarte