This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

BooksAudiobooksComicsSheet Music### Categories

### Categories

### Categories

### Publishers

Editors' Picks Books

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Editors' Picks Audiobooks

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Editors' Picks Comics

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Editors' Picks Sheet Music

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Top Books

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Audiobooks

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Comics

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Sheet Music

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Welcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out more

co Politécnico Grancolombiano Bogotá, Colombia Joseph Tham Fulbright Economics Teaching Program Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam ThamJx@yahoo.com jtham@fetp.vnn.vn

Ignacio Vélez-Pareja is the Director of the Department of International Relations and Finance professor at Politecnico GranColombiano, Bogota, Colombia. Joseph Tham is a Project Associate at the Center for Business and Government, J.F.K School of Government. Currently, he is teaching at the Fulbright Economics Teaching Program (FETP) in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Constructive feedback and critical comments are welcome. The authors may be contacted at: ivelez@poligran.edu.co, ThamJx@yahoo.com. Ignacio Vélez-Pareja will be the presenter at the conference of the European Financial Management Association, June 27-30, 2001 in Lugano, Switzerland. Contact Information Politécnico Grancolombiano Calle 57 N 3-00 E Bogota, Colombia Phone #: (571) 3468800 Fax #: (571) 3469258

**Firm Valuation: Free Cash Flow or Cash Flow to Equity?
**

Ignacio Vélez-Pareja ivelez@poligran.edu.co Joseph Tham ThamJx@yahoo.com jtham@fetp.vnn.vn

Abstract In a M & M world, the equity value is the present value of the Free Cash Flow FCF at the Weighted Average Cost of Capital WACC minus debt and it should be identical to the present value of the CFE (cash flow to equity) discounted at the cost of equity capital, e. In this paper the relationship between firm value calculated through the FCF and the CFE is examined. Several approaches to the firm value calculations are presented. We present a complex model where we compare the results obtained with the traditional M&M WACC found in the literature with the WACC approach presented by Harris and Pringle 1985. They make two assumpt ions that differ from the traditional M & M WACC. First, they assume that the discount rate for the tax shield is ρ, the return to unlevered equity. Second, based on the first assumption, the expression for e, the return to levered equity does not include the factor (1-T). Unlike the traditional WACC, the new WACC gives consistent results. However, the new WACC does not work if there are losses carried forward and/or the taxes are paid the following year. To solve these two practical issues, we present a ne w adjusted WACC. We call this adjusted WACC, TV WACC. In addition to the above-mentioned assumptions, this WACC is defined as a function of the real tax savings TS, earned. When this new approach is used, total consistency is found. In particular, with thi s new approach losses carried forward LCF and taxes paid at a different date as accrued, are taken into account and we obtain consistent values. Keywords Firm valuation, NPV, Free Cash Flow, FCF, Cash Flow to Equity, CFE, Cash Flow to Debt, CFD, Discounted Cash Flow, DFC. JEL Classification: D92, E22, G12, G31, M40, M41, M46

1

When valuing a firm the idea is to measure that value. However. In addition to the above -mentioned assumptions. What were they buying? Just value expectations. we present a new adjusted WACC. Where value lies? Some people think that the value of a firm is found in the financial statements. she will ask for a premium in order not to start the project. Value arises from expectations. Value will never be found in accounting statements. if somebody asks the owner of that project not to develop it. Anyone could buy it. Not even a dollar was earned and they sold the stocks for skyrocketed prices. The problems arise because what is sold is the value that can be created in the future. the return to levered equity does not include the factor (1-T). this WACC is defined as a function of the real tax savings TS. total consistency is found. 2 . TV W ACC. the return to unlevered equity. When this new approach is used. Several approaches to the firm value calculations are presented. To solve these two practical issues.Introduction In a M & M world. In this paper the relationship between firm value calculated through the FCF and the CFE is examined. the new WACC gives consistent results. are taken into account and we obtain consistent values. a plan and a team led by an outstanding manager. To understand these ideas assume that there is a box with a machine inside. And where are these expectations? They are in the future cash flows. the equity value is the present value of the Free Cash Flow FCF at the Weighted Average Cost of Capital WACC minus debt and it should be identical to the present value of the CFE (cash flow to equity) discounted at the cost of equity capital. earned. However. Second. Just remember the boom of the dot com firms. We present a complex model where we compare the results obtained with the traditional M&M WACC found in the literature with the WACC approach presented by Harris and Pringle 1985. greater that its price. it has the capacity to create wealth and value. In fact. with this new approach losses carried forward LCF and taxes paid at a different date as accrued. they assume that the discount rate for the tax shield is ρ. if that machine is accompanied by a strategy. We call this adjusted WACC. First. In particular. if she pays the price listed on the price tag. the new WACC does not work if there are losses carried forward and/or the taxes are paid the following year. the expression for e. e. based on the first assumption. And this value is based on expectations of what the machine and the team could do in terms of wealth creation. Unlike the traditional WACC. They make two assumptions that differ from the traditional M & M WACC.

