Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
251
263 514
1.2. 3.4.
1
64
2007/7
ABSTRACT:
This study is aimed to explore the self-healing power of meditation and
its effects on stress, depression, anxiety and well-being. The researcher
reviews the literature related to mediation and proposes the concept of the
self-healing power. Then, the hypotheses and measurement scales are
developed according to the study aim. The data of 514 cases used in this
study consist of 251 cases in the meditation group that practice meditation
and 263 cases in the non-meditation group that do not practice
meditation.The results of explanatory factor analysis show four major factors
for the self-healing power, 1. mindfulness, 2. kindness, 3. stability, and 4.
awareness. The major results are summarized as follows:1The cases in the
meditation group have higher scales of self-healing power, lower scales of
stress, lower scales of depression, and higher scales of well-being than those
in the non-meditation group.2The structural equation modeling SEM
for the self-healing power, stress, depression, anxiety and well-being fit in the
collected data. The path analysis shows the following results. The
self-healing power can reduce the stress and increase the well-being.
Through the reduction of stress, the self-healing power can reduce the
depression and increase the well-being. The researcher proposes suggestions
65
based on the above results that can be used for professional consulting,
medical institution, human resource units and future researches.
66
2007/7
1998
WHO
2005
Ludsin, 2004
Goldstein & Kornfield, 1987; Kabat-Zinn, 2005; Schmidt,
2004
67
MeditationWebsters dictionary
Perez-De-Albeniz & Holmes, 2000
Beson1975
relaxation response
Walsh2000
2000
68
2007/7
2004
Kabat-Zinn2005
healing ourself
2005
2005
1948 67~77
Victoroff 2002
2004
69
Walsh 2000
mindfulness
effort
investigation
rapture
concentration
calm
equanimity
2000Goldstein & Kornfield, 1987
Walsh
1996
Schmidt2004self-healing
power
mindfulness
awaeness
kindness
Schmidt
fight or flight
Vattano1978 self-management
70
2007/7
1998
Goldstein
Kornfield 1987 Schmidt2004
1996
Chang 2004Smith,
ComptonWest, 1995; Tompson, Waelde, Gallagher-Thompson, 2004
Vattano1978
Beson1975
Smith, Compton West1995
71
1998Murata,
Takahashi, Hamada, Omori, Kosaka, Yoshida 2004
Walsh1981
Smith, Compton & West, 1995
Maslow
2003
Goldstein Kornfield
1987Kabat-Zinn 2005Walsh 2000Schmidt2004
72
2007/7
1
2
73
66 35 31
purposive sampling
20
20
526 12
514 97.7%
251 263
74
2007/7
Likert-type
Goldstein Kornfield1987
Walsh
2000 2000
Schmidt2004
30 26 Cronbach .958
B2
.844
B3
.810
B7
.789
B11
.759
B1
.753
B8
.738
B18
.717
R9
.695
75
B15
.836
B17
.807
B14
.790
B16
.755
B13
.727
B4
.707
49.365
5.422
49.365
54.787
.000
KMO
.965
Bartlett
8529.377
R3
.887
R4
.870
R1
.837
R5
.794
R2
.731
R6
.725
R7
.809
R10
.758
R8
.755
B5
.722
B6
.665
B12
.643
4.252
3.993
59.039
63.032
promax
76
2007/7
.6
49.365% 5.422%
4.252% 3.993% 63.032%
8 B2
B3 B7
B11
B1 B8
B18 R9
.844.810.789.759.753.738.717.695 1
Goldstein Kornfield1987Walsh2000
Schmidt2004
77
6 B15
B17 B14
B16 B13
B4 836
807790755727707 1
Schmidt2004
Schmidt
6 R3
R4 R1 R5
R2 R6
.887.870.837.794.731.725 2
78
2007/7
Goldstein Kornfield1987Walsh2000
6 R7
R10 R8 B5
B6 B12
809758755
722665643 2
Schmidt2004
Schmidt
1.2.3.4.
2004
15 12
Cronbach .800
79
224.464 .01
3
S6
. 792
S7
.775
S3
.757
S9
.678
S5
.654
S2
.599
S15
.771
S13
.752
S14
.749
S11
.699
S12
.675
S10
.622
42.388
11.354
42.388
53.743
.000
KMO
Bartlett
.902
2244.464
promax
.5
42.388 % 11.354 %
53.734 %
6 S6S7
80
2007/7
S3S9S5S2792775757678654
599 6
S15S13S14S11S12S10 771752
749699675622
2 1. 2.
Zung1965 Crroll
1981
1997
13
10 Cronbach .901
Beck
1984
14 Cronbach .941
pilot study
A1.
.840
.837
.836
.827
A7.
A3.
A9.
A4.
A8.
A2.
A13.
A5.
D9.
81
.805
.793
.792
.733
.727
.711
4
.708
.666
.662
A14.
D1.
D7.
.850
.840
.836
.818
.695
.556
.519
D5.
D6.
D12.
D10.
D13.
D8.
D4.
KMO
Bartlett
.963
6874.779
52.881
52.881
6.841
59.722
.000
KMO
promax
.6
52.881 % 6.841 %
59.722 %
13 A1
A2A3A4 A5A7A8A9A 13A14 D1
82
2007/7
D7D9
10 13 .662 .840
3 10 7
D4D5D6D8D10D12D13 .51 .850
2
1.2.
