Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility Analysis

Average and Range Method

Num. of Platten Locations = 3 Gage: Height Gauge Date: 16.08.12 Number of Parts = 10 Part: Assy. Pipe Performed By: Manish Number of Trials = 3 Tolerance = 0.5 Leave blank for one-sided spec. Enter data and Information in open cells . Leave cell blank if data is missing. *If Range Check displays "FLAG", check data for errors or rerun trial(s)
Version: 17JUL96
Platten Location Parts

A
Average Trials

80.358

1 2 3

Range Range Check*

1 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.353

2 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.362

3 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.356

4 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.364

5 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.353

6 80.36 80.36 80.38 0.02 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.358

7 80.36 80.38 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.358

8 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.356 5.15

9 80.36 80.36 80.36 0 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.362

10 80.34 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.34 80.36 0.02 80.36 80.38 80.38 0.02 80.358

B
Average Trials

80.356

1 2 3

Range Range Check*

C
Average Trials

80.36

1 2 3

Range Range Check* Part Averages

Enter Process Distribution Width in Sigma's (Typically 5.15 or 6.00) =

SOURCE OF VARIATION Repeatability (EV - Equipment Var) Reproducibility (AV - Appraiser Var) Repeatability & Reproducibility (R&R) Part Variation (PV) Total Process Variation (TV) SIGMA VARIATION

PERCENT OF TOTAL VARIATION

PERCENT OF TOLERANCE

0.009056901 0.001285144 0.009147625 0.001759061 0.009315221

0.04664304 0.006618494 0.047110271 0.009059162 0.047973389

97.23% 13.80% 98.20% 18.88%

9.33% 1.32%

9.42%
1.81% 9.59%

Note: Percentages will not add to 100%.

"The final acceptance of a measurement system should not come down to a single set of indices. The performance of the measurement system should also be reviewed using graphical analyses." For measurement systems whose purpose is to analyze a process, general rules of thumb are: Acceptability Criteria for %R&R (% of Total Variation and % of Tolerance) Under 10% - acceptable system - Under 5% preferred 10% to 30% - may be acceptable depending on importance of the application, cost of the system, cost of repair, etc Over 30% - considered not acceptable - every effort should be made to improve the system Based on the AIAG Measurement Systems Analysis Reference Manual -- Call 810-358-3570 to order.
Spreadsheet created by Ken Kortge, Motorola, AIEG

R&R Plot - by Parts

80.39 80.38

Remember, variation between parts is expected

80.37

The solid black lines connect the trial averages The dotted red lines represent the part averages Each horizontal line represents the range of trial values

80.36

80.35

This plot will help identify systematic appraiser bias -each set of black lines should have roughly the same shape

80.34

80.33

80.32
A B C 1 1 1 A B C 2 2 2 A B C 3 3 3 A B C 4 4 4 A B C 5 5 5 A B C 6 6 6 A B C 7 7 7 A B C 8 8 8 A B C 9 9 9 A B C 0 0 0

R&R Plot - by Appraisers

80.39

80.38

80.37

80.36

80.35

80.34

80.33

80.32
A 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 A 5 A 6 A 7 A 8 A 9 A 0 B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 B 8 B 9 B 0 C 1 C 2 C 3 C 4 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 C 0

Part - Appraiser Average Chart

Averages with Control Limits
80.38 80.375 80.37 80.365
80.36

This chart is used to determine if enough part-to-part variation has been observed to estimate Part Variation To be an acceptable measure of Part Variation, 50% of the trial averages should fall outside the control limits This line is identical to the solid black line in the above chart If too few of the averages fall outside the control limits the parts selected here are too similar. Rerun analysis with different, more heterogeneous, parts

80.355 80.35 80.345 80.34 80.335 80.33 80.325

A 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 A 5 A 6 A 7 A 8 A 9 A 0 B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 B 8 B 9 B 0 C 1 C 2 C 3 C 4 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 C 0

For an adequate measurement system, at least 50% of averages should fall outside control limits. Because 0% of averages are outside control limits, the system is NOT adequate to detect part variation.

Part by Appraiser Plot

80.38 80.375 80.37 80.365 Average 80.36

80.355 80.35 80.345 80.34 80.335 80.33

5 PART
A B

10