Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Summary
According to network statistics a large percentage of failures in the RRC Active phase is attributed to problems with the Iu Interface. Most RRC Active Iu failures occur while there was an active PS NRT RAB. This RAB would also fail with the Iu reason. Correlation with NRT Connections drops while performing Inter-System HHO to GSM/GPRS was found. From Drive tests done to specifically target the fault, it was seen that at the application level, the active FTP session was not terminated .i.e. user is not aware of the fault. The possible scenarios that may lead this counter to increment even though no abnormal condition is present are:
The old Radio Link times out and the Nobe B sends a radio link failure message to the
RNC before the Iu Release Command is received from the CN. The RNC then misinterprets the failure and pegs the Iu failure counter (unsure if an Iu Release request is issued towards the CN). If this is the case then RRC_CONN_ACC_FAIL_RADIO should be incremented instead. A timer in the CN expires before the GSM/GPRS network informs the CN that the mobile has successfully connected to the GSM/GPRS network. The CN then sends the Iu Release Command to the RNC with a cause value that the RNC misinterprets.
Most likely this is a bug with the RNC but if not then the timers involved in the Inter-System HHO to GSM procedure should be checked to see if they allow enough time for the handover to complete.
A search was conducted to find possible correlations between RRC_CONN_ACT_FAIL_IU and other Service Level counters.
Result : Correlation with the Iu failures for PS Background Service -
RAB_ACT_FAIL_PS_BACKG_IU
Now knowing that that the PS Background Service was reported as the main contributor, counters involving PS and NRT services were investigated.
Result : Correlation with NRT Connections drops while performing
A route was planned to force Inter-RAT Cell Reselections (3g to 2g and 2g to 3g) in order that the impact on the ftp session (user perception) and statistics (network perception) could be assessed.
Statistics
Statistics during a 20 day period as shown below for RNC Enfield
Comparison between RRC Active IU Failures and RAB Active IU Failures with ISHO PS Drops
400 350 300 250 Occurances 200 150 100 50 0 01/01 02/01 03/01 04/01 05/01 06/01 07/01 08/01 09/01 10/01 11/01 12/01 13/01 14/01 15/01 16/01 17/01 18/01 19/01 20/01 con_drps_is_hho_all_nrt rab_act_fail_ps_backg_iu rrc_conn_act_fail_iu 63 59 77 166 152 161 78 72 84 51 44 60 89 82 98 136 126 170 165 160 176 102 69 83 90 77 104 85 80 93 119 111 123 172 165 280 162 153 235 94 87 116 181 172 210 151 143 183 332 323 348 107 95 113 192 176 191 172 161 179
ances Occ
01 01
02 01 1 0 0
01
01
01
01
07 01 0 0 0
01
01
10 01
11 01
12 01
01
01
01
01
17 01 1 1 1
01
01
20 01 1 1
C C NN C
C L
1 0 0
1 1 0
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
0 0 0
2 0 0
1 1 1
1 0 1
1 0 0
0 0 0
CKG
1 0
7 7
C N
S S
LL N
10
a te
!
!
!
!
!#
!"
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!#
!"
!
2 20 1 10
Test Setup
From Orange London Drivetest Methodology Document
1.1.1 S ata c llecti 1.1.1.1 Met l y
Methodology ll be dependant upon hich tests are being conducted. he follo ing test are defined:Data 1 ( F) ontext ct vat on ata 3 (L ) G
Log n
100k
do n oad
1M
Log off
etach
etach
ttach
Log off
etach
500k
do n oad
100k
' 46 5 3
Log n
Log n
500 byte p ng
500 byte p ng
up oad
ontext ct vat on
ontext ct vat on
2 '1' )(' 4)
' 4 5
2 '1' )(' 4
ata 2 (M )
ata 4 (
ttach
Log n
do n oad
Log off
500 byte p ng
500 byte p ng
ontext ct vat on
2 '1' )('
ttach
ttach
2 '1' )(' 4
&
PS-CN re-asks RNC to release resources RNC Releases the IU connection RNC sends Connection Release But MS not on channel any more
Occurances
0
RRC_CONN_ACT_FAIL_IU RAB_ACT_FAIL_PS_BACKG_IU CON_DRPS_IS_HHO_ALL_NRT
11:30 6 6 6
11:45 1 1 1
12:00 1 1 2
12:15 3 3 3
12:30 1 1 1
12:45 0 0 0
13:00 1 1 1
13:15 1 1 1
13:30 1 1 1
13:45 0 0 1
14:00 1 1 1
14:15 3 3 3
14:30 0 0 0
14:45 4 4 4
15:00 0 0 0
15:15 3 3 3
15:30 3 3 3
Time
Conclusions
From the analysis of drive test data, the problem does not seem to be visible to the subscriber. At the application level, FTP session was not terminated. Hence the user would have only experienced a temporary pause in the transfer and then a slowdown of the throughput rate. So the possible scenarios that may lead this counter to increment even though no abnormal condition is present:
The old Radio Link times out and the Nobe B sends a radio link failure message to the RNC before the Iu Release Command is received from the CN. With the receipt of the Iu Release Command, the RNC misinterprets the failure. A timer in the CN expires before the GSM/GPRS network informs the CN that the mobile has successfully connected to the GSM/GPRS network. The CN then sends the Iu Release Command to the RNC with a failure cause that the RNC misinterprets.
Most likely this is a bug with the RNC but if not then the timers involved in the Inter-System HHO to GSM procedure should be checked to see if they should allow more time for the procedure to complete.
