Está en la página 1de 9

 -- \


11111111111
g-
I,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 't NOV 102009 i
HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO ~
D85863636 I' I)
'- :;j
Jeff Eysoldt, et al., Case No. A0703129
Plaintiffs, (Judge Men) v.

General Verdict for Plaintiff

Jeff Eysoldt on Invasion of Privacy Claim

Go Daddy.com, Inc., et al, Defendants.

We. the Jury, being duly impaneled, do hereby find in favor of Plaintiff Jeff Eysoldt and against

Defendant Go Daddy on the invasion of privacy claim and award Plaintiff Jeff EysoJdt the following

damages, ifany:

s 2P\DoD

,...-- .. ~.- ----

1""'",,,, I

D85863630

'<, •

- - -. - .. - - .- .. j

Jeff Eysoldt, et al.t Plaintiffs,

v.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMIL TON COUNTY, omo

Case No. A0703129 (Judge Metz)

NOV 102009

General Verdict for Plaintiff Jeff Eysoldt on Conversion Claim

Go Daddy.com, Inc., et al, Defendants.

We, the Jury, being duly impaneled, do hereby find in favor of Plaintiff Jeff Eysoldt and against

Defendant Go Daddy on the conversion claim and award Plaintiff JeffEysoJdt the following damages, if

any:

$ 30ttcO

D

111111111111

085863615

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

NOV 102009

Jeff Eysoldt, et al., Plaintiffs,

Case No. A0703129 (Judge Metz)

v.

General Verdict for Plaintiff

Jill Eysoldt on Invasion of Privacy Claim

Go Daddy.com, Inc., et al.

Defendants.

We, the Jury, being duly impaneled, do hereby find in favor of Plaintiff Jill Eysoldt and against

Defendant Go Daddy on the invasion of privacy claim and award Plaintiff Jill Eysoldt the following

damages, if any:

$ J.(X[)

Jeff Eysoldt, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

NOV 102009

Case No. A070312J;iiiiiiiiiiii_iiliiiiiiiiiiRiiiiiiiiiiiiiii (Judge Metz)

General Verdict for Plaintiff Jill Eysoldt on Conversion Claim

Go Daddy.com, Inc., et al.

Defendants.

We, the Jury, being duly impaneled, do hereby find in favor of Plaintiff Jill Eysoldt and against

Defendant Go Daddy on the conversion claim and award Plaintiff Jill Eysoldt the following damages, if

any:

-.-- -_

Jeff Eysoldt, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

-,

I

I

I I

/ IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

I

) HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

Case No. A070312~iiiiiiiii:iiiiiiiiiiEiiiiiiiiiiiiii:;;;;;;;;~ (Judge Men)

ED NOV 1'0 2009

General Verdict for Plaintiff

Mark Eysoldt on Invasion of Privacy Claim

Go Daddy.com, Inc., et al, Defendants.

We, the Jury, being duly impaneled, do hereby find in favor of Plaintiff Mark Eysoldt and against

damages, if any:

Defendant Go Daddy on the invasion of privacy claim and award Plaintiff Mark Eysoldt the following

s ],CCO

---

I IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, omo

Jeff Eysoldt, et al., Plaintiffs,

Case No. A0703129 (Judge Metz)

~RED I NOV 1 '0 2009 I

r

~~:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii_;t!)j

v.

General Verdict for Plaintiff Mark Eysoldt on Conversion Claim

Go Daddy.com, Inc., et al.

Defendants.

We, the Jury, being duly impaneled, do hereby find in favor of Plaintiff Mark Eysoldt and against

Defendant Go Daddy on the conversion claim and award Plaintiff Mark Eysoldt the following damages, if

any:

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, omo

Case No. A0703129 (Judge Metz)

NOV 122009

Jeff Eysoldt, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

Punitive Damages for Plaintiff Jeff Eysoldt

Go Daddy .eom, Inc., et al, Defendants.

In addition to actual damages, we, the jury, make (CHECK ONE)

a.

______ No additional award to the Plaintiff Jeff Eysoldt.

CD An additional award to the Plaintiff Jeff Eysoldt of s 50, (JC() as

punitive damages, and we decide that attorney fee~or should not (CIRCLE ONE) be

awarded against Defendant.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

Jeff Eysoldt, et at, Plaintiffs,

Case No. A0703129 (Judge Metz)

NOV 122009

v.

Punitive Damages for Plaintiff Jill Eysoldt

Go Daddy.com, Inc., et al, Defendants.

In addition to actual damages, we, the jury, make (CHECK ONE)

___ --:;:- __ No additional award to the Plaintiff Jill Eysoldt.

G __ -'V'--- An additional award to the Plaintiff Jill EysoJdt of$ f),ow

punitive damages, and we decide that attorney fees 9 or should not (CIRCLE ONE) be

a.

as

awarded against Defendant.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

Jeff Eysoldt, et al., Plaintiffs,

Case No. A0703129 (Judge Metz)

v.

Punitive Damages for Plaintiff Mark Eysoldt

Go Daddy.com, Ine., et al.

Defendants.

r-

~ NOV 122009

In addition to actual damages, we, the jury, make (CHECK ONE)

a. No additional award to the Plaintiff Mark Eysoldt.

C9 ~ Anadditional award to the Plaintiff Mark Eysoldt ofS br DDO as

punitive damages, and we decide that attorney fees ~ should not (CIRCLE ONE) be awarded against Defendant.

También podría gustarte