It is expresse d as WACC = eE% + d(1-T)D% (1) Where e is the cost of equity. We assume that there are no losses and there are no losses carried forward (LCF) and taxes are paid the same year as accr ued. We will show how using different approaches we arrive at different figures and we will show approaches that produce consistent results and those that do not. However. This paper studies this problem. Unfortunately. This is. This WACC assumes that there are no losses and there are no losses carried forward (LCF) and taxes are paid the same year as accrued. We will call this the MM WACC. D% is the proportion of debt in total value and T is tax rate. Second. Then the correct WACC proposed by Tham & Velez (TV) is TV WACC = ρ – TS/(Total levered value) (4) 3 . current practice find that this does not happens.Discounting the free cash flow FCF. E% is the proportion of equity in the total value. We will examine the WACC proposed by Harris and Pringle (1985) and we call it the HP WACC. The problem lies in what is the correct discount rate to be used to discount the cash flows. In a M & M world. If there are LCF neither of the two expressions for WACC works. the expression for e does not include (1T). First. this traditional formulation does not work in the finite period cash flows. these two values must be equal. at the cost of equity. based on the first assumption. e = ρ + (ρ – d)D%/E% (3) In practice we encounter losses carried forward (LCF). e is calculated as e = ρ + (1-T) (ρ – d)D%/E% (2) And the discount rate for the tax shield is d. Some background on WACC In the literature we find the traditional presentation for WACC for discounting the FCF excluding tax savings from interest payments. for the firm at the Weighted Average Cost of Capital and subtracting the debt or discounting the cash flow to equity holders CFE. In the traditional presentation. This HP WACC differs from the MM WACC in two significant ways. d is the cost of debt before taxes. measures this future value. These two values are not equal. the discount rate for the tax shield is ρ.

1 4 . automatically it determines how much to borrow We are restricting our comparison to the traditional MM WACC. prices. As it is invested in the firm. dividend and inventory “policies”. accounts receivable and payable policies. There is not what some authors call “plugs” (an account where any difference between total assets and liabilities plus equity are included in order the Balance Sheet checks). From tables A12 to A16. This information is used to calculate firm value and NPV in order to compare with market values. the financial statements: Balance Sheet. These financial statements are all linked. Tables A8 to A11 present the forecasts of every variable including units sold. With these inputs we calculate interest rates (from real rates. And this means that losses carried forward are included in the analysis. P&L statements and Cash Budget or Working Cash Statement.TdD% WACC = eE% + dD% .TS/(Total levered value) (5) (6) (7) (8) This presentation is the most general way to express WACC. The inputs include initial costs. In the Cash Budget you will find that when the balance is in red.This last version of WACC assumes ρ as the discount rate for the Tax savings. a cash cushion 2. equity investments. it is expected to earn at least the WACC. prices and the rest. WACC = eE% + dD% . The complex model has several modules (See Annex). risk premium and debt ratio (accounting debt ratio)) for each year. In line 4. 2000 2 It is assumed that this amount of cash is deposited in a check account that is a nonbearing interest account. See Taggart 1991 and Fernandez. We recognize that many other WACC are found in the literature. volume increases. prices increases and an elasticity function among others. In reality.TdD/(Total levered value) WACC = eE% + dD% . In tables A1 to A7 are the inputs. It can be seen as a different presentation of the typical WACC formula. inflation. the TS refers to the difference in the tax shield between the levered cash flows and the unlevered cash flows. A Complex Model All these approaches work with a complex model.TS/(Total levered value) WACC = ρ . the “plug” is a decision: either to borrow money or to invest it (or leave it in the bank). It has the feature that considers tax savings when they are in fact earned. In this paper we will show a comparison between the results obtained with the thre e versions for WACC1.

In this model there exists some options: 1. The possibility to consider inventory. Tables A18 and A19 present the cash flow construction. The cost of debt after taxes is calculated as the IRR for the CFD. To pay taxes the same year as accrued or not. Another features of the model are the presence of an elasticity factor that relates price increase and demand. These inconsistencies are solved using the Adjusted WACC or TV WACC = ρ – TSt /(Total value at t-1). These options are handled with a dummy variable. etc. is included. Not all the options are used in the example presented in the Annex. accounts receivable and payable policies. With this information. we calculate in the last part. It doesn't matches if the cost of debt after taxes is calculated from CFD after taxes or if taxes are paid next year. To make inflation adjustments 2. To reinvest cash surpluses. In the cash budget the dividends paid are included. the FCF is constructed from the Cash Budget balance and deduct all the items related with the financing: loans received and paid. unless you use d(1-T) as the cost of debt after taxes. cash cushion. 5 . consistency is obtained. Table 17 shows the expected WACC and growth beyond year 4.taking into account the cash cushion. The FCF. A very important feature is the losses carried forward LCF. the calculations of firm value and the different WACC’s are done when there are losses and LCF and when there are no losses. When Adjusted WACC is used. the analysis with WACC is inconsistent. the WACC and firm value. CFD and the CFE. These calculations are done fixing ρ for year 0. As can be observed. We present the value calculations for the three WACC approaches presented above. When tax savings are not earned (for instance. In all cases it is assumed that taxes are paid at the same year as accrued. payout ratios. dividends and tax savings. PV(FCF) = PV(CFE) + PV(CFD) does not hold. Tables A20 to A33. In the complex model. It is calculated just as it is expected it will be in the Cash Budget. 3. interest paid. This is quite important because this means that tax savings are earned when taxes are paid. when there are losses) and losses carried forward. All this means that it is not necessary to consider changes in working capital as with other methods. equity from stockholders.

