Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
The state of European politics has always been a fluid, ever-changing one.
Countless factors can influence the interplay between the continent’s many diverse
cultures, and the politics of the 16th and 17th centuries were no exception. During these
times, science and religion were two of the most influential factors; both ideals would
often alternate between collaboration and conflict. Three events that best demonstrate the
dynamic nature in which science and religion affected European politics are the Age of
The Age of Exploration was one of the most influential eras upon Europe’s
history. With the discovery of not only a new world, but new people and resources, there
began a mad scramble among the European powers to exploit and colonize the untold
resources that lay awaiting them in new lands. However, to make travel across the globe
possible, new scientific advances would be necessary. Hence, the desire for power and
wealth among Europe’s nations drove a rapid advancement in technological and scientific
discovery. However, not all of the powers in Europe immediately recognized the value of
exploration. It was Portugal, in the hands of Prince Henry the Navigator, which pioneered
the Age of Exploration. Recent inventions such as the magnetic compass, along with
advances in shipbuilding craft, made possible the exploration of lands far beyond what
was previously imagined. Under Henry’s guidance, Portugal rapidly set out across the
Atlantic Ocean, establishing colonies and trading ports within Africa and India. Given the
valuable spice these regions possessed, along with other commodities, Portugal amassed
some of the Age’s best known figures. Columbus was the first to discover the Americas,
and Cortes and Pizarro later subjugated the native populations and harvested the wealth
of the South American “New World”. The mind-boggling riches which were acquired by
Spain during this time resulted directly in the ill-fated Spanish Armada, the greatest naval
force that the world had ever seen. More and more countries, such as France, England
and the Netherlands, were tempted by the lure of wealth and power that lands across the
Given that the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) was a nigh-omnipresent force
through most of Europe’s history, it is understandable that all aspects of life, including
scientific research and knowledge, were heavily influenced by religious dogma. Around
the time of the Scientific Revolution, the RCC’s official stance on science was through
the “discoveries” of its three official scientists: Aristotle, Ptolemy, and Galen. The “facts”
that the RCC perpetuated were often flawed, following with the original scientific errors
these three men made. Galen, for example, posited a dual circulatory system in the
human body; this idea, however, could not be researched, as dissecting a body was
viewed as immoral and sinful by the RCC. However, a new age of thinkers began to
emerge, galvanizing a revolution in the ways that Europeans viewed science. Nicolaus
Copernicus was one of the first men to begin to challenge the blindly accepted doctrines
that were held by the RCC. His work pointed towards disproval of the old geocentric
theories, suggesting instead that the sun was the center of the universe. This obviously
irked the RCC, who believed that the Earth, having been created by God, must be the
universe’s center in keeping with its divine importance. Tycho Brahe, a Danish
astronomer, further supported these views with his research into planetary revolution.
Robert Boyle, a later player in the Scientific Revolution, was integral to the movement;
he pioneered the Scientific Method, which stated the necessity for facts and experiments
in order to draw a truthful conclusion. Finally, Sir Isaac Newton was arguably the “peak”
of the revolution. He drew upon past scientist’s conclusions, tempered by his own
discoveries, and established universal laws governing the workings of the universe.
to the RCC. No longer could the complex forces and inner workings that governed the
and mathematics showed concrete, consistent proof of inherent physical laws, which
were independent of any supernatural influence. As people realized the error in the RCC’s
teachings, they began to become disillusioned with dogma; the protests of the Scientific
upheaval in European history. Where the Reformation originally began can be disputed;
some say that it can be traced back to any number of injustices or self-serving decrees the
RCC spawned, while others say that it was Martin Luther’s 95 Theses, a list of protests
against problems within the Catholic Church. At any rate, if Martin Luther was not the
direct cause of the Reformation, he was certainly the figure that granted the movement its
wings. His 95 Theses contained condemnations of the practice of simony (The sale of
positions within the Church) to the sale of indulgences (A practice of trading money for
spiritual salvation). Though Luther had no idea of the consequences that his revolutionary
ideals would lead to, Europe was plunged into a shocking period of religious strife and
warfare. With Protestants (Who, by this point, were represented in many splinter factions)
fighting against the socially entrenched RCC, bloody times were in store for all of
Europe. Except for Greece, they seemed to make out pretty well.
Beginning in 1531, war broke out within the Holy Roman Empire. The Protestant-
formed Schmalkadic League battled Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, in a fight for
religious independence. While Charles seemed to hold far more power than the
Protestants, over twenty years of widespread warfare (often extending beyond simply the
Holy Roman Protestants and Catholics) led to the Peace of Augsburg. This treaty stated
that the prince of each Holy Roman domain could select whether it would support
Lutheranism and Catholicism. This marked a major step forwards for Protestant aims.
example of which was the infamous St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre. While the number
of deaths is not known, it is possible that nearly 100,000 Huguenots (A sect of French
Calvinists) were slain in the slaughter and resulting violence. Rather than condemning the
atrocity, the RCC designated September 11, 1572 as a holy day to praise the Massacre.
Peace was not achieved until 1598 during which time Henry IV of Navarre, newly elected
King of France, converted from Calvinism to Catholicism and passed the Edict of Nantes
freely practice in any of 200 areas within France. Unfortunately, the greatest violence of
The Thirty Years’ War ranged from 1618 to 1648. While most of the battles were
centered within the Holy Roman Empire, nearly all of Europe’s major powers were
involved. Though the Peace of Augsburg still stood, disputes arose in greater and greater
quantities between Catholics and Protestants. Eventually, a schism occurred, and the two
religious factions squared off for battle. The resultant war could be considered the first
European “world war”, as there was hardly a corner of the continent not involved with
the conflict. A horrendously damaging even, it is estimated that Swedish armies alone
destroyed 2,000 castles, 18,000 villages, and nearly one-third of all German towns. The
violence ceased with 1648’s Treaty of Westphalia, which marked a renewal of the Peace
of Augsburg, and a heavy restriction of the papacy’s influence upon German, Hollandais
and Swiss affairs. However, the most important result of the Treaty of Westphalia
extended far beyond this. It marked a new standard of diplomatic interaction in Europe, a
European political interactions often have a habit of being fickle and fragile,
mainly due to the presence of highly varied cultures in such a dense proximity. In light of
this, it is no great leap of the imagination to see why such great events as the Age of
political state topsy-turvy. However, emerging from each of these periods, Europe
emerged with new laws, new technologies, and most importantly, new ideals which