Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
One
The United States Supreme Court has no interpretation.
All interpretations are interprets of inters.
If there was one, there was never just one.
Definitions are lies forgetting the truth of illusion
The Choice of one is one such meaningless substitution.
Two
Violation Our opponents attempt to assert non-figural meaning on
this dead metaphor.
Three
Implications Even from a purely utilitarian epistemology
It’s impossible to determine whether their particular heliotropes are flowers
turning the sun or do they merely turn to the reflection of light on water?
Another implication that they’re avoiding specifying is emphasizing
symptoms of separate signs and signified as if there existed any proof
implied as to what things called words are doing in their free time and if
those activities are worth abiding by
Four
Standards
Limits This interpretation limits the debate to their subjective
understanding of the resolution
Ground There isn’t any. Angels float, PICs float, blunt smoke
floats. If something does not float it’s either dense or one of Andrea Yates five kids.
Framers Intent Fuck the framers and fuck their intent. This is an
independent voter for fucking.
Better source We don’t have one. Never try to find one. All sources are
Sleeping with the illustrator. By not having one, we dodge their flawed
diseased nature
Five
Voters
Fairness doesn’t exist. Get up Get out and Get used to it.
Education is a myth. Substitute incarceration. The buildings where
They harness dispropriaty of the prevailing behavior. It’s
just another word for nothing left to lose
Counterplan
A Counterplan text: Allow snakes on the plan (put snake stickers on plantext)
B Competition
1 Snakes on a plan is not topical. Snakes are not in the resolution.
2 If it is topical than cross-apply every neg’s-gotta-be-topical
arguments you’ve heard for the last 2 years. Be Topical. Don’t be FX
topical. Don’t be extra-topical. Vote them down for vagueness mixing
burdens prima facie ipso factor make it a reverse reverse reverse independent voter.
3 Snakes are naturally competitive. The will fuck you up.
4 Plan Plus CPs are competitive
b If they say plan plus CP justify things like ‘do the plan plus save a
baby’ that makes them baby-hating nihilists. This is an independent voter.
c If we cannont have plan plus counter-plans we can only have plan minus
counter-plans and no one likes negative nelly
Double I The snake will slither toward the team of its choice and that
team will be the victor.
Triple I if the judge cannot find a snake Neg wins for discursive change.
Additionally, Harris 92
Being is being and not nonbeing. Non-being is thought as being but
nonbeing is not, not being thought which as identitity is exclusion of
everything i.e. nonbeing
Double I this means they have no proof and we do. It’s called evidence-
Based debate.
God is dead
Nietzche 1883 ‘the Gay Science’
They occupy a certain position within the hierarchy of ideas. Our subversion of hierarchy is proven by their
procedural arguments.
Taylor 1984