8.275. for the same reason. the present value is $47. The differences are the same when calculated as Total value less debt. which is higher than the previous value by 2.176.3. where we assume that there are no losses and taxes are paid the same year. which is higher than the previous value by 933. There are also differences when calculating the market equity value.316. with the HP WACC.9. which is higher than the previous value by 115. When calculating the Adjusted Present Value APV.The results for the first case are summarized in Table 1 Panels A and B. the present value is $48. the present value is $48. with the HP WACC. This means a lower WACC. which is higher than the previous value by 1. where we assume that there are losses.176.250.7.3. The reason the present value with the HP WACC is higher is because the difference in tax savings due to the LCF. lower than ρ. The present value of the FCF at the TV WACC (total market value) is $47. The reason the present value with the MM WACC is higher is because the discount rate for the tax shield is d. Another reason is the difference in tax savings due to the LCF. the present value is $32. However.225.9. When calculating the Adjusted Present Value APV. with the HP WACC.765.291.5. there is no difference. 6 . This means a lower WACC. for the same reason. which is higher than the previous value by 1. There are also differences when calculating the market equity value. when the market equity value is calculated from the CFE at e. The present value of CFE at e under TV WACC assumptions is 31. The reason the present value with the MM WACC is higher is because the discount rate for the tax shield is d lower than ρ.2.3. with the traditional MM WACC.312. the present value is the same. When calculating the Adjusted Present Value APV. when the market equity value is calculated from the CFE at e. The present value of the FCF at the TV WACC (total market value) is $47.3. the present value is $33.4.505.8.4. for the same reasons. The reason the present value with the HP WACC is higher is because the difference in tax savings due to the LCF.996.9.066.4. there is a difference of 253.505.1.439. there differences.9. However. The present value of the FCF at the TV WACC (total market value) is $47. there is a difference of 376. With the traditional MM WACC. there is a difference of 1. The reasons for this difference are the lower value for e (due to the (1-T) factor) and the difference in tax savings due to the LCF. When calc ulating the Adjusted Present Value APV.1. The results for the second case are summarized in Table 2 Panels A and B. The present value of the FCF at the TV WACC (total market value) is $47. the losses are carried forward and taxes are paid the same year. with the traditional MM WACC. The differences are the same when calculated as Total value less debt.

9. 7 .395.there differences. the present value is the same. which is higher than the previous value by 933.9. The present value of CFE at e under TV WACC assumptions is 31. The reasons for this difference are the lower value for e (due to the (1-T) factor) and the difference in tax savings due to the LCF. the present val ue is $32. with the HP WACC. With the traditional MM WACC.329.8.

8% 7. Both of them consider e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E and assume ρ as the correct discount rate for the tax savings. 8 .176.5 1.In summary Table 1 Panel A.4 253. Columns (4) and (5) show the absolute and relative difference with the TV WACC.5 32.489.1 1.3 3. losses carried forward and taxes paid the same year Total market value. Column (6) shows the values when calculated with the MM WACC.7 Column (1) of Table 1 (panels A and B) shows the name of the procedure to calculate Total or Equity value. losses carried forward and taxes paid the same year Total market value. Losses.2% 2.5 1.3 47. TS.4 115.429. if precision is desired. Losses. In table 2 the traditional WACC (MM WACC) also shows inconsistencies among the different values and between those values and the TV WACC.3 31.250.debt Equity value = PV(CFE @ e) 31. From columns (4) and (5) it can be seen that in this case TV WACC and HP WACC differ.115.319.4% 4.312.312.2 115. However.4 31.1 1.2% 0. The very small differences between TV WACC and HP WACC might show that for practical purposes HP WACC is a good approximation. Value calculation (1) With TV With HP WACC (TV WACC WACC = e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E ρ – TS/(Total (3) value) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E (2) 47.2 2.176.275.066.996. TV WACC should be used. Columns (2) and (3) show the different values when the Adjusted or TV WACC = ρ – TS/(Total value) and HP WACC = eE% + d(1-T)D%. this is WACC = eE% + d(1-T)D% where e=ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E Columns (7) and (8) show the absolute and relative difference with the TV WACC.5% Table 1 Panel B.debt Equity value = Total value (from CCF at ρ) .2 32.4 47.2 2.0% 33.debt Equity value = PV(FCF at ρ) + PV(TS at d) .2% 32.225.1% 4.5 48.316.9 1.996.066.3 Difference with TV WACC (4) % over TV With MM WACC WACC e= (5) ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E (6) Difference with TV WACC (7) % over TV WACC (8) Equity value = Total value (from FCF at WACC) .291.765.379.066.181.8% 48.3 31.1 0.4% 0.9 0.3 Difference with TV WACC (4) % over TV With MM WACC WACC e= (5) ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E (6) Difference with TV WACC (7) % over TV WACC (8) Total value PV(FCF @ WACC) Total value PV(CCF=FCF + TS @ ρ) Total value = PV(FCF at ρ) + PV(TS at d) 47.4 253. Equity market value Value calculation (1) With TV With HP WACC (TV WACC WACC = ρ – e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E TS/(Total (3) value) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E (2) 31. Notice the internal consistency of TV WACC.

9 1.2% 3.Table 2 Panel A No losses.debt Equity value = PV(CFE at e) 31.0% 48. Column (6) shows the values when calculated with the MM WACC.9 47.9 31.329.0) 0.395.0% Total value = PV(FCF at WACC) Total value = PV(CCF = FCF + TS at ρ) Total value = PV(FCF at ρ) + PV(TS at d) Table 2 Panel B.8 0. shows the name of the procedure to calculate Total or Equity value.0% Column (1) of Table 2. No losses.882.0) 0.8 debt Equity value = Total value (from CCF at ρ) . In table 2 the traditional WACC (MM WACC) shows inconsistencies among the different values and between those values and the TV WACC.9 (0.0% 32.8% Difference with TV WACC (7) 933. Both of them consider e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E and assume ρ as the correct discount rate for the tax savings. taxes paid the same year With TV WACC With HP Difference % over TV With MM WACC (TV WACC = ρ – WACC with TV WACC e= (5) ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E TS/(Total value) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E WACC (4) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E (3) (6) (2) Equity value = Total value (from FCF at WACC) 31.8 47.395.7 32. In Table 1. taxes paid the same year Value calculation (1) With TV WACC With HP Difference % over TV With MM WACC (TV WACC = ρ – WACC with TV WACC e= TS/(Total value) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E WACC (5) ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E (4) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E (3) (6) (2) 47.505.8 Difference with TV WACC (7) 933.debt 31.0% 31.9 % over TV WACC (8) 2.0) 0.0) 0.395.0% Value calculation (1) Equity value = PV(FCF at ρ) +PV(TS at d) .0% 47. No losses.505. Columns (4) and (5) show the absolute and relative difference with the TV WACC. 9 .772.0% 376.439.9 (0. taxes paid the same year and it is shown that there is no difference. Notice the internal consistency of TV WACC and HP WACC. TS.9 0.505.395.0 0.329.7 376.395.395. Columns (2) and (3) show the different values when the Adjusted or TV WACC = = ρ – TS/(Total value) and TV WACC = eE% + d(1-T)D% are used.9 47. Panels A and B.84 933.9 (0.9 31. this is WACC = eE% + d(1-T)D% where e=ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E Columns (7) and (8) show the absolute and relative difference with the TV WACC.505.9 % over TV WACC (8) 3.9 (0.9 31.

