## ¿Está seguro?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

co Politécnico Grancolombiano Bogotá, Colombia Joseph Tham Fulbright Economics Teaching Program Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam ThamJx@yahoo.com jtham@fetp.vnn.vn

Ignacio Vélez-Pareja is the Director of the Department of International Relations and Finance professor at Politecnico GranColombiano, Bogota, Colombia. Joseph Tham is a Project Associate at the Center for Business and Government, J.F.K School of Government. Currently, he is teaching at the Fulbright Economics Teaching Program (FETP) in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Constructive feedback and critical comments are welcome. The authors may be contacted at: ivelez@poligran.edu.co, ThamJx@yahoo.com. Ignacio Vélez-Pareja will be the presenter at the conference of the European Financial Management Association, June 27-30, 2001 in Lugano, Switzerland. Contact Information Politécnico Grancolombiano Calle 57 N 3-00 E Bogota, Colombia Phone #: (571) 3468800 Fax #: (571) 3469258

**Firm Valuation: Free Cash Flow or Cash Flow to Equity?
**

Ignacio Vélez-Pareja ivelez@poligran.edu.co Joseph Tham ThamJx@yahoo.com jtham@fetp.vnn.vn

Abstract In a M & M world, the equity value is the present value of the Free Cash Flow FCF at the Weighted Average Cost of Capital WACC minus debt and it should be identical to the present value of the CFE (cash flow to equity) discounted at the cost of equity capital, e. In this paper the relationship between firm value calculated through the FCF and the CFE is examined. Several approaches to the firm value calculations are presented. We present a complex model where we compare the results obtained with the traditional M&M WACC found in the literature with the WACC approach presented by Harris and Pringle 1985. They make two assumpt ions that differ from the traditional M & M WACC. First, they assume that the discount rate for the tax shield is ρ, the return to unlevered equity. Second, based on the first assumption, the expression for e, the return to levered equity does not include the factor (1-T). Unlike the traditional WACC, the new WACC gives consistent results. However, the new WACC does not work if there are losses carried forward and/or the taxes are paid the following year. To solve these two practical issues, we present a ne w adjusted WACC. We call this adjusted WACC, TV WACC. In addition to the above-mentioned assumptions, this WACC is defined as a function of the real tax savings TS, earned. When this new approach is used, total consistency is found. In particular, with thi s new approach losses carried forward LCF and taxes paid at a different date as accrued, are taken into account and we obtain consistent values. Keywords Firm valuation, NPV, Free Cash Flow, FCF, Cash Flow to Equity, CFE, Cash Flow to Debt, CFD, Discounted Cash Flow, DFC. JEL Classification: D92, E22, G12, G31, M40, M41, M46

1

total consistency is found. if she pays the price listed on the price tag. First. the equity value is the present value of the Free Cash Flow FCF at the Weighted Average Cost of Capital WACC minus debt and it should be identical to the present value of the CFE (cash flow to equity) discounted at the cost of equity capital. are taken into account and we obtain consistent values. a plan and a team led by an outstanding manager. 2 . To understand these ideas assume that there is a box with a machine inside. In addition to the above -mentioned assumptions. Anyone could buy it. We call this adjusted WACC. However. this WACC is defined as a function of the real tax savings TS. Unlike the traditional WACC. they assume that the discount rate for the tax shield is ρ. earned. When valuing a firm the idea is to measure that value. greater that its price. Where value lies? Some people think that the value of a firm is found in the financial statements. When this new approach is used. The problems arise because what is sold is the value that can be created in the future. the expression for e. And where are these expectations? They are in the future cash flows. Several approaches to the firm value calculations are presented. In this paper the relationship between firm value calculated through the FCF and the CFE is examined. They make two assumptions that differ from the traditional M & M WACC. the new WACC does not work if there are losses carried forward and/or the taxes are paid the following year.Introduction In a M & M world. We present a complex model where we compare the results obtained with the traditional M&M WACC found in the literature with the WACC approach presented by Harris and Pringle 1985. Value arises from expectations. And this value is based on expectations of what the machine and the team could do in terms of wealth creation. the return to levered equity does not include the factor (1-T). e. TV W ACC. Not even a dollar was earned and they sold the stocks for skyrocketed prices. However. if somebody asks the owner of that project not to develop it. the return to unlevered equity. with this new approach losses carried forward LCF and taxes paid at a different date as accrued. Value will never be found in accounting statements. she will ask for a premium in order not to start the project. What were they buying? Just value expectations. the new WACC gives consistent results. we present a new adjusted WACC. Second. In fact. based on the first assumption. it has the capacity to create wealth and value. To solve these two practical issues. if that machine is accompanied by a strategy. In particular. Just remember the boom of the dot com firms.

the discount rate for the tax shield is ρ. E% is the proportion of equity in the total value. However. measures this future value. based on the first assumption. If there are LCF neither of the two expressions for WACC works. This is. D% is the proportion of debt in total value and T is tax rate. the expression for e does not include (1T). This paper studies this problem. The problem lies in what is the correct discount rate to be used to discount the cash flows. for the firm at the Weighted Average Cost of Capital and subtracting the debt or discounting the cash flow to equity holders CFE. This WACC assumes that there are no losses and there are no losses carried forward (LCF) and taxes are paid the same year as accrued. It is expresse d as WACC = eE% + d(1-T)D% (1) Where e is the cost of equity. In the traditional presentation. We will examine the WACC proposed by Harris and Pringle (1985) and we call it the HP WACC. e = ρ + (ρ – d)D%/E% (3) In practice we encounter losses carried forward (LCF). These two values are not equal. Some background on WACC In the literature we find the traditional presentation for WACC for discounting the FCF excluding tax savings from interest payments. We will call this the MM WACC. First. We assume that there are no losses and there are no losses carried forward (LCF) and taxes are paid the same year as accr ued. current practice find that this does not happens. Then the correct WACC proposed by Tham & Velez (TV) is TV WACC = ρ – TS/(Total levered value) (4) 3 . We will show how using different approaches we arrive at different figures and we will show approaches that produce consistent results and those that do not. these two values must be equal. Second. In a M & M world. at the cost of equity. This HP WACC differs from the MM WACC in two significant ways. e is calculated as e = ρ + (1-T) (ρ – d)D%/E% (2) And the discount rate for the tax shield is d.Discounting the free cash flow FCF. d is the cost of debt before taxes. Unfortunately. this traditional formulation does not work in the finite period cash flows.