Summary
From results of investigations in other networks:
Most Active Radio Access failures were caused during the registration and inter-rat cell reselection procedures
Registration is used for either IMSI attach or GPRS attach, while Interrat Cell Reselection is used for 2g to 3g cell reselection. In Orange network, there is a high correlation between RRC Access Radio (Synchro) Failures and the counters for Registration Failures and Inter-RAT Reselection failures for those cells with high numbers of failures. The Registration and Inter-RAT Reselection procedures were tested in a normal cell to check if the issue was a problem with the counter or the system. Result was that under normal conditions these procedures do not increment the counters. Evaluation of cells suffering from high failures for high interference or availability problems found no relationship between the failures. So far results are inconclusive as to where the fault lies with poor radio conditions or system fault. Iub Trace has been requested on a candidate site with high numbers of failures to further investigate problem.
Registration is used for either IMSI attach or GPRS attach Inter-rat Cell Reselection used for 2g to 3g cell reselection
RRC Access Fa
1% 0% 1% 2% 1% 3%1%1% 5% 7% 7% 47%
re for Sy c
in e
o ig on o ig in e o ig e e lo
dea h o ig lo
24%
o ig e e
Q C H9 A 9 A H9 A QC P E 9 A H @ A@ B 9 C E @ GA 9 9 I 9 CA D C H9 A @ GA 9 9 I H9 A E @ GA 9 9 FE 9 9 A 9 ED C 9 A C @ 9 C A 9 B9 A A 9A @ 9
a igh p io i p io i ign ign on p io i ign all e e abli h en a g in e ba g
egi
a ion
The tests were conducted in a static environment where signal level and quality was good. The objective was to test the actual procedures and not the type of radio environment in which the procedures may usually occur. While undergoing the tests to identify causes of the Iu failures, many Registrations and Inter-RAT cell reselections were made. The data collected from that test was also analysed to check for RRC access radio failures.
1 1
10 0
All these procedures cause the registrations counter in M1001 Service Level to increment. If the attach is rejected for any of these procedures, the Registration Failures in M1001 Service Level does NOT increment. No RRC Access failures due to radio was seen during the tests. This proves that under good conditions, the registration procedures are not prone to cause the counter RRC_CON_ACC_FAIL_RADIO to increment. Some other reason must be the cause. Bad UE? Bad coverage? System Malfunction?
GSM
In normal conditions, Inter-RAT Cell Reselection and Registrations do not inherently fail or cause the counters to increment. Hence unlikely it is a mistriggering of the counter by the RNC. In normal conditions, there is a low correlation between the RRC Access failure counters and the Establishment Cause failure counters. This can be seen from the RNC level statistics. However there seems to be a very close relationship between RCC Access Failures due to Radio with the sum of Registration Failures and Inter-RAT cell reselection failures when a cell is functioning abnormally.
143 164 170 170 186 205 213 233 265 353 144 157 163 198 204 257 333 380 559 17608 144 172 183 182 186 209 211 230 276 356 152 162 170 206 401 182 413 389 559 17427
gln0170b1 gln0484a1 gln0649b1 ess0015c1 gln0881b1 gln0779a1 gln0788a1 gln0677a1 gln3192c1 sur0003c1 gln0537a1 gln0826c1 gln0462c1 gln0494b1 gln0730b1 gln0537c1 gln4013a1 gln0596c1 gln0367a1 gln3207a1
oxf0023c1 hrt0244c1 hrt0283c1 gln0140b1 gln0055a1 gln0390b1 gln0140c1 gln0322b1 gln0455b1 gln0289a1 gln3109a1
RRC_CONN_ACC_FAIL_RADIO
esx0033c1
INTERRAT_AND_REG_FAIL
gln0170b1 gln0484a1 gln0649b1 ess0015c1 gln0881b1 gln0779a1 gln0788a1 gln0677a1 gln3192c1 sur0003c1 gln0537a1 gln0826c1 gln0462c1 gln0494b1 gln0730b1 gln0537c1 gln4013a1 gln0596c1 gln0367a1 gln3207a1
esx0156c1 gln0580c1
esx0033c1
88 100
89 90
92 95
103 114 152 191 204 241 1972 154 176 210 276 281 346 349 369 449 101 116 155 198 205 240 1971 154 175 210 313 132 352 357 369 448
er R N C
it
re s e c t to R R C
c c e s s R a io
a il r e s a n
n te r-R
473 444
q p e e
h ri q p i h g f d
ter
ts
GLN500 GLN500 BRK400 GLN200 GLN200 GLN300 GLN300 GLN107 GLN107 0RNC1 0RNC2 0RNC1 0RNC1 0RNC2 0RNC1 0RNC2 0RNC1 0RNC2 8375 10385 104 148 2323 39160 23117 24541 668 807
RNC
6065 9794
1557 2820
6166 27001
1771 4990
Conclusions
RRC Access Radio Failures were compared with the M1000 counters: Site Availability, PRXNOISE and PRXTOT of the tested cells (5 of them) and no correlation was found between any of the counters.
Not Interference related. Not related to Site Availability.
Are Registrations fails causing the RRC Access failure counter to increment or RRC Access failures causing the Registration failure counter to increment? Iub trace to be done on candidate site GLN0730 with motivation to conclude if the problem is merely a side effect of poor coverage and/or large spillage, or if it is related with some system fault. Also a correlation was found on cells having a low RRC Setup Success Rate: many of the Setup failures also occur while doing Inter-RAT reselections and/or registrations. It might be possible that when an UE fails to register (attach) or complete the inter-RAT cell reselection, it may retry over and over again (all the time incremented the counters) while a user would most likely desist after a few failures.