7 71. 2000.7 42.809.9 1. Equivalence of the Different Cash Flow Valuation Methods.693. The first one produces inconsistent results. the only one that gives consistent results is TV WACC. Although not a formal proof.0 47. taxes paid the same year. The second one is consistent as long as there are no losses and/or losses carried forward. The last one.4 26.149.378.961. Market and book values ratios Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Book value for equity Market value for equity Market equity value/equity book value Book value for total assets Market total value Market total value/Book value for total assets 24.5 54. Social Science Research Network. PRINGLE.8 39.8 1.1 37. the HP WACC and the TV WACC.953.4 1.708.2 38. AND J.3 2.3 1. Conclusions We have shown three approaches to calculate total and equity value with different expressions for WACC.7 30.6 1.3 1.110.1 37. R.104.030.9 71.000.3 40.763.733.505.719. Working Paper.534.4 26.000. The equity market values are taken from the calculations made with the TV WACC approach.J. PABLO. terminal value accounts for more that 50% of the total value of the firm.066.0 31.176.1 1. the TV WACC. the tables give an idea on how much difference is present when the book values are used.9 1.0 31.204.7 43.220. It can be shown that when taxes are paid the following year after accrual.050.193.1 2. HARRIS . They are the MM WACC (the traditional WACC).0 47. Market and book values ratios Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Book value for equity Market value for equity Market equity value/equity book val ue Book value for total assets Market total value Market total value/Book value for total assets 24. “Risk-Adjusted Discount Rates – Extensions from the Average-Risk Case ".8 Table 4.221.3 40. Losses.651. losses carried forward and taxes paid the same year.395. These differences are explained because the financial statements do not consider any terminal value.2 23.8 67.110.654. 1985. Journal of Financial 10 . We consider that this is the correct method.022. Frequently.3 1.S.1 55.4 54.5 2.9 1.8 67.2 63.721.0 1.2 24.773. produces consistent results either with no losses or losses and losses carried forward.6 55.8 Tables 3 and 4 show the differences in market values when compared with book values.8 39.Table 3 No losses.2 38.7 Year 4 30.125.1 2.3 1.8 62. Bibliographic References FERNÁNDEZ .

1991. TAGGART . pp 237-244. pp8-20 11 . Financial Management. Autumn. Consistent Valuation and Cost of Capital Expressions with Corporate Taxes and Personal Taxes. JR. ROBERT A.. Fall.Research.

55% 28.64% 12.62% 22.00% Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 The purchase price is a function of Q. Table A4 Price and increase in price Year 0 Year 1 Purchase price Real price increase Annual increase in purchase price $2.00% 11.00% Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 The quantity and increase in the market might be obtained by a marketing research.95 0. the estimated quantity the market will buy.55% 28.00% 12.01% 1.00% 6.00% 6.00% 10. 12 .0% Year 4 40.00% 11.59% 30.59% 30.0% 40.55% 22.00% This information can be estimated based on the behavior of bonds or simply setting the cost of debt from a contract between the firm and the debt holder.ANNEX FINANCIAL ASSESMENT FOR THE CREATION OF A FIRM LOSSES AND LOSSES CARRIED FORWARD (LCF) Table A1 External or macroeconomic variables Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Tax rate Inflation rate 40.00% 5.00% Year 4 6.62% 22.0% Year 3 40.00% This information can be obtained from macroeconomic forecasts made by the government or associations or universities. Fisher Theorem is used to compose the three components.00% 4. Table A2 Market variables Quantity to sell at year t at price given at year 0 Increase in volume 7.00% 10.247 0. Table A3 Risk free discount rate and risk premium estimates Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Real risk free discount rate Rate of interest for debt Risk premium for debt Effective rate before taxes Annual nominal rate compounded twice a year Effective rate after taxes 10.00% 9.00% 10.00% 30.55% 28.62% 22.00% 7.90% 13.62% 6.59% 28.82% 1.10% 0.00% 10.0% 9.59% 30.

76% 12.9996 0.20% 13.00 $0.70% 9.00 1.00 1. (1-. Effect of price change upon demand.20% These are stated on a monthly base.Table A5 Internal variables (endogenous) with some degree of negotiability Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Selling price Real price increase Increase in selling price Elasticity factor.00 $0.9971 0.60 0.12% $0. Price increases might be estimated based on historical data of similar firms.40% 12.00% $0.34% 3.00 $37.88% 0. or simply a subjective forecast.366*((1+increase in selling price)/(1+inflation)-1)) $5.00 $0.00% $0.20% 11.90% 9.00 1.00 $0.9978 0.00% $0.60% Year 3 Year 4 0.30% 11. In the example.01% Year 2 $0.9974 The elasticity function has to be found for the specific product or service we are dealing with.32% 3. Table A6 Costs Year 0 Monthly auditing fees Real price increase Increase in monthly auditing fees Monthly overhead Real price increase Increase in overhead Monthly payroll Administrative payroll Monthly payroll of selling force Real price increase Increase in payroll Sales commissions Fringe benefits and taxes over payroll 56.00% $0.00 $0.00 1.10% 12.55% 3.00 Year 1 $0. Selling price is the result of a market survey and/or the cost structure of the good or service.00 1. an elasticity function calculated for the domestic water supply was used.10% 0.67% 10.11% 11.20% 11.000% 13.00 0.93% $160.10% 10.98% $0.00 $0. 13 .22% Year 3 $0. It is a function of selling price increase.00 $145.30% 12.00 $0.00 $40.00 $0.65% 3.44% $0.00 1.32% Year 4 $0.900% 13.00 1.00 1.43% $0.00 0.00 0.00 1.80% 0.60% 9.

