CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Analysis of data is a process of inspecting, cleaning, transforming, and modeling data with the goal of highlighting useful information, suggesting conclusions, and supporting decision making. Data mining is a particular data analysis technique that focuses on modeling and knowledge discovery for predictive rather than purely descriptive purposes. Business intelligence covers data analysis that relies heavily on aggregation, focusing on business information. In statistical applications, some people divide data analysis into descriptive statistics, exploratory data analysis (EDA), and confirmatory data analysis (CDA). EDA focuses on discovering new features in the data and CDA on confirming or falsifying existing hypotheses. Predictive analytics focuses on application of statistical or structural models for predictive forecasting or classification, while text analytics applies statistical, linguistic, and structural techniques to extract and classify information from textual sources, a species of unstructured data. All are varieties of data analysis. In simple, Data analysis and interpretation is the process of assigning meaning to the collected information and determining the conclusions, significance, and implications of the findings. The steps involved in data analysis are a function of the type of information collected, however, returning to the purpose of the assessment and the assessment questions will provide a structure for the organization of the data and a focus for the analysis.

4.1 SIMPLE PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS

Simple percentage analysis is the method to represent raw stream of data as a percentage (a part in 100 percent) for better understanding of collected data. The formula is;

Sl. No 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Interpretation

4.1.1 Table showing the Age group of Respondents TABLE 1 Age Group No. of Respondents Percentage Below 25 0 0 25-35 18 18 35-45 35 35 45-55 35 35 Above 55 12 12 100 100

The above table reveals that 18 percent of the respondents being to the age group of 2535, about 35 percent of them belong to the age group of 35-45, about 35 percent of the respondents belong to the age group of 45-55 and about 12 percent of them are above the age group of 55. There is no person less than 25.

CHART 1 Chart showing the Age group of Respondents

Age group of Respondents

12% 35% 18%

0%

Less than 25 25-35 35-45 45-55 Above 55

35%

Sl. No 1 2 3

4.1.2 Table showing the Gender of Respondents TABLE 2 Gender No. of Respondents Male 78 Female 22 100

Percentage 78 22 100

Interpretation The above table reveals that 78 percent of the respondents are male workers and the remaining 22 percent of workers are female workers in HLL. From this we can know that the majority of the respondents are male.

CHART 2 Chart showing the Gender of Respondents

Gender

22%

Male Female

78%

4.1.3 Table showing the Educational Qualification of Respondents TABLE 3 Sl. No Educational No. of Respondents Percentage Qualification 1 Below SSLC 1 1 2 SSLC 85 85 3 Graduation 12 12 4 P.G 2 2 Total 100 100

Interpretation The above table clearly stays that majority of the respondents are having the education only up to SSLC (85%). 12% of the respondents are graduates. There are 2% of respondents who are having a PG qualification. Only 1% of the respondents are having the educational qualification below SSLC.

CHART 3 Chart showing the Educational Qualification of Respondents

Educational Qualification

P.G

Graduation

12

Educational Qualification

SSLC

85

Below SSLC

20

40

60

80

100

Sl. No 1 2 Total

4.1.4 Table showing the marital status of Respondents TABLE 4 Marital Status No. of Respondents Percentage Married 98 98 Single / Unmarried 2 2 100 100

Interpretation From the above table we can know that majority (98%) of the respondents are married and only 2% are single.

CHART 4 Chart showing the marital status of Respondents

Marital Status

2%

98%

Married Single / Unmarried

4.1.5 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on the Procedure Adopted for Career Growth of Workers TABLE 5 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 9 16 66 9 0 100 9 16 66 9 0 100

Interpretation From the above table it is inferred that the most of the respondents are moderately satisfied with the Procedure Adopted for Career Growth of Workers in HLL. About 16 percent of the respondents are satisfied with it. 9 percent are highly satisfied and another 9 percent are dissatisfied with the Procedure Adopted for Career Growth of Workers in HLL. There are no on who are having any highly dissatisfied opinion about this particular issue.