In line 4. A Complex Model All these approaches work with a complex model. With these inputs we calculate interest rates (from real rates. These financial statements are all linked.TS/(Total levered value) WACC = ρ . We recognize that many other WACC are found in the literature. inflation. In tables A1 to A7 are the inputs. As it is invested in the firm. risk premium and debt ratio (accounting debt ratio)) for each year. It has the feature that considers tax savings when they are in fact earned.TdD% WACC = eE% + dD% . a cash cushion 2.TS/(Total levered value) (5) (6) (7) (8) This presentation is the most general way to express WACC. prices increases and an elasticity function among others. volume increases. the financial statements: Balance Sheet. WACC = eE% + dD% . the TS refers to the difference in the tax shield between the levered cash flows and the unlevered cash flows. There is not what some authors call “plugs” (an account where any difference between total assets and liabilities plus equity are included in order the Balance Sheet checks). Tables A8 to A11 present the forecasts of every variable including units sold. the “plug” is a decision: either to borrow money or to invest it (or leave it in the bank). prices.TdD/(Total levered value) WACC = eE% + dD% . dividend and inventory “policies”. It can be seen as a different presentation of the typical WACC formula. This information is used to calculate firm value and NPV in order to compare with market values. it is expected to earn at least the WACC. automatically it determines how much to borrow We are restricting our comparison to the traditional MM WACC. P&L statements and Cash Budget or Working Cash Statement. See Taggart 1991 and Fernandez.This last version of WACC assumes ρ as the discount rate for the Tax savings. 2000 2 It is assumed that this amount of cash is deposited in a check account that is a nonbearing interest account. accounts receivable and payable policies. In this paper we will show a comparison between the results obtained with the thre e versions for WACC1. The complex model has several modules (See Annex). From tables A12 to A16. prices and the rest. In the Cash Budget you will find that when the balance is in red. equity investments. 1 4 . In reality. And this means that losses carried forward are included in the analysis. The inputs include initial costs.

Another features of the model are the presence of an elasticity factor that relates price increase and demand. We present the value calculations for the three WACC approaches presented above. the analysis with WACC is inconsistent. unless you use d(1-T) as the cost of debt after taxes. The possibility to consider inventory. Table 17 shows the expected WACC and growth beyond year 4. In the cash budget the dividends paid are included. In all cases it is assumed that taxes are paid at the same year as accrued. To reinvest cash surpluses. accounts receivable and payable policies. In this model there exists some options: 1. PV(FCF) = PV(CFE) + PV(CFD) does not hold. When Adjusted WACC is used. 5 . CFD and the CFE. etc. when there are losses) and losses carried forward. cash cushion. When tax savings are not earned (for instance. It doesn't matches if the cost of debt after taxes is calculated from CFD after taxes or if taxes are paid next year. To make inflation adjustments 2. Not all the options are used in the example presented in the Annex. In the complex model. the calculations of firm value and the different WACC’s are done when there are losses and LCF and when there are no losses. payout ratios. As can be observed. All this means that it is not necessary to consider changes in working capital as with other methods. To pay taxes the same year as accrued or not. Tables A18 and A19 present the cash flow construction. This is quite important because this means that tax savings are earned when taxes are paid. is included. dividends and tax savings. consistency is obtained.taking into account the cash cushion. The FCF. interest paid. A very important feature is the losses carried forward LCF. The cost of debt after taxes is calculated as the IRR for the CFD. equity from stockholders. the WACC and firm value. These inconsistencies are solved using the Adjusted WACC or TV WACC = ρ – TSt /(Total value at t-1). 3. It is calculated just as it is expected it will be in the Cash Budget. These calculations are done fixing ρ for year 0. With this information. the FCF is constructed from the Cash Budget balance and deduct all the items related with the financing: loans received and paid. we calculate in the last part. Tables A20 to A33. These options are handled with a dummy variable.

there is a difference of 376. This means a lower WACC.3. with the HP WACC.275. The differences are the same when calculated as Total value less debt. there is no difference.3. The reasons for this difference are the lower value for e (due to the (1-T) factor) and the difference in tax savings due to the LCF. which is higher than the previous value by 2. for the same reason. when the market equity value is calculated from the CFE at e. However.4. the losses are carried forward and taxes are paid the same year. The differences are the same when calculated as Total value less debt.2. the present value is $48. there is a difference of 1.9. The reason the present value with the MM WACC is higher is because the discount rate for the tax shield is d. which is higher than the previous value by 933.The results for the first case are summarized in Table 1 Panels A and B. The present value of the FCF at the TV WACC (total market value) is $47. 6 . lower than ρ.439. When calculating the Adjusted Present Value APV.8.176.765.316.066. with the traditional MM WACC.291. When calc ulating the Adjusted Present Value APV.9. with the traditional MM WACC. Another reason is the difference in tax savings due to the LCF. When calculating the Adjusted Present Value APV. The present value of CFE at e under TV WACC assumptions is 31.250. which is higher than the previous value by 115.9.505.312.3.7. the present value is $48. where we assume that there are no losses and taxes are paid the same year. the present value is $33. for the same reason. The reason the present value with the HP WACC is higher is because the difference in tax savings due to the LCF.1. This means a lower WACC. there is a difference of 253. The present value of the FCF at the TV WACC (total market value) is $47. There are also differences when calculating the market equity value. The present value of the FCF at the TV WACC (total market value) is $47.8. The reason the present value with the MM WACC is higher is because the discount rate for the tax shield is d lower than ρ. However. where we assume that there are losses. which is higher than the previous value by 1.4. which is higher than the previous value by 1. when the market equity value is calculated from the CFE at e. There are also differences when calculating the market equity value.4. the present value is $47. the present value is the same. The present value of the FCF at the TV WACC (total market value) is $47.176. With the traditional MM WACC. with the HP WACC.3.505.225. there differences.1.9. The results for the second case are summarized in Table 2 Panels A and B.5. The reason the present value with the HP WACC is higher is because the difference in tax savings due to the LCF. for the same reasons. the present value is $32.996. with the HP WACC. When calculating the Adjusted Present Value APV.