00% 10.00 This depreciation is based on the lineal method stated above.33% 8.00% 95.00% 90.81 Selling price Buying price 6.79 Year 3 8.Table A7 Targets and/or operating policies Year 0 Advertising and promotions (% on sales) Equity contribution Fixed assets Depreciation (lineal for 5 years) Final inventory as percent of sales (units) Inventories valued at FIFO Percentage of sales receivedin the same year Percentage of sales receivedin the next year Percentage of payments made the same year as accrued (overhead and suppliers) Percentage of payments made the next year as accrued (overhead and suppliers) Percentage of net profits (dividends) paid to stockholders the year after obtained the net profits Minimum cash balance desired after financing deficits 8. The nominal selling price increase defines the elasticity factor.00% 30.00% 30. Table A10 Selling and purchasing prices Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 7.56 7.33% 8.00% 110 120 131 160 160 Many variables are just policies or target the firm will pursue. 14 .93 674. Table A8 Forecasts based on Tables A1 to A7 Year 1 Year 2 Units sold (increase plus elasticity effect) S Final inventory in units FI Initial inventory in units II Purchases in units P = S + FI .096.56 7.000.00 32.00% 90.90 603.00% 5.33% 95. Table A9 Depreciation Year 1 Year 2 Annual depreciation Cumulative depreciation 8.424.11 Year 4 8.399.33% 24.28 3.00 8. the increase in volume and the elasticity factor for the product or service.II 7.74 644.66 0.36 Units to be sold are based on the initial market survey.00% 10.74 8.00% 30.00 40.000.127.00 Year 4 8.00 8.01 3.00% 5.87 674.00% 10.00 3.00% 90.243.00% 8.00% 10.000.50 603.17 699.00 Year 3 8.13 8.000.03 These prices are based on the initial selling and purchasing price and the price increase stated above.00% 95.53 4.77 3.847.00 24.66 7.774.000.00% 5.00% 90.733.000.000.00 16.00% 30.00% 5.000.00% Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 3.95 644.00% 95.00 7.50 8.000.000.00% 3.00% 3.

149.273.14 502.37 2.00 8.69 41.534.00 5.456.35 544.56 564.15 629.823.91 24.02 2.000.030.12 612.21 41.65 1.000.221.966.66 390.22 681.34 1.312.26 196.000. cash is the same value found in the Cash Budget as cumulative cash balance.34) 23.267.110.50 15.278.719.00 8.000. 63 340.00 2.48 2.00 2.650.31 24.449.21 3.00 8.00 4.00 16.000.000.03 37.00 39.541.00 (46.206.00 40.082.11 2.457.766.890.94 220.027.30 2.110.68 227.726.953.100. In this table they are annualized.0 2.00 16.364.64 441.866.574.96 1.45 2.00 12.393.00 40.055.888.33 3. For instance.00 4.00 16.985.654.61 186.583.04 40.364.00 2.000.147.34) 2.398.70 0.110.12 24.41 204.813.000.000.000.000.000.28 2.25 1.00 32.Annual expenses Table A11 Administrative and selling expenses Year 1 Year 2 2.69 40.000.39 245.000.04 1.39 0.178.61 0.076.149.80 26.706.88 40.00 1. Net income 15 .06 2.989.000.433.20 40.160.76 3.11 5.68 40.25 2.861.00 0.18 8.70 490.81 270.78 38.50 7.166.67 30. 58 2.95 Administrative payroll Administrative fringe benefits on payroll Sales force payroll Sales commissions Fringe benefits (annual premium 1/12 of payroll) Other fringe benefits (46.22 214.97 2.110.44 1.176.43 37.030.293.888.76 38.00 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 27.000.43 16.719.000.574.00 (46.22 Year 4 2.00 24.16 747.719.37 159.38 0.00 11.00 32.95 241.00 110.26 692.000.534.654.91 249.16 2.00 40.814.626.67% payroll and commissions) Auditing fees Overhead Advertising and promotions These costs are based on the monthly based costs above.67 1.62 3.61 Year 3 2.000.626.35 1.00 16.000.33 All the financial statements are linked.20 181.78 24.00 8.05 1.45 37.66 39.711.00 24.75 2. Table A12 Balance sheet Year 0 Year 1 Assets Cash Accounts receivable Inventory Fixed assets Cumulative depreciation Net fixed assets Total Liabilities and equity Accounts payable (suppliers) Accounts payable (overhead) Fringe benefits accrued Interest charges accrued Accrued taxes Long term debt Total liabilities Equity Cumulative retained earnings Net income for the year Total net equity Total 24.559.00 24.