Neugaten,
Havighurst & Tobin, 1961 Gazio, 1977
Kammann Flett 1983
1997
15 12
Cronbach .913
t 5
83
263
82.94
16.04
.99
-10.167**
251
97.35
16.05
1.02
263
30.86
6.97
.43
251
25.08
6.94
.44
263
13.43
4.57
.28
251
10.85
3.87
.28
263
29.89
9.45
.58
251
23.25
7.93
.50
263
42.01
8.92
.55
251
46.87
8.88
.56
9.408**
6.890**
8.593**
-6.189**
**p<.01
1. 97.35
82.94t .01
2. 25.08
30.86t .01
3. 10.85
13.43t .01
4. 23.25
29.89t .01
84
2007/7
5. 46.87
42.01t .01
85
SEM
1. 2.
1. 2.
1.
B1B2B3B8B7B11B18R9
B4B13B14B16B15B17
R1R2 R3 R4 R5 R 6
R7R8R10B5B6B12
1 8
2 6
3 6
4
6
2.
2006
86
2007/7
S1S2S3S5S6S7
S9S10S11S12S13S14
D5D6D 10D12
D4D8D13
A1A2A3A4A5A7
A8
A9A13A14D1D7D9
W1W3W4W5W7H1
H2H3H4H5H6H8
1
6 6
2
4 3
3
7 6
4
6
3.
4
8 12 Pearson
8
87
1.000
0.741
*
1.000
0.742
*
0.684* 1.000
0.755
*
-.399*
-.482*
-.487*
-.493*
-.563*
-.571*
0.530
*
0.582
*
0.711* 0.726
1.000
*
-.284*
-.431*
1.000
*
-.415*
0.672 1.000
47*
-.409*
-.427*
-.443*
*
0.547* -.297
0.565* 0.539
-.403
-.464
-.446
-.425
-.393
1.000
0.578
0.51
0.585
-.28
-.41
-.48
-.45
-.47
-.42
0.82
7*
7*
8*
1*
7*
4*
6*
1*
1.000
P< .01
.05
88
2007/7
LISREL8.0
criteria
2006
1. 2. 3.
1.
1.2
2.RMSEA
3.GFI
4.AGFI
5.RMR
6.SRMR
7.NFI
2006
187.29
P<.00
.08
.94
RMSEA
0 1
< .10
GFI
0 1
> .9
AGFI
0 1
> .9
.90
RMR
< .05
.034
< .05
.034
> .9
.96
89
SRMR
NFI
0 1
SEM
200
514
3GFI .9 GFI
.94 .90
4AGFI .9
AGFI .90
5RMR .05
RMR .034 .05
6SRMR .05
SRMR .034 .05
90
2007/7
7NFI .9
NFI .96 .90
2
RMSEA
GFI
AGFI
RMR
SRMR
NFI
2.
2006
1
1 1
2
.5 .95 3
0
4t 2 2
.05 5
1.961.
10
2. 11
1.
10
.89*
.035
25.3
.21
.83*
.037
22.49
.32
.84*
.037
22.93
.20
.86*
.036
23.72
.27
.68*
.54
.80*
.79*
.87*
.93*
.95*
.89*
.93*
.049
16.28
91
.35
.38
.043
20.30
.25
.13
.024
39.00
.10
.22
.039
23.94
.14
(1) 1
(2)
.68 .95 .5
.95
(3) 0
.024 .049 0
(4) t 16.2839 2
.05
(5) .1 .54
1.96
2.
11
-.66*
.057
-11.75
.11
.058
1.89
-.035
.048
-.72
.61*
.057
10.65
92
2007/7
.99*
.079
12.57
.92*
.066
14.06
-.16*
.053
-3.06
(1) 1
(2)
.11
-.035 -.16
.61 .99
.5 .95
(3) 0
.048 .079 0
(4) t t -.072
t 1.89 3.0614.06
2 .05
t .72 1.89 2 11
93
1.
2. 3. 4
.54
.35
.68
.80
.21
.99*
79
.89
.87
-.66
*
.32
.92*
.83
.11
-.16*
.13
.93
-.03
.95
.84
.30
.38
.25
.10
.10
.22
.61*
.86
.27
.89
.93
.14
1.
(1) -.66 .05
94
2007/7
2.
(1) -.65 -.66
.99
3.
1
95
Goldstein
Kornfield, 1987; Schmidt, 2004; Walsh, 2000
Walsh2000
2000 Goldstein
Kornfield
Schmidt
Schmidt
Schmidt
Schmidt
96
2007/7
12
Walsh
Goldstein Kornfield
Schmidt
9
9
1.
BesonWallace1975
Chang 2004
Tompson
2004
2.
Chang 2004
Majumdar 2002
Smith,
Compton West 1995
3.
Chang 2004
Smith, Compton
West 1995
Tompson, Waelde Gallagher-Thompson 2004
4.
97
1.
2.Small2002
2003
Freud
98
2007/7
99
100
2007/7
2000Corsini Wedding
2004
Comer, R. J.
1998
124
47-54
2006SIMPLIS
1998
517-30
2004Victotoff, J.
1948
2004
198
183-187
200545523-35
2003
1996
2004
101
http://2k3dmz2.moea.gov.tw/heart/index.aspx?P1=examine
2005
1997
Robison, J. P., Saver, P. R. & wrightsman,
L. S.
2003Small, G.
2004
1984
3127-36
102
2007/7
103
W1.
H2.
W3.
H3.
W4.
H4.
W5.
H5.
W7.
H6.
H1.
H8.
104
2007/7