with the HP WACC. which is higher than the previous value by 933.395. the present val ue is $32. The present value of CFE at e under TV WACC assumptions is 31. With the traditional MM WACC. The reasons for this difference are the lower value for e (due to the (1-T) factor) and the difference in tax savings due to the LCF.8.329. the present value is the same. 7 .there differences.9.9.

1 0.3 31. this is WACC = eE% + d(1-T)D% where e=ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E Columns (7) and (8) show the absolute and relative difference with the TV WACC. TV WACC should be used.066.debt Equity value = PV(FCF at ρ) + PV(TS at d) . losses carried forward and taxes paid the same year Total market value.5% Table 1 Panel B.7 Column (1) of Table 1 (panels A and B) shows the name of the procedure to calculate Total or Equity value. Column (6) shows the values when calculated with the MM WACC.225.9 0.2 32. losses carried forward and taxes paid the same year Total market value.319. Both of them consider e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E and assume ρ as the correct discount rate for the tax savings.4 31.2% 32. From columns (4) and (5) it can be seen that in this case TV WACC and HP WACC differ.5 32.316.1% 4.996.429.2% 2.2 2.In summary Table 1 Panel A.5 48. Columns (2) and (3) show the different values when the Adjusted or TV WACC = ρ – TS/(Total value) and HP WACC = eE% + d(1-T)D%.9 1.8% 48.250.1 1. Columns (4) and (5) show the absolute and relative difference with the TV WACC.3 3.066. Losses.181.8% 7.996.2 2. 8 .5 1.4% 0.312.2 115.312.4 47.765. However.275. Equity market value Value calculation (1) With TV With HP WACC (TV WACC WACC = ρ – e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E TS/(Total (3) value) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E (2) 31.3 31.debt Equity value = Total value (from CCF at ρ) . Value calculation (1) With TV With HP WACC (TV WACC WACC = e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E ρ – TS/(Total (3) value) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E (2) 47.489.3 Difference with TV WACC (4) % over TV With MM WACC WACC e= (5) ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E (6) Difference with TV WACC (7) % over TV WACC (8) Total value PV(FCF @ WACC) Total value PV(CCF=FCF + TS @ ρ) Total value = PV(FCF at ρ) + PV(TS at d) 47. if precision is desired.379. In table 2 the traditional WACC (MM WACC) also shows inconsistencies among the different values and between those values and the TV WACC.4% 4.3 47.5 1. The very small differences between TV WACC and HP WACC might show that for practical purposes HP WACC is a good approximation.0% 33.176.2% 0.115.1 1. Losses.3 Difference with TV WACC (4) % over TV With MM WACC WACC e= (5) ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E (6) Difference with TV WACC (7) % over TV WACC (8) Equity value = Total value (from FCF at WACC) .176.debt Equity value = PV(CFE @ e) 31.4 115.4 253.066.4 253. TS. Notice the internal consistency of TV WACC.291.

505.Table 2 Panel A No losses.772.0 0.0% 376. taxes paid the same year Value calculation (1) With TV WACC With HP Difference % over TV With MM WACC (TV WACC = ρ – WACC with TV WACC e= TS/(Total value) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E WACC (5) ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E (4) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E (3) (6) (2) 47.debt 31.9 (0. Columns (2) and (3) show the different values when the Adjusted or TV WACC = = ρ – TS/(Total value) and TV WACC = eE% + d(1-T)D% are used. 9 .8 debt Equity value = Total value (from CCF at ρ) .9 % over TV WACC (8) 2.9 31.439. this is WACC = eE% + d(1-T)D% where e=ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E Columns (7) and (8) show the absolute and relative difference with the TV WACC.debt Equity value = PV(CFE at e) 31.395.0) 0.0% Value calculation (1) Equity value = PV(FCF at ρ) +PV(TS at d) .9 31.8% Difference with TV WACC (7) 933.395. In table 2 the traditional WACC (MM WACC) shows inconsistencies among the different values and between those values and the TV WACC.395.9 (0.8 0.0) 0.9 47.2% 3.0% Column (1) of Table 2.0) 0.0% 31. No losses.9 47.0% Total value = PV(FCF at WACC) Total value = PV(CCF = FCF + TS at ρ) Total value = PV(FCF at ρ) + PV(TS at d) Table 2 Panel B.8 47. shows the name of the procedure to calculate Total or Equity value.395.0% 48.395. TS.882.0) 0.7 32.0% 47.9 1.0% 32.9 % over TV WACC (8) 3.505.84 933.329. taxes paid the same year and it is shown that there is no difference. Both of them consider e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E and assume ρ as the correct discount rate for the tax savings.8 Difference with TV WACC (7) 933.9 (0.395.9 0. Column (6) shows the values when calculated with the MM WACC.9 31. Notice the internal consistency of TV WACC and HP WACC. No losses.7 376. Panels A and B.505. taxes paid the same year With TV WACC With HP Difference % over TV With MM WACC (TV WACC = ρ – WACC with TV WACC e= (5) ρ+(1-T)(ρ-d)D/E TS/(Total value) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E WACC (4) e=ρ+(ρ-d)D/E (3) (6) (2) Equity value = Total value (from FCF at WACC) 31.329.505. In Table 1.9 (0. Columns (4) and (5) show the absolute and relative difference with the TV WACC.