574.267. etc.796.00 24.966.890.22 2.50 441.20 22.823.940.31 2.149.682.40 340.88 37.68 26.706.003.286.000.293.479.15 2.11 2.723.95 2.598.00 3.664.364.788.738.480.37 4.954.65 490.34 8.149.79 18.95 15.00 8.888. 16 .300.000.77 3.61 692.67 The figures for the P&L statements are based on the forecasts above.456.00 1.66 4.926.62 22.38 0.452.25 1.34) 0.000.13 4. In this case.572.755.63 5.05 5.97 2.04 33. and so on.37 1.220.38 629. Items such as taxes will appear in the Balance Sheet in case taxes are paid the following year.595.450.57 1.11 3.00 2.00 (46.631.00 1.705.for the year is the same found in the P&L statement.982.44 8.600.574.39 502.04 32.93 33. Sales are simply quantity to be sold times the rice.340.35 8.61 2.38 5.75 1.76 1.748.70 564.44 5.178.217.138.626.669. There is no plug.364.293.000.988.34) 54.11 2.626.52 2.16 22. Table A13 Profit and losses statement Year 1 Year 2 Sales Cost of goods sold Initial inventory Purchases Final inventory Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Payroll expenses Annual premium Auditing fees Selling commissions Overhead Depreciation Advertising Earnings before interest and taxes Other expenses (interest expenses) Earnings before taxes Taxes Net profit 45.553.97 8.888.37 27.206.931.69 30.198.45 2.65 8.61 7.32 390.40 19.68 31.20 27.89 2.890.22 10.24 6.16 21. they appear as a cash outflow at the Cash Budget.393.988.265.30 1.00 (46.243.03 62.00 1.150.38 1.80 Year 3 Year 4 71.00 13.97 1.

100.44 33.98 1.34 1.479.16 54.00 43.902. It is a financing decision that will be made with the cash balance below.20 2.40 5.364.76 30.65 390.70 629.32 2.95 220.25 340.00 1.39 30.65 2.626.20 53.313.44 2.37 62.220.44 5.985.595.00 680.669.149.64 2.509.66 2.364.210.62 56.00 22.00 0.79 245.72 4.300.22 2.205.670.94 27.02 59.34 2.50 6.20 53. It takes into account the accounts receivables policy stated above.27 1.61 0.26 24. It does not include loans income.30 441.67 71.57 Payments for purchases year 2 27.39 564.783.888.456.359.457.37 1.450.273.504.966.147.71 196.626.75 5.480.115.03 68.769.32 502.72 24.988.97 1.95 0.61 1.38 692.553.63 1.02 50.340.69 71.00 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Cash collection of sales year 1 Cash collection of sales year 2 Cash collection of sales year 3 Cash collection of sales year 4 Total income accounts receivable Equity in cash Total cash inflows 43.000.97 3.228.793.150.37 1.35 40.31 62.589.00 3.60 0.228.65 3.Cash inflows Table A14 Cash budget: Cash inflows Year 0 Year 1 45.00 0.000.67 71.15 Total payments to suppliers Payroll and fringe benefits Annual premium year Auditing fees Commissions on sales Payment of overhead year 1 Payment of overhead year 2 Payment of overhead year 3 Payment of overhead year 4 Advertising Purchase of fixed assets Interest expenses Dividend payments Taxes Total cash outflows 40.081.00 2.972.89 Payments for purchases year 4 33.452.50 2.69 43.00 36.72 In this table all the cash inflows are registered.436.888.206.783.149.43 43.421.45 Payments for purchases year 3 31.572.940.93 24.00 4.32 27.115.504.50 3.982.00 0.903.664.00 1.000.706.11 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 1.711.600.35 2.000.689.598.766.63 17 .705.205.33 22.205.00 1.31 62.22 2.702.003.96 51. Table A15 Cash budget: Cash outflows Cash outflows Suppliers Payments for purchases year 1 24.

650.00 0.00 40.00 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 24.62 56. Table 17 Discount and growth rate beyond year 4 Discount rate for cash flows beyond year 4 Growth for year 5 Growth for year 6 and following years 23.498.000.00 4.191.00 110.00 4. It does not include loans payment.62 27.110.06 16.205.00 0.31 62.50 0.72 (16.12 31.00 4. These are.00 36. Table A16 Financing decision Year 0 Year 1 Total cash inflows Total cash outflows Net cash gain (loss) Cash balance at end of year Bank loans Repayment of loans (principal) Investment of surplus Net cash gain (loss) after financing Cash balance at end of year after financing and reinvestment 110.421.This table shows all the cash outflows.00) (16.811.63 6.20 53.50 0.756.79 8. These are included below.78 9.56 20.313.59 0.67 71.163.972.783.28 5.866.50 8.00 0.02 50.43 43.677.504.00 2.841.00) 16.702.000.28 2.00 43.00 4.000.339.10% 0.027.312.526.783.000.813.00% This table shows the growth and discount rate for determining the terminal value .893.55 10.783.11% 10.027. how much should beborrowed and how much can be paid with the available cash.78 12.50 0.21 This table shows the information from the Cash Budget in order to make the financing decisions.1 6.29 12.05 14.027.71 0.228.027. 18 .

