Está en la página 1de 7

HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTIONS

MATH 121

and

on the set

M. r1 , r2 R
and

m M,

we

have

included as part of the denition of a module.

Problem (10.1.4). Let

be the module

R. Prove that the {(x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ) | xi Ii }. {(x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ) | xi R and x1 + x2 + + xn = 0}.

(a) Call the set for

Rn described in Example 3 and let I1 , I2 , . . . , In following are submodules of M :

Solution.

r R

and

N . We have to check that N is a subgroup, and that x N , rx N . Let x = (x1 , . . . , xn ), y = (y1 , . . . , yn ) N . x + y = (x1 + y1 , . . . , xn + yn ) N

Then since the Ii 's are ideals and hence closed under sums. Now, let

x = (x1 , . . . , xn )

and

r R.

Then

rx = (rx1 , . . . , rxn ) N,
again because the (b) Call this set

Ii 's

is a submodule.

P.

P is a subgroup and is closed x = (x1 , . . . , xn ), y = (y1 , . . . , yn ) P and

r R.

Then

x + y = (x1 + y1 , . . . , xn + yn ). From the above, we know that this is in N , so we need to check that (x1 + y1 ) + + (xn + yn ) = 0. This is true because x1 + + xn = y1 + + yn = 0.
Similarly,

rx = (rx1 , . . . , rxn ) N,
and

so

(rx1 ) + + (rxn ) = r(x1 + + xn ) = 0, rx P . Hence P is a submodule.

1

Date

: 10 January, 2011.

2
Problem (10.1.9). If

MATH 121

is a submodule of

M,

the annihilator of

{r R | rn = 0 ideal of R.
be
Solution. Let

for all

n N }.

Prove that the annihilator of

N in R is dened to N in R is a 2-sided

ann(N )

be the annihilator of

and

n N.

N in R. Suppose r ann(N ), a R, ar, ra ann(N ). We have

(ar)(n) = a(rn) = 0
because

rn = 0,

and

for some

n N.

Hence

(ra)(n) = r(an) = rn = 0 ann(N ) is a 2-sided ideal of R. R, the annihilator

of

Problem (10.1.10). If

I in M is dened to be {m M | am = 0 for all a I}. Prove that the annihilator of I in M is a submodule of M .

is a right ideal of and

Solution. Let

r R,
so

Furthermore,

of

in

M.

Suppose that

m, m ann(I),

a(m + m ) = am + am = 0, m + m ann(I). a I. a(rm) = (ar)m = a m = 0

for some Hence

rm ann(I). M

Thus

ann(I)

is a submodule of

M.

Z-module) Z/24Z Z/15Z

Z/50Z.
(a) Find the annihilator of (b) Let

in

I = 2Z.

in

as a direct product of cyclic

groups.
Solution.

a Z annihilates M if and only if am = 0 for all m in a set of generators of M . One choice of generators of M is (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), and (0, 0, 1). Hence, ann(M ) is the intersection of the annihilators
(a) An element of the submodules generated by these elements. Clearly, the annihilators of these submodules are

(b)

(24), (15), and (50), respectively, so their intersection is (lcm(24, 15, 50)) = (600). An element m = (m1 , m2 , m3 ) of M is annihilated by I if and only if (2m1 , 2m2 , 2m3 ) = 0.
This happens if and only if

50Z/50Z, 25Z/50Z.

ann(I) = 12Z/24Z 15Z/15Z 25Z/25Z.

HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTIONS
Problem (10.2.5). Exhibit all

Z-module

homomorphisms from

Z/30Z

to

Z/21Z.

Z-module homomorphism from a cyclic module to any module is determined by where a generator is sent. (See Problem 10.2.9 below.) Let : Z/30Z Z/21Z be a Z-module homomorphism. Then we must have 30(1) = 0. The elements y Z/21Z so that 30y = 0 are y = 7k (mod 21) for k = 0, 1, 2, so there are three such homomorphisms, given by 1 7, 1 14, and 1 0.
Problem (10.2.9). Let

Solution. A

HomR (R, M ) and M are isomorphic as left R-modules. [Show that each element of HomR (R, M ) is determined by its value on the identity of R.]
be a commutative ring. Prove that

that this is a homomorphism of left

: HomR (R, M ) M given by (1). Let's show R-modules. For 1 , 2 HomR (R, M ), we have r R,
we have

and for

HomR (R, M )

and

(r) = (r)(1) = r(1) = r(),

as desired. Now let's show that that is injective. Suppose that

() = 0.