2000.1 1. losses carried forward and taxes paid the same year.221. PABLO. Conclusions We have shown three approaches to calculate total and equity value with different expressions for WACC.721.8 62.0 31. Social Science Research Network.3 40. Frequently. 1985.4 1.1 2.1 2.4 26.204.395. R.1 37.022.S.9 1.7 Year 4 30.193.3 2. the only one that gives consistent results is TV WACC. These differences are explained because the financial statements do not consider any terminal value.4 54.733.654.8 39.0 31. the tables give an idea on how much difference is present when the book values are used.8 Table 4.8 1.8 39.9 1. Although not a formal proof.5 54.2 38.3 40.125.3 1.6 1.961. “Risk-Adjusted Discount Rates – Extensions from the Average-Risk Case ".505. the HP WACC and the TV WACC.763.693.1 37. It can be shown that when taxes are paid the following year after accrual.104.3 1. We consider that this is the correct method. The equity market values are taken from the calculations made with the TV WACC approach.651. Market and book values ratios Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Book value for equity Market value for equity Market equity value/equity book val ue Book value for total assets Market total value Market total value/Book value for total assets 24.066.534.149.Table 3 No losses.220. The first one produces inconsistent results.110.2 24.3 1.030.7 30.9 71.773.176.2 63. The second one is consistent as long as there are no losses and/or losses carried forward. AND J.0 47.953.1 55. produces consistent results either with no losses or losses and losses carried forward.9 1.0 1.2 23.719. taxes paid the same year. terminal value accounts for more that 50% of the total value of the firm.000.2 38. Journal of Financial 10 .110. Equivalence of the Different Cash Flow Valuation Methods. They are the MM WACC (the traditional WACC).4 26. Losses.8 Tables 3 and 4 show the differences in market values when compared with book values.7 43. The last one.7 42.5 2.8 67. HARRIS .809.8 67.708. the TV WACC.050. Bibliographic References FERNÁNDEZ .7 71.6 55.3 1. Market and book values ratios Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Book value for equity Market value for equity Market equity value/equity book value Book value for total assets Market total value Market total value/Book value for total assets 24.J.000. PRINGLE.0 47. Working Paper.378.

Research. Consistent Valuation and Cost of Capital Expressions with Corporate Taxes and Personal Taxes. Autumn. 1991. Financial Management.. ROBERT A. pp8-20 11 . JR. pp 237-244. TAGGART . Fall.

Table A2 Market variables Quantity to sell at year t at price given at year 0 Increase in volume 7.0% Year 4 40.00% 6.00% 10. Fisher Theorem is used to compose the three components. the estimated quantity the market will buy.62% 22.55% 28. Table A4 Price and increase in price Year 0 Year 1 Purchase price Real price increase Annual increase in purchase price $2. Table A3 Risk free discount rate and risk premium estimates Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Real risk free discount rate Rate of interest for debt Risk premium for debt Effective rate before taxes Annual nominal rate compounded twice a year Effective rate after taxes 10.00% 10.0% 40.00% 30.ANNEX FINANCIAL ASSESMENT FOR THE CREATION OF A FIRM LOSSES AND LOSSES CARRIED FORWARD (LCF) Table A1 External or macroeconomic variables Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Tax rate Inflation rate 40.10% 0.247 0.59% 30.0% 9.00% 9.00% Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 The purchase price is a function of Q.55% 28.00% 5.00% 11.59% 30.62% 6.00% 6.55% 28.0% Year 3 40. 12 .59% 30.01% 1.62% 22.62% 22.90% 13.00% 10.00% This information can be estimated based on the behavior of bonds or simply setting the cost of debt from a contract between the firm and the debt holder.00% 4.00% 10.55% 22.00% 12.82% 1.00% 7.95 0.00% 11.00% Year 4 6.64% 12.00% This information can be obtained from macroeconomic forecasts made by the government or associations or universities.59% 28.00% Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 The quantity and increase in the market might be obtained by a marketing research.

00 1.00 $0.9996 0. an elasticity function calculated for the domestic water supply was used.93% $160.00 $37.76% 12.30% 11.000% 13.60 0. (1-. In the example.900% 13.10% 0.30% 12.00 $0.11% 11. Effect of price change upon demand.10% 10.70% 9.00 1.00 1.40% 12.00 0.00 1.00% $0.00% $0.88% 0.00 0. Table A6 Costs Year 0 Monthly auditing fees Real price increase Increase in monthly auditing fees Monthly overhead Real price increase Increase in overhead Monthly payroll Administrative payroll Monthly payroll of selling force Real price increase Increase in payroll Sales commissions Fringe benefits and taxes over payroll 56.60% Year 3 Year 4 0.20% 11.00 Year 1 $0. Price increases might be estimated based on historical data of similar firms.00 $0.90% 9.01% Year 2 $0.60% 9.32% Year 4 $0.00 0.00 $0.20% These are stated on a monthly base.00 1. 13 .20% 11.32% 3. Selling price is the result of a market survey and/or the cost structure of the good or service.00 1.55% 3.00 $40.00% $0.44% $0. It is a function of selling price increase.00 $0.Table A5 Internal variables (endogenous) with some degree of negotiability Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Selling price Real price increase Increase in selling price Elasticity factor.00% $0.00 $0.12% $0.9974 The elasticity function has to be found for the specific product or service we are dealing with.9978 0.366*((1+increase in selling price)/(1+inflation)-1)) $5.80% 0.43% $0.20% 13.98% $0.00 $0.9971 0.65% 3.00 $0.10% 12.00 1.00 $145.22% Year 3 $0. or simply a subjective forecast.00 1.34% 3.67% 10.00 1.