00 0.5 6.600.89 14.00 0.783.78 11.383.327.78 6.28 0.498.55 10.50 8.027.50 96.00) (460. the CFE.00 0.00 11.177.00 0.00 680.00 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 8.682.783.28 11.00 0. the cost before and after taxes calculated as the IRR of the CFD before and after taxes. We do not use the approach to calculate FCF from EBIT or net profit because this method increases the probability of errors.36 11.00 (920.5 5.00) 0.69 18.627. Cost of debt is assumed constant.251.097.00 4.00 (1.00 1.717.29 14. Table A19 Cash Flow to Equity CFE and Cash Flow to Debt Cash flow for stockholder (dividends plus any cash ) Financing cash flow (after tax) CFD Cost of debt as IRR of after tax CFD Financing cash flow (before tax) Cost of debt as IRR of before tax CFD Free cash flow (FCF) Financing cash flow (CFD) Stockholder's cash flow (CFE) Check: CFD + CFE =FCF Year 1 2. 19 .Table A18 Construction of Free Cash Flow (FCF) from the Net Cash Gain at the Cash Budget Year 1 Net cash gain (loss) after financing Bank loans Repayment of loans (principal) Interest expenses Tax shield for interest payments Dividends Equity in kind Equity in cash Cash flow without terminal value FCF n+1 = (FCFn (1+Growth rate for n+1) Terminal value Free cash flow after taxes (Plus) (Minus) (Plus) (Plus) (Minus) (Plus) (Minus) (Minus) 2.769.78 8.150.097.027.39 96.00 4.50 14.50 5.50 2.13 (Plus) 79.50 91.50 4.380.89 Year 4 91.964.881.251.627.407.383.29 6.34 1.881.717.843.756.553.39 5.383.05 8.50 11.00) 0. starting from EBIT might introduce errors in the tax paid and the tax savings earned. In particular.55 4.407.78 11.79 11.843.39 This table shows the CFD.00 0.05 4.55 96.39 16.477.50 2.00 4.627.300.027.964.55% 11.251.00 Year 2 5.881.50 3.50 4.912.50 28.28 Year 2 5.13% 8.5 7.60 0.251.756.163.05 The FCF is calculated from the Cash Budget.79 Year 3 8.756.881.783.464.027.59 0.383.682.5 17.79 0.682.450.29 5.29 14.

We do not calculate the TS straightforward with the formula TdD.477.34 11.39 4.40% 25.90% 25.027.220.TS/Total value at t-1 Market Total Value at t @ WACC 40.05 20 .733. we present the TV WACC approach.15% 47.38% 62.177.383.5137 11.50 8.75% 71.78 12.50 40.00 24.29 62. we determine how much TS is earned according to the financial situation of the firm.13% 0.00 40. Table A22 Capital Cash Flow and market value calculations at ρ Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Capital cash flow (CCF = FCF + TS) Total value 47.30 15. TS are calculated in an explicit way.176.50 5.7135 11.00% 28.78 54. This is.176.55% 36.251.627.733.3732 14.00 1.61 In table the resulting WACC and market values are shown. First. except for the tax savings TS.881.50 0 3. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet.00 40.110.383.30 Year 3 Year 4 36.327.055.65% 25.027.300.50 920.082.171.29 8.380.027.00% 28.220.00 4.00 4.50 1. Table A20 Basic information for TV WACC calculations Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Tax rate Cost of debt before taxes Given nominal ρ year 1 and assuming constant risk Real ρ (deflated) Discount factor at ρ FCF Debt (balance) Initial Equity contribution (book value) Initial investment (fixed assets plus cash) Interest payments Debt payment Cash flow to debt before taxes Tax savings (TS = TdD) 16.39 71.50 Year 4 40.50 460.13% 0.00 40.110.50 7. With the TV WACC approach.450.55% 37.763.13% 0.55% 38.00 4.15% 25.142.18% 35.00 4.00 2.13% 0.The next tables show the calculation of market values and the three different approaches to calculate WACC. Table A21 TV WACC and market value calculations Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 WACC after taxes = ρ .261.61 Year 4 97.150.027.50 6.85 13.600.763.85 36.00% 28.000.55% 40.00 4.05 This information is common for the three methods.027.2736 96.34 54.682.00% 28.

39 4.783.99% 8.00 40.11 53. In this table the market value is calculated directly with the CCF and ρ.380.055.840.22 1.176.50 6.13% 0.13% 0. With the TV WACC approach.7135 11.50 Year 4 40.13% 0.90% 25.50 1.00 40.627.178.682.00 1.65% 25.50 920.11 47.13% 0. are the same.251.110.55 67. e and market value of equity calculation with CFE at e Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 e=ρ +(ρ -d)D/E CFE=FCF+TS-CFD PV(CFE at e) 46. Table 24 CFE.150.881.00 4.Capital cash flow is defined as CCF = FCF + TS.027.15% 25.849.55% 38.027.11 In table the resulting e and equity market values are shown.883.998.177.5137 11.600.55% 36. Table A23 APV and market value calculations Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 PV(FCF at ρ ) PV(TS at ρ ) Total 45. Table A25 Basic information for HP WACC calculations Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Tax rate Cost of debt before taxes Given nominal ρ year 1 and assuming constant risk Real ρ (deflated) Discount factor at ρ FCF Debt (balance) Initial Equity contribution (book value) Initial investment (fixed assets plus cash) Interest payments Debt payment Cash flow to debt before taxes Tax savings (TS = TdD) 16.00 40.651.193.50 8. In the following tables the HP WACC approach is presented.066.28 31.36 Capital cash flow and APV with the TS discounted at ρ.34 45.178.35 38.00 3.000.50 40.450.29 8.50 5.34 41.05 This information is common for the three methods.383.55% 37. except for the tax savings TS.16% 2.998.2736 96.477.00 24.30 36.027.964.78 12.3732 14.027.00 4.40% 25.50 7.91 913.50 460.50 1.00% 28.00 4.708.300.25 70.00% 28.22 1.87% 91.79 42.73 1. TS are calculated in an explicit 21 .756.843.00% 28.89 54.12 61.55% 40.082.110.00 4.00% 28.082. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet.39 Year 4 337.00 2.327.027.83% 5.00 4.651.