This means

(1) = 0.

Now, let

r R.

We have

(r) = r(1) = r0 = 0
since that

is an R-module homomorphism. Hence = 0, as desired. Finally, we show is surjective. Pick m M . We need to nd HomR (R, M ) so that (1) = m. We dene (r) = rm, but we need to check that this is actually an R-module homomorphism. Let r1 , r2 R. We have (r1 + r2 ) = (r1 + r2 )m = r1 m + r2 m = (r1 ) + (r2 )
and

Hence

is indeed an

(r1 r2 ) = (r1 r2 )m = r1 (r2 m) = r1 (r2 ). R-module homomorphism, and so is an R

be a commutative ring. Prove that

isomorphism. and

Problem (10.2.10). Let

HomR (R, R)

are

isomorphic as rings.

HomR (R, R) and R are isomorphic as R-modules, so it suces to check that our map from that problem is in fact a ring map. Hence, we have to check that (1 2 ) = (1 )(2 ) and (1) = 1. For the
Solution. We showed in Problem 10.2.9 that

(1 2 ) = (1 2 )(1) = 1 (2 (1)) = 1 (1)2 (1) = (1 2 ).

For the second, we have

(id) = id(1) = 1,
as desired. Thus

is a ring isomorphism.

4
Problem (10.2.11). Let

MATH 121

A1 , A2 , . . . , An
Prove that

be

R-modules and let Bi

be a submodule of

Ai

for each

i = 1, 2, . . . , n.

(A1 An )/(B1 Bn ) (A1 /B1 ) (An /Bn ). =

[Recall Exercise 14 in Section 5.1.]
Solution. In Problem 5.1.4, we showed that there is an isomorphism

(A1 An )/(B1 Bn ) (A1 /B1 ) (An /Bn ) =

of groups. We must now show that it is compatible with the

R-module

structure.

Recall that the map is given by

((a1 , . . . , an )
Now, let

mod B1 Bn ) = (a1 (a1 , . . . , an ) A1 An . = (ra1 = r(a1

mod B1 , . . . , an
We have

mod Bn ).

rR

and

(r(a1 , . . . , an )

mod B1 Bn ) = ((ra1 , . . . , ran ) mod B1 Bn ) mod B1 , . . . , ran mod B1 , . . . , an mod Bn ) mod Bn )

= r((a1 , . . . , an )
Problem (10.2.13). Let

mod B1 Bn )

and

be

R-modules

and let

so that

is surjective.

Solution. Let

n N.

(m) = n +
where

ai ni , mi
so that

ai I

and

ni N .

For each

i,

(mi ) = ni +
Hence

i,j

ai mi = n

Hence we've shown that the induced map

M N/I 2 N

is surjective. Continuing in

the same manner, we can see that all the induced maps r Since some I = 0, this shows that the original map : Note that we didn't use the fact that

more down-to-earth example that sets aside that hypothesis. Let

R = Z, M = N = Z, I = (3), and suppose that : M N is multiplication by 5. Now, the induced map M/IM N/IN is surjective, which means that every integer is a multiple of 5 up to a multiple of 3. For example, if n = 4, then n is a multiple of 5 up to a multiple of 3 because 4 + 2 3 = 10 is a multiple of 5. The argument above shows that we

HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTIONS

can improve the situation to saying that 4 is a multiple of 5 up to a multiple of 9, which is true because up to a multiple of no power of

is actually surjective because

is 0.

Problem (10.3.4). An

there is a nonzero

R-module M is called a torsion module if for each m M element r R such that rm = 0, where r may depend on m (i.e.,
Prove that every nite Give an example of an innite abelian group

M = Tor(M )

abelian group is a torsion that is a torsion

Z-module. Z-module. A

a A, na = 0.

Hence

is

example of an innite abelian group that is a torsion

Z-module

(Z/2Z).
i=1
Problem (10.3.9). An

R-module M is called irreducible if M = 0 and if 0 and M are the only submodules of M . Show that M is irreducible if and only if M = 0 and M is

a cyclic module with any nonzero element as its generator. Determine all irreducible

Z-modules.
Solution. Suppose that

is an irreducible

R-module. M

Let

be a nonzero element

of

M.

Then

Rm

is a submodule of

M,

M = Rm.

Hence,

direction, suppose Now suppose that must be all

contains

M is a cyclic module, and that any nonzero element is a generator. N is a nonzero submodule of M . Then for any nonzero n N , Rn of M , because n is also a nonzero element of M . As any submodule of some Rn, M must be irreducible. The irreducible Z-modules, then, are M1
and

exactly the cyclic groups of prime order.