000.Table A7 Targets and/or operating policies Year 0 Advertising and promotions (% on sales) Equity contribution Fixed assets Depreciation (lineal for 5 years) Final inventory as percent of sales (units) Inventories valued at FIFO Percentage of sales receivedin the same year Percentage of sales receivedin the next year Percentage of payments made the same year as accrued (overhead and suppliers) Percentage of payments made the next year as accrued (overhead and suppliers) Percentage of net profits (dividends) paid to stockholders the year after obtained the net profits Minimum cash balance desired after financing deficits 8.00 3.000.00% 30. Table A10 Selling and purchasing prices Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 7.56 7.00 32.00% 5.00 40.00% 10.90 603.53 4.66 7.93 674.00 8.000.00 This depreciation is based on the lineal method stated above.000.00% 10. The nominal selling price increase defines the elasticity factor.74 644.774.00% 90.66 0.000.00% 95.00% 30.00% 8. the increase in volume and the elasticity factor for the product or service.00% 10. Table A8 Forecasts based on Tables A1 to A7 Year 1 Year 2 Units sold (increase plus elasticity effect) S Final inventory in units FI Initial inventory in units II Purchases in units P = S + FI .00% 95. 14 .00% 5.127.00% 90.00 Year 3 8.17 699.000.00 8.11 Year 4 8.00% 95.00 24.79 Year 3 8.74 8.00 16.56 7.000.000.36 Units to be sold are based on the initial market survey.87 674.00% 30.00% 3.000.00 7.33% 8.50 603.096.II 7.33% 95.733.00% 110 120 131 160 160 Many variables are just policies or target the firm will pursue.50 8.00% 90.243.03 These prices are based on the initial selling and purchasing price and the price increase stated above.13 8.399.00% 30.00% 90.847.424.77 3.00% 10.33% 8.000. Table A9 Depreciation Year 1 Year 2 Annual depreciation Cumulative depreciation 8.00% 5.01 3.00% 3.28 3.95 644.33% 24.00 Year 4 8.00% Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 3.00% 5.81 Selling price Buying price 6.

541.75 2.22 Year 4 2.082.69 40.719.45 2.00 8.000.813.000.626.293.178.278.68 227.00 40.000.68 40.706.00 2.393.000.78 38.110.559.34) 23.26 196.88 40. cash is the same value found in the Cash Budget as cumulative cash balance.000.00 12.69 41.766.00 24.449.000.00 32.814.44 1.41 204.76 3.14 502.43 16.433. Net income 15 .50 7.000.364.457.21 3.000.267.00 40.11 5.00 16.000.45 37.000.00 24.149.00 4.076. 63 340.110.00 24.04 1.04 40.000.39 0.48 2.33 All the financial statements are linked.221.160. For instance.70 0.61 Year 3 2. 58 2.030.100.0 2.654.28 2. In this table they are annualized.00 8.22 214.866.64 441.21 41.50 15.25 2.00 1.000.96 1.03 37.38 0.00 4.000.888.20 40.00 11.110.000.35 544.18 8.00 8.43 37.67% payroll and commissions) Auditing fees Overhead Advertising and promotions These costs are based on the monthly based costs above.31 24.39 245.78 24.80 26.626.95 241.00 2.00 (46.726.00 39.711.176.37 2.25 1.00 32.00 2.861.70 490.94 220.00 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 27.985.65 1.61 186.26 692.02 2.166.22 681.149.654.00 (46.76 38.34 1.00 0.00 8.206.00 110.37 159.66 39.67 30.574.055.15 629.000.989.534.574.888.953.00 16.583.030.456.06 2.110.000.398.62 3.00 40.12 612.000.05 1.16 747.312.91 249.34) 2.81 270.534.00 16.000.97 2.719.33 3.66 390.56 564.147.20 181.61 0.719.364.650.00 5.95 Administrative payroll Administrative fringe benefits on payroll Sales force payroll Sales commissions Fringe benefits (annual premium 1/12 of payroll) Other fringe benefits (46.027.890. Table A12 Balance sheet Year 0 Year 1 Assets Cash Accounts receivable Inventory Fixed assets Cumulative depreciation Net fixed assets Total Liabilities and equity Accounts payable (suppliers) Accounts payable (overhead) Fringe benefits accrued Interest charges accrued Accrued taxes Long term debt Total liabilities Equity Cumulative retained earnings Net income for the year Total net equity Total 24.16 2.823.11 2.273.00 16.12 24.30 2.67 1.966.000.35 1.000.91 24.Annual expenses Table A11 Administrative and selling expenses Year 1 Year 2 2.

37 1.35 8.479.293.97 2.00 1.574.788.52 2.34) 54.890.286.456.682.748.69 30.79 18.150.480.393.95 15.04 33.888. they appear as a cash outflow at the Cash Budget.40 19.626.178.888.11 2.68 26.664. Items such as taxes will appear in the Balance Sheet in case taxes are paid the following year.05 5.364.364. 16 .44 8.669.97 8.95 2. There is no plug.44 5.50 441.940.67 The figures for the P&L statements are based on the forecasts above. Sales are simply quantity to be sold times the rice.220.34 8.982.198.00 8.931.75 1.40 340.45 2.926.37 27.38 0.595.705.24 6.61 692.00 13.65 8.00 1.890.300.57 1.13 4.38 5.000.452.25 1.265.88 37.15 2.000.149.80 Year 3 Year 4 71.04 32.553.598.000.966.723. etc.267.70 564.66 4.37 4.631.89 2.93 33.243.97 1.32 390.954.38 629.706. In this case.39 502.00 (46.796.00 (46.574.988.217.000.340.63 5.03 62.68 31.738.572.149.for the year is the same found in the P&L statement.61 7.16 21.30 1.61 2.65 490.20 27.450.77 3.38 1.00 2.600.626.00 3.138.34) 0.755.11 3.11 2.22 10.62 22.206. and so on.31 2.22 2.003.823.16 22.988.76 1.00 24.20 22.293.00 1. Table A13 Profit and losses statement Year 1 Year 2 Sales Cost of goods sold Initial inventory Purchases Final inventory Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Payroll expenses Annual premium Auditing fees Selling commissions Overhead Depreciation Advertising Earnings before interest and taxes Other expenses (interest expenses) Earnings before taxes Taxes Net profit 45.