CHART 5 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on the Procedure Adopted for Career Growth of Workers

Procedure Adopted for Career Growth of Workers

70

66

60

Percentage of Respondents

50

40

30 Procedure Adopted for Career Growth of Workers

20

16 9 9 0

10

0 Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Disatisfied

4.1.6 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theWorking Environment of HLL TABLE 6 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 17 48 16 9 0 100 17 48 16 9 0 100

Interpretation From the above table it is inferred that the most of the respondents are moderately satisfied with the Procedure Adopted for Career Growth of Workers in HLL. About 16 percent of the

CHART 6 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theWorking Environment of HLL

Working Environment of HLL

Highly Satisfied

Dissatisfied

9 Working Environment of HLL

Moderately Satisfied

16

Satisfied

48

Highly Satisfied

17

10

20

30

40

50

60

Percentage of Respondents

4.1.7 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theSafety practices for the welfare of the workers TABLE 7 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 24 66 8 2 0 100 24 66 8 2 0 100

CHART 7 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theSafety practices for the welfare of the workers

Safety practices for the welfare of the workers

70 60 Percentage of Respondents 50 40 30 20 10 0 Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied 8 2 0 Highly Dissatisfied 24 Safety practices for the welfare of the workers 66

4.1.8Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on the Staff Benevolent fund TABLE 8 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Satisfied 9 51 29 5 6 100 9 51 29 5 6 100

CHART 8 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theStaff Benevolent fund

Staff Benevolent fund

6% 9%

5%

Highly Satisfied Satisfied 29% Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied 51% Highly Dissatisfied

4.1.9 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theRecreation of employees TABLE 9 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 31 44 19 4 2 100 31 44 19 4 2 100

CHART 9 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on the Recreation of employees

Recreation of employees
44 45

Percentage of Respondents

40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 4 2 19 Recreation of employees 31

4.1.10Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on the Educational assistance provided for childrens education TABLE 10 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 8 45 30 14 3 100 8 45 30 14 3 100

CHART 10 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theEducational assistance provided for childrens education

Educational assistance provided for childrens education

3% 14% Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied 30% 45% Highly Dissatisfied 8%

4.1.11Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on the Organizations policy for death in harness TABLE 11 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 20 44 18 14 4 100 20 44 18 14 4 100

CHART 11 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theOrganizations policy for death in harness

Organizations policy for death in harness

Percentage of Respondents 50 40 30 20 20 10 0 Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied 18 14 44 Organizations policy for death in harness

Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied

4.1.12Table showing theLevel of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theAppreciation and recognition given to employees for their excellence TABLE 12 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 14 42 23 15 6 100 14 42 23 15 6 100

CHART 12 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theAppreciation and recognition given to employees for their excellence

Appreciation and recognition given to employees for their excellence

Dissatisfied; 15% Highly Dissatisfied; 6% Highly Satisfied; 14%

Moderately Satisfied; 23%

Satisfied; 42%

4.1.13 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theAssistance for post death formalities of employees and relatives TABLE 13 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 17 46 19 13 5 100 17 46 19 13 5 100

CHART 13 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theAssistance for post death formalities of employees and relatives

50 45 Percentage of Respondents 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Assistance for post death formalities of employees and relatives

46 Assistance for post death formalities of employees and relatives 17 19 13 5

Highly Satisfied

Satisfied

Moderately Satisfied Axis Title

Dissatisfied

Highly Dissatisfied

1.1.14Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondentson the Retirement benefit TABLE 14 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 2 35 20 31 12 100 2 35 20 31 12 100

CHART 14 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theRetirement benefit

Retirement benefit
Highly Dissatisfied 12 Retirement benefit

Dissatisfied 20

31

Moderately Satisfied

Satisfied 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

35

Highly Satisfied

Percentage of Respondents

4.1.15Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on the HRA TABLE 15 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 3 63 22 4 8 100 3 63 22 4 8 100

