Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
A Learning Experience
Chandramauli Shukla (CEO, AICTSL)
Project Basics
Initiated Length of route Road section System type Stations 2007 11.6 km 31.6 / 60 metres Closed Median stations 21 50 12 m long with AC 900 mm Semi Low Floor 245 hp, BS III engine November 2012
Completion
Included cost of civil works of corridor only Land acquisition Utility laying / shifting Relocation of religious structures Stations Buses ITS (AVLS + AFCS + Signalling)
Initially Delhi BRT design model followed for Indore However, Delhi BRT turned unsuccessful Ahmedabad BRT introduced proved huge success Decision to change Indore BRT design to Ahmedabad BRT design model
Further additions to cost and timelines Partnerships with BRT experts at the outset would have avoided such time and money losses
Corridor construction was underway Design change involved re-configuring of utility ducts
Technical Expertise
Limited
capacity at AICTSL Adequate technical expertise not available with government to provide assistance / guidance to AICTSL External consultation came with a pricetag
Project Publicity
BRTS blamed for any and every traffic incident along BRT corridor by media and experts
Limited awareness among people and media presents great challenges for BRTS
Partnership
Partnership
with EMBARQ India bridged the knowledge gap for the BRT project
Malls, Hotels, Hospitals, Corporate Offices etc. have developed since project inception Premium on FAR in commercial buildings presents significant funding generation
Transforming Indore
Mangal City
Transforming Indore
Niranjanpur
Transforming Indore
Transforming Indore
Transforming Indore
commitments from government sources not received Funding from World Bank for ITS project available, but not flexible to suit the changes over time AICTSL had no other streams of revenue to fund excesses
Advertisement
rights along entire corridor transferred to AICTSL from IMC Proposed share of Urban Transport Fund (UTF) tax being introduced in Indore Proposed share of Land Value Capture
A quick comparison
Parameters System type Stations Network length Ahmedabad (Ph-1) Closed Median 12.5 km Delhi (Ph-1 partial) Open Staggered 5.5 km Indore (Ph-1) Closed Median 11.6 km
Bus type
AC & Non AC
AC & Non AC
AC
Technology Accessibility
Stepped boarding
September 2012
1. Agreement with bus operator 2. Receive first lot of 8 buses from Corona 3. Finalise contractor for Automatic Sliding Gates 4. Finalise contractor for construction of Bus Workshop 5. Hold ITMS tender Prebid meeting 6. Complete 50% work for Branding and Outreach 7. Complete corridor railing construction 8. Tender for advertising along BRT
October 2012
1. Staff recruitment and training by operator 2. Total 16 buses received from Corona 3. Commence installation of Automatic Sliding Gates Complete bus station construction 4. Complete 50% construction of Bus Workshop 5. Finalise concessionaire for ITMS tender 6. Complete Branding and Outreach project (100%) 7. Finalise advertising contractor
Thank you!