Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Rationale: You may be familiar with the PEEL framework but how can you further enhance your arguments without necessarily becoming a critical deconstructionist overnight? Perhaps these ideas on evaluation might help (assuming you already have relevant points with adequate evidence) to reinforce your normal PEEL structure with an additional E before your link.
Basically you have to imagine that some opponent is always opposite you when youre writing your essay and you need to make sure your argument will be able to defeat this sorry brute who has chosen to stand in your way! Rebuttal: A refutation of a reasonable opposing argument E.g. Some people might claim that women today are educated enough to not be negatively influenced by the contest mages. However, that argument simply sidesteps the issue of moral responsibility, which is important for any organization with massive influence. Qualification: Refining your point by acknowledging certain conditions E.g. Although we cannot say that all girls are negatively affected by the beauty contests, but given how such contest news and images are getting more pervasive and accessible, it is hard to deny its psychological impact on a majority of them.
List is not exhaustive and the bases are not mutually exclusive (i.e. notice how the examples above actually utilize them in combination) 2 Can refer to http://blog.geekpress.com/2006/09/excellent-list-of-logical-fallaciesad.html
contestants based on wider criteria such as intellect and creativity, a simple visual survey of recent contests reveal how most contestants still possess a similar slim body, adorned with the prettiest dresses and elaborate make up and glitter. HUMAN NATURE and Refer to how example on implications also considers human nature and PSYCHOLOGY how beauty contests might over indulge our inherent need to compete and compare. Mnemonic acronym: SMART RICH