tis also notable that evo other states, Connecticut and Hawaii, are alse holding
constitutional convention referenda this year. Itis useful to compare Illinois” loquacious
referendum question tothe versions being used in two other states, Hawaii's question is
formatted as follows:
STATE OF HAWAII CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION QUESTION
Shall there be a convention to propose revision of or amendments to the Constitution’?
CConnectict’s question is similarly brief:
SHALL THERE BE A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION TO AMEND OR REVISE
‘THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE?
Conn. Const. Art 13, See. 2
‘Tae examples ofthese two states shoul
strate that there
no practical impediment 0
choosing a bref, concise question format when submitting a constitutional convention
referendum othe public. Given the exterediference in length and complexity between
Ulinois* proposed constitutional convention question, and the concise questions in Hawai and
Connecticut, its apparent that referenda on ealing coasttational conventions do aot need
‘verbosity, linois' proposed question, besides violating the sate Becton Code, appears
needlessly complex when compared to ther state” practices. For this andthe other
aforen
tioned reasons, the current wording should be abandoned.
Bart IV - Remedy
In sum, petitioner requests thatthe Secretary of State, pursuant to his explicit and
exclusive powers under Article XIV See, 1(b) ofthe Illinois Constitution, revoke the certification
ofthe question of whether to call a constitutional convention that is scheduled to appear on the
November, 2008 General Election ballot and substitute in its place a question that conforms to
7 Accessed at www hawall.govielections; see Appendix.
unthe express requirements of Section 16-6 ofthe Election Code and ofall relevant Federal and
state constitutional guarantees. Specifically petitioner requests thatthe constitutional convention
‘question forthe November, 2008 General Election be subrnited as follows:
For the calling -
‘of Constitutional
‘Convention,
‘Wherefore, petitioner respectfully requests respondent grant the relief set forth above for the
reasons discussed herein,
Respectfully Submited,
Ed Rucon
Pat Quinn,
Lieutenant GovernorI, Sean Vinck, affirm that today, September 15, 2008, at 4:57 PM, [submitted an
‘administrative petition regarding the wording ofthe November, 2008 Ilinois
constitutional convention referendum on behalf of Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn tothe General
‘Counsel to Secretary of State Jesse White, Ms. Irene Lyons, in accordance with Section
'552-10(e) ofthe Ilinois Administrative Code,
Hear Vouk
‘Sean Vinek
‘State of Iinois
County of Cook
Nowy: AZo