A Comparison of Discipline Models Rhondalyn Cornett Grand Canyon University TCH-536

Theory

Strengths
Wongs model offers strategies on how to establish classes that run smoothly with little misbehavior. Wongs model gives you step by step directions of the beginning of the year that are easy to follow.

Weaknesses
This model is very rigid, and does not offer a lot of lead way in making changes.

Advantages
Teaching routines and procedures allow students to feel secure about their environment and what is expected from them. Wongs model reduces behavior problems and keeps the focus on learning and educating. This is a very positive approach to teaching students how to become responsible citizens. This model

Disadvantages
Students may not comply with the rules or consequences. Students may not have buy-in to the process because they help make the rules.

Agree/Disagree with the model

Yes, I agree with many aspects of the models.

Reason
I believe that students need structure in their lives and the classroom is a great place to teach that life has specific routines and procedures. It is just a no nonsense way to have successful classroom management.

Wongs Pragmatic Classroom

The theory behind Wongs discipline model is that the key to desirable classroom behavior and learning lies in 1) clarifying the responsibilities of teachers and students and 2) teaching the procedures students are expected to follow in class.

Kagan, Kyle, and Scotts Win-Win Discipline

The theory behind Win-Win Discipline is discipline is best

The Win-Win Discipline model places parents, teachers, and students on the same side to enhance the school

Parents and students may think they have more control or power of the classroom than the teacher. Although there are consequences

This process may take a long time to develop and there may be a lot content not covered.

No, I do not agree with a lot of the aspects of this model.

Although, I do like the way the rules are developed, I think the students are given too much power in the classroom.

A Comparison of Discipline Models Rhondalyn Cornett Grand Canyon University TCH-536

established by using structuressets of organized steps-to prevent and redirect misbehavior. experience. Students and teachers cooperate in proposing workable solutions to discipline problems. Morrishs model teaches what is acceptable and what is un-acceptable before they are given latitude to make choices. Morrishs model has 3 particular goals: training for compliance, teaching students how to behave, and managing student choices. it seems that students are given a lot of warnings before consequences are administered. teaches students learned responsibility.

Morrishs Real Discipline

Morrishs theory is that discipline is best established through purposeful teacher guidance, in which the teacher set stands and helps students understand exactly how they are expected to behave.

Real Discipline is totally teacher driven. The model is based more on reaction of students behavior than being proactive. Students may not have a buy-in to this model.

The rules in Real Discipline indicate how students are to behave. Teachers make the rules.

Students may become defiant when they are forced to comply. Parents may think that teacher is too strict.

Yes, I agree with many aspects of this model.

I agree that teachers should set the standards and help students understand exactly how they are expected to behave.