Documentos de Académico
Documentos de Profesional
Documentos de Cultura
Assignment
The prevalence of creative accounting in the corporate world is as a result of
deficiencies in the legal systems for banking and accounting, inadequacies in the
enforcing legal and ethical rules due to the slow functioning of the judicial system
and the personal greed of top management and owners. However, it has been
Introduction
A typical aim of creative accounting will be to inflate profit figures. Some companies
may also reduce reported profits in good years to smooth results. Assets and
liabilities may also be manipulated either to remain within limits such as debt
agreements, or to hide problems.
Typical creative accounting tricks include off balance sheet financing, over-optimistic
revenue recognition and the use of exaggerated non-recurring items.
The term “window dressing” has similar meaning when applied to accounts, but is a
broader term that may be applied to other areas. In the context of accounts, “window
dressing” is more likely to imply illegal or fraudulent practices.
Creative Accounting is a term that many people, from all walks of life, feel free to
use; but which can prove difficult to define. One of the first books, certainly in the
UK, to be written on this subject, had a title that gave a good clue as to the definition
of creative accounting, the title was Creative Accounting: How to make your profits
what you want them to be. (Ian Griffiths (1986) Sidgwick and Jackson).
The problem with Griffiths’ definition, if that is what it is, is that suggesting that it is
merely a profit manipulation technique does not take it far enough. As we will wee,
creative accounting includes profit manipulations; but it also includes such matters
as Off Balance Sheet financing, Ratio manipulation, shareholder control avoidance.
My definition, therefore, is that
Creative accounting is the legal use of accounting principles and rules in such a way
as to create a deceptive view of a financial statement.
‘There is little evidence that companies are engaging in flagrant breaches of
accounting standards … However … there is strong pressure on auditors from time
to time to accept interpretations of accounting standards which conform to the
interests of the preparers rather than with the spirit of the standard ‘
(Dearing Committee (1988) The making of accounting standards)
We can see from McBarnet and Whelan’s list why Griffiths’ title does not go far
enough. We should also be able to see that if creative accounting is practiced by
any organisation, then there is plenty of scope of planning and manipulation the
accounting information. Such manipulation might leave the shareholder, the public,
the Government, and any other interested party, absolutely confused as to what is
and what is not real and true in connection with a published set of accounting
statements.
[ CITATION McB99 \l 2057 ]
This example helps to show us the sort of outcome being creative can comprise on
the results of a business. If the lease remains off the Balance Sheet, the gearing
ratio and the ROCE ratio are both radically different to the position when the
business buys the asset in question.
The situation we have then is that accountants have a genuine array of techniques
they can employ in the creative accounting field; but inadequate enforcement of the
rules and the legislation provides little or no deterrent from being so creative.
General internal control system can be used to prevent and detect, usually involving
direct embezzlement of public funds or theft of property. Management of fraud
generally refers to senior management personnel to obtain illegal benefits to achieve
the purpose of deliberately glossing over the accounting statements, leading to
serious inaccuracies in the accounting statements. Management of fraud are usually
prepared in advance, and afterwards strongly try to hide those who cheat the higher
levels of management, within the short term even more difficult to identify.
Enterprise management motivation for fraud
Here are five categories:
1. To ensure that jobs and earn rewards. In business, shareholders and
regulatory authorities is a contract between the contractual relationships.
However, as the authorities and not consistent between the interests of
4. To avoid the huge cost. Political costs refer to enterprises for political
reasons, the burden of expenditure. When the strong profitability of the
enterprises, they will be too much public and government concern.
Government departments may be taken to impose high taxes or other
restrictions on the enterprise. This is in large enterprises and people's
livelihood, particularly evident in the performance of the industry. For
example, since 2003, world oil prices rose, the oil company profits soared,
the government may be taken in order to avoid the very income tax, and the
oil companies have adopted varying degrees of fraud in order to reduce
profits.
How do we know when a company has been creative with its accounts?
When should someone blow the whistle on the company that is using creative
accounting? It might happen by accident: someone may be idly reading through a
set of accounting statements and be the first person to spot something that falls foul
of the creative accounting rules. This is possible, of course, but a more formal list of
who should report creativity in accounting statements is
Business organisations, or other corporate bodies
A qualified audit report in the statements themselves
A note in the accounting statements discusses a departure from accounting
standards or other requirements
An article in a newspaper, journal or magazine
[ CITATION McB99 \l 2057 ]
Revsine (1991) considers the problem in relation to both managers and shareholders
and argues that each can draw benefits from 'loose' accounting standards that
provide managers with latitude in timing the reporting of income. He thinks that the
prime role of accounting is as a mechanism for monitoring contracts between
managers and other groups providing finance; market mechanisms will operate
efficiently, identifying the prospect of accounting manipulation and reflecting this
appropriately in pricing and contracting decisions. The literature on the ethics of bias
in accounting policy choice is reviewed at the 'macro' level of the accounting
regulator. This literature can similarly be applied to the bias in accounting policy
choice at the 'micro' level of the management of individual companies that is implicit
in creative accounting.
The techniques of creative accounting change over time according to the accounting
standards. Many changes in accounting standards are meant to block particular
ways of manipulating accounts, which means that intent on creative accounting need
to find new ways of doing things. At the same time, other, well-intentioned, changes
in accounting standards open up new opportunities for creative accounting (the use
of fair value is a good example of this). Many (but not all) creative accounting
techniques change the main numbers shown in the financial statements, but make
themselves evident elsewhere, most often in the notes to the accounts. The market
has been surprised before by bad news hidden in the notes, so a diligent approach
can give you an edge
Of course, for someone to want to blow the whistle, there has to be a reason, a
motivation, to do it. In some cases, such reasons could be strong. In other cases,
the reasons could be weak or very weak:
Shareholders may resist blowing the whistle because the accounting policy
adopted may be good for the dividend
Auditors may resist blowing the whistle because they may lose the audit
account if they do
Conclusions
If an accountant wants to use creative accounting, he will. There seems little doubt
that there is always room for the accounting profession to leave room for
2. Abuse of judgement can be curbed in two ways. One is to draft rules that
minimise the use of judgement. At one time, for example, company
accountants tended to use the 'extraordinary item' part of the profit and loss
account for items they wished to avoid including in operating profit. Again, the
Both legitimate and illegitimate creative accountings are in practice frequently. (Profit
overstatement) and (profit understatement) of Appendix 3 constitute violation of the
law and of GAAP. [ CITATION Bar04 \l 2057 ]