CHART 15 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theHRA

Highly Dissatisfied 8% Dissatisfied 4%

HRA

Highly Satisfied 3%

Moderately Satisfied 22% Satisfied 63%

1.1.16Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on the Night shift allowance TABLE 16 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 2 48 26 16 8 100 2 48 26 16 8 100

CHART 16 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theNight shift allowance

Night shift allowance

50 45 Percentage of Respondents 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 2 16 8 26 48

Night shift

4.1.17 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theCanteen Subsidy TABLE 17 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 2 33 15 40 10 100 2 33 15 40 10 100

CHART 17 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theCanteen Subsidy
Highly Dissatisfied 10%

Canteen Subsidy

Highly Satisfied 2%

Satisfied 33% Dissatisfied 40% Moderately Satisfied 15%

4.1.18 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theFestival Allowance TABLE 18 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 0 40 35 19 6 100 0 40 35 19 6 100

CHART 18 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theFestival Allowance

Festival Allowance
Highly Dissatisfied 6 Festival Allowance

Dissatisfied

19

Moderately Satisfied

35

Satisfied

40

Highly Satisfied 0

0 10 20 Percentage of Respondents 30 40

4.1.19Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theRest room facility TABLE 19 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 13 58 20 8 1 100 13 58 20 8 1 100

CHART 19 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theRest room facility

Rest room facility

Dissatisfied 8% Moderately Satisfied 20% Highly Dissatisfied 1% Highly Satisfied 13%

Satisfied 58%

4.1.20 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theTraining Programs Conducted TABLE 20 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 7 54 30 6 3 100 7 54 30 6 3 100

CHART 20 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theTraining Programs Conducted

Training Programs Conducted

6% 3% 7%

Highly Satisfied Satisfied

30%

Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied

54%

Highly Satisfied

4.1.21 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theUniform allowance TABLE 21 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 8 45 22 22 3 100 8 45 22 22 3 100

CHART 21 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theUniform allowance

Uniform allowance
50 45 Percentage of Respondents 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied

45

Uniform allowance

22 8

22

3
Highly Dissatisfied

4.1.22 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theCounseling process TABLE 22 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 10 49 30 8 3 100 10 49 30 8 3 100

CHART 22 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theCounseling process

Counseling process
3% 8% 10%
Highly Satisfied Satisfied

30% 49%

Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied

4.1.23 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theFirst aid TABLE 23 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 30 53 12 4 1 100 30 53 12 4 1 100

CHART 23 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theFirst aid

First aid
Highly Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Moderately Satisfied Satisfied Highly Satisfied 0 10 20 30

1 4 12 53 30
40 50 60

First aid

Percentage of Respondents

4.1.24 Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on the Grievance handling procedure in the company TABLE 24 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 22 62 16 0 0 100 22 62 16 0 0 100

CHART 24 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theGrievance handling procedure in the company

Grievance handling procedure in the company

Highly Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Moderately Satisfied Satisfied Highly Satisfied 0 10 20 22 30 40 50 60 70 0 0 16 62 Grievance handling procedure in the company

Perecentage of Respondents

4.1.25Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theWork shift timings. TABLE 25 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 4 5 Total Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 41 51 8 0 0 100 41 51 8 0 0 100

CHART 25 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theWork shift timings.

Work shift timings.

60 51 50 41 Axis Title 40 30 20 10 0 Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied 8 0 0

4.1.26Table showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theTransport facilities TABLE 26 Sl. No 1 2 3 4 5 Total Particulars Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderately Satisfied Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied No. of Respondents 20 56 19 3 2 100 Percentage 20 56 19 3 2 100

CHART 26 Chart showing the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents on theTransport facilities

Transport facilities
Dissatisfied 3%

Highly Dissatisfied 2%

Moderately Satisfied 19%

Highly Satisfied 20%

Satisfied 56%

4.1.27 Table showing the existence of Housing facility in the company. TABLE 27 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 Total Yes No No Opinion 97 0 3 100 97 0 3 100