Problem (10.3.11). Show that if

M2

are irreducible

R-modules,

then any

nonzero

is irreducible then

R-module homomorphism from M1 to M2 is an isomorphism. Deduce that if EndR (M ) is a division ring (this result is called Schur's Lemma.) : M1 M2
be a nonzero

Solution. Let

R-module

homomorphism between two

irreducible

Then ker and im are submodules of M1 and M2 , respecker = 0 and im = M2 . Hence is an isomorphism. Now, let EndR (M ) be nonzero. By the previous argument, is an automorphism, so it has an inverse. Since was arbitrary, every nonzero element of EndR (M ) is invertible, so EndR (M ) is a division ring. tively, so we must have

R-modules.

6
Problem (10.3.20). Let

MATH 121

iI

let

Mi

be an

R-module.

Mi

is dened to be their direct product

as abelian groups (cf. Exercise 15 in Section 5.1) with the action of multiplication. The direct sum of the modules product of the abelian groups

R componentwise Mi is dened to be the restricted direct Mi 's is the iI mi such of R on the

Mi

(cf. Exercise 17 in Section 5.1) with the action of which consists of the elements

subset of the direct product,

prodiI Mi ,

that only nitely many of the components direct product or direct sum is given by denoted by

mi

are nonzero; the action

r iI mi = ii rmi (cf. Appendix I for the denition of Cartesian products of innitely many sets). The direct sum will be
ii

Mi . Mi 's
is an

R-module

Mi 's

for each

i,

Mi 's

is not isomorphic to their direct product.

[Look at torsion.]
Solution.

(a) We have

and

Mi

so

we then this

Mi

is an

R-module.

To show that and

must show that if all but nitely many of is also true of the many indices

mi + m + i

i so that at least one and mi is nonzero, so there can only be nitely many indices in which the sum is nonzero. Similarly, for the scalar
product, there are only nitely many the only positions in which

rmi . of mi i

in which

mi

is nonzero, and these are Hence the direct sum is

rmi

can be nonzero.

indeed a submodule of the direct product. (b) One way to do this is to observe that

Mi is a torsion group, whereas Mi is not. To see that Mi is torsion, let (mi ) be any element of Mi , and suppose that n is large enough so that mi = 0 for i > n. Then n!(mi ) = 0, so (mi ) is a torsion element. Since (mi ) was arbitrary, Mi is a torsion group. Now, let's illustrate a non-torsion element of Mi . Take x = (1, 1, 1, . . .) = Mi . th place, n Suppose that nx = 0. Then in order to annihilate the 1 in the i + must be a multiple of i. Hence, n must be a multiple of i for each i Z . The only integer with this property is 0, so x is torsion-free. Another way to do this is to note that Mi is countable (as a set), whereas Mi is uncountable.

HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTIONS
Problem (10.3.22). Let

(cf. Exercise 4) and let

R be a Principal Ideal Domain, let M be a torsion R-module p be a prime in R (do not assume M is nitely generated, hence it need not have a nonzero annihilator  cf. Exercise 5). The p-primary component of M is the set of all elements of M that are annihilated by some positive power of p. (a) Prove that the p-primary component is a submodule. [See Exercise 13 in
Section 1.] (b) Prove that this denition of in Exercise 18 when (c) Prove that as

p-primary

is the (possibly innite) direct sum of its

p-primary components,

runs over all primes of (a) Let

R.

Solution.

M [p] denote the p-primary component of M . Suppose that m, n M [p] and r R. Suppose that m and n are annihilated by pa and pb ,
respectively. Then

pa+b (m + n) = pa+b m + pa+b n = 0,

so

m + n M [p]. rm M [p].

Also,

pa (rm) = r(pa m) = r0 = 0,
so Hence

M [p]

is a submodule of

M. p p ,
so the denitions

(b) In this case, any element of coincide. (c) We dene a map

M [p]

is annihilated by

M [p], as follows. Let m M . Then m is contained in a nitely generated R-submodule of M , say N = Rm. Then N has an annihilator ann(N ), so by Exercise 10.3.18, N is the direct sum of its p-primary components, : N N [p]. Now, we embed each N [p] inside the corresponding M [p] in the natural way: p : N [p] M [p]. Now, we dene (m) = ( p )(m). One can check that is in fact an R-module

: M

isomorphism.