61 Capital cash flow is defined as CCF = FCF + TS.62% 1.939.07% 12. we determine how much TS is earned according to the financial situation of the firm.9% 71.78% 36.67% 22.39 Year 4 70.142.651.082. are the same.6% 62.998.998.28% Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 In table the resulting WACC and market values are shown.490.88% 32.05 71.73 1.220.62% 5.99 Year 2 53.324.11 87.29 54.85 15.60% 41.763.42% 38.93% 46. Table A27 Capital Cash Flow and market value calculations at ρ Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Capital Cash Flow (CCF = FCF + TS) Total value 13. Table A26 HP WACC and market value calculation at HP WACC Year 0 ρ known Year 0 Debt Weight for Debt D% After tax cost of debt Contribution of debt to WACC Equity Weight for Equity E% et =ρ t + (ρ t – d)Dt -1/Et -1 Contribution of equity to WACC WACC after taxes Market Value at t @ WACC 47.92% 22. 22 .14% 30.08% 39.261.489.78 48.489.883.way.94 77. The HP WACC is calculated based on the contribution of each: the debt and the equity.45 94.291.22 13. In this table the market value is calculated directly with the CCF and ρ. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet.33% 36.058.71% 22.91 913.22 Year 1 45.1% 34.12 Year 3 61.490.22 2.62% 2. This is.96% 36.47 65.00% 33.99 48.849.62% 7. Table A28 APV and market value calculations Year 0 PV(FCF at ρ ) PV(TS at ρ ) Total 45. In this case we calculate the TS straightforward with the formula TdD.39 62.733.07% 22.22 2.25 Capital cash flow and APV with the TS discounted at ρ.87% 34.30 97.171.1% 53.36 337.40% 22.50% 37.223.92% 5.

13% 0.89 54.00 3.316.55 67.50 5.50 40. and market value of equity calculation with CFE at e Year 0 CFE=FCF+TS-CFD PV(CFE at e) 32.783.00 4.00 4.300.00 40.29 8.316. With the TV WACC approach. the MM WACC approach is presented.110.00 24.631.251.55% 36.39 4.383.50 920. except for the tax savings TS.00% 28.964. In this case we calculate the TS straightforward with the formula TdD. Now.00 4.2736 96.682. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet. we determine how much TS is earned according to the financial situation of the firm.596.027.00 2.3732 14. 23 .055.50 460.00% 28.627.027.78 12.Table 29 CFE.00 1.50 6.192.380.55% 38.55% 40. This is.63 Year 4 91.15% 25. TS are calculated in an explicit way.881. Table A30 Basic information for MM WACC calculations Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Tax rate Cost of debt before taxes Given nominal ρ year 1 and assuming constant risk Real ρ (deflated) Discount factor at ρ FCF Debt (balance) Initial Equity contribution (book value) Initial investment (fixed assets plus cash) Interest payments Debt payment Cash flow to debt before taxes Tax savings (TS = TdD) 16.327.150.00 40.40% 25.13% 0.43 Year 2 5.65% 25.79 42.600.843.05 This information is common for the three methods.477.90% 25.43 Year 1 4.00 4.027.000.027.5137 11.00% 28.00 40.110.177.28 32.00% 28.7135 11.55% 37.00 4.082.027.50 1.55 In table the resulting e and equity market values are shown.50 7.50 Year 4 40.450.50 8.50 1.13% 0.36 Year 3 8.13% 0.840.703.

28% Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 In table the resulting WACC and market values are shown.08 94.151. Table 33 CFE.201. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet.62% 7.3 Year 2 53.13% 38.8 In this case.06% 36.51% 36.6% 54.431.7 Year 4 70.2 1.27 87.431.40 In table the resulting e and equity market values are shown.843.9% 33.34% 36.073.9 715. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet.2 1.28 33.60% 35.04 Year 3 8.89 54.64% 29.4% 71.4 357.5 Year 3 61.91% 5. and market value of equity calculation with CFE at e Year 0 CFE=FCF+TS-CFD PV(CFE at e) Year 1 4.79 43.7 1. The HP WACC is calculated based on the contribution of each: the debt and the equity.7% 62.275.883.998.72 Year 2 5.62% 5.596.998.83% 40.41% 22.604.17% 22.985.964.67% 31.62% 2.66% 22.68% 34.56% 22.62% 1.59 77. 24 . Table A32 APV and market value calculations Year 0 PV(FCF at ρ ) PV(TS at d) Total 45.65% 36.5 Year 1 45.Table A31 MM WACC and market value calculations Year 0 ρ known Year 0 WACC calculations Debt Weight for Debt D% After tax cost of debt Contribution of debt to WACC Equity Weight for Equity E% et =ρ t + (1-T)(ρ t – d)Dt -1/Et -1 Contribution of equity to WACC WACC after taxes Market Value at t @ WACC 48.55 67. The FCF is discounted at ρ and the TS is discounted at d.66 Year 4 91.87% 22.082.45% 33.41 66.02% 12.59% 43.783.225.285.501. the CCF does not have any meaning.3 47.429.849.

Download

by Anthony Doerr

by Graeme Simsion

by Lindsay Harrison

by Brad Kessler

by David McCullough

by Jaron Lanier

by Miriam Toews

by Meg Wolitzer

by Alexandra Horowitz

by Ernest Hemingway

by Lewis MacAdams

by Katie Ward

by Nic Pizzolatto

by Rachel Kushner

by Aravind Adiga

by David Gordon

by Maxim Biller

by Åke Edwardson

On Writing

The Shell Collector

I Am Having So Much Fun Here Without You

The Rosie Project

The Blazing World

Quiet Dell

After Visiting Friends

Missing

Birds in Fall

Who Owns the Future?

All My Puny Sorrows

The Wife

A Farewell to Arms

Birth of the Cool

Girl Reading

Galveston

Telex from Cuba

Rin Tin Tin

The White Tiger

The Serialist

No One Belongs Here More Than You

Love Today

Sail of Stone

Fourth of July Creek

The Walls Around Us

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

CANCEL

OK

scribd