00 0.210.149.436.00 36.589.888. It takes into account the accounts receivables policy stated above.27 1.31 62.00 1.669.25 340. Table A15 Cash budget: Cash outflows Cash outflows Suppliers Payments for purchases year 1 24.000.72 24.00 43.72 4.20 53.22 2.57 Payments for purchases year 2 27.02 50.37 1.39 564.64 2.504.504.97 1.02 59.43 43.45 Payments for purchases year 3 31.44 2.313.00 1.79 245.33 22.572.766. It is a financing decision that will be made with the cash balance below.985.149.003.115.670.150.988.65 3.689.96 51.00 0.61 0.50 6.20 53.100.000.664.081.205.15 Total payments to suppliers Payroll and fringe benefits Annual premium year Auditing fees Commissions on sales Payment of overhead year 1 Payment of overhead year 2 Payment of overhead year 3 Payment of overhead year 4 Advertising Purchase of fixed assets Interest expenses Dividend payments Taxes Total cash outflows 40.32 27.940.147.30 441.62 56.95 0.456.60 0.65 390.75 5.40 5.00 0.76 30.69 43.22 2.479.67 71.595.205.89 Payments for purchases year 4 33.32 502.783.95 220.50 3.598.69 71.97 3.63 17 .61 1.340.903.44 33.71 196.03 68.Cash inflows Table A14 Cash budget: Cash inflows Year 0 Year 1 45.00 2.364.66 2.793.98 1.20 2.37 62.450.000.26 24.39 30.702.00 1.00 3.553.63 1.35 2.00 680.50 2.34 1.70 629.31 62.67 71.206.888.72 In this table all the cash inflows are registered.35 40.65 2.32 2.364.966.00 22.626.452.00 4.115.359.93 24.300.94 27.205.000.228.37 1.273.600.34 2.480.705.228.706.457. It does not include loans income.982.220.11 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 1.783.509.00 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Cash collection of sales year 1 Cash collection of sales year 2 Cash collection of sales year 3 Cash collection of sales year 4 Total income accounts receivable Equity in cash Total cash inflows 43.902.711.769.16 54.626.421.38 692.44 5.972.

00 0.893. These are included below.00 4.50 0.00 43.00 4.110.00 2.06 16.498.78 12.62 56.783.28 5.00 40.20 53.00) 16.00 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 24.650. These are.00 110.00% This table shows the growth and discount rate for determining the terminal value .339.29 12.02 50.72 (16.866.67 71.163. how much should beborrowed and how much can be paid with the available cash.55 10.71 0.312.702.00) (16.00 36.756.This table shows all the cash outflows.526.000.43 43.228.50 8.027.027.00 0.12 31.00 4.783.972.62 27.56 20.783.00 4.000.78 9.027. It does not include loans payment. Table 17 Discount and growth rate beyond year 4 Discount rate for cash flows beyond year 4 Growth for year 5 Growth for year 6 and following years 23.205.000.811.63 6. 18 .21 This table shows the information from the Cash Budget in order to make the financing decisions.31 62.027.000. Table A16 Financing decision Year 0 Year 1 Total cash inflows Total cash outflows Net cash gain (loss) Cash balance at end of year Bank loans Repayment of loans (principal) Investment of surplus Net cash gain (loss) after financing Cash balance at end of year after financing and reinvestment 110.677.05 14.79 8.50 0.813.191.10% 0.504.421.28 2.50 0.841.1 6.59 0.11% 10.313.00 0.

756.464.682.79 Year 3 8.553.29 6.627.39 5.00 0.251.383.50 2.717.50 3.29 14.00 0.39 96.150.50 5.163.5 7.097.50 2.00 0.13 (Plus) 79.783.00 4.00 0. the cost before and after taxes calculated as the IRR of the CFD before and after taxes.28 0.89 14.383.407.881.251.843.05 4.59 0.00) 0.00 Year 2 5.05 8.783.027.50 28.34 1.29 14.28 11.29 5.00 (920.756.36 11.964. We do not use the approach to calculate FCF from EBIT or net profit because this method increases the probability of errors.498.327.383.027.13% 8.783.69 18.383.097.881.50 96. starting from EBIT might introduce errors in the tax paid and the tax savings earned.00 0.55 96.251.55 10.00 4. 19 .177.843.05 The FCF is calculated from the Cash Budget.964.682.55 4.79 0.756.027.881.Table A18 Construction of Free Cash Flow (FCF) from the Net Cash Gain at the Cash Budget Year 1 Net cash gain (loss) after financing Bank loans Repayment of loans (principal) Interest expenses Tax shield for interest payments Dividends Equity in kind Equity in cash Cash flow without terminal value FCF n+1 = (FCFn (1+Growth rate for n+1) Terminal value Free cash flow after taxes (Plus) (Minus) (Plus) (Plus) (Minus) (Plus) (Minus) (Minus) 2. In particular.300.50 91.627.78 8.50 11.39 This table shows the CFD.79 11.450.00 0.39 16.78 11.78 11.60 0. the CFE.89 Year 4 91.78 6.380.00 11.00 (1.50 4.717.251.00 680.50 4. Cost of debt is assumed constant.881.627.027.00 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 8.600.912.5 17.00 4.50 14.55% 11.50 8.00 1.28 Year 2 5.00) 0.682.477.5 6. Table A19 Cash Flow to Equity CFE and Cash Flow to Debt Cash flow for stockholder (dividends plus any cash ) Financing cash flow (after tax) CFD Cost of debt as IRR of after tax CFD Financing cash flow (before tax) Cost of debt as IRR of before tax CFD Free cash flow (FCF) Financing cash flow (CFD) Stockholder's cash flow (CFE) Check: CFD + CFE =FCF Year 1 2.407.5 5.769.00) (460.

The next tables show the calculation of market values and the three different approaches to calculate WACC.05 20 .55% 37.261.00 24.50 6. With the TV WACC approach.55% 38.61 In table the resulting WACC and market values are shown. We do not calculate the TS straightforward with the formula TdD.00 40.50 0 3.85 36. TS are calculated in an explicit way.477.383.600.00 40.00% 28.55% 36.50 1.65% 25. Table A21 TV WACC and market value calculations Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 WACC after taxes = ρ .176.327.50 8.00 4.50 7.300.881.00 40.383.7135 11. First.733.000.90% 25.50 460.251.13% 0.85 13.39 4.5137 11.00% 28.75% 71.39 71. we determine how much TS is earned according to the financial situation of the firm. This is.00 4.150.3732 14.05 This information is common for the three methods.220.171.00 4.38% 62. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet.30 15.15% 25.13% 0.50 Year 4 40.2736 96. Table A22 Capital Cash Flow and market value calculations at ρ Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Capital cash flow (CCF = FCF + TS) Total value 47.00% 28.34 11.627.50 5.176.177.733.00 4.027.40% 25.110.00 4. Table A20 Basic information for TV WACC calculations Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Tax rate Cost of debt before taxes Given nominal ρ year 1 and assuming constant risk Real ρ (deflated) Discount factor at ρ FCF Debt (balance) Initial Equity contribution (book value) Initial investment (fixed assets plus cash) Interest payments Debt payment Cash flow to debt before taxes Tax savings (TS = TdD) 16.55% 40. except for the tax savings TS.61 Year 4 97.380.13% 0.15% 47.13% 0.082.34 54.220.29 62.763.00% 28.30 Year 3 Year 4 36.027.027.450.50 920.682.763.027.055.TS/Total value at t-1 Market Total Value at t @ WACC 40.50 40.027.78 54.18% 35.78 12. we present the TV WACC approach.00 1.110.29 8.142.00 2.

881. With the TV WACC approach.00 1.55% 38.055.00 4.87% 91.00% 28.13% 0.00% 28.78 12.00 40.00 4.682.178.89 54.30 36.383.251.50 6.450.00 4.027.00% 28.00 4.027.99% 8.651.50 460.13% 0.00 24. In this table the market value is calculated directly with the CCF and ρ.50 8.25 70. Table A23 APV and market value calculations Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 PV(FCF at ρ ) PV(TS at ρ ) Total 45.600.00 40.177.11 In table the resulting e and equity market values are shown.178.55% 37.50 1. Table 24 CFE.90% 25.13% 0.00 4.300.50 40.15% 25.Capital cash flow is defined as CCF = FCF + TS.027. e and market value of equity calculation with CFE at e Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 e=ρ +(ρ -d)D/E CFE=FCF+TS-CFD PV(CFE at e) 46.756.2736 96. TS are calculated in an explicit 21 .027.110. Table A25 Basic information for HP WACC calculations Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Tax rate Cost of debt before taxes Given nominal ρ year 1 and assuming constant risk Real ρ (deflated) Discount factor at ρ FCF Debt (balance) Initial Equity contribution (book value) Initial investment (fixed assets plus cash) Interest payments Debt payment Cash flow to debt before taxes Tax savings (TS = TdD) 16.55% 36.50 Year 4 40.7135 11.39 Year 4 337.39 4.91 913.327.11 47. except for the tax savings TS.066.34 41.50 7.708.651.34 45.964.28 31.00 2.11 53.50 5.35 38.79 42.29 8.193.50 1.65% 25.000.00% 28.477.380. In the following tables the HP WACC approach is presented.150.082.12 61.5137 11.176.998.840.73 1.16% 2.027.849.05 This information is common for the three methods.40% 25.110.55% 40.22 1.83% 5.36 Capital cash flow and APV with the TS discounted at ρ.00 3. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet.783.082.00 40.55 67.998.3732 14. are the same.22 1.13% 0.627.50 920.843.883.

22 Year 1 45.62% 2.223.47 65.261.93% 46.33% 36.99 Year 2 53. In this table the market value is calculated directly with the CCF and ρ.28% Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 In table the resulting WACC and market values are shown.45 94.9% 71.60% 41.849.61 Capital cash flow is defined as CCF = FCF + TS.11 87.way.73 1. Table A26 HP WACC and market value calculation at HP WACC Year 0 ρ known Year 0 Debt Weight for Debt D% After tax cost of debt Contribution of debt to WACC Equity Weight for Equity E% et =ρ t + (ρ t – d)Dt -1/Et -1 Contribution of equity to WACC WACC after taxes Market Value at t @ WACC 47.651. 22 .92% 22.220.14% 30.489.96% 36.42% 38.142.22 2.67% 22.490.39 Year 4 70. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet.490.998.85 15. The HP WACC is calculated based on the contribution of each: the debt and the equity.08% 39.50% 37.88% 32.05 71.94 77.082.62% 1.733.36 337.62% 7.07% 12. Table A28 APV and market value calculations Year 0 PV(FCF at ρ ) PV(TS at ρ ) Total 45.998.6% 62.489.1% 34.39 62.07% 22.324.91 913.92% 5.22 13. we determine how much TS is earned according to the financial situation of the firm.058.25 Capital cash flow and APV with the TS discounted at ρ.883. This is.87% 34.939.71% 22.1% 53. In this case we calculate the TS straightforward with the formula TdD.30 97.99 48. are the same.78% 36.29 54. Table A27 Capital Cash Flow and market value calculations at ρ Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Capital Cash Flow (CCF = FCF + TS) Total value 13.22 2.12 Year 3 61.00% 33.291.62% 5.763.78 48.40% 22.171.

the MM WACC approach is presented.082.251.00 4.7135 11.316.50 1.783.55 In table the resulting e and equity market values are shown.327.5137 11.150. With the TV WACC approach.177.65% 25.63 Year 4 91.00 3.000. we determine how much TS is earned according to the financial situation of the firm.28 32.13% 0.50 1.881.13% 0.2736 96.36 Year 3 8. This is.00 40. TS are calculated in an explicit way.00% 28.50 40.05 This information is common for the three methods.00 4.40% 25.39 4.78 12.43 Year 2 5.596.00% 28.79 42.964.110.300.13% 0.055.631.450.316.Table 29 CFE.110.50 8.627.380. Now.00% 28.55% 37.00 4.703.55 67.027.50 5.00 1.843.027. and market value of equity calculation with CFE at e Year 0 CFE=FCF+TS-CFD PV(CFE at e) 32. In this case we calculate the TS straightforward with the formula TdD.50 Year 4 40.00 24.027. 23 . Table A30 Basic information for MM WACC calculations Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Tax rate Cost of debt before taxes Given nominal ρ year 1 and assuming constant risk Real ρ (deflated) Discount factor at ρ FCF Debt (balance) Initial Equity contribution (book value) Initial investment (fixed assets plus cash) Interest payments Debt payment Cash flow to debt before taxes Tax savings (TS = TdD) 16.027.3732 14.840.43 Year 1 4.00 4.00% 28.600.192.50 460.00 40.55% 36.89 54. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet.55% 40.15% 25.383.50 6.55% 38.682.00 4.29 8.027. except for the tax savings TS.50 7.00 2.50 920.00 40.13% 0.90% 25.477.

151.883.55 67.45% 33.964.3 Year 2 53.501.08 94.783.5 Year 1 45.02% 12.849.9 715.3 47.40 In table the resulting e and equity market values are shown. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet.79 43.998.62% 5.073.9% 33.4 357.91% 5.985.17% 22.431.56% 22.13% 38.6% 54. Table 33 CFE.04 Year 3 8.66 Year 4 91.68% 34.62% 2.7% 62.65% 36.843. The HP WACC is calculated based on the contribution of each: the debt and the equity. the CCF does not have any meaning.604.4% 71.8 In this case.28 33.28% Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 In table the resulting WACC and market values are shown.34% 36.27 87.62% 7.201.89 54.62% 1.082.2 1. Table A32 APV and market value calculations Year 0 PV(FCF at ρ ) PV(TS at d) Total 45.06% 36.41% 22.275.225.87% 22.Table A31 MM WACC and market value calculations Year 0 ρ known Year 0 WACC calculations Debt Weight for Debt D% After tax cost of debt Contribution of debt to WACC Equity Weight for Equity E% et =ρ t + (1-T)(ρ t – d)Dt -1/Et -1 Contribution of equity to WACC WACC after taxes Market Value at t @ WACC 48. and market value of equity calculation with CFE at e Year 0 CFE=FCF+TS-CFD PV(CFE at e) Year 1 4.83% 40. It has to be remembered that there exists circularity and this is the result of iterations done by the spreadsheet. The FCF is discounted at ρ and the TS is discounted at d.429.285.51% 36.2 1.59 77.41 66.998. 24 .59% 43.431.7 Year 4 70.66% 22.596.60% 35.67% 31.64% 29.72 Year 2 5.7 1.5 Year 3 61.

- BUSN379 Course Project Part IIuploaded byEstela Velazco
- 186854504-Teletech-Student-Spreadsheet-1.xlsuploaded byStanly Chan
- 1230.docxuploaded byIbrahim
- Colgateuploaded byMichael Johnson
- 05 Star Riveruploaded bydewimachfud
- Key to Intercouploaded byKim Hiệp Trần
- JP Morgan - Indonesia Coal Mining 2011uploaded byKJPP ASR
- Case_3_report_-1208_2056uploaded byapi-3748540
- EVA for Small Manufacturing Companiesuploaded byatif shaikh
- Financeuploaded byNawab Ali
- Boeing 777 CaseStudy Solutionuploaded byRohit Parnerkar
- Restructuringuploaded byJimsy Antu
- BFD s2009uploaded byImran Ahmad
- FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTuploaded byGuruKPO
- The Effect of Corporate Tax Avoidance on the Cost of Equityuploaded byDavid Luntungan
- residual income valuation_urp.pptuploaded byarmando.chappell1005
- Marketing Productivityuploaded byEnkhbat Dulamtsetseg
- Source of Finance 8 Septuploaded byRohan Sharma
- 2.4[2]uploaded byHemal Pandya
- ACCA F9 Past Year Q&A 07-13uploaded byXCC
- FM2uploaded byLouie De La Torre
- 38_Valuation by Prof. Grohuploaded byHemendra Sharma
- Cost of Capital for Foreign Investmentsuploaded bySammir Malhotra
- sap_SEMuploaded byMazen Maher
- American Chemical Corporationuploaded byjlvaldesm
- VEMBA_4_HCM_HB_Case7uploaded byNhạc Bất Quần
- Cost Capitaluploaded bymayilu2122
- Required Readinguploaded byVasiliy Lobatyy
- Grasim Industries Finance Projectuploaded bysurbhimo

Read Free for 30 Days

Cancel anytime.

Cerrar diálogo## ¿Está seguro?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Cargando