CHART 27 Chart showing the existence of Housing facility in the company

Housing facility in the company

120 100

97

Percentage of Respondents

80 60 40 20 0 Yes Housing facility in the company

0
No

3
No Opinion

4.1.28 Table showing the existence of Recreation facility in the company. TABLE 28 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 Total Yes No No Opinion 98 0 3 100 98 0 3 100

CHART 28 Chart showing the existence ofRecreation facility in the company

Recreation facility in the company

120 100

98

Percentage of Respondents

80 60 40 20 0 Yes Recreation facility in the company

0
No

3
No Opinion

4.1.29 Table showing the existence of Uniform facility in the company. TABLE 29 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 Total Yes No No Opinion 100 0 0 100 100 0 0 100

CHART 29 Chart showing the existence ofUniform facility in the company

Uniform facility in the company

120 100

100

Percentage of Respondents

80 60 40 20 0 Yes Uniform facility in the company

0
No

0
No Opinion

4.1.30 Table showing the existence of Health Insurance facility in the company. TABLE 30 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 Total Yes No No opinion 99 0 1 100 99 0 1 100

CHART 30 Chart showing the existence ofHealth Insurance facility in the company

Health Insurance facility in the company

120 100

99

Percentage of Respondents

80 60 40 20 0 Yes Health Insurance facility in the company

0
No

1
No Opinion

4.1.31 Table showing the existence of Conducive Working Conditions facility in the company. TABLE 31 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 Total Yes No No Opinion 98 0 2 100 98 0 2 100

CHART 31 Chart showing the existence ofWorking Conditions facility in the company.

Working Conditions facility in the company.

120 100

98

Percentage of Respondents

80 60 40 20 0 Yes Working Conditions facility in the company.

0
No

2
No Opinion

4.1.32 Table showing the existence of Lighting and Ventilation facility in the company TABLE 32 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 Total Yes No No Opinion 99 0 1 100 99 0 1 100

CHART 32 Chart showing the existence ofLighting and Ventilation facility in the company

Lighting and Ventilation facility in the company

120 100

99

Percentage of Respondents

80 60 40 20 0 Yes Lighting and Ventilation facility in the company

0
No

1
No Opinion

4.1.33 Table showing the existence of Safe Drinking Water facility in the company. TABLE 33 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 Total Yes No NO Opinion 99 0 1 100 99 0 1 100

CHART 33 Chart showing the existence ofSafe Drinking Water facility in the company

Safe Drinking Water facility in the company

120 100

99

Percentage of Respondents

80 60 40 20 0 Yes Safe Drinking Water facility in the company

0
No

1
No Opinion

4.1.34 Table showing the existence of Rest room facility in the company TABLE 34 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 Total Yes No No Opinion 98 0 2 100 98 0 2 100

CHART 34 Chart showing the existence ofRest room facility in the company

Rest room facility in the company

120 100

98

Percentage of Respondents

80 60 40 20 0 Yes Rest room facility in the company

0
No

2
No Opinion

4.1.35 Table showing that, whether the respondent leaves the work place for complains about the working conditions in aday TABLE 35 Sl. No Particulars No. of Respondents Percentage 1 2 3 Total Always Often Sometimes Rarely 6 40 54 100 6 40 54 100

CHART 35 Chart showing that, whether the respondent leaves the work place for complains about the working conditions in a day

Leaves the work place for complains about the working conditions in a day
6%

54%

40%

Always Often Sometimes

4.1.36 Table showing the first objective of respondents in the company TABLE 36 Sl. No Particulars No. of Percentage Respondents 1 Higher Productivity 33 33 2 Industrial Peace and Harmony 12 12 3 Welfare Programs 47 47 4 Others 8 8 Total 100 100 CHART 36 Chart showing the first objective of respondents in the company

First objective of respondents in the company

50 Percentage of Respondents 40 30 First objective of respondents in the company

47
20 10 0 Higher Productivity Industrial Peace and Harmony Welfare Programs Others

33 12 8