Case 2:09-cv-00104-LDG-GWF Document 102

Filed 03/23/12 Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

JOHN B. BULGOZDY, Cal Bar No. 219897 E-mail: bulgozdyj@sec.gov DAVID J. VAN HAVERMAAT, Cal. Bar No. 175761 E-mail: vanhavermaatd@sec.gov Attorney for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission Rosalind R. Tyson, Regional Director Michele Wein Layne, Associate Regional Director John W. Berry, Regional Trial Counsel 5670 Wilshire Boulevard, 11th Floor Los Angeles, California 90036 Telephone: (323) 965-3998 Facsimile: (323) 965-3908

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. MARCO GLISSON, Defendant Case No. 2:09-cv-00104-LDG-GWF [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND SECTION VII OF THE JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER TO CONFORM TO COURT PROCEDURE

Case 2:09-cv-00104-LDG-GWF Document 102

Filed 03/23/12 Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

This matter is now before the Court on the motion of Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) to amend Section VII of the Joint Pretrial Order (JPO) entered by this Court on April 22, 2011. Plaintiff moved to amend Section VII to renumber the exhibits as directed by the Courtroom Deputy and to conform to the Courts desired method of identifying joint exhibits, and each partys exhibits. In addition, plaintiff moved to amend Section VII to delete stale objections made by defendant Marco Glisson (Glisson) to certain of plaintiffs exhibits, namely, that the exhibits were not provided to Glisson, because plaintiff provided the exhibits in August 2011. Finally, plaintiff moved to add to its exhibit list new Exhibits 527-534, which are summary and demonstrative exhibits that were provided to defendant on February 29, 2012. The proposed amended Section VII of the JPO was attached to plaintiffs motion as Exhibit A. Plaintiff moved for this relief so that it can timely prepare for the April 9, 2012 trial set in this matter, and because defendant refuses to cooperate in this simple administrative matter. For good cause shown, plaintiffs motion is GRANTED, and the JPO is hereby amended so that Exhibit A to plaintiffs motion is substituted for Section VII of the JPO. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: _______________, 2012

HON. LLOYD D. GEORGE U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE